WASHINGTON — In a carefully orchestrated publicity stunt on Monday, President Donald Trump received a McDonald’s order at the White House and handed the delivery driver a $100 tip to highlight his administration’s tax policy benefiting workers who earn gratuities.
The delivery driver, Sharon Simmons from Arkansas, wore a “DoorDash Grandma” shirt as she approached the Oval Office exterior door while news cameras captured the moment. Trump emerged to greet her, saying “Hello. Nice to see you,” before acknowledging the obvious staging by asking nearby reporters, “This doesn’t look staged, does it?”
The event was indeed completely planned, as accessing White House grounds requires advance security clearance and background checks — making any spontaneous delivery impossible.
The White House organized this media opportunity to draw attention to Trump’s tax legislation passed last summer, which permits Americans to temporarily deduct federal taxes from tip income. The policy allows qualifying workers to deduct as much as $25,000, though benefits decrease for higher earners.
Administration officials are ramping up promotion of this tax benefit before Wednesday’s Tax Day deadline, despite recent focus shifting to the Iran conflict that has driven up gas prices and unsettled markets, plus Trump’s ongoing dispute with Pope Leo XIV.
Trump has long favored McDonald’s and previously used the fast-food chain for political purposes. During his first presidency in 2019, he served McDonald’s and other fast food to the visiting Clemson Tigers football team during a government shutdown that reduced White House kitchen operations. He also created a memorable 2024 campaign moment by working at a Pennsylvania McDonald’s location, operating the fryer and answering reporters’ questions through the drive-thru.
During Monday’s event, Simmons explained how the tax policy helped her receive $11,000 she otherwise wouldn’t have gotten — money that proved essential while her husband fought cancer.
Trump then invited her to join an impromptu press conference, asking “Would you like to do a little news conference with me?” as she stood beside him during questions about his Strait of Hormuz threats and his refusal to apologize to the Pope.
The president eventually asked Simmons: “I think you voted for me. Do you think?” She replied uncertainly, “Um, maybe.” Trump persisted: “I heard you’re a great supporter. We appreciate it.”
When a reporter inquired whether the White House tipped well, Simmons paused and said “Um … potentially.”
“Wait,” Trump exclaimed, pulling out a $100 bill and presenting it to Simmons with a smile. She accepted the money and laughed, changing her answer to “Yes, very,” while Trump patted her back and smiled broadly.
Minutes later, Trump questioned Simmons about whether she thinks “men should play in women’s sports” — a topic he frequently raises while criticizing Democrats’ stance on transgender rights.
“I really don’t have an opinion on that,” Simmons answered, leading Trump to respond, “I’ll bet you do.”
“No, no,” she maintained. “I’m here about no tax on tips.”
The White House later reported that Trump personally distributed the delivered food — cheeseburgers and fries — to West Wing employees.
Officials didn’t mention whether he received any tips for that service.
National Public Radio host Mary Louise Kelly conducted an interview with PBS NewsHour reporter Lisa Desjardins regarding recent sexual misconduct claims involving Representative Eric Swalwell and the continuing trend of similar accusations targeting Congressional members.
The discussion examined the persistent nature of these allegations within the halls of Congress and how they reflect a broader institutional challenge facing lawmakers on Capitol Hill.
NEW YORK — Law enforcement officers arrested approximately 90 demonstrators Monday during a protest targeting Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer and Senator Kirsten Gillibrand over their stance on American weapons sales to Israel.
The antiwar organization Jewish Voice for Peace organized the demonstration, which drew hundreds of participants to the Manhattan offices of both Democratic senators. Activists accused the lawmakers of supporting Israel’s escalating military operations in Lebanon and the broader U.S.-Israeli conflict with Iran.
When building security prevented protesters from conducting their planned sit-in inside the offices, demonstrators moved to the street where they blocked vehicular traffic. Participants chanted “fund people, not bombs” as officers placed them under arrest and transported them on three separate buses.
Notable individuals among the 90 people detained included whistleblower Chelsea Manning, actress Hari Nef, and New York City Council Member Alexa Avilés, a spokesperson for Jewish Voice for Peace confirmed.
The protest centered around legislative measures introduced by Senator Bernie Sanders that would prevent the sale of over $600 million worth of bombs to Israel.
Previous attempts by Sanders, a Vermont independent, to advance similar legislation have been unsuccessful. However, his latest effort during the summer months gained backing from more than half of the Democratic senators in response to widespread humanitarian concerns in Gaza. Neither Schumer nor Gillibrand supported those measures.
Monday’s demonstrators emphasized that Israel’s military campaign in southern Lebanon, combined with the expanded U.S.-Israeli operations against Iran, made the upcoming vote more critical. The Senate is expected to consider the resolution later this week.
“This is the moment when Schumer and Gillibrand must listen to their constituents,” stated Sonya Meyerson-Knox, communications director for Jewish Voice for Peace. “The majority of Americans and New Yorkers want a resolution to what the Israeli government is doing.”
Representatives for both Senator Schumer and Senator Gillibrand did not respond to requests for comment.
The Trump family’s business empire has experienced unprecedented growth during Donald Trump’s second presidency, raising new questions about potential conflicts of interest and what precedent this might establish for future commanders-in-chief.
While the Trump Organization completed zero international agreements during Trump’s initial White House tenure, the family has closed eight overseas deals within the last twelve months alone.
The financial windfall has been remarkable. Revenue from Trump-branded digital “meme” coins over just four months has exceeded twice what the organization earned operating their prominent Washington D.C. hotel throughout Trump’s entire first presidency.
Additional ethical concerns arise from family investments in corporations that rely on federal contracts and pursue government-backed funding and loans.
Columbia University historian Timothy Naftali observed that any previous limitations seem to have vanished entirely. “Whatever constraints there were in the first term appear to have completely disappeared,” Naftali stated.
Princeton University historian Julian Zelizer expressed concern about the precedent being established for future presidents. “He has shown politically there is no price to be paid to making money,” Zelizer explained. “You know you can go there.”
White House officials maintain Trump faces no conflicts of interest, emphasizing his assets remain in a trust overseen by his children and asserting he maintains “no involvement” in family business transactions. The Trump Organization separately declared, “The implication that politics has enriched the Trump family is unfounded.”
However, the recent surge in family business activity presents a stark contrast to Trump’s first presidential term.
International projects include a Qatar golf club and villa development partially backed by a Qatari government-owned company. In Vietnam, where The New York Times documented government displacement of farmers to accommodate a Trump resort, the nation’s deputy prime minister formally approved the project during a signing ceremony. Saudi Arabia is developing a “Trump Plaza” resort along the Red Sea through a Saudi developer with close royal family connections.
While determining whether these deals influenced U.S. policy decisions remains virtually impossible, each country achieved significant policy objectives: Qatar gained access to cutting-edge American technology, Vietnam received tariff reductions, and Saudi Arabia secured fighter jet purchases.
The Trump Organization has earned tens of millions in fees from these arrangements.
Just before inauguration, the Trump family sold nearly half their World Liberty Financial crypto operation to a UAE government-connected firm managed by a UAE royal family member for $500 million.
A second UAE entity, a government investment fund, purchased $2 billion worth of stablecoin digital currency for the offshore cryptocurrency platform Binance through World Liberty. This arrangement allows the Trump company receiving those dollars to invest in secure options like bonds or money market accounts while retaining tens of millions in interest earnings.
Subsequently, the Trump administration lifted Biden-era restrictions, granting the UAE access to advanced American semiconductor technology. Binance founder Changpeng Zhao later received a presidential pardon despite pleading guilty to failing to prevent criminals from using his platform for money laundering connected to child exploitation, drug trafficking, and terrorism.
Regarding the pardon, White House officials characterized Zhao as a casualty of what they termed “The Biden Administration’s war on crypto.” Zhao’s legal representative stated via email, “Any claim of a quid pro quo by Binance or CZ, or preferential financial treatment by Binance, is a clear misstatement of the public record.”
World Liberty has created another revenue source for a new Trump limited liability company through “governance token” sales, which provide buyers voting rights without ownership stakes. These sales generated $2 billion last year, translating to hundreds of millions for the Trumps through their World Liberty ownership and a separate agreement providing them a percentage of sales.
Cryptocurrency billionaire Justin Sun emerged as a major token purchaser, spending $75 million between Trump’s election and inauguration. As a foreign national, Sun would be prohibited under U.S. law from making political contributions to American politicians.
A federal lawsuit accusing Sun of investor fraud was suspended in February before reaching a $10 million settlement last month.
Digital “meme” coins featuring Trump’s image launched just days before his second inauguration have proven extraordinarily profitable.
Within four months, these coins generated $320 million, with the majority flowing to Trump-affiliated entities according to blockchain analyst Chainalysis. Unlike lobbyists or campaign contributors seeking to influence Trump, coin purchasers can buy anonymously.
Forbes estimates place Trump’s current net worth at $6.3 billion, representing a 60% increase since returning to office.
The business expansion has continued into Trump’s second year back in the White House.
Last month, his eldest sons acquired stakes in an armed drone manufacturer pursuing Pentagon contracts and seeking business with Gulf nations under Iranian attack who depend on U.S. military protection led by their father.
Other government contractors where one or both sons have obtained ownership interests this year include a rocket motor producer, an artificial intelligence chip supplier, and a data analytics firm.
When questioned about potential conflicts following the drone deal announcement, Eric Trump stated, “I am incredibly proud to invest in companies I believe in.” A representative for Donald Trump Jr. said he doesn’t “interface” with government officials regarding his portfolio companies.
The president has largely dismissed conflict-of-interest concerns, telling The New York Times in January, “I found out that nobody cared.”
WASHINGTON – California Representative Eric Swalwell faces mounting pressure from his Democratic colleagues to step down from Congress as a House ethics committee begins investigating sexual misconduct allegations against him.
The congressional ethics panel announced Monday it is examining whether Swalwell broke House rules. Four women have come forward with sexual assault accusations against the California congressman.
Swalwell ended his gubernatorial campaign on Sunday, issuing an apology for “mistakes in judgment” while maintaining his innocence and calling the allegations serious but untrue.
Oregon Representative Andrea Salinas issued a statement Monday demanding Swalwell’s resignation. “The allegations against him are serious, credible, and demand accountability,” Salinas stated. “The halls of power must not be a place where predators are shielded by inaction.”
Swalwell joins three other House members currently facing mounting calls for resignation or expulsion from Congress – a bipartisan group of two Democrats and two Republicans.
Texas Republican Tony Gonzales withdrew from his reelection bid last month, abandoning a May 26 runoff against gun rights advocate Brandon Herrera. Gonzales allegedly engaged in an affair with a former staff member who later took their own life.
New Jersey Democratic Representative Nellie Pou condemned both lawmakers in strong terms. “At a minimum, it is clear that Reps. Swalwell and Gonzalez have betrayed their constituents, staff, and their oath of office,” Pou declared. “At worst, it appears they may have committed abhorrent, outrageous, and potentially criminal acts. They should resign immediately; if they refuse, the House should debate their removal through expulsion.”
