Blog

Tehran has delivered an updated 14-point peace proposal to Washington through Pakistani intermediaries, according to reports from Iran’s semi-official Tasnim news agency on Monday. The development comes amid heightened tensions between the two nations as both the United States and Israel make preparations for potential renewed military action.

According to the news agency, Iranian officials modified their original proposal following receipt of a recent American counterproposal. The updated framework emphasizes negotiations to halt the conflict and includes measures aimed at building trust between Washington and Tehran.

A source with knowledge of Iran’s negotiating team told Tasnim that Washington’s most recent proposal includes an agreement to suspend oil sanctions against Iran during the negotiation phase. This represents a change from previous American proposals, though Tehran continues to demand the complete elimination of all sanctions as part of any final agreement.

President Trump issued a stern warning on Sunday, stating that time is running out for Tehran to reach an accord. “The clock is ticking,” he declared, adding “there won’t be anything left of them” if negotiations fail.

Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesman Esmaeil Baghaei confirmed Monday that the United States had transmitted updated terms and considerations to Tehran via Pakistan, despite publicly dismissing Iran’s initial proposal.

“After Iran sent its 14-point (proposed) plan (to the United States through Pakistan), the US side conveyed its considerations. We also presented our considerations in return,” Baghaei explained.

Speaking at his weekly news briefing, Baghaei noted the apparent contradiction in American diplomacy. “Although the American side publicly announced that this plan was rejected, we received from the Pakistani mediator a set of revised points and considerations from their (the Americans’) point of view,” he stated.

Baghaei emphasized that diplomatic talks continue while reaffirming Iran’s unwillingness to abandon what it characterizes as its sovereign right to enrich uranium.

President Trump has demanded that Iran halt uranium enrichment activities and has stated that any final agreement must block Tehran’s path to nuclear weapons development.

Earlier draft agreements that President Trump reportedly declined would have permitted Iran to maintain its current stockpile of 60%-enriched uranium and continue enrichment operations. While Iran maintains it is not pursuing nuclear weapons, it continues enriching uranium to levels that serve no civilian purpose.

Baghaei also addressed maritime security in the Strait of Hormuz, stating that Iran and Oman view themselves as responsible for maintaining safe passage through the strategic waterway. He further suggested that Iran would seek war damages from the United States, characterizing the conflict as “illegal and baseless.”

Israeli President Isaac Herzog welcomed Mohamed Hagi as Somaliland’s inaugural ambassador to Israel during a diplomatic ceremony held at the President’s Residence in Jerusalem on May 18, 2026.

The historic credential presentation coincided with the 35th anniversary of Somaliland’s declaration of independence from Somalia on May 18, 1991. Israel became the first nation to officially recognize Somaliland on December 26, 2025.

During the same ceremony, Herzog also accepted credentials from new ambassadors representing the Republic of Korea (Park Inho), the Holy See (Apostolic Nuncio Monsignor Giorgio Lingua), Australia (Neil Hawkins), and Vietnam (Nguyen Ky Son).

Herzog characterized Hagi’s appointment as part of Israel’s broader initiative to enhance relationships with African countries and referenced his previous encounter with Somaliland’s president in Davos.

“It’s a great honor to receive the first ambassador of the Republic of Somaliland in Israel as we further pursue our warm and good relations with the nations of Africa. I especially want to welcome you after I met your President in Davos, where we had a wonderful meeting,” Herzog stated.

The Israeli president characterized Somaliland’s response to Israel’s recognition as emotionally powerful.

“The incredible joy of the people of Somaliland shown upon Israel’s recognition of your nation warmed our hearts. I think this is a unique opportunity to develop dialogue with … Muslim countries who are so important in the region.”

Herzog indicated Israel plans to provide support in areas including food security, energy, and science, stating: “Hopefully, we will go from strength to strength together.”

Hagi characterized the Israel-Somaliland partnership as extending beyond standard diplomatic relations, calling it strategic cooperation.

“It’s an honor to be here today. We have built a great relationship, which is a strategic one that will pave the way forward on many things in all domains, whether that is development, political cooperation, security cooperation, and, of course, the people-to-people relationship,” Hagi stated.

“The people of Somaliland very much appreciate that Israel became the first country to recognize Somaliland,” he concluded.

Israeli military authorities have implemented a controversial law that establishes capital punishment as the standard sentence for Palestinians found guilty of terror-related murders targeting Israelis. The measure became official Sunday evening when Maj. Gen. Avi Bluth, who leads the Israel Defense Forces Central Command, signed the necessary military directive.

The Knesset approved this legislation on March 30, 2026, establishing death sentences as the presumed punishment for Palestinians convicted of terrorism-motivated killings of Israelis. Judges may only substitute life imprisonment when they find exceptional circumstances warrant an alternative sentence.

The new rules allow military tribunals to order executions with just a simple majority rather than requiring complete agreement among judges. Additionally, the law eliminates any power to grant pardons or reduce sentences handed down by military courts.

Israeli citizens are exempt from this legislation’s provisions.

Since the Knesset’s approval, the law has faced substantial legal and global criticism. The Association for Civil Rights in Israel joined with additional human rights groups in filing Supreme Court petitions challenging the measure, contending it creates discriminatory practices.

Israel’s Supreme Court has directed government officials to provide responses to these legal challenges by May 24.

Those filing petitions highlighted specific language in the law requiring that attackers must have acted to “negate the existence of the State of Israel or the authority of the military commander in the area.” Opposition voices maintain this criterion would disproportionately target Palestinian perpetrators.

Some observers suggest that proving intent to “negate the existence of the State of Israel” or undermine military authority may prove challenging, potentially resulting in life sentences rather than executions for many accused individuals.

International bodies have also voiced strong opposition. The United Nations Human Rights Office along with multiple independent UN specialists have denounced the measure, stating it creates discriminatory death penalty practices and breaches international standards for fair legal proceedings.

National Security Minister Ben Gvir and Defense Minister Israel Katz praised the law’s implementation.

“This is a clear and sharp change of policy after the October 7 [2023] massacre: A terrorist who murders Jews can no longer rely on [prisoner exchange] deals, [good prison] conditions, or the hope to be released in the future,” Defense Minister Israel Katz and National Security Minister Itamar Ben Gvir said in a joint statement.

“Whoever chooses murderous terrorism against Jews needs to know that the State of Israel will bring him to justice all the way.”

Katz added: “Terrorists who murder Jews will not sit in prison in pleasant conditions, will not wait for [prisoner exchange deals] and will not dream of release — they will pay the heaviest price.”

Peru’s progressive presidential hopeful Roberto Sanchez has named a former economy minister to spearhead his economic policy team as he prepares for a June runoff election against conservative rival Keiko Fujimori.

Sanchez announced Monday that Pedro Francke, viewed as a moderate economist, will lead the technical committee responsible for developing key policy proposals including a review of resource extraction agreements, a 33% boost to minimum wage levels, and constitutional reforms.

The left-wing candidate barely qualified for the June 7 runoff after a prolonged month-long vote counting process from the initial election round, which faced delays due to logistical challenges and fraud allegations.

Financial markets have grown nervous about Sanchez’s increasing poll numbers, particularly given his proposals to examine mining agreements in Peru, one of the globe’s top copper-producing nations.

Francke previously held the economy minister position for half a year during 2021 and 2022 under leftist leader Pedro Castillo, playing a crucial role in reassuring financial markets during Castillo’s own electoral battle against Fujimori.

Castillo currently remains imprisoned on charges of rebellion and conspiracy following his brief presidency, which concluded with an unsuccessful attempt to disband Congress in 2022. He has publicly backed Sanchez’s campaign from behind bars.

During remarks at a Swiss embassy-hosted forum on informal mining in Lima, Sanchez indicated he would soon reveal his complete technical team roster along with a detailed agenda for his administration’s initial 100 days.

“We need a strong, social, market-based economy, not one of oligopolies and monopolies,” Sanchez said. “We are a truly popular government that wants to democratize rights, the economy, resources, and justice.”

When asked directly, Sanchez avoided confirming whether Francke might serve as economy minister if elected to office.

The progressive candidate also revealed that economist Oscar Dancourt, who previously directed Peru’s central bank between 2001 and 2005, has joined his economic advisory team.

A Palestinian worker has died from injuries sustained when Israeli forces opened fire as he attempted to enter Israel in search of employment, according to Palestinian medical authorities who confirmed his death on Monday.

This represents the second fatal incident within a week involving a Palestinian worker being shot while attempting to cross the border for employment purposes.

Palestinian health officials in Ramallah named the victim as 32-year-old Mahmoud Al-Amleh. Medical authorities reported he sustained gunshot wounds on Sunday morning from Israeli forces in Beit Ula village, located in the southern territory close to Hebron. Emergency responders transported Al-Amleh to a Hebron medical facility where he underwent emergency surgery.

