Author: Admin

Malaysian Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim’s governing alliance confronts a critical examination of public confidence following announcements this week that two states will hold unexpected elections, raising questions about potential early national voting.

Coalition partners of Anwar control the state governments in Negeri Sembilan and Johor, where legislative bodies were disbanded on Friday and Monday respectively, triggering elections that must occur within two months.

Although these regional contests won’t directly affect Anwar’s parliamentary majority at the national level, substantial defeats could damage his coalition’s standing before the next general election scheduled for early 2028. Last month, Anwar indicated he might call an early national vote if disagreements within his government continue expanding.

Officials from Anwar’s office had not responded to requests for comment by Friday.

Anwar’s governing partnership, comprising his Pakatan Harapan group, former opponent Barisan Nasional, and several smaller parties, has experienced disagreements over approaches to ethnic and religious matters in the diverse, predominantly Muslim nation. Progressive coalition members have expressed dissatisfaction with the gradual implementation of reform measures.

The prime minister has also faced demands from the previously powerful United Malays National Organisation, a Barisan component, regarding its campaign for royal clemency for former prime minister and UMNO chief Najib Razak, who received a prison sentence in 2022 for his involvement in the massive 1MDB financial scandal.

Pakatan currently controls Negeri Sembilan state, where voting wasn’t scheduled until late 2028, while Barisan oversees Johor, where elections weren’t expected until next year.

Highlighting coalition strains, Barisan announced it will compete in Johor’s state elections alone, without Pakatan backing. In Negeri Sembilan, Pakatan plans to field candidates for all 36 available positions, having secured 17 seats in the previous state contest.

Two additional states, Malacca and Sarawak, must also conduct elections in upcoming months. The Election Commission, responsible for scheduling state voting, has noted that an early general election would enable simultaneous state contests, reducing expenses.

Chinese President Xi Jinping will travel to North Korea from June 8 to 9, according to state news agency Xinhua’s announcement Friday, marking his first visit in nearly seven years as China works to strengthen relationships with Pyongyang.

The trip comes after Xi recently hosted separate summits in Beijing with U.S. President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin last month. Trump, who held three meetings with North Korean leader Kim Jong Un during his first term, has previously indicated willingness to meet with the North Korean leader again.

Kim attended a large-scale military parade in Beijing last September, making the journey to China’s capital aboard his distinctive green armored train.

China has been working to bring Pyongyang — its sole formal treaty ally — back into closer alignment after COVID-19 restrictions halted diplomatic exchanges and the North Korean leader strengthened ties with Moscow through military support, including troops and weapons for Russia’s invasion of Ukraine.

VIENNA (AP) — International nuclear monitors have been blocked from accessing Iranian nuclear sites impacted by ongoing warfare since June, according to a classified document from the U.N. nuclear oversight body that was distributed to member nations and obtained Thursday by The Associated Press.

The International Atomic Energy Agency stated it “cannot provide any information on the current size, composition or whereabouts of the stockpile of enriched uranium in Iran or whether Iran has suspended all enrichment-related activities.”

The IAEA cautioned that it was “unable to discharge its safeguards responsibilities” required under the Safeguards Agreement of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, emphasizing that Tehran’s compliance with Treaty obligations is “indispensable and urgent.”

Since February’s previous report, IAEA inspectors have only been able to examine one Iranian nuclear site — the Bushehr nuclear power plant, which they visited June 1-3. The facility’s operational reactor utilizes Russian-supplied uranium enriched to 4.5%, the minimal concentration required for electricity production at such installations.

This classified assessment emerges amid escalating Middle East tensions.

Iranian drones severely struck a passenger terminal at Kuwait’s primary airport Wednesday, resulting in one death and injuring dozens while temporarily shuttering the facility — marking another episode in the ongoing exchange of strikes between Iran and the U.S. that challenges a tenuous ceasefire.

The IAEA reports Iran possesses 440.9 kilograms (972 pounds) of uranium enriched to 60% purity — requiring only minor technical advancement to reach weapons-grade concentrations of 90%.

This stockpile could enable Iran to construct up to 10 nuclear weapons if it chose to militarize its program, IAEA director general Rafael Grossi cautioned in a recent AP interview. He emphasized this doesn’t indicate Iran currently possesses such weapons.

Nuclear material enriched to such high levels typically requires monthly verification under IAEA protocols.

The assessment noted Grossi’s continued “full support to the negotiations underway aimed at finding a mutually acceptable solution to issues related to Iran’s nuclear programme, and his readiness … to support an eventual agreement.”

Diplomatic discussions have continued for weeks as intermediaries pursue a more lasting ceasefire in the conflict, now entering its fourth month. These efforts face increasing pressure from Israel’s expanding confrontation with Iran-supported Hezbollah forces in Lebanon.

Iran continues controlling the Strait of Hormuz — a vital passage for global oil and natural gas shipments plus related commodities like fertilizer — while the U.S. maintains its embargo of Iranian ports. International energy costs stay elevated, with conflict impacts extending far beyond the immediate region.

Armed attackers stormed a student residence in Nigeria’s northwest region and abducted seven students, according to local police authorities.

The raid took place in the early morning hours on Wednesday in Kaura Namoda, located in Zamfara state, which has been plagued by ongoing conflict, police spokesman Yazid Abubakar reported in an official statement. One student managed to flee during the attack and is now being held in protective custody.

According to the police spokesman, authorities are uncertain about the location where the abducted students were transported, though rescue operations are currently in progress to locate the six remaining victims.

The region of Zamfara has become a center of activity for criminal organizations that conduct kidnapping operations to collect ransom payments, with student abductions becoming more frequent throughout Nigeria in recent years.

Research conducted by local news organization Premium Times revealed that no fewer than 1,900 students have been taken from 20 educational institutions since the large-scale 2014 kidnapping of more than 200 female students from Chibok in Borno state.