House expulsion represents the chamber’s harshest disciplinary action and demands a two-thirds majority vote for approval. Throughout history, only six House members have faced expulsion – most recently former New York Republican George Santos in December 2023.
With Republicans maintaining a slim 217-214 advantage over Democrats, any successful expulsion effort would require support from both parties.
Florida Republican Anna Paulina Luna announced plans to introduce expulsion legislation targeting Swalwell. Meanwhile, New Mexico Democrat Teresa Leger Fernandez said she would file similar measures against Gonzalez, with Luna promising her support.
North Carolina Republican Addison McDowell emphasized the need for action. “It’s past time to get rid of predators in Congress who prey on women – especially their own staff,” McDowell stated. “Women working in the halls of Congress deserve to know that, as an institution, we have their backs and that we condemn this behavior at the highest level.”
Arizona Democratic Representative Yassamin Ansari indicated she would vote to remove both men if they refuse to resign voluntarily. Maryland Democrat April McClain Delaney characterized their alleged behavior as “beyond inexcusable” and potentially criminal. “Both should be expelled,” she declared, contingent on investigations confirming “the facts are true.”
A coalition of Democrats from competitive districts that could determine House control in November’s midterm elections urged leadership to accelerate misconduct investigations.
“Public confidence in Congress is at a historic low, but it can be earned back through public accountability,” the group wrote. “We must demonstrate that no one is above the law and that serious misconduct will result in serious consequences. We respectfully request that you work together in a bipartisan manner to ensure these investigations proceed swiftly, that findings are made public, and that action is brought to the floor for a vote.”
New York Representative Nydia Velazquez went beyond her Democratic colleagues by suggesting two additional Florida representatives should also face resignation or expulsion. She named Democrat Sheila Cherfilus-McCormick and Republican Cory Mills alongside Swalwell and Gonzales.
Federal prosecutors have charged Cherfilus-McCormick with misappropriating $5 million in federal disaster relief funds for her congressional campaign. Mills faces allegations of sexual misconduct and campaign finance violations.
“Congress should not tolerate representatives who abuse staff, betray public trust for personal gain, and generally violate their oath of office,” Velazquez stated. “Americans deserve better and Congress must hold our members accountable.”
WASHINGTON – President Donald Trump orchestrated a McDonald’s delivery to the Oval Office Monday as part of an effort to showcase his elimination of taxes on tips, giving the delivery driver what looked like a $100 bill when reporters questioned whether White House staff tip well.
Sharon Simmons, a DoorDash driver from Arkansas sporting a red “DoorDash Grandma” shirt, arrived at the door with two bags of fast food while cameras rolled. The President greeted her and subsequently fielded questions from the press with Simmons beside him, who mentioned she has kept significantly more money since tip taxes were eliminated in January.
As November’s midterm elections approach with Congressional control at stake, Trump’s team began this year planning to highlight the robust U.S. economy. However, the ongoing U.S.-Israeli conflict with Iran has complicated these plans, especially as climbing oil prices have increased fuel costs, diminishing the impact of tax reductions on tips, Social Security benefits, overtime wages, auto loan interest, and state and local taxes that were included in last year’s GOP-supported tax legislation.
In fact, DoorDash and similar companies relying on independent contractors recently implemented strategies to address rising gasoline costs.
When a reporter questioned Simmons about the White House’s tipping practices, she responded: “Ummm, potentially.”
Trump interrupted with “wait,” reaching into his pocket to pull out what appeared to be a $100 bill for her.
“Thank you, you reminded me,” he stated.
During a later Fox News appearance, Simmons commented on the tip: “He took good care of me.” However, she declined to reveal the amount: “I don’t talk money.”
Simmons also skillfully deflected Trump’s attempts to draw her into political discussions before the press.
When Trump inquired: “Do you think that men should play in women’s sports?” she responded: “I really don’t have an opinion on that … I’m here about tax on tips.”
He also questioned whether she had voted for him. Smiling, Simmons answered: “Ummm, maybe.”
Federal workplace safety officials have penalized three construction companies following the workplace death of an employee who was helping construct a massive immigration detention facility in Texas last year.
The U.S. Occupational Safety and Health Administration determined that serious safety violations occurred during its investigation of the July 21, 2025 fatal accident that killed Hector Gonzalez, 38. Gonzalez died when construction materials collapsed on him while crews worked to complete Camp East Montana in El Paso, Texas.
These safety violations were brought to public attention in a Monday report from Public Citizen, a watchdog organization that examined companies earning profits from work at the expensive and problematic U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement detention facility.
Gonzalez’s fatal accident occurred just days following the Army’s decision to award Acquisition Logistics a contract valued at up to $1.3 billion for constructing and managing the facility at Fort Bliss, located near the border with Mexico. The detention center began operations the following month and rapidly expanded to become ICE’s biggest facility for immigrants facing deportation proceedings or challenging removal orders, sometimes holding over 3,000 individuals.
The facility has faced numerous problems including accusations of cruel treatment conditions, disease outbreaks, and the deaths of three detainees between December and January. An ICE Office of Detention Oversight inspection conducted in February discovered dozens of violations of federal detention standards. Last month, ICE terminated its contract with Acquisition Logistics, a small Virginia-based company lacking previous detention facility management experience, and awarded a no-bid contract to Amentum Services instead.
“The Trump administration is doling out billions of dollars in taxpayer funds on contracts that have led to the deaths of four people in a six-month period. And things are not likely to improve,” said Public Citizen researcher Douglas Pasternak, who authored Monday’s report.
OSHA conducted its standard investigation into Gonzalez’s workplace death to evaluate compliance with safety regulations. The agency chose not to penalize Acquisition Logistics but pursued fines against three subcontractors involved in the camp’s construction. These companies — Base International, JMJ Production Services and Fulfillment Personnel Services — received citations in January for violations related to powered industrial truck safety standards, according to agency records.
Base International, which employed Gonzalez, is owned by Florida businessman Nathan Albers, who has contributed to Trump and other Republican candidates and organizations in recent years. OSHA determined the company violated safety regulations by exposing workers to “struck-by hazards” from an unstable, elevated stack of composite beams on a forklift during supply unloading operations.
The investigation also cited the remaining two companies for that same violation plus another for failing to verify that employees had proper certification to operate powered industrial trucks at the construction site.
Both JMJ Production Services and Fulfillment Personnel Services accepted reduced penalty payments of $15,000 each through February settlements with OSHA. However, Base International is challenging its citation, which carries a proposed $11,585 fine, according to the agency’s enforcement records. Without a settlement agreement, an administrative law judge will conduct a hearing to review the company’s appeal.
“Base International is appealing the ruling, because there was no wrongdoing by the company,” company spokesperson Tom McNicholas said.
Albers also serves as CEO of Disaster Management Group, a federal contractor operating from the same Jupiter, Florida address as Base International.
Public Citizen’s report characterized Albers as having close ties to the Trump family, noting he contributed over $150,000 to Republican campaigns in 2025. The report also mentioned that Albers’ wife recently co-chaired a pet fundraising event at Mar-A-Lago alongside Trump’s daughter-in-law, Lara Trump.
Juan Munoz, founder and president of Austin, Texas-based JMJ Production Services, told the AP by phone Friday, “I wish I could talk about that but you’d have to talk to my attorneys.” He did not respond to a follow-up email he requested.
Fulfillment Personnel Services, headquartered in Mobile, Alabama, did not respond to phone calls and email messages requesting comment.
WASHINGTON — Federal lawmakers have launched a formal ethics investigation into California Democratic Representative Eric Swalwell following accusations of sexual misconduct involving a staff member who worked under him, officials announced Monday.
The congressional probe was revealed just 24 hours after Swalwell withdrew from the California governor’s race as allegations surfaced that he has consistently rejected.
Democratic Party members swiftly withdrew their backing of Swalwell following reports that he sexually assaulted a woman on two occasions, including during her employment in his office. These accusations, first detailed by the San Francisco Chronicle and subsequently reported by CNN, emerged just as Swalwell was gaining momentum as a top candidate in the competitive gubernatorial contest.
“I will fight the serious, false allegations that have been made — but that’s my fight, not a campaign’s,” Swalwell said in a social media post.
Committee officials emphasized that initiating this investigation and making it public does not suggest any wrongdoing has been established.
The investigation announcement follows mounting pressure from legislators across party lines demanding Swalwell’s resignation from Congress. Some discussions have even addressed the possibility of a House expulsion vote, though no such measure has been placed on the legislative calendar.
The Ethics Committee’s decision to begin its own investigation may temporarily halt other immediate congressional actions regarding the matter.
COLUMBIA, S.C. — Paul Dans, a leading figure behind the conservative Project 2025 initiative, has ended his Republican primary campaign against Senator Lindsey Graham in South Carolina, withdrawing from a race that was expected to highlight divisions within President Trump’s political base.
Dans withdrew his candidacy on Friday, which marked the final opportunity to have his name removed from ballots ahead of South Carolina’s June 9 primary election.
President Trump, who has long supported Graham as one of his key congressional supporters, responded to Dans’ withdrawal with a social media message claiming that Tucker Carlson’s backing of Dans had been the “KISS OF DEATH” for his campaign.
The former president and Carlson have been in a public dispute regarding the Iran conflict, which the ex-Fox News host described as “absolutely disgusting and evil.” Dans rejected claims that Carlson’s involvement influenced his decision to exit the race.
Following his withdrawal, Dans announced his support for Mark Lynch, a Republican candidate who owns an appliance business. Trump quickly criticized this endorsement in another social media message, stating that Lynch “would be a DISASTER for the Republican Party” if he wins.
Dans gained national recognition as a primary organizer of Project 2025, a comprehensive conservative policy framework designed for Trump’s potential return to office. While expressing satisfaction with certain Trump administration achievements — such as reducing federal employment and cutting government programs — Dans indicated that “more work to do” remains in the Senate.
“What we’ve done with Project 2025 is really change the game in terms of closing the door on the progressive era,” Dans shared with The Associated Press in a previous interview. “If you look at where the chokepoint is, it’s the United States Senate. That’s the headwaters of the swamp.”
Dans, who served as White House liaison to the Office of Personnel Management during Trump’s first presidency, frequently traveled to Washington while developing Project 2025 at the Heritage Foundation, a prominent conservative policy organization. The extensive policy document spans nearly 1,000 pages and features contributions from prominent conservative policy experts.
Taking on Graham, who has successfully defended his seat against multiple challengers throughout his tenure, represents a significant political challenge. Six other Republican candidates continue their campaigns, while Graham’s team reported having over $11.6 million available, after raising approximately $1.4 million during the year’s first quarter.
Trump provided early support for Graham, who serves as both a trusted advisor and frequent golf companion, despite their occasionally strained relationship. Graham, who is pursuing a fifth Senate term, has also secured endorsements from South Carolina’s top Republican leaders, including Senator Tim Scott and Governor Henry McMaster, who will lead his 2026 campaign effort.