Speaking to The Associated Press, Hamdan Al-Amleh explained that his cousin had joined other workers attempting to enter Israel for employment.

Israeli military officials acknowledged opening fire on Palestinians and wounding an individual. Military representatives stated that soldiers discharged their weapons because the Palestinians were believed to be damaging border infrastructure during their crossing attempt. The military’s official statement indicated that firing at suspects represents standard protocol during detention operations.

This incident follows another Palestinian fatality under comparable circumstances less than seven days earlier.

Prior to the conflict between Israel and Hamas, Israeli authorities permitted tens of thousands of Palestinians to work within Israel’s borders. However, Israel revoked the majority of these work permits following the Hamas-led assault on southern Israel that occurred on Oct. 7, 2023. As the West Bank’s economy continues to deteriorate and joblessness increases, growing numbers of Palestinians from the occupied territory have tried to enter Israel without authorization to find basic employment opportunities.

Data from the U.N. Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs indicates that Israeli military personnel or settlers have fatally shot no fewer than 47 Palestinians in the West Bank during this year through May 11.

OCHA reports that 17 Palestinians have lost their lives and more than 290 others have sustained injuries while attempting to cross the barrier since Oct. 7, 2023.

Supporters of Bolivia’s former President Evo Morales joined massive demonstrations Monday as the South American nation grapples with its most severe economic crisis in decades.

The protests and highway blockades, which began more than two weeks ago, represent the most significant threat yet to President Rodrigo Paz, Bolivia’s first conservative president following almost 20 years of socialist leadership.

Following a six-day trek across the Andes mountains, thousands of Morales backers carrying dynamite sticks and slingshots arrived in the capital, where riot police awaited them. Explosions echoed through downtown La Paz as security forces responded with tear gas against demonstrators demanding the president step down just six months after taking office. “Homeland or death, we will win!” protesters shouted.

Paz assumed the presidency last year during a period when conservative leaders aligned with the Trump administration gained power across Latin America. Facing the country’s worst economic downturn in four decades, he has worked to address Bolivia’s fuel shortages, control its enormous budget deficit, and tackle the lack of U.S. dollars while managing powerful factions connected to Morales that threaten his administration.

Recently, his administration has negotiated agreements with protesting miners and educators who have agreed to halt their demonstrations.

Highway blockades have traditionally served as the primary tactic for social movements supporting Morales that say they speak for Bolivia’s predominantly rural Indigenous population. During the past 16 days, these roadblocks have trapped thousands of trucks on major routes, creating shortages of food, fuel and medical supplies in La Paz and other urban areas.

The administration sent police and military personnel throughout the nation over the weekend attempting to clear the blockades, resulting in an undetermined number of injuries and at least 90 arrests by Monday, the public prosecutor reported.

“They can march if it’s peaceful, but we will take action if they commit crimes,” Deputy Interior Minister Hernán Paredes stated Monday.

Paz claims Morales is directing the civil unrest to weaken his government.

Eight allied Latin American nations, spanning from Argentina to Panama, issued a collective statement last week condemning “any action aimed at destabilizing the democratic order.” The U.S. State Department joined the criticism Sunday, expressing support for Paz’s efforts “to restore order for the peace, security, and stability of the Bolivian people.”

Following Paz’s appeal, neighboring Argentina announced it would begin a week-long humanitarian airlift to help address shortages in the country.

Morales coordinated the recent march from his refuge in Bolivia’s isolated tropical region. He has remained hidden in the highlands for the past year and a half, avoiding an arrest warrant related to charges concerning his sexual relationship with a 15-year-old girl.

Morales maintains the allegations are politically motivated.

A controversial gold mining operation in Brazil’s Amazon rainforest faces a crucial legal decision Wednesday, as a court in the nation’s capital determines which level of government holds authority over the project’s environmental approval process.

The judicial panel in Brasilia must decide whether Brazil’s federal government or the northern state of Para holds jurisdiction to issue environmental permits for the mining venture operated by Canadian firm Belo Sun.

Since 2012, Belo Sun has worked to develop the Volta Grande gold extraction facility along the Xingu River in Para state. The proposed location sits approximately 20 kilometers (12.4 miles) from Belo Monte, ranked as the planet’s third-largest hydroelectric facility, whose operations have diminished river flow and significantly impacted nearby communities.

The Volta Grande operation would become the Brazilian Amazon’s largest gold mining facility.

Based on a 2015 feasibility analysis submitted by Belo Sun, the company plans to extract 3.52 million ounces of gold across 17 years, removing over 600 million tons of material. The mining site would span 24 square kilometers (9.2 square miles) and impact 125 hectares (309 acres) of Amazon rainforest.

A 2021 independent evaluation by researchers from the University of Sao Paulo and University of Amazonas determined the operation posed excessive risks and recommended rejection.

The assessment’s primary concern focused on the planned tailings dam, engineered to hold mining debris directly above a water channel near the Xingu River. Researchers warned that dam failure could rapidly release toxic materials into the river, endangering Indigenous and riverine populations along with the ecosystem.

The operation would also force relocation of 813 families, according to the Articulation of Indigenous Peoples of Brazil, or Apib. These communities, already severely impacted by droughts following the Belo Monte development, could experience additional hardship. The Belo Monte facility has decreased water flow in the Xingu River section where the Belo Sun operation is planned.

Using analysis from nonprofit Amazon Watch, prosecutors calculated the Volta Grande facility would generate approximately 3.7 million tons of carbon dioxide emissions, a greenhouse gas contributing to global warming. The calculation assumes one ton of carbon dioxide emissions per 28 grams of extracted gold.

The Volta Grande licensing process has encountered resistance from its inception.

In 2013, prosecutors moved to stop the process, pointing to inadequate consultation with affected Indigenous communities. In 2017, a complete federal court panel supported this position, mandating federal government approval and formal Indigenous community consultation before project advancement.

Nevertheless, in 2025, justices reversed that ruling and transferred licensing authority back to Para state. Prosecutors filed an appeal, contending the recent decision constituted a separate, new proceeding. The court will address the appeal Wednesday.

Last December, the Juruna and Arara Indigenous communities of the Xingu issued an open letter declaring they have never consented to the project, as mandated by the 2017 ruling. In a statement provided to The Associated Press, Belo Sun maintained it has conducted proper Indigenous consultation, following protocols established by affected communities and monitored by authorities.

Federal prosecutors contended that Brazil’s national government — rather than Para’s local government — should authorize the project given its nationwide implications. The operation would impact Indigenous territories, which falls under federal oversight, affect the Xingu River — a federal waterway — and further influence the Belo Monte hydropower facility, constructed by the federal government.

“From the start, as we did in Belo Monte, we have argued that the licensing falls under federal jurisdiction because it affects Indigenous lands and a federal river,” federal prosecutor Felício Pontes Jr., who is working on the case, said.

He noted that combined impacts with the hydroelectric facility represent a central concern. Brazilian courts have already established that Belo Monte’s effects exceeded initial projections.

In recent decisions, courts have mandated compensation for affected communities and required Norte Energia, the dam operating company, to supply clean water to families whose natural sources disappeared, as well as reassess water diversion from the Xingu River for turbine operations.

“This could create a major conflict if there isn’t a single authority licensing both projects, given the impacts one project has on the other,” the prosecutor said.

Should the court choose to transfer the case to federal oversight, the decision could nullify environmental permits issued in 2025 to Belo Sun by Para state. Regardless, parties may still pursue challenges. Additional lawsuits questioning the operation remain pending in courts.

Before the vote, Belo Sun announced initiation of new technical research for the Volta Grande operation. On May 12, the company reported hiring a mining consultancy to examine and update technical studies for the Installation License. The objective includes identifying enhancements, outlining updates to a definitive feasibility study and creating a phased project plan. Belo Sun anticipates completing this phase by the third quarter of 2026.

Belo Sun stated the Volta Grande facility remains subject to environmental licensing by appropriate regulatory and judicial authorities in Brazil.

WASHINGTON — President Donald Trump announced Monday that he has postponed a military operation against Iran that was set to take place Tuesday, citing ongoing diplomatic efforts.

The president made the announcement through a social media post, explaining that serious negotiations are currently happening. This comes after Trump had warned that time was running out for Iran to reach an agreement or face renewed military action following a delicate ceasefire.

While Trump did not provide specifics about the military operation that was planned, he stated that he directed U.S. armed forces to remain ready for a comprehensive, major attack on Iran at any moment if diplomatic efforts fail to produce a satisfactory agreement.