GUIZHOU, China — A colossal suspension bridge in China’s southwestern mountains has transformed into more than just a spectacular photo opportunity for visitors. While tourists flock to capture social media moments at the impressive structure, local communities are experiencing something much more significant: dramatically reduced travel times and unprecedented connectivity through high-speed internet infrastructure investments.

Standing 625 meters (2,050 feet) above the valley floor, the Huajiang Grand Canyon Bridge in Guizhou province holds the distinction of being the planet’s tallest bridge. The massive structure spans 2,890 meters (9,482 feet) across the canyon, featuring a central span measuring 1,420 meters (4,660 feet).

Following its September 2025 opening, the bridge has attracted thousands of visitors to the previously isolated region, where telecommunications companies are simultaneously developing advanced 5G network capabilities. This tourism boom has sparked the creation of numerous local enterprises, including retail shops, dining establishments, and guest accommodations designed for travelers.

The Associated Press participated in a recent media expedition to explore the area’s transformation.

China’s expansion of transportation networks and digital infrastructure into isolated regions has delivered significant benefits to surrounding communities through enhanced internet connectivity. Tianlong Tunpu, a historic settlement with over six centuries of history situated more than 100 kilometers (60 miles) from the bridge, exemplifies these improvements.

Founded as a military garrison during the Ming Dynasty era, this ancient community is renowned for its distinctive Dixi opera performances. These theatrical productions feature military narratives, elaborate wooden masks, and unique performance techniques that distinguish them from other Chinese opera traditions.

Local inhabitants report increasing visitor numbers, attributing part of this growth to social media platforms that enable them to showcase their community to broader audiences.

A leading figure from Germany’s far-right Alternative for Germany party has conducted meetings with high-ranking Russian officials, including sanctioned energy executives and advisors to Russian President Vladimir Putin.

Markus Frohnmaier, who serves as the AfD’s parliamentary foreign policy spokesperson, participated in Putin’s signature economic summit in St Petersburg despite explicit warnings from Germany’s foreign ministry, which stated it “explicitly advised the AfD against these trips”.

Through posts on social media platform X, Frohnmaier revealed he had conducted meetings with Gazprom CEO Alexei Miller and Kirill Dmitriev, Putin’s special envoy for investment and economic cooperation, during Wednesday’s events.

All three individuals – Dmitriev, Miller and Gazprom – face Western sanctions related to Russia’s military conflict in Ukraine.

Frohnmaier, who has consistently advocated for Germany to restore diplomatic ties with Russia for energy supply purposes, indicated the discussion with Miller centered on pipeline infrastructure and complete restoration of Russian gas shipments to Germany.

“Germany is caught in a severe economic downward spiral, and a key driver of this is the high cost of energy,” Frohnmaier stated.

“That is why all options must be put back on the table, including the recommissioning of Nord Stream and the resumption of trade relations with Russia.”

Gazprom officials also verified the meeting occurred with Frohnmaier.

“Looking forward to building a great FUTURE together with AfD, Germany’s most popular party,” Dmitriev posted on his X account.

Germany’s economic foundation relied heavily on affordable Russian energy resources for many years. Before Moscow’s military action in Ukraine began, Russia provided more than one-third of crude oil imports and over half of natural gas supplies.

The nation has faced significant challenges recovering from the disruption caused by the Nord Stream pipeline shutdown, which suffered damage from explosions in September 2022, forcing Berlin to seek alternative energy sources urgently.

The blasts damaged both pipelines in Nord Stream 1. Nord Stream 2, which was completed in 2021, maintains one undamaged pipeline, but Germany suspended the project and operations never commenced.

Russian officials have blamed Ukraine for the pipeline attack, though Kyiv has consistently rejected any responsibility.

Current polling data indicates the AfD, presently the main opposition party in parliament, is gaining ground against Chancellor Friedrich Merz’s conservatives, who maintain a coalition with the centre-left Social Democrats.

With two significant state elections approaching in eastern Germany this September, the AfD aims to secure governmental control for the first time in Saxony-Anhalt, while polling suggests the party could capture the most votes in Mecklenburg-Vorpommern.

The party, which has also achieved notable success in recent western German elections, has criticized Merz’s robust Ukraine support and indicates it would seek to rebuild diplomatic ties with Moscow.

“At a time when many seem more comfortable with confrontation than conversation, genuine dialogue matters more than ever,” Frohnmaier posted on X following his meeting with Dmitriev.

A recent survey by Ipsos reveals that Peru’s presidential runoff election has become a dead heat between the two remaining candidates ahead of Sunday’s decisive vote.

The leftist contender Roberto Sanchez, who has connections to the previously removed and imprisoned former President Pedro Castillo, has narrowed the gap considerably and now holds 43.8% support according to the polling data released Thursday. His opponent, conservative candidate Keiko Fujimori, whose father previously served as president, captured 43.2% of voter intentions in the same survey.

The numbers show a dramatic shift from Ipsos polling conducted on May 31, which had Fujimori leading with 38% compared to Sanchez’s 35%, while 27% of respondents remained undecided at that time.

Key details from the latest polling:

• The survey was completed on June 3 with a margin of error of plus or minus 2.1%, according to sources familiar with Ipsos methodology.

• Approximately 13% of those polled indicated they would submit blank or invalid ballots.

• Fujimori, making her fourth presidential bid and known for her pro-market positions, secured victory in the initial round of voting on April 12 with 17.18% of the vote.

• Sanchez finished as the runner-up in that first round, earning 12.03% of votes cast.

Sanchez has recently adjusted his campaign approach, softening his rhetoric as the runoff approaches.

Peruvian election law prohibits the publication of polling results during the final week before a presidential election, though surveys may still be conducted as long as domestic news outlets do not report the findings.