WASHINGTON — Federal lawmakers have initiated a formal ethics investigation into California Representative Eric Swalwell following accusations of sexual misconduct involving a staff member who worked under his authority, according to an announcement made Monday by the House Ethics Committee.
The investigation was announced just one day after the Democratic congressman halted his bid for California’s governorship when serious allegations surfaced that he continues to refute.
Support from fellow Democrats evaporated rapidly after reports emerged claiming Swalwell sexually assaulted a woman on two separate occasions, including during her employment in his office. These accusations, first reported by the San Francisco Chronicle and subsequently covered by CNN, surfaced just as Swalwell was gaining momentum as a top candidate in the competitive gubernatorial race.
“I will fight the serious, false allegations that have been made — but that’s my fight, not a campaign’s,” Swalwell said in a social media post.
Committee officials emphasized that launching this investigation and making it public does not suggest any wrongdoing has been confirmed.
The investigation announcement follows mounting pressure from legislators across party lines demanding Swalwell’s resignation from Congress. Some discussions have even explored the possibility of a House vote to remove the congressman from office, though no such vote has been officially scheduled.
The Ethics Committee’s decision to begin its own investigation may temporarily halt any other immediate congressional actions regarding Swalwell’s future.
Officials in Minnesota’s Ramsey County announced Monday they are examining whether federal immigration agents committed kidnapping, burglary and false imprisonment when they arrested a Hmong American citizen in an incident caught on camera.
County Attorney John Choi and Sheriff Bob Fletcher told reporters they plan to seek information from the Department of Homeland Security for their probe into the January detention of ChongLy “Scott” Thao. The county encompasses Minnesota’s capital city of St. Paul.
Federal Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents broke down Thao’s front door with weapons drawn, operating without a warrant, before forcing him outside wearing only undergarments and a blanket during bitter cold weather.
“There are many facts we don’t know yet, but there’s one that we do know. And that is that Mr. Thao is and has been an American citizen. There’s not a dispute over that,” Fletcher stated. “There’s no dispute that he was taken out of his house, forcibly taken out of his home and driven around.”
Fletcher added: “Is that good law enforcement, to take an American citizen out of their home and drive them around aimlessly, trying to determine what they can tell them?”
The Department of Homeland Security, which supervises ICE, has declined to assist with other state and local probes into fatal shootings of two American citizens by federal agents in Minneapolis during the previous administration’s immigration enforcement efforts.
Choi explained they are working to establish if any violations occurred that could warrant prosecution under state or federal statutes.
“This is not about, any type of predetermined agenda other than to seek the truth and to investigate the facts,” he stated.
Federal agents ultimately discovered Thao was a long-term American citizen without any criminal history, Thao revealed during a January interview with The Associated Press. Officials brought him back to his residence after several hours.
Homeland Security subsequently stated ICE personnel had been searching for two individuals convicted of sex crimes. However, Thao informed the AP he had never encountered these men and they were not residents of his home.
Recorded footage showed the incident, featuring community members using whistles and horns, while neighbors shouted at more than twelve armed agents to stop bothering Thao’s family.
Minnesota and the top prosecutor in Hennepin County, which contains Minneapolis, filed legal action against the former administration last month seeking access to evidence they claim is necessary for independent investigations of three federal officer shootings in Minneapolis, including the deaths of Renee Good and Alex Pretti.
The legal challenge alleges the federal government broke its commitment to assist state investigations following the deployment of approximately 3,000 federal law enforcement personnel to Minnesota.
Both Minnesota and Hennepin County have requested public assistance in gathering information about potentially unlawful federal officer conduct, citing federal authorities’ refusal to provide evidence.
The former administration argued Minnesota officials lack authority to investigate these incidents. State and county prosecutors maintain they must conduct independent reviews because they lack confidence in federal oversight.
The Justice Department announced in January it was launching a federal civil rights investigation into Pretti’s death, placing two officers on administrative leave, but determined a similar federal review was unnecessary for Good’s killing.
President Donald Trump took down a controversial artificial intelligence-created image from his Truth Social account on Monday after facing sharp criticism from religious supporters who typically back him.
The digitally-generated picture, shared on Sunday, showed Trump wearing white robes while placing his hand on a man’s head in a healing gesture reminiscent of biblical imagery. The image also featured a glowing sphere in Trump’s hand, with the Statue of Liberty, fireworks, military aircraft, and eagles visible in the background.
The controversial social media post emerged during Trump’s intensifying public conflict with Pope Leo, the first pontiff born in America. Leo has condemned the ongoing U.S.-Israeli military campaign against Iran as inhumane. Just before sharing the image, Trump had published a harsh attack on Pope Leo, labeling him “WEAK on crime and terrible for Foreign Policy.”
When confronted by reporters at the White House on Monday, Trump rejected suggestions that the image portrayed him in a Christ-like manner, dismissing such interpretations as “fake news.”
“It’s supposed to be me as a doctor making people better, and I do make people better,” Trump explained to journalists shortly after removing the post.
The incident has created tension between Trump and some of his religious conservative supporters, whose backing proved essential in his 2024 electoral victory. Several prominent Republican figures publicly criticized the image.
Brilyn Hollyhand, who previously served as co-chair of the Republican National Committee Youth Advisory Council, posted on X: “This is gross blasphemy. Faith is not a prop. You don’t need to portray yourself as a savior when your record should speak for itself.”
Riley Gaines, a former competitive swimmer and vocal opponent of transgender participation in women’s athletics who has joined Trump at campaign events, also expressed confusion about the post on X.
“Does he actually think this?” she questioned. “Either way, two things are true. 1) a little humility would serve him well 2) God shall not be mocked.”
Christian voters, including Catholics, represent a crucial segment of Trump’s political coalition. Despite his irregular church attendance, Trump secured overwhelming support from Christian voters in the 2024 election, including Catholics who had previously been more evenly divided politically.
Following Trump’s narrow survival of an assassination attempt in July 2024, some evangelical supporters interpreted the incident as divine intervention.
David Gibson, who directs the Center on Religion and Culture at Fordham University, a Catholic institution, characterized the situation as a critical test for American Catholics.
“Will this move cross a red line for them? Will they finally punish Trump and the GOP and at the ballot box?” Gibson questioned. “This is a watershed moment – will Catholics in America choose the pope or the president?”
Bishop Robert Barron, who sits on a religious liberty commission established by Trump, called the president’s social media statements about Leo “inappropriate” and suggested an apology was warranted, while simultaneously commending Trump’s Catholic outreach efforts.
When asked about apologizing to the pope, Trump told reporters Monday he had “nothing to apologize for.”
In recent weeks, Pope Leo has emerged as one of the most vocal opponents of the Iranian conflict, making an unprecedented direct appeal to Trump to seek an “off-ramp” from the military engagement.
Leo has also stated that Jesus cannot be invoked to justify warfare and that God rejects prayers from those who initiate conflicts. These comments were widely interpreted as criticism of Trump administration officials like Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, who has referenced scripture to defend using “overwhelming violence” against adversaries and compared the rescue of an American airman in Iran to Christ’s resurrection.
This isn’t Trump’s first papal controversy. He previously clashed with Leo’s predecessor, Francis, who publicly criticized Trump’s deportation policies as un-Christian. After Francis’s death last year, Trump shared an AI-generated image depicting himself as pope, which also sparked outrage among Catholics.
However, Gibson noted that Trump’s confrontation with Leo has escalated beyond his previous disputes with Francis.
“American presidents and American Catholics have disagreed with popes in the past,” Gibson observed. “But this is disrespect. Disrespect is way different than disagreement, and that’s the danger for Trump here.”
Trump’s current cabinet includes at least eight Catholic members, among them Vice President JD Vance and Secretary of State Marco Rubio.
NEW YORK (AP) — Federal officials have reversed their decision to remove the rainbow Pride flag from New York’s Stonewall National Monument, announcing Monday they will restore the banner following legal pressure from advocacy groups.
The decision comes as the government works to resolve a lawsuit brought by LGBTQ+ organizations and historic preservation advocates who challenged the flag’s removal in February. The settlement still requires judicial approval.
Court documents show the Interior Department and National Park Service “have confirmed their intention to maintain a Pride flag at Stonewall.” The flag will remain in place permanently, only coming down for “maintenance or other practical purposes.”
The settlement requires the Park Service to install three flags within one week on the monument’s flagpole, each measuring three by five feet. The Pride banner will be positioned between the American flag and the Park Service flag.
The rainbow flag had become a source of controversy regarding President Donald Trump’s handling of the Stonewall site — the nation’s first national monument dedicated to LGBTQ+ history — along with other historic properties.
Following years of activist campaigns pushing for daily display of the LGBTQ+ pride symbol at the park service location, officials formally installed the flag in 2022 under Democratic President Joe Biden’s administration.
Park service officials in New York described the display at that time as demonstrating the government’s dedication to “telling the complex and diverse histories of all Americans.”
However, the agency took down the flag in February, citing adherence to federal guidelines governing flag displays. A January 21 park service directive primarily limits the agency to showing U.S., Department of the Interior and POW/MIA flags, though exceptions exist for providing “historical context.”
The park service maintained that the monument “remains committed to preserving and interpreting the history and significance of this site” through various displays and educational programs. LGBTQ+ advocates, however, viewed the flag’s removal as a deliberate insult designed to undermine a location central to their struggle for rights and recognition.
Supporters and several New York Democratic officials quickly appeared with another rainbow flag and — following tense moments when the politicians initially seemed willing to place it on a separate, lower pole — hoisted it alongside the U.S. flag that park service had erected.
Democratic President Barack Obama established the Stonewall monument in 2016. The memorial focuses on a small park situated across from the Stonewall Inn, the gay establishment where a 1969 police raid triggered an uprising that helped launch the contemporary LGBTQ+ rights movement.
Following Trump’s return to office as a Republican last year, he has targeted diversity, equity and inclusion programs and protections for transgender individuals. As one result of his policies, numerous references to transgender people were eliminated from the monument’s website and educational materials.
Trump’s administration has similarly scrutinized national parks, museums and landmarks for messaging, working to remove or modify materials the government considers “divisive or partisan” or that “inappropriately disparage Americans.”
WASHINGTON — A fresh White House economic analysis released Monday reveals America faces a deficit of 10 million homes, with economists proposing regulatory reductions as the key to spurring more construction, stabilizing costs, boosting homeownership, and accelerating economic expansion.
The findings, included in the Economic Report of the President, present both political challenges and messaging opportunities for President Donald Trump, whose approval ratings have declined amid concerns over tariff policies, the Iran conflict, and unmet promises to reduce inflation and strengthen economic growth.
While Trump issued two executive orders in March instructing federal departments to ease housing regulatory barriers and simplify mortgage lending for smaller banks, he has moved slowly on additional measures that would demonstrate housing affordability as an administration priority.
For months, the White House has attempted to emphasize housing and affordability concerns in preparation for what many anticipate will be a difficult midterm election cycle for Republicans, though international crises have repeatedly disrupted this focus. A January World Economic Forum speech in Davos, Switzerland, originally planned to highlight housing policy, instead became dominated by Trump’s Greenland acquisition dispute.