For several weeks, Trump has warned that the ceasefire established in mid-April might collapse without a deal between the nations, though the requirements for such an agreement have varied over time.

MIAMI — A former business associate of Venezuelan leadership faced federal charges in Miami court Monday, accused of laundering money through an alleged bribery operation involving government officials.

Alex Saab appeared before a federal judge following his weekend deportation by acting President Delcy Rodríguez, who has been removing insider businesspeople suspected of corrupt activities with the previous administration.

Wearing shackles and prison clothing, the defendant responded “Yes, ma’am,” in English when informed of the single money laundering charge connected to an undisclosed bribery operation. Court documents were unsealed during the proceeding but remain unavailable to the public.

The 54-year-old Saab faced previous federal charges in 2019 under the first Trump presidency and was detained in Cape Verde during a fuel stop while on what Venezuelan officials called an important humanitarian trip to Iran.

President Joe Biden granted him a pardon in 2023 as part of a prisoner exchange that freed multiple detained Americans in Venezuela and returned a fleeing foreign defense contractor. The agreement, which was part of an unsuccessful Biden administration attempt to encourage free elections, drew sharp criticism from Republicans and federal investigators, who continued pursuing Saab for additional alleged crimes outside the limited pardon scope.

Federal authorities have historically characterized Saab as the former leader’s “bag man” and may seek his testimony against his previous associate, who faces drug trafficking charges in Manhattan following his January capture during a U.S. military operation.

This latest prosecution unfolds as the Trump administration works to reshape Venezuelan relations.

Trump and top officials have praised Rodríguez, who has opened Venezuela’s petroleum sector to American investment during rising oil costs linked to Iranian conflict. In return, the White House has reduced election pressure, despite constitutional requirements for voting within 30 days of a president becoming “permanently unavailable.”

However, Rodríguez confronts significant internal opposition from the ruling socialist party’s more radical elements, including figures like Interior Minister Diosdado Cabello, who maintains substantial security force influence and faces his own U.S. criminal charges.

Mario Silva, who previously hosted pro-government programming on state television before his removal following the former president’s capture, challenged Saab’s deportation legality, citing constitutional extradition prohibitions.

“The imperialists don’t negotiate. They conquer, test and probe — until our country shatters,” Silva stated during a Sunday social media livestream. “Nobody is safe right now.”

Silva noted that Venezuela’s previous efforts to secure Saab’s freedom exceeded actions taken for the former president and former First Lady Cilia Flores.

Possibly expecting criticism, Venezuela’s immigration department Saturday described Saab only as a “Colombian citizen who is implicated in committing several crimes in the United States of America, a fact that is widely known, notorious, and heavily documented in the media.”

Rodríguez’s current silence contrasts sharply with her previous support during Venezuela’s international campaign for his release from U.S. custody. She previously called him an “innocent Venezuelan diplomat” who was illegally “kidnapped” during a humanitarian mission to Iran to bypass the “immoral, imperial blockade” imposed by the United States.

While consolidating power, Rodríguez has separated herself from Saab, removing him from her Cabinet and eliminating his position as primary liaison for foreign companies seeking Venezuelan investments.

Saab built wealth through Venezuelan government deals. His 2019 charges involved a low-income housing contract that was never completed.

The Associated Press previously reported his investigation connection to another Justice Department case against Saab’s business partner, Alvaro Pulido, regarding the CLAP program established to provide basic foods — rice, corn flour, cooking oil — to impoverished Venezuelans during severe hyperinflation and currency collapse.

The 2021 indictment identified Saab as “Co-Conspirator 1” and alleged he helped create shell companies to bribe a pro-government governor who granted the partners an overpriced Mexican food box import contract.

Saab previously met secretly with the Drug Enforcement Administration before his initial arrest and, during a private 2022 court session, his attorneys disclosed his years-long cooperation helping the DEA investigate corruption within the former administration’s inner circle. Through this cooperation, he surrendered over $12 million in illegal profits from corrupt business activities.

Officials in the Maldives are examining several potential causes behind the tragic deaths of five Italian researchers during a cave diving expedition last week, with authorities questioning whether the team went far deeper underwater than originally intended.

The diving team entered the underwater cave on Thursday under the leadership of Monica Montefalcone, a 51-year-old marine ecology professor from the University of Genoa who frequently conducted research dives in Maldivian waters. Among those who perished were her daughter and four other researchers, including a diving instructor whose remains were retrieved from 60 meters below the surface.

This incident represents the most fatal single diving accident in the nation’s recorded history.

Mohamed Hussain Shareef, the chief spokesperson for the Maldives president’s office, confirmed that officials had authorized the research team to study soft corals at the Devana Kandu location.

“What we didn’t know was that it was cave diving,” Shareef explained. “Because, as divers will tell you and appreciate, it’s a very different discipline with its own sets of challenges and risks involved, and particularly at that depth, there are any number of things that could have gone wrong.”

Carlo Sommacal, Montefalcone’s husband, defended his wife’s expertise in statements to Italian news outlets, emphasizing she would never have endangered her daughter or team members. He characterized her as “one of the best divers in the world” with approximately 5,000 dives to her credit, describing her as “always conscientious” and “never reckless.”

“I’m sorry, I wasn’t there and I’m no expert, and from what I’m seeing and reading, even the experts don’t have definite answers but are merely making hypotheses – lots of them,” he communicated to Reuters through WhatsApp.

Finnish diving specialists located the remaining four victims on Monday within the cave’s deepest third chamber, where they were found “pretty much together,” according to Shareef. Recovery operations are scheduled to retrieve two bodies on Tuesday and the remaining two on Wednesday.

The dangerous nature of these depths became tragically apparent when a Maldivian rescue diver also lost his life during body recovery attempts last week. The non-profit Divers Alert Network Europe, which is coordinating the recovery mission, reported that their expert divers required sophisticated technical equipment, including closed-circuit rebreathers that recycle exhaled air, to locate the victims on Monday.

Shafraz Naeem, a veteran Maldivian diver who has navigated the Devana Kandu cave system more than 30 times under deep-exploration permits and currently advises the nation’s defense forces and police, explained that the cave opening sits approximately 55 meters down, with sunlight penetrating only the initial chamber before complete darkness takes over.

Diving specialists explain that increasing depth creates higher pressure around divers, causing each breath to deliver greater oxygen quantities to the lungs and bloodstream, even when breathing standard air. When this oxygen exposure becomes excessive or prolonged, it can overstimulate the central nervous system and cause tissue damage.

“It is incredibly dangerous to conduct dives at these depths on compressed air,” Naeem warned. “Theoretically oxygen toxicity starts to occur on compressed air at about 55 meters. That is very risky and very dangerous. You never know when oxygen toxicity will hit you.”

However, Riccardo Gambacorta, who previously served as diving instructor for victim Muriel Oddenino, disputed the oxygen poisoning theory.

“My personal opinion is that an unexpected incident may have occurred underwater. They essentially did not anticipate a certain situation,” he stated.

The Italian research team that entered the caves Thursday consisted of Montefalcone’s daughter Giorgia Sommacal, biologist Federico Gualtieri, researcher Oddenino, and diving instructor Gianluca Benedetti, whose body was recovered that same evening. Benedetti had resided in the Maldives for seven years.

Shareef announced the suspension of the vessel used by the diving team “because the regulations here say that if you want to take divers on expeditions, you need a dive school permit, which they didn’t have, sadly.”

Abdul Muhsin Moosa, operator of the MV Duke of York, stated his vessel held authorization for recreational diving to depths of 30 meters maximum.

“We are sharing these details with the government, as well,” he noted, explaining that arriving divers received briefings about Maldivian recreational diving restrictions prohibiting descents beyond 30 meters.

For recreational dives within 30 meters, standard compressed air contains 21% oxygen and 79% nitrogen, but deeper expeditions require oxygen concentrations above 32%, according to diving experts. For depths approaching 50 meters, specialists recommend divers carry at least two cylinders of specialized breathing gas each.

Investigators have not yet determined whether strong underwater currents may have forced the divers below their intended depths.

Thousands of demonstrators backing Bolivia’s former leftist leader Evo Morales took to the streets of La Paz on Monday, escalating civil unrest that has paralyzed the nation for almost two weeks and created critical shortages of essential goods including food, fuel and medical supplies.

The widespread disruptions have left commercial vehicles stranded on major highways and prevented patients from accessing medical care, according to government officials. Bolivia has requested assistance from Argentina, which responded by dispatching a military transport plane loaded with food aid.

ORIGINS OF THE CIVIL UNREST

What started as labor strikes in early May has transformed into a countrywide movement encompassing trade unions, mining workers, transportation employees and agricultural communities. Demonstrators are demanding that President Rodrigo Paz’s administration reverse budget-cutting policies and tackle escalating costs of living, with some groups demanding his removal from office.