The International Monetary Fund has chosen Alvaro Piris Chavarri to serve as its new mission chief for Venezuela, Bloomberg News reported Thursday, according to sources with knowledge of the decision.

When contacted by Reuters, the IMF declined to provide comment on personnel matters.

Piris currently holds the position of assistant director within the IMF’s African Department and serves as mission chief for Ethiopia, the IMF confirmed. His background includes heading IMF missions in Mozambique, Lebanon and China.

This selection follows Venezuela’s announcement last month that it would begin restructuring efforts after defaulting on its external debt in 2017. Analysts believe the total amount owed, which includes unpaid bonds, arbitration awards and accumulated interest, surpasses $150 billion.

Venezuela is working to rejoin the global financial community after reestablishing connections with the IMF and World Bank, relationships that were halted in 2019 due to disagreements over government recognition.

The IMF confirmed it is exploring a pathway toward conducting an “Article IV” consultation with Venezuela, indicating that engagement with Caracas is progressing toward standard economic oversight.

The discussion surrounding Israel’s ultra-Orthodox population has evolved beyond religious and political considerations into a pressing economic challenge, according to experts who spoke at a prominent policy conference this week.

As military expenditures climb toward 8% of the nation’s gross domestic product and approximately 25% of the government budget, while the ultra-Orthodox are expected to represent an increasing portion of military-age Jewish citizens, the issue has taken on new urgency.

Military service forms part of Israel’s social framework, defense costs consume an expanding portion of national resources, and the armed forces represent a shared experience for most Jewish citizens. Under these mounting pressures, ultra-Orthodox integration has transformed from a dispute about exemptions into a budgetary, military, and economic concern.

The implications are clear. As the ultra-Orthodox become a larger segment of Israel’s population, the mix of military exemptions, restricted core education, reduced male workforce participation, and political influence could burden the military, tax system, and skilled economy that Israel increasingly relies upon.

This theme permeated the Eli Hurvitz Conference on Economy and Society, hosted by the Israel Democracy Institute in Jerusalem. While the conference addressed defense spending, artificial intelligence, technology, living costs, reconstruction, healthcare, and the national budget, the ultra-Orthodox issue emerged repeatedly through discussions of human capital, labor participation, education, and public priorities.

The ultra-Orthodox community refers to Israel’s rapidly expanding religious population whose traditional male institutions focus on full-time religious study. Many ultra-Orthodox boys don’t receive the standard curriculum in mathematics, English, and science that other Israelis do; many men don’t serve in the military and enter employment late or remain outside the workforce for long periods. Ultra-Orthodox women work at higher rates, often supporting large families, but household earnings remain relatively modest.

Gilad Cohen Kovacs, a researcher at the Israel Democracy Institute who led a session on “The Economy as a Driver of Change in Haredi Autonomy,” contended that the matter also involves how a separate institutional framework affects growth, employment, and social services.

Cohen Kovacs stated that subsidies supporting the current ultra-Orthodox model total approximately 35 to 37 billion shekels annually, roughly 5.5% of the national budget. Without modifications, he cautioned, that amount could increase to more than 60 billion shekels yearly in coming decades. These numbers were part of his conference presentation analyzing ultra-Orthodox autonomy and government support.

He emphasized that the issue shouldn’t be viewed as simply transferring “money to Haredim.” In his assessment, some funding encourages behaviors that keep ultra-Orthodox men out of the workforce, while other portions strengthen what he called a parallel system of authority, educational networks, community institutions, and political influence.

A welfare system, Cohen Kovacs explained, aims to assist those unable to work, protect those who have been harmed, and enable advancement. In the ultra-Orthodox situation, he maintained, part of the subsidy supports the reverse pattern: reduced use of earning potential, partial employment, large families, and a religious study-centered lifestyle.

“These are not the conditions for which the welfare state was built,” he said.

This perspective redirects attention from individual poverty toward policy incentives that, according to Cohen Kovacs, maintain dependence and separation. His overall finding was that the present model creates a substantial cross-community transfer from non-ultra-Orthodox Jewish households to ultra-Orthodox households through tax differences, public services, subsidies, and exemptions from shared responsibilities.

Former Prime Minister Naftali Bennett also referenced research on this balance. According to Bennett, what he termed a “Zionist household”—a non-ultra-Orthodox Jewish household participating in military service and the job market—contributes about 6,000 shekels more monthly to the state than it uses or receives, while an ultra-Orthodox household receives about 4,000 shekels more monthly than it contributes. He characterized this as approximately a 10,000 shekel monthly difference between the two household categories.

The comparison brought the budget discussion from national figures to family income levels. It wasn’t presented as claiming one specific family directly supports another, but as an overall measurement of taxes, government services, subsidies, benefits, and participation in public duties.

Dr. Gilad Malach, a researcher at the Israel Democracy Institute who presented separate research on defense burdens, told The Media Line that his work examined one particular aspect of the broader subsidy discussion: security. He noted Israel typically views defense spending as a national budget matter, without examining how this burden distributes across different community sectors.

Malach said it would be “too simplistic” to attribute the disparity solely to the ultra-Orthodox community being poorer and therefore paying less tax. “You might say, ‘OK, this is a poor society, so they pay less than their share in the population,’” he said. “But we see that the gaps between them and others—it’s much more than that.”

According to Malach, the apparent security budget totals about 120 billion shekels annually, but the actual cost approaches 150 billion once hidden burdens are included: conscripts paid below their market value, delayed workforce entry, and costs to employers when reservists leave jobs for extended service.

If the ultra-Orthodox represent about 14% of Israel’s population, he said, they should bear roughly 21 billion shekels of that burden. In reality, he estimated, they contribute about 6 billion.

“So, the gap is 15 billion,” he said.