Additionally, the Iran conflict has increased homebuying costs, with 30-year mortgage rates climbing from below 6% to 6.37%.
Trump has also expressed support for maintaining elevated home values to protect current homeowners’ investments. “I don’t want to drive housing prices down,” Trump told his Cabinet earlier this year. “I want to drive housing prices up for people that own their homes, and they can be assured that’s what’s going to happen.”
The housing section of the annual economic assessment, acquired by The Associated Press prior to publication, establishes a framework showing how increased home construction would benefit middle-class families and the broader economy, providing Trump with potential voter messaging.
Compiled by White House Council of Economic Advisers personnel, the report determines the nation would have 10 million additional homes if “homebuilding and the growth of the single-family housing stock had continued at their historical pace instead of falling dramatically” following the 2008 global financial crisis. That crisis stemmed primarily from widespread housing market defaults, where prices had been inflated by questionable lending practices.
The study highlights that home values have increased 82% since 2000, while wages have grown only 12% — a disparity previously hidden by historically low mortgage rates. However, when rates surged with post-pandemic inflation, monthly mortgage payments also increased for buyers, making homeownership — a traditional middle-class milestone — a primary concern for voters under 40.
The White House contends that March’s executive orders, combined with plans to acquire mortgage-backed securities, demonstrate the president’s commitment to housing issues.
The report identifies various home construction regulations, termed “the bureaucrat tax,” as adding over $100,000 to building expenses. These costs encompass recent building code modifications, compliance requirements, and zoning approval charges, among other expenditures.
According to the report’s calculations, reducing these regulatory expenses could stimulate construction of up to 13.2 million homes. This development could contribute an average of 1.3 percentage points to annual economic growth over the coming decade and support 2 million manufacturing and construction positions.
Trump might consider making federal funding to state and local governments dependent on regulatory reduction, according to an administration official who requested anonymity to discuss the unreleased report.
The analysis also criticizes green energy housing requirements implemented during the Biden administration as contributing to increased construction expenses. Those measures favored more efficient air conditioning systems and water heaters, along with enhanced ductwork standards.
However, eliminating some requirements could raise other long-term homeowner expenses, including utility costs.
The report references a 2021 National Association of Home Builders study indicating the standards could increase new home prices by up to $31,000, while homebuyers might need as long as 90 years “to realize a payback on the added cost of the home.”
The potential savings from reversing Biden-era housing standards remains uncertain due to ongoing legal challenges regarding enforcement and varying state practices. In March, a Texas federal judge sided with 15 Republican-led states arguing that federally backed housing standards were unlawful.
WASHINGTON — A newly released White House economic analysis reveals America faces a deficit of 10 million homes, with economists proposing regulatory reductions as a pathway to increase construction and address affordability concerns affecting families nationwide.
Released Monday as part of the Economic Report of the President, the study presents both challenges and opportunities for President Donald Trump’s administration as it grapples with public concerns over economic policies and housing costs.
In March, Trump issued two executive directives aimed at reducing federal housing regulations and expanding mortgage access through smaller financial institutions, though critics say additional action is needed to demonstrate the administration’s commitment to tackling housing affordability.
The administration has attempted to prioritize housing and cost-of-living issues in preparation for upcoming midterm elections, but international crises have repeatedly diverted attention. A January housing-focused address at the World Economic Forum in Switzerland was overshadowed by Trump’s Greenland acquisition discussions.
Additionally, ongoing conflict with Iran has pushed mortgage rates higher, with 30-year loan rates climbing from below 6% to 6.37%, further straining homebuyers.
Trump has previously expressed reluctance to lower home values, stating to his Cabinet: “I don’t want to drive housing prices down. I want to drive housing prices up for people that own their homes, and they can be assured that’s what’s going to happen.”
The housing analysis, compiled by White House Council of Economic Advisers staff and obtained by The Associated Press, establishes a framework for how increased construction could benefit middle-class Americans and strengthen economic growth.
Researchers determined the housing shortage exists because “homebuilding and the growth of the single-family housing stock had continued at their historical pace instead of falling dramatically” following the 2008 financial crisis. That economic collapse stemmed largely from housing market failures and risky lending practices.
The report highlights a stark economic reality: home values have surged 82% since 2000 while household incomes grew only 12%. This disparity was temporarily offset by record-low interest rates, but post-pandemic inflation drove borrowing costs higher, making homeownership increasingly difficult for Americans under 40.
According to the White House, March’s executive orders and plans to purchase mortgage-backed securities demonstrate presidential focus on housing challenges.
The analysis identifies what it terms “the bureaucrat tax” — regulatory expenses adding over $100,000 to construction costs through updated building codes, compliance requirements, and zoning approval processes.
Reducing these regulatory barriers could potentially generate 13.2 million new homes, boost annual economic growth by 1.3 percentage points over ten years, and create 2 million manufacturing and construction positions, according to administration projections.
One administration official, speaking anonymously about the unreleased report, suggested Trump might tie federal funding for state and local governments to regulatory reform requirements.
The document also criticizes energy efficiency standards implemented under the Biden administration, arguing these requirements for improved air conditioning, water heating systems, and related infrastructure increase building expenses.
However, eliminating such standards could raise long-term homeowner costs through higher utility expenses.
Citing a 2021 National Association of Home Builders study, the report claims these efficiency standards add up to $31,000 to new home prices, requiring up to 90 years for buyers “to realize a payback on the added cost of the home.”
The potential savings from reversing Biden-era housing standards remains uncertain due to ongoing legal disputes and varying state implementation practices. In March, a Texas federal judge sided with 15 Republican-led states challenging the legality of federally-backed housing standards.
A federal judge has thrown out former President Donald Trump’s massive $10 billion legal action against the Wall Street Journal regarding the publication’s coverage of Jeffrey Epstein matters.
The court ruling, handed down on Monday, determined that Trump’s legal team could not successfully demonstrate that the Wall Street Journal published their report with malicious intentions. The disputed article focused on correspondence to Epstein that the publication claimed contained Trump’s signature.
According to the judge’s written decision, the former president’s attorneys were unable to establish that the newspaper’s story about the letter was created or distributed with deliberate harmful intent, which is a crucial legal standard required for such defamation cases.
The lawsuit represented one of Trump’s efforts to challenge media coverage through the court system, seeking substantial financial damages from the prominent business publication owned by News Corp.
A Florida federal court has thrown out President Donald Trump’s massive $10 billion defamation case against the Wall Street Journal and media mogul Rupert Murdoch over the newspaper’s coverage of his connection to Jeffrey Epstein.
In his Monday ruling, U.S. District Judge Darrin P. Gayles determined that Trump’s legal team had not successfully demonstrated that the publication acted with malicious intent when reporting the story. However, the judge has allowed Trump the opportunity to submit a revised complaint.
The legal action was initiated by Trump in July, stemming from a Wall Street Journal piece that highlighted his documented association with Epstein. The article featured details about a provocative letter allegedly bearing Trump’s signature that was part of a commemorative album created for Epstein’s 50th birthday celebration in 2003.
Congressional investigators later made the letter public after obtaining it through a subpoena of Epstein’s estate records. Trump has firmly rejected claims he authored the correspondence, describing the newspaper’s reporting as “false, malicious, and defamatory.”
Legal representatives for the publication and Murdoch had requested that Judge Gayles declare the article’s claims factually accurate, which would eliminate any basis for defamation. The judge declined this approach, stating that “whether President Trump was the author of the Letter or Epstein’s friend are questions of fact that cannot be determined at this stage of the litigation.”
This court decision represents another setback for the Trump administration as it continues dealing with consequences from the public release of Epstein-related documents and the president’s pattern of pursuing legal action against news organizations whose coverage he considers unfavorable.
Representatives from both the White House and Dow Jones, the Wall Street Journal’s parent company, have not yet provided responses to requests for comment on the ruling.
NEW YORK (AP) — Throughout American history, presidents have traditionally steered clear of any appearance that they might financially benefit from their position in office.
Former President Harry Truman declined to attach his name to any commercial ventures, even after leaving the White House. Richard Nixon grew so concerned about potential conflicts involving his brother that he authorized surveillance of his phone calls. George W. Bush sold off his individual stock portfolio before assuming the presidency.
President Donald Trump has chosen a markedly different path.
The Trump family’s real estate empire is experiencing its most rapid international growth since the company’s establishment 100 years ago, with each new venture potentially influencing decisions on trade policies and military assistance.
Under the leadership of Eric Trump and Donald Trump Jr., the family enterprise has ventured into digital currencies through projects that generated billions in revenue while raising concerns about whether major investors received preferential government treatment.
The Trump sons have also acquired interests in multiple companies seeking government contracts with the administration their father leads. Recently, they secured ownership positions worth millions in a military drone manufacturer pursuing Pentagon contracts and deals with Gulf nations under Iranian threat who rely on U.S. military protection led by their father.
Both the White House and Trump Organization reject claims of ethical violations. When questioned about these issues at a recent cryptocurrency conference, Donald Jr. responded, “Frankly, it’s gotten old.”
While conflict of interest concerns date back to Trump’s initial presidential campaign a decade ago, ethics specialists and historians contend the situation has become more urgent as conflicts accumulate during his second presidency, which they describe as unprecedented, flagrant and threatening to democratic principles.
“I don’t think there’s any line right now between policy decisions and political calculations and the interest of the Trump family,” said Julian Zelizer, a presidential historian at Princeton University.
During Trump’s initial presidency, the Trump Organization completed no international deals. Within just over a year of his return to office, the company has finalized eight such agreements, all reportedly adhering to the organization’s self-imposed guideline against direct business with foreign governments.
However, governments in authoritarian and single-party nations typically maintain significant control over business activities — particularly when those businesses belong to a sitting president.
In Qatar, a Trump golf facility and residential project involves development by a company with Qatari government ownership. In Vietnam, where The New York Times documented government displacement of farmers to accommodate a Trump resort, the nation’s deputy prime minister formally endorsed the project at a signing ceremony. In Saudi Arabia, a proposed “Trump Plaza” resort along the Red Sea coast is being constructed by a Saudi developer with close royal family connections.
While determining whether these deals influenced U.S. policy changes favoring these nations remains nearly impossible, each country achieved its desired outcomes — Qatar gained access to advanced American technology, Vietnam received tariff reductions, and Saudi Arabia obtained fighter aircraft.
The Trump Organization also benefited significantly: tens of millions in licensing fees.
When asked about these projects, the Trump Organization stated it has avoided government deals, emphasizing that the Saudi partner operates privately and clarifying it is “collaborating” rather than forming a “partnership” with the Qatari entity that would violate its self-imposed restrictions.
Another potentially conflicting arrangement first emerged in a Wall Street Journal report in January — one year after the deal’s completion.
Just before inauguration, the Trump family sold nearly half of its World Liberty Financial cryptocurrency venture to a UAE government-connected firm managed by a UAE royal family member for $500 million.