Political experts indicate the civil disorder has expanded beyond local complaints to encompass broader opposition to the government’s economic policies.

PRIMARY CONCERNS OF PROTESTERS

The demonstrations focus on mounting financial hardships. Educational workers are seeking increased salaries and additional funding, while transportation unions have initiated indefinite work stoppages due to fuel scarcities and supply chain issues. Native and farming communities are resisting land reform policies they claim benefit wealthy property owners.

Even after the administration withdrew a disputed land reform law earlier this month, demonstrations have persisted.

GOVERNMENT’S REACTION

Paz, who assumed the presidency in November and inherited a struggling economy, has justified budget reductions and cuts to fuel subsidies as essential for restoring fiscal stability.

He is developing a legislative reform proposal for Congress that involves progressively removing fuel price regulations and implementing strategies to increase domestic energy output and investment.

The administration has attempted to reduce tensions through dialogue and salary improvements while sending approximately 3,500 security personnel to remove highway blockades. Officials report that roughly 57 individuals have been detained.

Government representatives have accused opposition figures and Morales supporters of promoting the roadblocks, which they claim have led to at least three fatalities, including patients who could not reach medical facilities.

EVO MORALES’ INVOLVEMENT

Morales, who led Bolivia from 2006 to 2019, has endorsed the demonstrations, characterizing them as a reaction to economic difficulties and political targeting.

Thousands of his followers have gathered after a judge found him in contempt earlier this month for not appearing in court regarding a trafficking case. Morales maintains his innocence.

“As long as the structural demands such as fuel, food, and inflation are not addressed, the uprising will not be halted,” he wrote on X.

INVESTOR SENTIMENT

Market responses have remained subdued so far, partly because Bolivian government bonds typically see limited trading activity. The additional yield that investors require for holding Bolivian debt compared to similar U.S. Treasury securities decreased in May to its lowest level since at least 2020, according to LSEG data.

Nevertheless, analysts caution about increasing risks.

“Bolivia is in a period of social and political stress, as an escalating national strike converges with mass protests and widespread roadblocks,” JPMorgan said in a client note.

HISTORICAL CONTEXT FOR BOLIVIA

Highway blockades have traditionally been a standard strategy employed by protesters. During the tenure of former left-wing president Luis Arce, comparable disruptions organized by groups supporting Morales along with mining and agricultural communities sometimes brought major transportation corridors to a standstill and resulted in billions in economic damage.

Political analysts note that Paz confronts the difficult task of stabilizing the economy while forming new political and social partnerships in a deeply divided political landscape.

“There are no easy or quick solutions in sight,” said economist Gonzalo Chavez.

The European Union decided Monday to continue sanctions against people and organizations connected to former Syrian President Bashar al-Assad’s administration for an additional year, but simultaneously removed seven government bodies from its restricted list as part of broader policy changes toward Damascus.

The restrictive measures will now remain in effect until June 1, 2027, according to an announcement from the European Council following the organization’s yearly assessment of its Syria sanctions policy.

Individuals and entities still on the list face frozen assets and restrictions on travel, while European Union citizens and businesses cannot provide financial resources to them.

The European Union stated that removing the seven entities from sanctions was designed to help “the strengthening of the EU’s engagement with Syria” after Assad’s government fell in late 2024 and a new administration under President Ahmed al-Sharaa took power.

Syria’s foreign ministry responded with a statement saying the sanctions relief for the seven entities would aid the nation’s recovery and rebuilding work, bolster government institutions, and help maintain stability.

The ministry also expressed approval for continuing sanctions against former Assad government figures accused of participating in violations against Syrian citizens.

In May 2025, the European Union removed all economic restrictions on Syria while maintaining measures targeting former Assad administration members and security-related sanctions.

The organization explained that networks connected to the previous government still maintain power and could interfere with Syria’s democratic transition and peace-building processes.

Earlier this month, the European Union also reinstated its full cooperation agreement with Syria, stating that the circumstances that caused its suspension during Assad’s violent response to demonstrators in 2011 no longer existed.

A high-ranking Sudanese paramilitary officer who was jailed following international condemnation over footage showing him killing defenseless civilians has been freed from custody and sent back to active combat, according to nine sources who spoke with Reuters.

Two sources – including a Sudanese intelligence official and a commander from the paramilitary Rapid Support Forces – reported personally witnessing RSF Brigadier General al-Fateh Abdullah Idris, nicknamed Abu Lulu, fighting in Kordofan during March. A Chadian military officer informed Reuters that RSF officers had requested Abu Lulu’s return to combat to improve troop morale amid intense fighting.

Reuters interviewed 13 total sources claiming knowledge of Abu Lulu’s release, including three RSF commanders, one RSF officer, a family member of Abu Lulu, a Chadian military officer with RSF command connections, and seven additional sources with RSF leadership contacts or intelligence access regarding RSF field activities.

When questioned by Reuters, the RSF-led coalition government issued a Monday statement rejecting claims that Abu Lulu had been released. Ahmed Tugud Lisan, spokesman for the RSF-led Tasis government, said a special court would prosecute him and others charged with violations during the al-Fashir offensive.

“The talk about Abu Lulu being released is untrue, malicious, and completely false,” the statement said. “Abu Lulu and the others accused of violations during the liberation of al-Fashir have been in detention since their arrest and have never left prison.”

Reuters could not contact Abu Lulu directly.

SANCTIONS CITE WAR CRIMES

The RSF detained Abu Lulu in late October 2025, days following its violent capture of al-Fashir, a major North Darfur city. Several videos had emerged showing him killing defenseless individuals during the assault. His conduct led to the nickname “the butcher of al-Fashir,” which the U.N. Security Council referenced when imposing sanctions on him February 24 for human rights violations.

The three-year civil conflict between Sudan’s army and the RSF represents a vicious power battle for national control and financial resources. Aid organizations describe it as creating the world’s most severe humanitarian emergency. An independent U.N. investigation determined earlier this year that the mass murders in al-Fashir showed characteristics of genocide. Another U.N. investigation documented over 6,000 deaths by RSF fighters between October 25-27.

Four videos authenticated by Reuters demonstrate Abu Lulu shooting no fewer than 15 defenseless captives in al-Fashir on October 27, following the RSF’s city takeover. All victims wore civilian clothes. International law considers killing any unarmed, non-threatening person – including former combatants – a war crime.

Following international condemnation from U.N. officials, U.S. politicians and others, RSF leader Mohamed Hamdan Dagalo, called Hemedti, publicly admitted his fighters committed violations in al-Fashir and promised to establish an accountability committee for investigating abuses. On October 30, the RSF published video of Abu Lulu being transported to Shala prison in southwestern al-Fashir. The footage shows a handcuffed Abu Lulu being removed from a vehicle by armed personnel and placed in a cell. An unnamed RSF spokesperson at the prison states Abu Lulu “will be presented to a just trial in accordance with the law.”

In November, Al Jazeera reported Abu Lulu’s release, referencing unspecified online videos. However, on December 2, the leader of the RSF-appointed accountability committee informed Reuters they held Abu Lulu in custody while investigating him and other RSF soldiers for al-Fashir violations. Al Jazeera did not respond to Reuters’ questions about their November coverage.

Four sources informed Reuters that Abu Lulu was freed in December. Reuters could not verify his exact release date.

The family member stated that before Abu Lulu received authorization to resume Kordofan duties, he appeared before a November disciplinary panel of six senior officers. The hearing addressed videos featuring him that harmed the RSF’s image. Reuters could not confirm the hearing occurred or its results.

Abu Lulu belongs to the same clan as Hemedti, the RSF leader. Three sources – an RSF commander and RSF officer both connected to RSF leadership, plus a researcher with committee contacts investigating Abu Lulu – said Hemedti’s brother, Abdelrahim Dagalo, the RSF deputy commander, personally authorized Abu Lulu’s prison release.

The RSF officer explained that while the disciplinary committee had not formally released Abu Lulu, the deputy commander ordered his freedom through radio communication.

COMMAND RESPONSIBILITY

The Abu Lulu videos represent part of nearly 300 online videos from the offensive period analyzed by Reuters and the Sudan Witness project at the Centre for Information Resilience.

Abu Lulu was the sole commander Reuters identified in video footage shooting unarmed individuals. However, the Reuters-Sudan Witness investigation discovered three additional senior RSF commanders were present in the same location during the mass killings.

One Reuters-verified video shows Gedo Hamdan Abu Nashuk, the top RSF commander for North Darfur, walking beside Abu Lulu on October 27 morning. Reuters geolocated videos from this location and found Nashuk was recorded within 40 meters of two other videos showing Abu Lulu executing defenseless men. By analyzing shadows in the three videos, Reuters determined they were filmed within a two-hour timeframe.