This figure carries political weight because it positions the draft discussion within a broader fiscal framework: who funds security, who serves, and who bears the indirect costs of a society structured around extended military service.

Malach was cautious not to claim the gap could close rapidly. He said the policy measures he presented could reduce it, but not eliminate it. At best, he estimated, the immediate impact could be several billion shekels, not the complete 15 billion.

“Just to make the situation less unequal, more equal than today, but not a real equality between the population,” he said.

The demographic projection was more alarming. Some forecasts, Malach noted, project the ultra-Orthodox population at around 30% of Israel’s total population within roughly four decades. The more significant figure, he added, isn’t the overall population percentage, but the proportion among draft-eligible Jews.

Among Jewish 18-year-olds, he said, the ultra-Orthodox percentage could surpass half. In his assessment, if this forecast materialized, “We won’t have manpower for an army if the situation would be that they are not serving in the army. And we can’t have a prosperous economy if so many people won’t have the ability to work in a modern labor market.”

Reem Aminoach, a senior researcher at the Institute for National Security Studies who previously served as financial adviser to the Israel Defense Forces chief of staff, told The Media Line that the problem is often portrayed as more complex than necessary.

“All you need is to cancel the deferral,” he stated, referring to the legal process that has permitted many ultra-Orthodox men to avoid conscription while remaining in religious study.

In his opinion, eliminating the deferral would create a clearer choice: service, employment, or another publicly accountable framework, rather than a system where avoiding the army also discourages work. Aminoach said the army’s requirement is practical and urgent.

“The army lacks fighters, not clerks,” he said.

Shaul Meridor, a former senior Finance Ministry official, brought the discussion from national totals to individual Israeli family level. He described a middle- or lower-middle-class family in places such as Migdal HaEmek or Dimona, with five children, one serving in Lebanon, and struggling financially. Based on figures he cited from a recent study, such a family subsidizes a comparable low-income ultra-Orthodox family by nearly 1,000 shekels monthly.

“Many times we talk about high-tech and the rich and all kinds of other people who subsidize,” Meridor said. “I am talking about socioeconomic cluster four. Whoever knows what that means understands that this is not high-tech, and these are not people sitting in Tel Aviv or Ramat Hasharon. These are people who do not finish the month.”

He said the moral question after October 7 was no longer theoretical.

“Why should a family that does not finish the month have to allocate, from money it does not have, 1,000 shekels net a month to subsidize a Haredi family that chose a different life?”

Meridor also maintained that Israel’s current policies damage ultra-Orthodox children themselves by directing them toward poverty.

“As leadership, we must not condemn Haredi children to poverty,” he said. “And that is what we are doing today.”

His suggested principle was straightforward: those who serve should receive benefits, those who don’t serve should not. Combat service, he said, should receive the most; other service should receive less; avoidance should receive nothing. But he warned that dismantling ultra-Orthodox autonomy wouldn’t happen through one major law. It would require changes in thousands of government decisions, benefits, tax rules, and allocations that currently favor institutions over individuals.

Political speakers addressed the same matter from various angles. Bennett concentrated on education and subsidies, using his remarks to criticize daycare payments for families where the father doesn’t work and doesn’t serve. He also suggested broad education reform based on a shared state curriculum, while maintaining limited community autonomy.

Avigdor Liberman, chairman of Yisrael Beitenu and a former defense and finance minister, approached the issue through coalition politics. In a discussion with Yohanan Plesner, president of the Israel Democracy Institute, Liberman contended that Israel cannot maintain higher defense spending while preserving sectoral budgets and avoiding structural reform. He said meaningful change would require a government not reliant on the ultra-Orthodox parties Shas and United Torah Judaism.

Former Defense Minister Benny Gantz provided a more measured criticism. He said parts of the ultra-Orthodox leadership were making a serious error by continuing a situation where the community takes precedence over the state. Simultaneously, he stressed that there are ultra-Orthodox who work, study, serve, and contribute to the economy, and they deserve recognition.

Meirav Cohen, a Yesh Atid lawmaker and former minister for social equality, used Jerusalem as a cautionary example. Speaking as a Jerusalem resident, she said the capital already demonstrates what occurs when integration in the army, employment, and education doesn’t advance quickly enough. Jerusalem, she said, has dropped in fewer than three decades from socioeconomic cluster five to cluster two. Every second household receives a municipal property tax discount, she said, meaning the other half must bear some of Israel’s highest municipal tax burdens.

“There is no economic model for this,” Cohen said. “You don’t need prophecies or warnings. Look at what happened to us in Jerusalem.”

The ultra-Orthodox discussion occurred during a conference focused on rising security costs and shrinking civilian spending space. Former Bank of Israel Governor Karnit Flug said in the opening budget session that Israel’s economy had demonstrated resilience, but the Israel-Hamas war had imposed a significant cost. Defense spending, she said, now reaches nearly 8% of GDP, compared with slightly more than 4% before October 7, 2023. Its budget share has increased to about one-quarter, compared with 16% before the war.

This broader fiscal context helps explain why ultra-Orthodox integration is no longer viewed solely as a dispute over religious exemptions. Israel is attempting to fund a larger defense establishment, increased rehabilitation needs, more reservist support, reconstruction in the north and south, health-system gaps, transportation infrastructure, and a technology sector facing global competition. Speakers also warned that insufficient investment in Arab society carries its own cost in lost output, making the broader point that Israel cannot afford to underinvest in any large population group while defense and rehabilitation needs are increasing.

Artificial intelligence and technology added another dimension. The Israel Innovation Authority’s 2026 report, presented at the conference, showed that technology remains Israel’s primary growth engine. In 2025, the sector contributed roughly half of the economy’s growth, reached 18.3% of GDP, accounted for 58% of exports, and employed more than 400,000 people. But the same report also warned of employment share stagnation, declining research and development jobs in Israel, activity expansion abroad, and growing pressure from currency appreciation.