A separate UAE entity, a government investment fund, placed $2 billion worth of a digital currency called a stablecoin into the offshore cryptocurrency exchange Binance through World Liberty. This arrangement allowed the Trump company receiving the funds to invest in secure options like bonds or money market accounts while retaining tens of millions in interest earnings.
Soon afterward, the Trump administration lifted a Biden-era limitation and authorized UAE access to advanced American semiconductors. Binance founder Changpeng Zhao subsequently received a Trump pardon despite pleading guilty to failing to prevent criminals from using his platform for money transfers related to child exploitation, drug trafficking and terrorism.
Zhao’s attorney denied any connection between Binance’s Trump family business relationship and the presidential pardon.
“Any claim of a quid pro quo by Binance or CZ, or preferential financial treatment by Binance, is a clear misstatement of the public record,” said Teresa Goody Guillen in an email to the AP, referring to Zhao by his initials.
Regarding the pardon, the White House stated federal authorities had unjustly penalized Zhao in what it termed “The Biden Administration’s war on crypto.”
World Liberty rejected conflict suggestions, asserting the UAE agreement had no relationship to presidential semiconductor policy.
World Liberty has also generated additional revenue for a new Trump limited liability company through “governance token” sales that provide buyers certain voting privileges in its operations, though not ownership shares, raising $2 billion last year. This translates to hundreds of millions for the Trumps through their World Liberty stake and a separate arrangement granting them a portion of sales proceeds.
One major token purchaser was Justin Sun, a cryptocurrency billionaire who, as a foreign national, faces U.S. legal prohibitions on political donations to American politicians. Between Trump’s election victory and inauguration, Sun invested $75 million in the tokens.
In February of last year, a federal lawsuit accusing Sun of investor fraud was suspended before reaching a $10 million settlement last month.
Additionally, commemorative “meme” coins featuring Trump’s image went on sale days before he assumed office last year.
Over the following four months, these coins generated $320 million, primarily benefiting Trump-related entities, according to blockchain tracker Chainalysis. This amount exceeds double the revenue collected during four years of operating his Washington D.C. hotel during Trump’s first presidency.
Unlike lobbyists or campaign contributors attempting to influence Trump, coin purchasers can buy anonymously. One who chose to publicize his purchase was Sun, who spent $200 million on the coins and gained Trump access at a gala event he hosted for major buyers.
Another family cryptocurrency venture, American Bitcoin, went public in September, providing Donald Jr. and Eric approximately $1 billion in paper wealth at that time. Months earlier, their father announced a new national bitcoin reserve, driving cryptocurrency prices to record levels.
Trump businesses aren’t entirely protected from crypto’s infamous volatility. Bitcoin and other digital token values have since plummeted, unsettling investors. Both American Bitcoin stock and Trump’s commemorative meme coins have dropped 90% from their peaks.
Last month, Trump announced another dinner with new top meme coin holders, temporarily boosting the coin before it declined again.
“Whatever constraints there were in the first term appear to have completely disappeared,” says Columbia University historian Timothy Naftali. “Do you want future presidents to be open to the highest bidder?”
When asked to comment, the White House said Trump operates in an “ethically-sound manner” and that any contrary suggestions are either “ill-informed or malicious.” It emphasized that his assets are managed by a trust overseen by his children and stated he has “no involvement” in family business transactions.
“There are no conflicts of interest,” said spokesperson Anna Kelly.
In a separate statement, the Trump Organization said it remains “fully compliant with all applicable ethics and conflicts of interest laws” and added, “The implication that politics has enriched the Trump family is unfounded.”
Trump told The New York Times in January that regarding potential conflicts of interest, “I found out that nobody cared, and I’m allowed to,” referencing a presidential exemption from federal statutes prohibiting federal officials from maintaining financial interests in businesses affected by policies they help create.
His assessment of American attitudes may be accurate, though they appear to be shifting even among Republicans. A Pew Research Center poll in January showed 42% of Republican voters expressed confidence in Trump’s ethical conduct in office, declining from 55% at the beginning of his second term one year ago.
Forbes estimates Trump’s current net worth at $6.3 billion, rising 60% since returning to office, a remarkable development considering the Trump Organization’s previous struggles.
The Trump International Hotel in Washington never achieved profitability before being sold. Two Trump hotel brands targeting middle-class travelers during his first presidency closed due to insufficient demand. Condominium buildings removed the Trump name from their exteriors after discovering it deterred rather than attracted buyers.
No new American condominiums are displaying the Trump name during his second presidency, but his brand holds value in Washington where individuals conduct federal government business.
Donald Jr. launched a private club in Georgetown, Washington, charging initiation fees up to $500,000 for founding members.
One of the few clubs with comparable fees, Montana’s Yellowstone Club, provides access to multiple resorts, 50 ski slopes and over a dozen restaurants across a members-only area matching Manhattan’s size.
Donald Jr.’s club operates from a building’s basement but offers something different — proximity to political power.
The club’s name is “Executive Branch.”
Other presidents and their families have pursued profit in ways that tarnished the office’s dignity.
Hunter Biden received payment as a Ukrainian gas company director while his father served as vice president. The Clinton Foundation accepted foreign donations, though after Bill Clinton left office. Jimmy Carter’s brother Billy capitalized on the family name by marketing beer.
In Trump’s situation, the president himself markets merchandise, including $59.99 “God Bless the USA” Bibles, $399 sneakers marked “Never Surrender” and electric guitars priced up to $11,500 — shipping excluded — for presidential autographed models.
During the initial months of Trump’s second year back in the White House, this momentum continues.
In January, the Trump Organization announced its third Saudi Arabian deal in under a year, this time a “collaboration” with a company more directly connected to the government through ownership by the country’s sovereign wealth fund chaired by Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman. When the AP asked whether the project outside Riyadh for Trump residences, a hotel and golf course violated the company’s commitment to avoid foreign government deals, the Trump Organization said it doesn’t “conduct business with any government entity” but didn’t address the project specifically.
Meanwhile, as the two eldest brothers’ new drone company pursues Pentagon contracts, other government contractors in which one or both have acquired ownership stakes this past year are receiving tens of millions in new taxpayer funding. This includes a rocket motor manufacturer, an AI chip supplier and a data analytics company, according to government contracting records.
When asked about potential conflicts following the drone deal announcement, Eric said, “I am incredibly proud to invest in companies I believe in.” A Donald Jr. spokesman said he doesn’t “interface” with the government regarding portfolio companies, adding that “the idea that he should cease living his life and making a living to provide for his five kids just because his dad is president, is quite frankly, a laughable and ridiculous standard.”
A new investment firm that the brothers joined as advisers last year has raised $345 million in an initial public offering to acquire stakes in American companies designed to support their father’s manufacturing revival goals. After the AP inquired about Trump’s chief business lawyer regarding language in a regulatory filing stating the firm would target companies seeking federal grants, tax credits and government contracts, he submitted a new document with that language deleted.
Zelizer, the Princeton historian, expects future presidents will demonstrate greater restraint in self-enrichment but worries about Trump’s message.
“He has shown politically there is no price to be paid to making money,” he said. “You know you can go there.”
The federal government under the Trump administration is making a push to assume control of three historic public golf courses located in the nation’s capital, creating uncertainty about the future management of these recreational facilities.
The administration is currently engaged in a legal battle to wrest control of the golf courses away from the National Links Trust, which currently oversees operations at the Washington, D.C. properties.
The outcome of this federal takeover attempt could significantly impact public access to these longstanding recreational venues in the District of Columbia.
LOS ANGELES — The California governor’s race was thrown into upheaval this weekend when Democratic Congressman Eric Swalwell withdrew his candidacy following published reports of sexual assault allegations, prompting his competitors to immediately pursue his former base of support in an already packed primary field.
Swalwell announced the suspension of his gubernatorial campaign on Sunday, just days after the San Francisco Chronicle and CNN published accounts from a woman alleging he sexually assaulted her on two separate occasions, including once while she was employed by him. Despite ending his campaign, the congressman remained combative in a statement posted to social media platform X, declaring, “I will fight the serious, false allegations that have been made — but that’s my fight, not a campaign’s.”
The congressman’s withdrawal immediately sparked a scramble among remaining candidates to capture his supporters in what political observers describe as a wide-open contest with no dominant frontrunner. Mail-in ballots are set to be distributed to voters in early May ahead of the June 2 primary.
Fellow Democrat Katie Porter, considered among the race’s leading contenders, shared a San Francisco Chronicle opinion piece on social media stating, “Democrats can pull victory from the jaws of defeat by coalescing around Porter.” Meanwhile, billionaire activist Tom Steyer announced he had gained the endorsement of Bay Area Representative Jared Huffman.
The primary ballot features seven established Democratic candidates and two prominent Republicans among more than 50 total contenders. Although Swalwell has ended his campaign, election rules prevent removing his name from the ballot.
“Nobody has really caught fire,” observed Democratic strategist Andrew Acosta, who is not affiliated with any campaign. He predicted Swalwell’s supporters “will scatter out to other candidates.”
Swalwell gained national recognition as a House manager during former President Donald Trump’s second impeachment proceedings in early 2021. However, in a media landscape dominated by Trump coverage, the California governor’s race has struggled to capture widespread voter attention.
Following the sexual misconduct allegations becoming public, “I think there are probably more people who know who Eric Swalwell is than can articulate a Tom Steyer position paper,” Acosta noted.
Political analysts had ranked Swalwell among the top contenders alongside Democrats Steyer and Porter, plus Republicans Riverside County Sheriff Chad Bianco and conservative commentator Steve Hilton.
The dramatic turn of events represents a stunning 48-hour collapse for a candidate who had appeared to be building momentum in the race to succeed outgoing Governor Gavin Newsom, who cannot seek a third term under state law.
While Swalwell has denied the allegations, his public statements have appeared to acknowledge personal misconduct. “To my family, staff, friends, and supporters, I am deeply sorry for mistakes in judgment I’ve made in my past,” he wrote. This followed a Friday video message in which he apologized to his wife.
The allegations have reshuffled a gubernatorial contest that already had Democrats concerned about their numerous candidates potentially splitting the vote and being shut out of November’s general election. California’s top-two primary system advances the two highest vote-getters to the general election regardless of party affiliation.
Swalwell had emerged as a target for Democratic rivals as he secured key institutional endorsements. Some opponents had begun referencing unsubstantiated social media rumors about sexual misconduct weeks before the Chronicle’s investigation.
According to the San Francisco Chronicle’s reporting, a woman alleged Swalwell sexually assaulted her in 2019 while she worked for him, and again in 2024. The woman told reporters she did not contact police following either incident because she feared not being believed. She stated she was too intoxicated to provide consent in both instances. CNN published similar allegations that appeared to involve the same accuser, and interviewed additional women who described other instances of alleged sexual misconduct by Swalwell.
Both news organizations protected the woman’s identity, and The Associated Press has been unable to independently confirm her account or identity. Her attorney declined to provide comment.