Under international law, these leaders could face criminal liability for crimes their fighters committed during the conflict, according to Jehanne Henry, a human rights attorney and Sudan director at The Reckoning Project, a U.S. non-profit documenting war crimes.

The RSF did not address questions regarding specific commander actions during the al-Fashir offensive. On October 29, Hemedti stated that any soldier or officer committing crimes would face arrest and investigation, with results made public.

The RSF government has been delayed in prosecuting those accused of violations, spokesman Lisan explained, because it is “establishing state structures under difficult circumstances.”

“We are committed to achieving justice and holding all those who commit violations accountable,” Lisan said. “Any talk to the contrary is deliberate misinformation.”

WITNESS ACCOUNTS

Reuters interviewed six survivors in Chadian refugee camps who reported witnessing Abu Lulu killing civilians in al-Fashir before fleeing in October 2025.

Manazil Mousa, 25, identified Abu Lulu from videos a Reuters reporter showed her and said she encountered him while her family was escaping al-Fashir. She said he confiscated their phones and possessions, severely beat them, and shot and killed her brother, Mubarak.

“Abu Lulu is the one who abused us,” she said. “He was the one who killed Mubarak. He is the one who killed our families and killed our husbands.”

Madina Adam, 38, reported that Abu Lulu entered Al-Fashir University on October 27, where she was taking shelter with other civilians, and began killing women and children.

She recounted one incident where Abu Lulu asked a pregnant woman about her pregnancy stage, and when she answered “seven months,” he shot her seven times in the stomach. Two witnesses described the identical scene in a February U.N. report.

Adam said Abu Lulu then ordered 10 children to sit down and made them chant RSF slogans while recording. The children begged not to be killed, she said, but he shot all 10.

SECRECY ORDERED

An RSF commander reported that leadership instructed other officers to remain silent about Abu Lulu’s combat return. A different RSF commander and the relative said Abu Lulu was freed under conditions prohibiting him from filming or being filmed during battle. Reuters has found no images of him in action since his release.

“He has been free for about three or four months and is on the battlefield with his troops,” said one RSF commander, who declined to be named.

Abu Lulu’s relative explained the RSF required the commander’s expertise because its forces are encountering difficulties. After securing al-Fashir control, the RSF moved its offensive eastward into Kordofan region, between its territory and army-controlled areas. It has experienced fierce combat there.

“He is very popular with the troops and that’s good for their morale,” the relative said.

In multiple videos verified by Reuters and Sudan Witness, other RSF fighters celebrate Abu Lulu and his killings. In one filmed and posted online November 1, 2025, by Salah Abdeen Mohamed Azala, an RSF fighter, Azala states many fighters are prepared to replace Abu Lulu.

“If Abu Lulu disappeared, or you arrested him or tried him, we are all 1,000 Abu Lulus,” he says, speaking to the camera. “I too am Abu Lulu.”

Three months following joint military action by the United States and Israel against Iran, an escalating standoff has developed with neither Washington nor Tehran showing signs of backing down, creating mounting economic hardship and increasing the likelihood of renewed warfare.

Policy experts are expressing growing alarm not about the possibility of reaching an agreement, but rather how much longer this volatile situation can continue before a strategic error by either the United States or Iran sparks another round of conflict.

Voices within the U.S. and Israel are increasingly advocating for additional military action, with certain officials believing that heightened pressure might diminish Tehran’s bargaining position and compel Iran to return to diplomatic discussions.

“There is one major problem with this theory: We have already tested it, repeatedly, and Iran did not capitulate,” said Danny Citrinowicz, a senior researcher on Iran at Israel’s Institute for National Security Studies and former head of the Iran branch in Israeli Defense Intelligence.

“We’re in a war of attrition with the prospect of a new U.S.-Israeli attack growing by the day,” said one regional official.

Iranian officials told Reuters concessions on their missile programme, nuclear capabilities or control of the Strait are not policy tools but ideological pillars of the Islamic Republic’s survival — giving them up is not compromise, it is surrender.

This perspective, according to Citrinowicz, explains why extended military confrontation has been unable to force Tehran away from its fundamental positions, and why additional escalation is unlikely to achieve success.

Multiple rounds of indirect diplomatic discussions facilitated by Pakistan have failed to yield any significant progress. The differences between the two sides remain enormous.

The United States is demanding that Iran cease uranium enrichment activities for two decades and transfer its existing stockpiles to American custody.

Iran is seeking an end to military strikes, security assurances, compensation for war damages, and acknowledgment of its authority over the Strait of Hormuz — conditions that Washington has dismissed.

Iran’s foreign ministry did not reply to a request for comment. The U.S. State Department did not immediately respond to a request for comment on the issues raised in this article.

President Donald Trump has warned Tehran that the “clock is ticking,” saying they “better get moving, FAST, or there won’t be anything left of them.” He threatened that if Tehran fails to reach a deal with Washington, it will face “a very bad time.”

Ali Vaez of the International Crisis Group said neither side has shown willingness to make “the painful concessions” needed for a deal. “Both believe time is on their side and they have the upper hand, and that perception is precisely what is making a deal impossible.”

The outcome is a prolonged struggle focused on one of the globe’s most vital shipping routes. Prior to the conflict, the Strait handled approximately 25% of worldwide oil commerce and 20% of liquefied natural gas shipments. Currently, with the waterway nearly sealed off, economic consequences are expanding and disrupting supply chains.

Former State Department Iran official Alan Eyre, who took part in past U.S.-Iran talks, said an agreement may be out of reach. “These two sides will never reach a deal. Trump doesn’t want to just win, he wants to humiliate Iran and be seen as having crushed Iran.”

Tehran views its enriched uranium reserves and dominance over the Strait of Hormuz as fundamental strategic resources vital to its survival. “Iran is therefore determined to use these assets to guarantee its interests,” a senior Iranian official said, adding capitulation is not an option.

“We fight, we die, but we don’t accept humiliation. Surrender is fundamentally incompatible with Iran’s identity.”

A second Iranian official contended that Tehran has already achieved victory — not through military defeat of Washington, but by maintaining its resistance. Extended periods of U.S. and Israeli attacks have been unable to break Iran’s resolve, strengthening its belief that its nuclear reserves and Strait control remain central to its defensive strategy.

Giving up these advantages would destroy that equilibrium. “Trump wants to declare victory but Iran won’t give it to him. Can the world economy withstand the pressure? That’s the question Trump owes the world an answer to,” he added.

Additional strikes would not alter Iran’s strategic thinking, only speed up escalation, he stated, emphasizing that Iran will not abandon enrichment activities or yield to ultimatums without reciprocal concessions from Washington.

However, beneath the defiant public stance, Iranian sources close to the establishment describe a more conflicted reality: Tehran does not want a prolonged “no war, no peace” scenario as inflation rises, unemployment worsens and strikes on key industries bleed an already battered economy.

Instead, they said, Iran is seeking a preliminary deal to end the war — reopening the Strait of Hormuz under Iranian oversight in exchange for lifting the U.S. blockade, before tackling harder issues such as sanctions relief and nuclear restrictions. The U.S. says ending the war must be deferred to later talks.

Regarding nuclear matters, Iranian sources indicate Tehran might dilute its 440 kilogram stockpile of highly enriched uranium or transfer portions overseas, preferably to Russia, maintaining it could retrieve the material if Washington breaches any future agreement. Washington has declined this proposal.

Iran is also advocating for a shorter suspension of enrichment than Washington’s 20-year requirement and complete access to $30 billion in frozen funds, but Washington has only agreed to release a quarter of those assets under a timetable, the sources added.

Tehran is pursuing a new management structure for the Strait of Hormuz, refusing to return to pre-conflict conditions, while the U.S. demands unconditional reopening — no fees, no restrictions — a division that may prove more difficult to resolve than the nuclear dispute itself.

Aaron David Miller, a former U.S. official and Middle East negotiator, says control of the Strait of Hormuz will be the key measure of success or failure for Washington. How this ends could define Trump’s foreign policy, he added, with the U.S. leader acutely sensitive to the risk of being seen as having lost.

Reopening the waterway without a political settlement, Miller added, would require “a prolonged American occupation with ground forces of Iranian territory”.

There is no military solution to the Strait of Hormuz other than the costly one that Trump may be unwilling to undertake, argued Vaez, leaving negotiations as the only viable path.

Despite operational gains of the U.S.-Israeli campaign, the strikes have failed to deliver a strategic knockout, Citrinowicz said.

“We didn’t topple the regime — we have a more radicalised one. We didn’t end Iran’s missile capacity. And they still have the uranium.”