This is why ultra-Orthodox integration now intersects with the artificial intelligence discussion. Israel wants to compete in a global economy based on advanced skills, data science, engineering, defense technology, and artificial intelligence. But a growing portion of its future workforce is educated in systems that often don’t provide the tools required for that economy. The point wasn’t that every Israeli must work in technology, but that the next economy will demand basic quantitative and digital skills across far more jobs.

Eli Hurvitz, CEO of the Eddie and Jules Trump Family Foundation, told the conference that children currently choosing what to study in high school will be the workforce of 2040. In an artificial intelligence-driven world, he said, mathematics, data, teamwork, and independent learning will become basic requirements for opportunity.

The challenge of ultra-Orthodox integration doesn’t fit easily into familiar categories of minority rights or welfare policy. In Israel, it connects to compulsory service, repeated wars, high defense costs, a knowledge-based economy, and a parliamentary system where sectoral parties can hold the balance of power. The ultra-Orthodox community is a growing part of Israel’s electorate, budget, labor market, and future security burden. This is why the discussion has become one of the country’s central governance tests.

The conference produced no single, comprehensive solution. Some speakers emphasized immediate enforcement of the existing draft framework. Others focused on incentives, core education, tax benefits, or direct ties between the state and ultra-Orthodox individuals rather than through community institutions. Some warned against coercion that could backfire, while others argued that decades of gradualism have failed. But there was notable agreement around one point: the status quo is no longer to be treated as a manageable inconvenience.

The discussion, as reflected in the conference sessions and interviews cited here, was dominated by economists, former senior officials, and political figures warning about the long-term costs of the current model. Representatives of the major ultra-Orthodox parties were not quoted in those sessions or interviews.

Malach expressed the warning in the most direct terms. Israel has survived enormous shocks, he said, and remains a wealthy country with a strong economy. But if current patterns continue as the ultra-Orthodox population grows, the problem will not remain a matter of resentment or budgetary imbalance. It will become a question of manpower, productivity, and national resilience.

“Right now, it’s very hard, but we are handling,” he said. “The point is that if you call today’s situation very bad, things would be worse than that.”

What emerged in Jerusalem was more than an argument over the draft. It was a broader economic assessment of who serves, who pays, who studies the skills needed for the next economy, and whether the state can continue financing separate rules for a growing part of its population. Israel’s next election may decide the coalition arithmetic. The harder question, raised throughout the conference, is whether any government will be willing to change the arithmetic of the country itself.

Authorities are requesting prolonged custody for 62 individuals taken into custody during a destructive demonstration at the residence of High Court Justice Noam Sohlberg, where protesters opposing military conscription requirements for ultra-Orthodox yeshiva students damaged property and fought with law enforcement.

The individuals in custody are set to appear at the Jerusalem Magistrate’s Court Thursday morning, where authorities will ask that they continue to be held while the investigation proceeds.

Law enforcement officials report that 65 individuals were taken into custody after the disturbances occurred. Walla news outlet indicated that 62 continued to be held and would face a judge.

The violent demonstration took place Wednesday evening as large groups of protesters gathered at Sohlberg’s residence in the West Bank settlement of Alon Shvut. Throughout the disturbance, demonstrators broke windows at the justice’s residence and car, while also destroying flower containers at the property’s entrance.

According to Ynet reporting, authorities seized drones and GoPro cameras that were in the possession of several suspects.

The demonstration stemmed from resistance among certain ultra-Orthodox activists to Supreme Court rulings regarding military service requirements. Sohlberg had recently overseen decisions mandating that the government enhance enforcement actions against those avoiding the draft, which made him a focus for protesters opposing the military service of yeshiva students.

Following the dispersal of the crowd, Magen David Adom medical personnel responded to the residence after Sohlberg reportedly became ill.

Meira Sohlberg, his wife, voiced her dismay at the destruction that occurred during the disturbance.

“How is it possible that Jews are hurting each other?” she said. “Look at this destruction, a pogrom, what is this, Kristallnacht?” according to Ynet.

Police Commissioner Danny Levy denounced the violence and directed officers to pursue those involved “to the fullest extent of the law.” Authorities stated that Levy received a briefing from Jerusalem District Deputy Commander Yishai Shalem and emphasized that lawful demonstration cannot involve violence, property destruction or assaults on government officials.

Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu subsequently contacted Sohlberg and denounced the incident.

United Torah Judaism chairman MK Yitzhak Goldknopf and Shas MK Yinon Azoulai similarly criticized the violence.

Subsequently, numerous ultra-Orthodox demonstrators obstructed Jerusalem’s Kikar Shabbat junction in protest of the arrests.

Michael Rabello, who has served as Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s personal attorney for many years, won election as Israel’s state comptroller Wednesday in a disputed Knesset vote marked by allegations of voting irregularities.

The attorney claimed victory in a runoff election after both candidates failed to reach the necessary vote count in the first round of balloting.

During the initial vote, former Supreme Court justice Yosef Elron garnered 60 votes compared to Rabello’s 57. Parliamentary regulations require 61 votes for a first-round victory.

The decisive second round saw Rabello prevail over Elron with a 61-57 vote margin.

Controversy erupted over claims that the voting process violated ballot secrecy requirements. News reports indicated that Likud party members faced pressure to take photos or videos of their ballots as proof they supported Rabello, despite laws mandating secret voting.

These claims drew harsh condemnation from opposition lawmakers, who characterized the ruling Likud party’s behavior as resembling a “crime organization.”

Media reports also suggested that cabinet members believed to favor Elron were called to Netanyahu’s office while voting was underway.

Due to the mounting concerns, Knesset Speaker Amir Ohana mandated a complete restart of the second voting round. Ohana declared that any directive telling legislators to document their ballots was “illegal and invalid.”