The alleged 2024 incident reportedly occurred in New York, and the Manhattan District Attorney’s Office confirmed it is conducting an investigation. Prosecutors have encouraged anyone with relevant information to contact their special victims unit.
As Swalwell’s campaign crumbled over the weekend, several California colleagues called for his resignation from Congress, including Representatives Jared Huffman, Ro Khanna, and Sam Liccardo. They were joined by Representatives Teresa Leger Fernández of New Mexico and Pramila Jayapal of Washington state.
“This is not a partisan issue,” Jayapal stated Sunday. “This cuts across party lines. And it is depravity of the way that women have been treated.”
Several lawmakers indicated they would support the extraordinary measure of expelling Swalwell from the House if he refuses to resign voluntarily.
The mounting pressure began when key allies including Senator Adam Schiff and Representative Jimmy Gomez withdrew their support. Gomez, who had been helping manage Swalwell’s campaign, announced he was immediately ending his involvement.
With Congress returning to session Tuesday, the question of potential expulsion could advance rapidly. Representative Anna Paulina Luna, a Florida Republican, announced Saturday she would file a motion to begin the expulsion process.
House expulsions require a two-thirds majority and are extremely rare, but recent precedent exists. Republican George Santos of New York became just the sixth House member in history expelled by colleagues in 2023 due to his conduct.
Representatives Huffman, Jayapal, and Leger Fernández stated they would vote to expel Swalwell, though they also support expelling Representative Tony Gonzales, a Texas Republican who admitted to an affair with a former staff member who later died by suicide.
Swalwell, originally from Iowa, won election in 2012 and represents a House district east of San Francisco. He launched a brief presidential campaign in April 2019 but ended it months later after failing to gain traction with voters.
WASHINGTON — A weekend election outcome in Hungary is creating major political waves across the United States, as the electoral defeat of Prime Minister Viktor Orbán delivers a significant blow to Donald Trump and his conservative allies.
Trump and numerous American right-wing figures have long championed Orbán, viewing him as a leading figure in the global conservative movement due to his hardline immigration policies. Trump’s political approach mirrors many of Orbán’s tactics for manipulating government institutions, including the press, courts, and voting systems, to maintain his party’s 16-year grip on power.
The former president actively endorsed Orbán’s campaign for reelection and sent Vice President JD Vance to the Hungarian capital just last week to rally support for the embattled leader during the ongoing Iran conflict.
The Hungarian leader’s electoral loss highlights how the current war has weakened Trump’s influence in supporting international political allies, while also demonstrating the challenges leaders face when trying to manipulate democratic processes amid global anti-incumbent sentiment.
“Oppositions can win despite a tilted playing field,” stated Steven Levitsky, a Harvard political science professor who co-wrote “How Democracies Die.” “Democracies are facing many challenges in many parts of the world, but so are autocracies.”
Orbán’s downfall carries immediate worldwide consequences, given his position as Europe’s leader most aligned with Russian President Vladimir Putin and his role in obstructing European Union assistance to Ukraine following Russia’s 2022 military invasion.
Both Democratic and Republican politicians celebrated his defeat on Sunday, with some GOP members criticizing their own party’s administration for so openly backing the Hungarian politician.
“Don’t fiddle-paddle in other democracies’ elections,” Nebraska Republican Representative Don Bacon wrote on social media platform X.
Mississippi Republican Senator Roger Wicker posted: “The freedom-loving people of Hungary have voted decisively in favor of democracy and the rule of law.”
Matt Schlapp, who leads the American Conservative Union, represents the segment of the American right that has embraced Orbán’s leadership style. His organization’s Conservative Political Action Conference hosted its inaugural European gathering in Budapest and regularly features Hungary as a destination.
Orbán delivered a keynote address at the group’s 2022 Dallas conference.
Schlapp offered a straightforward analysis of Orbán’s electoral defeat.
“Eventually, democracies just want change,” he explained. “In democracies, you don’t have kings, and the people in the end speak.”
“The people of Hungary were saying, ‘We’re having a difficult time with inflation, the economy and the war. Let’s try the new guy,’” Schlapp added, while noting his support for Trump’s Iran war policies despite the chaos it has generated, particularly affecting European energy markets and hurting Orbán politically.
Diana Sosoaca, a far-right European Parliament member from Romania, criticized Vance’s Budapest trip on Sunday as “a big mistake” due to widespread European opposition to the Iran conflict.
“You invite a representative of the United States of America, who created the big disorder in this world?” Sosoaca questioned during an interview broadcast on RT, the Kremlin-controlled media outlet. “It was the biggest mistake he could do before the elections.”
Originally an anti-communist activist, Orbán first won the prime minister’s office in 1998 but shifted toward right-wing politics after losing power in 2002. When he regained control in 2010, Orbán and his Fidesz party implemented a comprehensive legal strategy to consolidate power that they had developed during their time in opposition.
Orbán promoted what he called “illiberal democracy,” constructing a wall along Hungary’s southern frontier to prevent African and Asian migrants from traveling through Europe. His administration restricted LGBTQ+ rights, suppressed press freedoms, and weakened judicial independence.
Orbán solidified his control when Fidesz secured enough parliamentary seats during the 2010 economic crisis to completely rewrite Hungary’s constitution. The party restructured the court system to channel judicial appointments through party supporters, redrew voting districts to protect Fidesz candidates from electoral challenges, and facilitated the sale of Hungarian media outlets to business leaders loyal to Orbán.
The European Union has officially classified Hungary as an “electoral autocracy.”
Orbán’s supporters have dismissed claims that the Hungarian leader threatens democratic institutions, and he promptly acknowledged his electoral loss on Sunday. Democrats express concern that Trump may attempt to use presidential powers to influence November’s midterm elections or the 2028 presidential race, similar to his efforts to reverse Democrat Joe Biden’s 2020 presidential victory.
“Most importantly for American voters, even a guy who rigs the system can be defeated when the people unite and turn out against him,” commented Ian Bassin from Protect Democracy, a nonpartisan organization focused on combating authoritarian threats.
California Democratic Representative Ro Khanna used the opportunity to challenge Vance directly: “Your ally Orban conceded. In 2028, will you @JDVance follow suit if you lose?” he posted on X.
Levitsky cautioned that democracy advocates shouldn’t draw excessive encouragement from Orbán’s defeat, pointing out that Trump has employed more severe authoritarian tactics. He referenced Trump’s use of the Justice Department to target political enemies and the fatal shootings of demonstrators by immigration enforcement — actions that Orbán’s administration never pursued, according to Levitsky.
However, Maryland Democratic Senator Chris Van Hollen identified similarities between Trump’s and Orbán’s political strategies, as well as their potential electoral consequences.
“He was essentially doing what Donald Trump is trying to do here in the United States,” Van Hollen said regarding Orbán. “My read of the election is that the people of Hungary rejected that, just like people in the United States are rejecting that here at home.”
Trump remained silent about the Hungarian election results on Sunday.
Democratic politicians nationwide are celebrating after Hungarian voters ousted Prime Minister Viktor Orban, a close ally of President Donald Trump who had held power for 16 years.
The Hungarian election saw record turnout as citizens chose center-right opposition leader Peter Magyar, who campaigned on a pro-European Union platform, over the Trump-endorsed incumbent.
Trump had shown strong support for Orban before the election, even making a brief appearance at a Hungarian campaign event last week when Vice President JD Vance called him during a rally appearance.
Democratic leadership wasted no time connecting Orban’s loss to American politics and the upcoming November midterm elections.
“Pay attention, Donald Trump. Wannabe dictators wear out their welcome,” declared Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer.
House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries also drew parallels to American politics, stating: “Far-right authoritarian Viktor Orban has lost the election. Trump sycophants and MAGA extremists in Congress are up next in November.”
Republican reactions were more nuanced, with some GOP lawmakers like Mississippi Senator Roger Wicker, who leads the Senate Armed Services Committee, interpreting the results as Hungarian voters rejecting “the malign influence of Vladimir Putin” and choosing to “decide their own future.” Orban had maintained close relationships with the Russian leader throughout his tenure.
While Trump remained silent about the Hungarian results despite his active social media presence and public appearances Sunday, some of his supporters expressed disappointment.
Tech billionaire Elon Musk posted on his X platform: “Soros Organization has taken over Hungary,” referencing Democratic megadonor George Soros, a Hungarian-born American businessman frequently criticized by conservative figures.
Throughout his time in office, Orban had frequently clashed with European Union leadership on multiple fronts, including Hungary’s stance on Russia’s conflict with Ukraine.
The defeated Hungarian leader had promoted what he called “illiberal democracy,” implementing policies similar to Trump’s agenda, such as strict immigration restrictions, opposition to international organizations, and criticism of media outlets and academic institutions.
Orban made history as the first European head of government to support Trump’s 2016 presidential campaign.
Just last week, Trump had promised his administration would be prepared “to use the full economic might of the United States to strengthen Hungary’s economy” if Orban secured victory in the election.
Lawmakers from both major political parties extended congratulations to Magyar following his electoral success.
WASHINGTON — In an unprecedented public confrontation, President Donald Trump launched a scathing attack on Pope Leo XIV Sunday evening, declaring the first American pontiff isn’t “doing a very good job” and characterizing him as “a very liberal person” who should “stop catering to the Radical Left.”
The president’s harsh criticism came during his return flight from Florida to Washington, where he posted a lengthy social media message targeting the Pope, then continued his verbal assault while speaking with reporters on the airport tarmac.
“I’m not a fan of Pope Leo,” Trump told journalists.
The verbal confrontation erupted after Pope Leo XIV suggested during the weekend that a “delusion of omnipotence” was driving the ongoing U.S.-Israel military conflict in Iran. Though disagreements between papal leaders and American presidents aren’t uncommon, direct papal criticism of U.S. leadership is extraordinarily rare — making Trump’s fierce rebuttal equally unprecedented.
“Pope Leo is WEAK on Crime, and terrible for Foreign Policy,” Trump declared in his social media statement, continuing, “I don’t want a Pope who thinks it’s OK for Iran to have a Nuclear Weapon.”
Speaking to reporters, he reiterated his position: “We don’t like a pope who says it’s OK to have a nuclear weapon.”
The pontiff had conducted an evening prayer ceremony Saturday at St. Peter’s Basilica, coinciding with the start of direct U.S.-Iran diplomatic talks in Pakistan amid a temporary ceasefire. Though Pope Leo XIV avoided naming Trump or America specifically, his remarks and tone seemed clearly aimed at the president and administration officials who have celebrated American military dominance and framed the conflict in religious language.
Pope Leo XIV, who begins an 11-day African tour Monday, has previously stated that God “does not listen to the prayers of those who wage war, but rejects them.” He has also quoted Old Testament scripture from Isaiah, declaring that “even though you make many prayers, I will not listen — your hands are full of blood.”
Prior to the current ceasefire, when Trump threatened massive strikes on Iranian power infrastructure and warned that “an entire civilization will die tonight,” the Pope condemned such language as “truly unacceptable.”