Citrinowicz said overestimating pressure and underestimating Tehran’s resilience carries its own danger.

“It raises the risk that Washington once again enters a confrontation expecting coercion to produce capitulation, and discovers, too late, that the regime was prepared to absorb far more pain than anticipated,” he said.

Kremlin leaders are finding it increasingly difficult to portray the ongoing Ukraine conflict — now entering its fifth year — as a far-off battle that doesn’t impact ordinary Russian citizens’ everyday lives.

Between frustrating online service outages and this month’s reduced Victory Day celebration, plus a major weekend drone strike in the Moscow area that left three dead, Russia’s comprehensive military campaign no longer appears to be a remote confrontation.

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy described the Moscow-area assault as rightful payback for the continuous and lethal Russian rocket and drone bombardments targeting Kyiv and other Ukrainian urban centers in recent days.

These escalating attacks occurred just days following statements from President Vladimir Putin and U.S. President Donald Trump indicating the Ukrainian conflict might be approaching its conclusion.

Russia’s Defense Ministry announced Sunday that its defensive systems intercepted 1,054 Ukrainian drones within a 24-hour period, marking one of the highest numbers the military has disclosed. Moscow Mayor Sergei Sobyanin stated that 81 drones were shot down by the capital’s defense systems between late Saturday and early Sunday morning.

The bombardment resulted in three fatalities near Russia’s capital, wounded 12 additional people, caused damage to numerous residential buildings and completely destroyed several private residences.

One drone struck within a Moscow refinery’s boundaries but failed to halt operations, Sobyanin reported. A separate drone impacted an oil storage tank at a facility, sparking a fire that covered the surrounding area with dark smoke.

Multiple Moscow aviation hubs halted activities, causing dozens of flights to face delays or rerouting. One Ukrainian drone crashed within the capital’s Sheremetyevo airport property but caused no structural damage, officials reported.

Ukraine’s success in breaking through Moscow’s extensive air defense network demonstrated both the expansion of its drone fleet and improved operational strategies. Kyiv has consistently increased its drone operations, targeting power infrastructure and weapons manufacturing sites, though the capital has proven more challenging to reach.

“The Moscow region is the most heavily saturated with Russian air defense systems,” Zelenskyy stated during a national address, adding that “our long-range capabilities are significantly changing the situation — and, more broadly, the world’s perception of Russia’s war.”

The weekend Moscow strike represented a warranted reaction to “Russia’s prolongation of the war and attacks on our cities and communities,” Zelenskyy declared.

“We are clearly telling the Russians: Their state must end its war,” he stated in a social media message.

Last week’s most devastating attack in Ukraine claimed 24 lives when a Russian missile destroyed a nine-story residential building in Kyiv.

These strikes followed a short U.S.-mediated three-day truce that failed to stop the combat but created a break in long-distance attacks, permitting Moscow to conduct its yearly May 9 military demonstration honoring Nazi Germany’s World War II defeat.

Worries about Ukraine’s extended-range drone strikes prompted Russian officials to reduce the parade’s scale. Unlike previous years, no tanks, missiles or other military equipment rolled through Red Square.

Following the parade, Putin declared the Ukraine war was approaching its conclusion, though he provided no explanation or timeline. He has maintained his extensive conditions for ending the conflict, including Ukraine’s withdrawal from four regions Moscow has claimed but never completely controlled. Kyiv has refused this demand.

Trump also stated last week that the war’s end was “getting very close,” despite U.S. mediation efforts showing little meaningful advancement and being essentially paused since starting its conflict with Iran.

The Moscow attacks occur as tensions increase within Russia regarding the war’s mounting expenses and increasingly restrictive government measures that have reduced Putin’s historically strong approval ratings.

Certain military bloggers and social media personalities previously supportive of the Kremlin have begun openly challenging some governmental policies.

Government restrictions on mobile internet access and blocking widely-used messaging applications have created substantial business losses and daily disruptions for millions of Russians, generating public anger.

Officials justified these measures by citing the necessity to prevent Ukrainian drone attacks, some of which use mobile internet for navigation. Critics condemn the shutdowns as authorities’ latest effort to increase internet control.

Rising frustration over these limitations led citizens to submit petitions to presidential offices and attempt organizing demonstrations that were promptly prevented.

As tensions escalate, Putin begins a two-day China visit on Tuesday.

State television networks attempted to minimize the Moscow attacks, giving them only brief coverage on some broadcasts. They instead highlighted last week’s successful test of a new intercontinental ballistic missile designed as a crucial component of Russia’s nuclear arsenal.

Multiple war bloggers claimed the weekend attack revealed air defense weaknesses requiring immediate fixes. Some called for the Kremlin to intensify Ukrainian attacks and target its leadership.

“The time has come to hit the decision-making centers,” Alexander Kots of the daily Komsomolskaya Pravda wrote.

Pro-Kremlin political commentator Sergei Markov wrote about awakening to explosion sounds over the weekend as defense systems engaged the attacking drones. He accused Kyiv’s allies of assisting Ukraine’s drone production increase, claiming “it was Europe that tried to hit Moscow.”

“As long as Europe believes it’s safe, such attempts will continue,” Markov stated.

Russian hardliners have long pressed the Kremlin to retaliate against increasing Ukrainian attacks by targeting Kyiv’s European allies.

Last month, the Defense Ministry released a European factory list allegedly involved in producing drones and components for Ukraine. It cautioned that Russian attacks using European-manufactured drones carry “unpredictable consequences.”

When asked Sunday by a state TV commentator why Moscow accepts being “bitten” in this manner, Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov replied that its nuclear deterrent aims to counter threats to Russia’s survival.

LONDON — British Prime Minister Keir Starmer worked to solidify his position in office Monday, declaring he was focused on governing after accepting responsibility for Labour Party’s poor showing in elections that have threatened his leadership role.

Speaking to staff at Labour Party headquarters rather than the general public, Starmer acknowledged their dedication despite the party’s disappointing performance in May 7 local and regional contests.

“The election results were not the ones that we wanted, they were really tough. But you worked your socks off,” Starmer told the workers. “It’s not been easy circumstances in the last 10 days.”

The past two weeks have proven challenging for Starmer, who guided Labour to an overwhelming win just two years earlier. Multiple party officials have demanded his resignation while previous supporters are organizing efforts to remove him from leadership.

Wes Streeting, a prominent Labour legislator, stepped down from his health secretary position last week and declared his intention to compete in any Labour leadership contest against Starmer.

Andy Burnham, Greater Manchester mayor and another potential challenger, has received approval to compete in an upcoming special parliamentary election anticipated in the coming weeks. Should Burnham succeed, he could enter the leadership competition and present a significant challenge to Starmer.

On Monday, Starmer promised his complete backing for “whoever” seeks the available Labour seat, while stating he would not step down if Burnham prevails.

The identity of Britain’s next prime minister could be determined by approximately 76,000 voters in a small northwestern England election.

Focus centers on Makerfield, located near Manchester, where Burnham is anticipated to campaign.

Before this week, the well-regarded mayor could not challenge Starmer due to his absence from the House of Commons.

This situation shifted when Josh Simons, the Labour representative for that district, resigned to create an opening for Burnham.

Burnham has confirmed his intention to seek the Makerfield parliamentary seat. He stated that winning would allow him to bring his advocacy for northern England voters to the national stage and improve Labour’s prospects.

“If I get to stand, a vote for me will be a vote to change Labour, because Labour needs to change if we are to regain people’s trust,” he declared Monday. “I know what my party has offered in the past has simply not been good enough.”

British news outlets indicate the Makerfield election may occur on June 18.

Candidate applications for Labour’s nomination end Monday, with the party leadership endorsing their choice Thursday.

Despite his popularity and extensive Labour experience, the 56-year-old Burnham faces uncertainty in securing the seat.

Though historically a reliable Labour district, Makerfield has witnessed increasing support for Reform UK party, which opposes immigration and European Union ties.

Numerous local voters supported Brexit in the referendum ten years ago. Recent local contests saw Reform capture all constituency areas with approximately half the total votes.

Burnham’s campaign became more difficult after Streeting, his main leadership rival, called Brexit a “catastrophic mistake” Saturday and suggested Britain should eventually return to EU membership.

Political observers interpreted Streeting’s remarks as a direct confrontation with Burnham, who has previously indicated support for eventual EU rejoining but must navigate carefully to succeed in Makerfield.

Reform UK will likely emphasize immigration during the special election, with party leader Nigel Farage, a prominent Brexit advocate, quickly criticizing Burnham. In Monday’s Daily Express, Farage claimed Burnham “wants to drag you closer to the EU.”