Vote totals shifted between the rounds, suggesting some parliament members altered their choices.

Opposition groups plan to challenge the election results in the High Court of Justice, citing alleged procedural violations.

Rabello’s legal work has encompassed representing Netanyahu across multiple court cases and has also included representation of Netanyahu’s spouse, Sara Netanyahu. His professional duties have extended to participating in political negotiations tied to the prime minister.

The state comptroller position functions as an independent watchdog agency answerable directly to the Knesset. This office conducts audits of government departments, oversees municipal government operations, examines political party finances, and safeguards public interests.

European Union officials on Thursday expressed broad support for restricting temporary protection access for Ukrainian men eligible for military service, according to Sweden’s migration minister.

The bloc implemented its Temporary Protection Directive following Russia’s invasion of Ukraine in 2022 to handle the massive influx of displaced individuals fleeing the conflict.

This protection program, which has received three extensions and is scheduled to end in March 2027, provides recipients with residence permits along with work authorization and social benefits access.

Sweden’s Migration Minister Johan Forssell indicated his nation backs the proposal that was deliberated during a Justice and Home Affairs session in Luxembourg. He emphasized that any new limitations would only affect future applicants for temporary protection status, while current beneficiaries would remain unaffected.

“It is essential for us to provide Ukrainians with protection, but at the same time the war needs to be fought and won. For that to happen, it is essential that more men stay in Ukraine and fight,” Forssell stated before the meeting commenced.

Any extension or changes to the current framework would require a proposal from the European Commission, followed by approval from member nations.

Current Eurostat figures show that over 4.33 million Ukrainian refugees are receiving benefits under this directive.

According to the same data, Germany accommodates the highest number of Ukrainians under this program, representing approximately 29% of the EU’s total, with Poland and Czechia following in the rankings.

WASHINGTON — The Treasury Department announced Thursday it has placed financial sanctions on Cuba’s President Miguel Díaz-Canel and four additional officials, according to documents posted on the department’s website.

Among those targeted by the sanctions is Alejandro Castro Espín, whose father is former President Raúl Castro.

The financial penalties follow President Donald Trump’s signing of an executive order that broadened sanctions against the Caribbean nation.

These latest sanctions increase economic pressure on Cuban leadership, though this marks just another instance in a long history of the United States targeting foreign leaders and their family members with similar measures.

Previous sanctions have targeted leaders including former Sudanese President Omar Bashir and former Zimbabwean President Robert Mugabe in the early 2000s, as well as more recent penalties against former Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro and his spouse.

Officials appointed by Russia at the Zaporizhzhia nuclear facility in Ukraine claimed Thursday that Ukrainian forces conducted drone strikes against a thermal power station essential for maintaining electricity to the nuclear site.

The facility’s Russian-installed administrators reported that Ukrainian military forces carried out what they described as a “multiple attack using heavy unmanned aerial vehicles” in the vicinity of the nuclear plant.

“More than 20 drone strikes have been recorded,” the management stated.

According to the officials, the strikes targeted the thermal power facility, which they described as “site of critically important energy infrastructure that ensures the operation of the… Ferrosplavnaya-1 power transmission line.”

The administrators warned that “such attacks pose a direct threat to the reliability of the Zaporizhzhia nuclear plant power supply and once again demonstrate disregard for the principles of nuclear safety.”

Ukrainian officials have not responded to these accusations.

Russian military forces captured the nuclear facility, which contains six reactors and ranks as Europe’s largest, during the initial weeks after Russia’s February 2022 invasion. Since that time, both nations have consistently blamed each other for military actions that endanger nuclear security.

While the facility currently produces no power, it requires external electricity to prevent nuclear fuel stored at the location from overheating.

Two power lines provide grid connections, though one has remained offline since late March. The International Atomic Energy Agency has been working to establish a ceasefire that would allow repairs to the damaged line.

The IAEA reported Thursday that Russian plant management had notified them of the incident, and agency monitors stationed permanently at the site observed light smoke rising from the thermal plant area.

Rafael Grossi, IAEA director general, called for an immediate halt to attacks to avoid an extended loss of external power.

A French billionaire made his first appearance before lawmakers Thursday to outline his mission of advancing conservative and free-market principles in French politics, with the country’s presidential election approaching next year.

Pierre-Edouard Sterin, an entrepreneur who moved to Belgium to avoid French taxes, testified before senators as part of an investigation into political financing practices and whether his organizations comply with applicable rules.

“Our aim is to spread free-market, conservative ideas as widely as possible,” Sterin explained to the senators, characterizing his activities as “meta-political.”

“We hope it will, in the coming months and years, bring free-market, conservative right‑wing ideas to power in France,” he added.

The 52-year-old businessman, who had previously refused to respond to parliamentary requests to appear, rejected any suggestion of improper conduct. “There is no ongoing legal procedure, no investigation, no breach of the law,” he stated during his testimony.

Operating through an organization called Pericles, Sterin has remained largely unknown to the French public until recent years while funding various projects aligned with his political vision. Documents that appeared in the French publication L’Humanite in 2024 and later verified by Sterin revealed his objectives include combating “socialism, wokism, Islamism, immigration.”

The political influence of his network has grown, with Pericles co-founder Francois Durvye now serving as a special adviser to far-right leader Jordan Bardella, who current polling suggests leads the field for next year’s presidential race.

During his Senate testimony, Sterin, a practicing Catholic and father of five who resides in Belgium, stood by controversial immigration positions that have drawn criticism.

“I am in favour of the re-migration of foreign criminals, undocumented migrants or those unemployed for more than 12 months,” he declared, noting these views put him “to the right of the (French) far right.”

The businessman built his wealth through Smartbox, a company specializing in gift vouchers, and describes himself as a “tax exile of the François Hollande generation.”