Trump’s Sunday evening social media response expanded well beyond the Iranian conflict in attacking Pope Leo XIV.
“I don’t want a Pope who thinks it’s terrible that America attacked Venezuela, a Country that was sending massive amounts of Drugs into the United States,” the president wrote.
“I don’t want a Pope who criticizes the President of the United States because I’m doing exactly what I was elected, IN A LANDSLIDE, to do,” Trump added, referring to his 2024 electoral victory.
Trump also insinuated in his post that the Pope received his position “because he was an American, and they thought that would be the best way to deal with President Donald J. Trump.”
“If I wasn’t in the White House, Leo wouldn’t be in the Vatican,” Trump claimed, adding, “Leo should get his act together as Pope, use Common Sense, stop catering to the Radical Left, and focus on being a Great Pope, not a Politician. It’s hurting him very badly and, more importantly, it’s hurting the Catholic Church!”
During his airport remarks, Trump maintained his critical stance, stating about Pope Leo XIV: “I don’t think he’s doing a very good job. He likes crime I guess,” while describing the pontiff as “a very liberal person.”
The Trump administration has cultivated strong relationships with conservative evangelical Protestant leadership and has asserted divine approval for the Iranian military campaign.
Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth has encouraged Americans to pray for military success “in the name of Jesus Christ.” When questioned about whether God supports the war, Trump responded, “I do, because God is good — because God is good and God wants to see people taken care of.”
Former President Donald Trump launched a harsh verbal assault against Pope Leo on Sunday evening, branding the religious leader as ineffective on crime matters and inadequate in handling foreign policy issues.
The confrontational remarks followed recent criticism from the Pope regarding Trump’s approaches to immigration and international relations.
In a detailed message posted to his Truth Social platform, Trump declared: “Pope Leo is WEAK on Crime and terrible for Foreign Policy.”
The pontiff, recognized for his measured and deliberate communication style, has become a vocal opponent of the ongoing U.S.-Israeli military conflict with Iran that commenced on February 28.
Earlier this month, Pope Leo condemned Trump’s warning to obliterate Iranian civilization as “unacceptable.” Additionally, the religious leader has urged “deep reflection” regarding the treatment of immigrants within the United States during Trump’s presidency.
Trump’s social media post continued with further criticism, stating: “Leo should get his act together as Pope.” When questioned by journalists later, Trump confirmed he was not a “big fan” of the Pope.
The exchange highlights growing tensions between the former president and the Vatican leadership over policy disagreements on multiple international and domestic issues.
NEW YORK (AP) — Marking his first 100 days as New York City’s mayor, Zohran Mamdani gathered supporters Sunday to highlight his administration’s early achievements while unveiling ambitious plans that include launching municipal grocery stores across the city.
Speaking to an enthusiastic audience just days after hitting the milestone, Mamdani reflected on his inaugural promise that “City Hall would hold a singular purpose, to make this city belong to more of its people than it did the day before.”
“For 102 days, we have endeavored to do exactly that,” he said.
Following a review of his administration’s initial successes, the mayor outlined several upcoming initiatives, beginning with progress on a signature campaign commitment: establishing government-operated grocery stores. According to Mamdani, the first location will launch next year, with additional stores planned for each borough before his four-year term concludes.
“At our stores, eggs will be cheaper. Bread will be cheaper. Grocery shopping will no longer be an unsolvable equation,” said Mamdani, a Democrat.
The mayor also revealed plans to broaden the city’s covered waste container program. “Say goodbye to black bags and say hello to the bins,” he declared, committing to implement the system citywide before 2031 ends.
Mamdani also renewed his campaign commitment to improve bus service while eliminating fares, announcing immediate steps to accelerate transit along certain routes. However, the pathway to removing bus costs remains uncertain.
“Tonight, we’re delivering the fast, and we’re excited to keep working with Albany to deliver the free,” he stated, acknowledging the governor and state Legislature’s influence over portions of his agenda.
Prior to the mayor’s remarks, attendees heard from a transportation department employee discussing Mamdani’s pothole repair initiative, a tenant advocate praising his renter-focused policies, and a parent supporting his childcare expansion efforts.
“No longer will city government be afraid of its own shadow,” Mamdani declared upon taking the stage. “If anyone should be afraid it is those who take advantage of working people.”
The 34-year-old mayor assumed office in January following a campaign focused on improving affordability throughout New York City, with his platform emphasizing the use of government resources to support the city’s financially struggling working population.
California Congressman Eric Swalwell announced Sunday that he’s ending his bid for governor while confronting sexual assault accusations.
The Democratic representative took to social media platform X to make the announcement, stating his decision to halt the gubernatorial race.
“I am suspending my campaign for Governor. To my family, staff, friends, and supporters, I am deeply sorry for mistakes in judgment I’ve made in my past. I will fight the serious, false allegations that have been made – but that’s my fight, not a campaign’s,” Swalwell posted.
The congressman indicated he plans to challenge the allegations while keeping that battle separate from his political ambitions.
WASHINGTON — Democratic Congressman Eric Swalwell is facing intense pressure from his own party colleagues to abandon his California gubernatorial bid and step down from Congress following serious sexual assault accusations from a former staff member.
The California representative has firmly rejected the claims, stating they “are absolutely false.” The allegations emerged as Swalwell had gained significant momentum in the race to succeed outgoing Democratic Governor Gavin Newsom.
During the weekend, as Swalwell’s gubernatorial ambitions appeared to crumble, multiple House Democrats began demanding his immediate resignation. Several indicated they would back the extraordinary measure of expelling him if he refuses to leave voluntarily.
Among those calling for his departure are California Representatives Jared Huffman, Ro Khanna, and Sam Liccardo, along with Representatives Teresa Leger Fernández from New Mexico and Pramila Jayapal from Washington state.
“This is not a partisan issue,” Jayapal stated Sunday. “This cuts across party lines. And it is depravity of the way that women have been treated.”
Swalwell’s gubernatorial campaign did not respond to requests for comment from The Associated Press.
The congressman’s political standing continues to deteriorate as high-profile backers, including Senator Adam Schiff and influential labor organizations, have withdrawn their support and demanded he exit the race. Representative Jimmy Gomez of California, who previously helped manage Swalwell’s campaign, announced he was immediately terminating his involvement.
When the House reconvenes Tuesday, the question of Swalwell’s potential expulsion may quickly advance. Florida Republican Representative Anna Paulina Luna announced Saturday her intention to file a motion initiating the expulsion process.
House expulsion votes are uncommon and need a two-thirds majority to succeed, though recent history shows it’s possible. In 2023, Republican George Santos of New York became only the sixth House member ever removed by colleagues for misconduct.
Huffman, Jayapal, and Leger Fernández confirmed they would vote to remove Swalwell from the House, while also supporting expulsion proceedings against Representative Tony Gonzales, a Texas Republican who acknowledged having an affair with a former staff member who subsequently died by suicide.
Florida Republican Representative Byron Donalds, who is pursuing his own gubernatorial campaign, said both Swalwell and Gonzales “need to go home” and pledged to vote for expelling both lawmakers.
Khanna similarly expressed support for congressional action against both representatives.
“So, it depends on if it’s worded in a fair way,” Khanna said. “But this shouldn’t be about politics. Anyone who abuses young girls and staffers should not be in the United States Congress.”
The San Francisco Chronicle published a Friday report detailing accusations that Swalwell sexually assaulted a woman during incidents in 2019 and 2024. The accuser stated she avoided contacting police initially because she feared her claims would be dismissed.
According to the Chronicle’s reporting, the woman was employed by Swalwell when the first alleged assault took place in 2019, while the second incident allegedly happened at a charity gala in 2024. The woman claimed she was too intoxicated to provide consent during both encounters.
The newspaper protected the woman’s identity, and The Associated Press has been unable to independently confirm her account or identity. Her legal representative declined to provide comment.
The alleged 2024 incident took place in New York, and the Manhattan District Attorney’s Office confirmed Saturday it has opened an investigation. The office encouraged anyone with relevant information to contact its special victims division.
Following the publication of the allegations, Swalwell posted a Friday video on social media saying he would spend the weekend with loved ones and provide an update “very soon.” He is not seeking reelection to his House position.
“These allegations of sexual assault are flat false. They’re absolutely false. They did not happen, they have never happened, and I will fight them with everything that I have,” the congressman declared.
Former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, who continues wielding considerable influence in California Democratic politics, said the “serious allegations” require investigation. She revealed she spoke with Swalwell and recommended the investigation occur “outside of a gubernatorial campaign.”
New York Representative Hakeem Jeffries, the House Democratic leader, and his leadership team have also demanded an investigation while calling for Swalwell to terminate his gubernatorial campaign.
Jayapal and Donalds made their comments during appearances on NBC’s “Meet the Press,” while Khanna was interviewed on “Fox News Sunday.”
Former President Donald Trump indicated that putting a recently declared U.S. naval blockade of the Strait of Hormuz into action will require some time to implement, according to comments he made during a Fox News television appearance.
Trump made the remarks while speaking with host Maria Bartiromo on the Sunday morning news program “Sunday Morning Futures” from Miami, Florida on April 12th.
Former President Donald Trump announced on Sunday that American naval forces would begin an immediate blockade of the strategically important Strait of Hormuz waterway.
In a post on his Truth Social platform, Trump declared that the U.S. Navy would also stop and inspect any ships traveling through international waters that have made toll payments to Iran.
The announcement was made through Trump’s social media channel on April 12th.
JACKSON, Miss. — Transparent glass displays at the Lynching Victims Monolith bear the engraved names of over 600 people killed in documented racial murders throughout Mississippi, alongside descriptions of why they were targeted.
Among them was Malcolm Wright, who died in 1949 when attackers beat him to death as his family watched. His crime? “Hogging the road.” Later investigation showed his mule-pulled cart was simply traveling too slowly for his murderers’ liking.
These displays represent just a fraction of the thousands of items and historical pieces housed within the Mississippi Civil Rights Museum and its connected Museum of Mississippi History. Known collectively as the Two Mississippi Museums, this enormous facility within view of the state capitol serves as a cornerstone of Mississippi’s America 250 commemoration.
“That’s just the people that we know about,” said Kiama Johnson, a visitor from Monroe, Louisiana, as she viewed the victim displays while wiping away tears. “Just imagine the ones that we don’t. Imagine the ones that’s never going to be written in history books.”
Mississippi’s complete and unvarnished presentation of its past for the nation’s 250th anniversary celebration stands in sharp opposition to developments at the federal level since President Donald Trump’s return to office in January 2025.
Softening the harsh realities of America’s sometimes violent history has become a key focus of Trump’s administration. On his first day back in office, he issued an executive order dismantling diversity, equity and inclusion programs across federal agencies. This action, combined with a March 2025 executive order titled “Restoring Truth and Sanity to American History,” has resulted in modified signage at federal parks, altered or removed exhibits, and renamed military installations.
The Republican administration’s America 250 preparations have included pressuring federal institutions like the Smithsonian to present historical narratives that downplay discrimination and racial violence.