Burnham attempted to dismiss such criticism, stating: “The last thing we should do right now is rerun those arguments.”

Coverage of Starmer’s difficulties overshadowed problems facing his political opponents across the spectrum.

A parliamentary oversight body launched an investigation last week into whether Farage failed to disclose a 5 million pound ($6.7 million) contribution from a supporter.

Farage explained the funds from Thailand-based cryptocurrency investor Christopher Harborne preceded his parliamentary campaign, were unrelated to politics, and covered personal security costs. He subsequently told the Sun newspaper the donation supported Brexit advocacy.

Sky News revealed Farage purchased a 1.4 million pound ($1.9 million) residence after receiving the money. However, Farage claimed he bought the property using earnings from appearing on reality television show “I’m A Celebrity… Get Me Out Of Here!”

Additionally, the Green Party leader, whose organization has also drawn votes from Labour, acknowledged missing the recent local elections.

Zack Polanski was relocating during the voting period and failed to complete voter registration at his new residence, according to a party representative.

Polanski also faces questions regarding unpaid taxes on an east London houseboat where he previously resided.

He has acknowledged incorrectly claiming British Red Cross spokesperson status during his 2022 campaign for deputy party leadership.

A vessel carrying emergency humanitarian supplies from the Mexican and Uruguayan governments reached Havana on Monday, bringing relief to Cuba as the island nation faces mounting economic difficulties.

The vessel, which set sail from Mexico, transported food supplies and personal hygiene products, officials announced.

Alberto López Díaz, Cuba’s food industry minister, noted the supplies come “at a time of great economic hardship, exacerbated by the tightening of the blockade imposed on our country by the United States government.”

In his statement, he explained the assistance would be handed out “with the utmost responsibility and respect,” with children, the elderly and vulnerable families receiving priority.

The island’s economic troubles and power grid failures have worsened throughout this year following the U.S. invasion of Venezuela in early January, which stopped vital oil deliveries from the South American nation.

Later in January, U.S. President Donald Trump warned he would impose tariffs on any nation that sells or supplies oil to the island.

An acute fuel shortage has continued, while power outages remain widespread throughout the island.

The opposition party in Cape Verde has successfully defeated the current ruling government in Sunday’s parliamentary elections, setting the stage for a return to power following a decade outside of government, according to preliminary vote tallies and party announcements released Monday.

The island nation in the Atlantic, consisting of 10 islands, has historically seen control shift back and forth between its two dominant political organizations: the Movement for Democracy (MpD), which has held power since 2016, and the African Party for the Independence of Cape Verde (PAICV).

Preliminary vote counts from the National Election Commission, covering 98.2% of voting locations, revealed PAICV captured 46.7% of votes, translating to 37 out of 72 parliamentary seats, while MpD secured 43.6%.

Francisco Carvalho, who leads PAICV, appears positioned to assume the role of prime minister following the current leader Ulisses Correia e Silva’s acknowledgment of electoral defeat in his initial post-election comments.

However, Correia e Silva noted uncertainty remained about whether PAICV had achieved a complete majority since ballot counting continued.

“The results, obviously, did not reach the level of our objectives, which were to win the elections, continue governing Cape Verde and move the country forward,” he said.

Carvalho celebrated the results as a mandate for transformation and stated voters had strongly endorsed his political agenda.

Carvalho, currently serving his second term as mayor of the capital, Praia, will now collaborate with President Jose Maria Neves, who also belongs to PAICV.

The nation functions under a combined presidential-parliamentary system, where the prime minister, chosen by the National Assembly, leads the government while the president maintains substantial authority including veto powers and serves as a mediator.

Officials in Greenland announced Monday that diplomatic discussions with the United States have shown positive developments, while firmly rejecting any possibility of selling the Arctic territory to America.

Jeff Landry, the U.S. special envoy designated by President Donald Trump last year to pursue American control of Greenland, touched down in Nuuk on Sunday and conducted meetings Monday with Prime Minister Jens-Frederik Nielsen and Foreign Minister Mute Egede.

“We believe there is progress, and from Greenland’s side we are focused on finding a solution that is good for us all, and most importantly that threats of annexation, takeover or a purchase of Greenland and the Greenlandic people does not occur,” Nielsen stated to the press following his session with Landry.

Landry did not issue an immediate response, though he had previously informed local news outlets on Sunday that his mission was to “listen and learn”.

President Donald Trump’s demands that America must obtain or control Greenland, which operates as a semi-autonomous Danish territory, have created diplomatic friction between Washington and Copenhagen, despite both nations being founding NATO allies, and have generated broader concerns throughout Europe.

“They asked for a meeting, and we’ve explained our situation and standpoint, and that we have some red lines — we will not sell Greenland, we will own Greenland for all time,” Egede declared.

In an effort to reduce diplomatic strain, Greenland, Denmark and the United States reached an agreement earlier this year to conduct high-level diplomatic negotiations aimed at resolving the dispute, though results from these continuing discussions have not yet been announced.

America seeks to expand its military footprint in Greenland and incorporate it into President Donald Trump’s proposed “Golden Dome” defensive network designed to protect against nuclear threats.

The United States maintains one operational base in Greenland currently, the Pituffik Space Base located in the northwest region, a significant reduction from approximately 17 installations in 1945 when thousands of American military personnel operated facilities across the island.

Cuban President Miguel Diaz-Canel issued a stark warning Monday, stating that any American military intervention against his nation would result in a “bloodbath” with devastating effects on regional peace and stability.

“Cuba does not represent a threat,” Diaz-Canel wrote in a message posted to X.

His remarks came in response to a Sunday Axios report that referenced classified intelligence sources. The report claimed Cuba has obtained more than 300 military drones and has considered using them against the U.S. naval base at Guantanamo Bay, American military ships, and Key West, Florida. Cuban officials dismissed the report as American fabrication designed to justify possible military intervention.

In Havana’s streets, residents expressed willingness to fight back against any attack, despite facing severe economic difficulties.

“I know Cuba is a strong country. Cubans are very brave and they are not going to find us unprepared,” said Sandra Roseaux, 57. “If they come, they will have to fight, because Cuba will respond. My country, hungry or however it may be, will respond. It is better that they do not come because there will be a fight.”

The communist nation, which has been at odds with Washington for decades, faces mounting pressure after the United States severed energy supplies following the arrest of the president of its former ally Venezuela in January. Recent weeks have brought fuel shortages and electricity blackouts lasting all but one or two hours daily.

Relations between the nations have deteriorated rapidly in recent days. Reuters previously reported that U.S. Department of Justice prosecutors are preparing to charge former Cuban leader Raul Castro in connection with Cuba’s 1996 downing of two aircraft operated by a humanitarian organization, according to a Justice Department source.

Foreign Minister Bruno Rodriguez posted on social media that Cuba, “like every nation in the world,” possesses the right to defend itself against external threats under the U.N. Charter and international law.

Havana resident Ulises Medina, 58, called for diplomatic solutions. “It would not be right for the United States to invade Cuba, nor for Cuba to invade the United States,” he said. “They must reach an agreement and talk and negotiate. Cuba, in any case, will defend itself because the country will not be surrendered.”

Charging Castro, 94 — the brother of late former leader Fidel Castro and a hero of the 1959 Cuban Revolution — would represent a significant escalation in pressure on Cuba by the Trump administration.

“The Cuban people do not let anyone interfere with their land,” said Jorge Villalobos, 87. “Cubans know how to defend themselves, even with sticks and stones.”

BEIRUT (AP) — Lebanon’s health ministry announced Monday that fatalities from the current conflict between Israel and the Iranian-backed Hezbollah have now exceeded 3,000 people.

Officials report the death count has reached 3,020, with casualties including 292 women and 211 children, as violence persists despite an unstable ceasefire agreement. The conflict initiated on March 2 when the Hezbollah militant organization launched attacks against Israel, occurring two days following joint U.S. and Israeli strikes on Iran.

Israeli forces have subsequently launched ground operations in southern Lebanon while conducting bombing campaigns in Beirut and surrounding regions, stating their objective is to prevent Hezbollah’s rearmament efforts. The organization, which holds significant political influence within Lebanon, has rejected demands from various sources, including Lebanon’s own government, to surrender its weapons.

The conflict has forced more than one million Lebanese citizens from their homes, with many seeking refuge in makeshift tent camps along roadways and coastal areas near Beirut. Israeli forces continue facing challenges from persistent Hezbollah drone strikes.

Historic face-to-face negotiations between Israeli and Lebanese representatives, with American mediation, resulted in a ceasefire that took effect April 17 and has been prolonged through June. The two nations have remained technically at war since Israel’s establishment in 1948.

Hezbollah, however, is not part of the talks.