His reference pointed to France’s Socialist leader who served as president from 2012 to 2017 and proposed implementing a 75% tax rate on millionaires. Sterin relocated to Belgium in 2012, and despite the constitutional council quickly rejecting the tax proposal, he chose not to return to France.

“Hollande doesn’t like the rich, and I don’t like the social‑communists,” Sterin remarked.

He told senators that his residence outside France has enabled him to reduce his tax burden by €100,000 to €200,000 annually, allowing him to direct larger amounts toward charitable projects within France.

LONDON, June 4 – Greater Manchester mayor Andy Burnham indicated Thursday that he would participate in a leadership challenge against Prime Minister Keir Starmer, contingent on winning a local election scheduled for later this month.

During a BBC debate with other candidates competing for a parliamentary seat in northern England, the Labour mayor stated that the governing Labour Party requires fundamental change as it continues to lag behind in public opinion surveys.

Prime Minister Starmer, who currently holds some of the poorest approval ratings of any British leader, has pledged to defend his position. However, potential challengers are positioning themselves, including Burnham and former health minister Wes Streeting, who stepped down from his role last month in opposition to the prime minister’s performance.

When questioned about his political aspirations, Burnham, who previously made two unsuccessful bids for Labour leadership, expressed that he didn’t want to get “ahead of himself.” He emphasized that he must first secure victory in the Makerfield election on June 18 before he can mount any challenge to Starmer.

“I can’t do anything unless I’m lucky enough to get the support of people here (in Makerfield). But if I get your support, I would seek to represent you at the highest possible level,” Burnham stated during the debate.

Burnham suggested that Streeting appeared to have already “launched a leadership contest,” though the former health minister has not yet made any formal announcement.

“So if that is running, I would seek to join it. But I’d have to persuade members of the parliamentary Labour Party to do the same. So that’s the only question,” Burnham explained.

KYIV, Ukraine — In an unprecedented move, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy has issued a public letter directly to Russian President Vladimir Putin on Thursday, requesting face-to-face talks to resolve the ongoing conflict.

This marks the first direct written communication Zelenskyy has made public to Putin since Russia began its full-scale invasion in 2022. The letter contained a broad condemnation of Putin’s 26-year tenure in office.

Recognizing changing U.S. priorities, Zelenskyy noted it would be incorrect to merely wait for the Trump administration to refocus on resolving the Ukraine conflict while it remains concentrated on the Iran war.

“I am proposing a meeting,” Zelenskyy stated in his letter.

U.S. President Donald Trump responded positively to the proposal, saying it “would be great” if the two leaders met. “They should get it done,” Trump commented.

When questioned about what concessions he had recommended Putin make to conclude the war, Trump refused to elaborate but indicated both parties would need to make sacrifices.

“They’re going to both make compromises,” he stated. “I suggested those compromises.”

Zelenskyy seems to be capitalizing on what he views as a crucial turning point in the conflict, as Ukraine has started to recover some military advantage primarily through enhanced long-range strike capabilities that have hindered Russian progress. Meanwhile, Moscow has escalated its lethal air offensive throughout Ukraine, attempting to capitalize on Kyiv’s resource shortages and ongoing susceptibility to ballistic missile strikes.

The Ukrainian president suggested the discussions could take place in an impartial third nation, excluding both Moscow and Kyiv as potential locations. He recommended Switzerland, Turkey, or Arab nations as possible hosts for the negotiations.

“It is leaders who resolve the key issues. That has always been the case, and it always will be,” he stated. “I propose to set a clear date for such a meeting.”

According to Zelenskyy, Ukrainian intelligence suggests Russia is contemplating extending the war through 2027 and 2028, while depending more heavily on ballistic missile attacks to achieve objectives that its ground operations have failed to secure.

Zelenskyy also charged Moscow with attempting to involve Belarus more deeply in the conflict and trying to create instability around Transnistria, the Russian-supported breakaway region of Moldova.

The Ukrainian president contended that Russia is increasingly experiencing the war’s consequences, citing drone strikes far within Russian borders, economic pressure, fuel shortages, inflation, and the need for additional military conscription.

Zelenskyy reported that Russia lost more than 30,000 soldiers killed or seriously wounded in May alone, claiming Ukraine possessed “video confirmation” of these battlefield casualties and that such loss rates have continued consistently each month.

He acknowledged that Ukraine also continues to experience significant losses despite what he characterized as a favorable casualty ratio.

Zelenskyy indicated Ukraine was ready to establish a complete ceasefire throughout the negotiation period and suggested a comprehensive prisoner exchange as an initial step toward resolving the conflict.

The Ukrainian leader also demanded the return of civilians and children removed from Ukraine during the war.

“The world has not grown tired of Ukraine, as you long hoped it would. But there is growing fatigue with Russia,” Zelenskyy declared.

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy issued a public letter to President Vladimir Putin on Thursday, calling for face-to-face discussions between the two leaders to bring their conflict to a close after more than four years of fighting. Zelenskyy cautioned that his country remains prepared to continue its defense if no agreement can be reached.

The Ukrainian president’s office confirmed the correspondence was distributed to multiple nations, including the United States. In his message, Zelenskyy argued that most Russian citizens have become weary of Ukrainian aerial strikes, rising prices, and fuel supply problems, making them receptive to ending hostilities.

Noting America’s current focus on the Iranian situation, Zelenskyy stated “it would be wrong to simply wait until the war in Europe returns to the center of its attention.”

The Ukrainian leader emphasized that any peace process must begin where the fighting occurs, describing it as “the line from which diplomacy must begin.” He advocated for “a full ceasefire for the duration of the negotiations,” calling this “standard practice.”

Zelenskyy suggested establishing a specific meeting date and noted that multiple nations have “traditionally hosted leaders to resolve issues of war and peace,” mentioning Switzerland, Turkey and Arab world countries as potential venues.