Israeli representatives have emphasized dismantling Hezbollah’s military capabilities and view the current discussions as potentially leading to normalized diplomatic ties. Lebanese negotiators indicate they are pursuing a security arrangement or armistice that would fall short of full diplomatic normalization.

U.S. President Donald Trump has publicly called for a meeting between Lebanese President Joseph Aoun and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, while Aoun has declined to meet or speak directly with Netanyahu at this stage — a move that would likely generate blowback in Lebanon, where talks with Israel were met with protests.

Israeli casualties include twenty military personnel, two civilians within Israeli territory, and one defense contractor operating in southern Lebanon.

U.N. peacekeeping forces in southern Lebanon have also been caught in the crossfire and six have been killed.

A top German diplomat suggested Monday that Turkey holds substantial power to affect the ongoing conflicts involving Ukraine and Iran, calling for enhanced cooperation between Ankara and the European Union.

German Foreign Minister Johann Wadephul emphasized Turkey’s strategic importance during a Berlin press conference alongside his Turkish counterpart Hakan Fidan. “Turkey has the potential to exert considerable influence on these trouble spots, not only because of its geographical proximity, but also because of its enormous political and economic significance,” Wadephul stated.

The German minister expressed support for deepening strategic partnerships between Turkey and the EU, noting that Germany backs including Turkey in discussions about the European Union’s defense and industrial policy development.

Regarding Turkey’s aspirations for EU membership, Wadephul offered encouragement while noting requirements must be fulfilled. “If Turkey wishes to join the European Union, it will find a friendly and reliable partner in Germany,” he said, though he emphasized that Turkey would need to satisfy all membership requirements.

Belarus announced Monday that it has begun military exercises with Russia designed to rehearse nuclear weapon deployment and operational procedures using atomic weapons that Moscow has stationed within Belarusian territory.

The authoritarian leader Alexander Lukashenko has permitted Russia to position tactical nuclear weapons within his nation’s borders. Last December, Russia declared that its newest intermediate-range nuclear-capable Oreshnik missile system had been deployed to Belarus, a country that shares borders with Ukraine and the NATO nations of Poland, Latvia and Lithuania.

According to the Belarusian Defense Ministry, the military exercises will include missile forces and aircraft operations.

“During the exercise, in cooperation with the Russian side, it is planned to practice the delivery of nuclear weapons and preparations for their use,” the ministry said in a statement. The ministry noted that the exercises will concentrate on instructing military personnel in stealthy movement over extensive distances.

Officials stated that these military operations were scheduled beforehand and were not directed toward any specific third-party nations.

Lukashenko has maintained authoritarian control over the country of 9.5 million people for over thirty years. Western nations have imposed multiple sanctions on his administration due to human rights violations and for permitting Moscow to utilize Belarusian territory during the February 2022 invasion of Ukraine.

During 2024, the Kremlin unveiled an updated nuclear policy that brought Belarus within Russia’s nuclear protection framework. Russian President Vladimir Putin has stated that Moscow will maintain authority over its nuclear arsenal positioned in Belarus, while permitting its partner nation to choose targets during potential conflicts.

Russia has employed conventional versions of the Oreshnik weapon — named after the Russian term for hazelnut tree — against Ukrainian targets twice: once in November 2024 and again in January.

Putin has declared that Oreshnik’s multiple warheads descend at velocities reaching Mach 10 and cannot be stopped by defensive systems, claiming that multiple conventional strikes from such weapons could match the destruction of nuclear attacks.

Intermediate-range weapons have flight capabilities between 500 to 5,500 kilometers (310 to 3,400 miles). These weapon systems were prohibited under a Soviet-era agreement that both Washington and Moscow withdrew from in 2019.

Belarusian opposition leader Sviatlana Tsikhanouskaya condemned the military exercises, stating that Russian nuclear weapon placement has “turned Belarus into a target.”

“Lukashenko has turned Belarus into a platform for Russian threats, but Belarusians don’t need these weapons,” Tsikhanouskaya told The Associated Press. “Only a free Belarus will become a source of security, not nuclear blackmail, in Europe.”

LONDON (AP) — The estate that generates income for Prince William’s family is preparing to divest approximately one-fifth of its property holdings, valued at 1 billion pounds ($1.3 billion), during the next ten years. The funds will support housing construction, renewable energy expansion, and wildlife conservation initiatives.

The chief executive of the duchy, Will Bax, outlined these plans during a conversation with the Times of London, which the publication released on Monday. The strategy aligns with the estate’s goal of streamlining its widespread property interests and channeling profits into environmental and community-focused initiatives, as detailed in their latest yearly financial report.

According to Bax’s comments to the Times, William believes the duchy “shouldn’t just exist to own land.” He added, “It should first and foremost exist to have a positive impact on the world.”

This development occurs amid growing demands for Britain’s royal family and the Duchy of Cornwall to operate with greater financial transparency and demonstrate their worth to taxpaying citizens.

Established during the 14th century to generate revenue for the Prince of Wales, the duchy controls 52,173 hectares (131,393 acres) spread across 19 English counties.

According to Bax, the estate will concentrate its efforts on five core regions: the Isles of Scilly, Cornwall, Dartmoor, the Bath vicinity in southwestern England, and London’s Kennington district.

Property sales will enable the duchy to channel approximately 500 million pounds toward housing, renewable energy, and environmental initiatives, Bax explained.

The estate’s earnings fund both official duties and personal expenses for the Prince and Princess of Wales and their three children. Financial records show a profit of 22.9 million pounds for the fiscal year concluded March 31, 2025.

Although the current Prince of Wales receives the duchy’s operational earnings, he lacks authority to sell properties for personal gain. A board of directors supervises the duchy’s operations with the responsibility of preserving assets for future heirs. Government approval is required for significant property transactions to safeguard the long-term worth of these holdings.

Greenland’s Prime Minister Jens-Frederik Nielsen announced Monday that he held a cordial and constructive discussion with President Donald Trump’s special Arctic representative, while firmly emphasizing that Greenlandic independence remains non-negotiable.

The Arctic territory operates as a semiautonomous region under NATO member Denmark, while Trump has repeatedly expressed desires for American control over the island citing security concerns, sparking resistance from both Greenlandic and Danish officials.

“The Greenlandic people are not for sale. Greenlandic self-determination is not something that can be negotiated,” Nielsen stated to Danish TV 2 following his discussion on the island with the special representative, Louisiana Gov. Jeff Landry.

Nielsen emphasized that Greenlandic residents “seek good cooperation” with America, describing his “courtesy meeting” with Landry as conducted with “mutual respect and in a positive atmosphere.”

Upon arriving in Greenland Sunday, Landry reportedly indicated that Trump instructed him to “go over there and make as many friends as we can get,” according to public Danish broadcaster DR.

Greenland’s Foreign Minister Múte B. Egede informed media Monday that a collaborative team including America, Greenland, and Denmark remains active in addressing ongoing American requests for territorial control. Trump has claimed Russia or China might attempt to seize Greenland, though regional specialists have rejected this possibility.

“We haven’t been the ones creating obstacles to cooperation between the United States and Greenland,” the Greenlandic foreign minister stated, having also joined the discussion with Landry and his team in Greenland’s capital Nuuk.

“So if we are to continue down this positive and constructive path, we must await the working group’s report,” he explained to TV 2, noting the group’s efforts seem “more promising” than previously.

U.S. Ambassador to Denmark Ken Howery, accompanying the American delegation in Greenland, will officially open the U.S. Consulate’s updated Nuuk facilities, with both he and Landry scheduled to participate in a commercial event Tuesday and Wednesday, local outlets reported.

Following President Trump’s return to Washington after his Beijing visit, focus has shifted to rising tensions with Iran and potential U.S. response options.

During a conversation with Axios, the president delivered a stern message to Tehran, stating that “the clock is ticking.” Trump further indicated that without Iran offering an improved deal proposal, “they are going to get hit much harder.”

According to insider sources, the president plans to convene with his senior national security team in the Situation Room on Tuesday to examine potential military responses. U.S. officials report this meeting comes after multiple high-level weekend consultations.

Trump held discussions Sunday with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu regarding the Iranian situation. The previous day, he gathered with key advisors at his Virginia golf facility, including Vice President J.D. Vance, Secretary of State Marco Rubio, White House envoy Steve Witkoff, and CIA Director John Ratcliffe.

Diplomatic channels remain active as Pakistan’s interior minister made a weekend trip to Tehran for discussions with Iranian officials. Pakistan currently functions as the designated intermediary between Washington and Tehran.

Separately, the United Arab Emirates’ sole nuclear facility suffered a drone attack. Officials report no significant damage or radiation release occurred, and no organization has claimed responsibility, though Iran remains under suspicion.