“Do not be afraid to take the path out of this war. That is the main thing that is required of you now,” Zelenskyy addressed Putin directly.

“Ukraine proposes ending this war through direct engagement between us — and you. I am proposing a meeting… If you do not personally come to the conclusion that it is time to end this war, Ukraine will continue fighting for its existence.”

Zelenskyy also hinted that prolonged warfare might jeopardize Putin’s leadership position, writing: “It is a fact of Russian history that you know well: when Russia grows tired, change comes.”

Russian officials in Moscow confirmed they received Zelenskyy’s correspondence and indicated Putin would be informed about its contents.

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy announced Thursday his nation will maintain a strict schedule for European Union membership negotiations and fulfill its commitments to the 27-member organization.

The president’s remarks came one day after Cyprus, which currently holds the EU’s rotating presidency, announced it had begun preparations to launch negotiations on the initial set of discussion topics with Ukraine and Moldova. The opening chapter focuses on democratic standards and rule-of-law requirements.

“We will have a very clear schedule for moving forward in these talks, especially after changes in Hungary,” Zelenskiy said in his nightly video address.

“We have kept to the schedule and now in June we very much expect the opening of (negotiating) clusters for which Ukraine has prepared. We have done our part of the work. The next step is up to the European Union.”

The decision to advance with negotiations followed Hungarian Prime Minister Peter Magyar’s announcement that his nation had resolved disagreements with Kiev regarding the rights of Ukraine’s 100,000-strong ethnic Hungarian community.

Magyar had earlier stated that resolving the longstanding disagreement was necessary for Budapest to support Ukraine’s EU admission. His predecessor, nationalist Viktor Orban, had blocked Ukrainian EU membership efforts.

Zelenskiy has consistently advocated for Ukraine’s EU membership as a way to establish Western principles in his country during more than four years of conflict with Russia.

The president noted that Ukrainian representatives maintain daily communication with EU officials regarding membership plans, calling this contact “important for our motivation.”

Zelenskiy also mentioned that Ukraine was meeting with European officials to explore strengthening his nation’s air defense systems, coordinating Russian sanctions, and collaborative weapons manufacturing.

ST. PETERSBURG, Russia, June 4 – Russian President Vladimir Putin addressed topics including the ongoing Ukraine conflict, potential peace negotiations with U.S. President Donald Trump, and his possible tenure in office through 2036 during a Thursday meeting with international news agency editors.

The Russian leader met with senior editorial staff from multiple news organizations, including Reuters, in the Russian city of St. Petersburg.

Below are Putin’s statements as provided through Reuters translation.

REGARDING UKRAINE, DONBAS TERRITORY AND PEACE NEGOTIATIONS:

“One does not exclude the other. Controlling the entire Donbas region and making a deal do not contradict each other. Why do you assume that this is in contradiction?”

“Russian troops are advancing along the entire front.” Putin claimed Russian forces now hold more than 85% of the Donetsk region and maintain control over 80% of the Zaporizhzhia region.

“We are certainly ready and willing to reach an agreement with Ukraine by peaceful means. And specifically on the basis that we discussed at the meeting with President Trump in Anchorage. At that time questions were put before Russia so that we could make certain compromises. And Russia agrees to the compromises that we discussed in Anchorage. The Ukrainian side must also agree to these compromises. And the conflict will quickly come to its natural conclusion.”

CONCERNING TRUMP’S PEACE INITIATIVES

“The proposals that were made by President Trump, as I have already said, may well be the basis for peace agreements. Therefore, answering your question, whether the administration acted in the right direction or not, yes, this is a proposal that requires compromise, and compromise for both sides. For Russia, too. And we generally agreed with these compromises. We need to convince the Ukrainian side of this and that’s it. In general, I believe that they can well form the basis of an agreement between Russia and Ukraine and can put an end to this conflict.”

REGARDING REMAINING IN OFFICE UNTIL 2036

When Reuters asked whether he possessed sufficient stamina and health to serve that duration, Putin responded: “Only God knows if we have enough health – for me, for you, and for everyone gathered here, in order to live until tomorrow, the day after tomorrow, and even more so to solve some of the tasks we face, to achieve the goals that we set for ourselves.”

Putin, who has held power as either president or prime minister since 1999, noted that constitutional provisions would permit him to seek reelection in 2030 and potentially serve another term concluding in 2036 if victorious.

“Indeed, the Constitution allows me to run in 2030, but I think it’s too early to talk about it. To be honest, it’s very early. I’m not even thinking about it right now. I’m being completely honest. I don’t even think about it,” Putin said.

“The country faces a lot of large-scale and pressing issues. They need to be solved without thinking about it, but thinking about the future of Russia.”

ST. PETERSBURG, Russia, June 4 — During a Thursday gathering with top news agency editors in St. Petersburg, Russian President Vladimir Putin avoided giving a direct response when asked about his intentions to remain in office through 2036, stating the topic was premature and noting that only divine providence could determine his health and longevity.

When Reuters posed the question about whether he would continue serving until 2036 and if he possessed the physical capacity for such extended leadership, Putin responded:

“Only God knows if we have enough health — for me, for you, and for everyone gathered here, in order to live until tomorrow, the day after tomorrow, and even more so to solve some of the tasks we face, to achieve the goals that we set for ourselves.”

The Russian leader, who has held power in various capacities since 1999 as either president or prime minister, acknowledged that constitutional provisions would permit him to seek reelection in 2030 and potentially serve another full term extending to 2036.

“Indeed, the Constitution allows me to run in 2030, but I think it’s too early to talk about it. To be honest, it’s very early. I’m not even thinking about it right now. I’m being completely honest. I don’t even think about it,” Putin stated.

“The country faces a lot of large-scale and pressing issues. They need to be solved without thinking about it, but thinking about the future of Russia.”