In Mississippi, a special exhibition called Mississippi Made was developed specifically for the anniversary celebration, occupying a rotating gallery space designed to encourage repeat visits. However, this showcase of achievements sits within a complex where success stories are woven together with the state’s troubling history involving Native Americans, enslaved individuals, and the Civil Rights struggle.
Nan Prince, who oversees collections for the Mississippi Department of Archives & History, explained that the guidance was straightforward from academics, elected officials, staff, and community and civil rights organizations during the museums’ planning and construction phases.
“Don’t brush over anything, don’t whitewash anything,” she recalled. “Just tell the absolute truth.”
Jackson Mayor John Horhn served as a state senator when he began advocating for the Civil Rights Museum in 1999. His initiative gained momentum when Haley Barbour, former Republican National Committee chairman, assumed the governor’s office.
Museum plans eventually merged with separate efforts to relocate the state history museum from the Capitol area, with both facilities opening together in 2017.
The philosophy for developing the state history museum remained consistent — present the complete narrative, starting with the forced removal of Native Americans from their ancestral lands.
“We said at the beginning we weren’t going to hide anything,” Barbour explained in an interview, referencing his upbringing during segregation. “We weren’t gonna try to justify what was done. That’s what the people wanted — to say, ‘Look, we’re not proud of this, but we’re not going to deny it.’”
Other states have emphasized diversity in their America 250 presentations. Neighboring Alabama’s “America 250” description includes significant Civil Rights Movement achievements.
Mississippi confronts its history directly. The state’s “America 250 MS” platform acknowledges that Mississippi’s story reflects the broader American experience, with Native American displacement paving the way for slavery, which led to the Civil War, followed by Reconstruction and the Jim Crow period.
Horhn commended Mississippi leadership for using the museums to present the state’s complete historical record.
“We still have issues, we still have a lot of challenges,” he noted. “But it’s a demonstration that progress has been made.”
The History Museum entrance features a gallery examining Mississippi’s original inhabitants, Native Americans. A 500-year-old canoe dominates the space, serving as a powerful reminder that Native Americans lived on this land for millennia before settlers arrived, displaced them, and claimed the territory for cotton cultivation using enslaved labor.
The Civil Rights Museum sits across the main lobby. Its first audio experience is jarring: “We don’t serve your kind,” a threatening voice announces when visitors enter the museum space.
This represents one of multiple phrases that were routine during America’s segregated era, confronting visitors immediately upon entering the gallery.
The museum directly addresses one of Mississippi’s most notorious racial murders — that of Emmett Till. The 14-year-old was abducted, tortured and murdered in 1955 following accusations that he whistled at a white woman in a rural Mississippi store.
Till’s killing became a turning point in the Civil Rights Movement. Thousands attended his Chicago funeral, where his mother, Mamie Till Mobley, demanded an open casket to show the nation the horrific condition of her son’s remains.
Following Oprah Winfrey’s narration of events, visitors can view the .45-caliber weapon used to murder the teenager.
Lindsay Ward, 49, wept in the lobby after completing her Civil Rights Museum tour. Growing up in what she called a protected environment in Salt Lake City, she had never encountered the subjects she experienced during her visit — “this heaviness,” as she described it.
Ward, currently living in Denver, expressed distress over how recently some events occurred.
“We’re not talking about hundreds and hundreds of years ago. We’re talking 60 years. It just made me want to weep,” she said. “It doesn’t feel great, but it’s important we understand what happened in the past.”
Connor Lynch, a Chicago history educator and social justice advocate, observed that determining how history gets presented has always been contentious.
“All we have is human narrative” and that includes bias, he explained. “I do believe that no matter what sort of erasure the country might be doing, we know the stories. We know the truth.”
For the America 250 celebration, the museums developed “Mississippi Made,” highlighting the state’s products and accomplishments.
Featured items include Pine-Sol household cleaner, a Nissan Frontier and Toyota Corolla, sections documenting the state’s space program contributions, and medical breakthroughs including the first human lung transplant.
The exhibit also includes work by celebrated Mississippi quilter Hystercine Rankin — a quilt depicting her father’s 1939 murder.
Jessica Walzer, the exhibit’s curator, explained she included it because it represents one of the few narrative quilts in the museums’ collection and because it tells part of Mississippi’s story.
“I think it’s important to have something kind of striking like that to kind of remind us that Mississippi also has this very difficult history that a lot of people have been through,” she said.
Prince, the state collections director, noted that such honesty had been absent for decades. Visitors to antebellum mansions, for example, learned about the families who resided there, but “they would never once tell you about the people that lived behind the house or the people that built the house or the people that worked the fields,” she said.
“For so long,” she concluded, “we just tried to gloss over that because it was uncomfortable.”
WASHINGTON — During the debut episode of “The Apprentice” in January 2004, Donald Trump made a rare admission he would be unlikely to repeat today.
“It wasn’t always so easy,” Trump narrated in a voice-over, acknowledging that during the late 1980s, “I was seriously in trouble” and “billions of dollars in debt.”
This represents one of the rare occasions when Trump has publicly recognized failure. However, even then, he was following a script designed to showcase his comeback story for television audiences, foreshadowing the confrontational appeal that would fuel his political ambitions years later.
“I fought back,” Trump declared. “And I won. Big league.”
According to Trump’s narrative, he never experiences defeat.
He proclaimed success just days after the Iran conflict began and continued making such claims throughout the crisis, even as Tehran launched attacks against American and allied forces while blocking the Strait of Hormuz, creating worldwide economic disruption.
Now that a ceasefire has been established, Trump maintains the United States achieved its objectives.
The president is celebrating a leadership transition following the death of Iran’s supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. However, his replacement is his son, Mojtaba Khamenei, who holds more extreme positions. While Trump insists Iran will be prevented from obtaining nuclear weapons, Tehran continues to maintain uranium stockpiles. The strait is reopening, but under Iranian military oversight.
After The Wall Street Journal’s editorial board criticized Trump for declaring premature success in Iran, the president responded on social media Thursday, stating, “Actually, it is a Victory.”
On Saturday, he posted that media outlets “love saying that Iran is ‘winning’ when, in fact, everyone knows that they are LOSING, and LOSING BIG!” When questioned later about ongoing Iranian negotiations, Trump replied, “Regardless what happens, we win.”
This tendency to claim victory has characterized Trump’s mindset since his youth as a New York property developer. The pattern continues across both significant and minor matters.
From golf tournaments at his properties where he consistently emerges as champion, to unfavorable court decisions he portrays as favorable, to business deals he announces but never finalizes.
“He has this fictional narrative in his head” and is “like a screenwriter,” explained David Cay Johnston, who wrote “The Making of Donald Trump.” “When you need to change the narrative, you just change it.”
The most dramatic example remains Trump’s refusal to accept his 2020 election loss to Democrat Joe Biden, despite confirmation through more than 60 court cases and his own attorney general. Yet Trump’s repeated victory declarations have convinced his supporters. He understands the influence of persistence and volume.
This defines Trump’s reality — as both promoter and president, crafting his narrative and others’, using slogans throughout his second term. One baseball cap he wears and sells summarizes this philosophy in five words: “TRUMP WAS RIGHT ABOUT EVERYTHING.”
“It’s much easier to lead when you’re successful and you’re winning,” Trump told a recent Saudi investment conference in Florida, where he also mentioned, “I always like to hang around losers, actually, because it makes me feel better.”
“People follow you if you win,” Trump added.
While White Houses have traditionally attempted to present negative developments positively to minimize unfavorable political assessments, Trump has elevated constant winning as central to his presidency.
When the Supreme Court overturns his key tariff policies, Trump promises to circumvent the decision so his import taxes can be “used in a much more powerful and obnoxious way, with legal certainty.” When promised American investments he promoted fail to materialize, he simply claims they occurred while sometimes exaggerating their imaginary value.
His Justice Department initially stopped challenging court rulings that blocked executive orders targeting major law firms, then reversed course because failing to appeal might appear as accepting defeat.
This alternative approach has become both a governing philosophy and a Trump family principle.
Eric Trump, one of the president’s sons, stated his father “has never needed to project a ‘winning image.’”
“He IS the definition of a winner,” the younger Trump declared in a statement, “based on what he has built and accomplished.”
Sarah Matthews, a former deputy press secretary from Trump’s first term who resigned following the January 6, 2021 Capitol riot by Trump supporters, said the president’s “ego won’t allow him to acknowledge defeat” and that “reality just kind of bends” to accommodate it.
“That was the messaging strategy,” Matthews explained. “It was, ‘How can we redefine this loss as a victory?’”
She admits regret now, but explained that previously, there was “always a way to find an excuse to justify that loss and defend his position.”
Recently, Trump’s second-term administration celebrated his first year back in office by compiling “365 wins” across the same timeframe. These included some repetitive and inflated claims while highlighting rising stock markets, declining gas prices, and robust job growth that have largely reversed since the Iran conflict started.
White House spokesman Davis Ingle said Trump “proudly projects the unmatched greatness of our country consistently in his public comments.”
John Bolton served as Trump’s first-term national security adviser and initially supported American and Israeli strikes against Iran. However, he said Trump’s victory declaration regarding Iran was always “baked in the cake” regardless of actual results.
“The world for him is divided into winners and losers,” Bolton observed. “And he’s always a winner.”
In 1973, federal officials sued Trump and his father for alleged racial discrimination in apartment rentals at their Brooklyn and Queens properties. Roy Cohn, the infamous attorney who aggressively promoted Senator Joseph McCarthy’s anti-communist hearings during the 1950s, encouraged the Trumps to file a countersuit.
Both parties reached a settlement two years later that prohibited the Trumps from “discriminating against any person.” The future Republican president called it a victory, emphasizing there was no guilt admission — despite the Justice Department describing the settlement as “one of the most far-reaching ever negotiated.”
Trump first encountered Cohn in 1973 at Manhattan’s exclusive Le Club, and Cohn is credited with teaching key principles, including never acknowledging wrongdoing or defeat and counterattacking anyone who attacks you.
Cohn “taught Donald, you never concede as much as a comma,” Johnston explained.
“Whatever position you’ve taken, that’s the position, and anybody who challenges you, they’re wrong. They’re disgusting. They’re incompetent. They’re idiotic,” Johnston continued. “If they’re law enforcement, they’re corrupt.”
Throughout the years, Trump consistently lost money, launching unsuccessful product lines bearing his name including steaks, bottled water, vodka, a magazine, an airline, a mortgage company, and online education. His Trump Plaza Hotel declared bankruptcy, his New Jersey Generals football team folded, and the Tour de Trump cycling event never became America’s equivalent to the Tour de France.
Barbara Res, who worked at Trump’s company for nearly twenty years, recalls him enjoying creating competition among top executives to ensure he remained the dominant voice, even as losses accumulated.
Regarding today’s Trump, she said, “Nothing is wrong to him, if it helps him.”
“He wasn’t always like that. He understood the difference before,” said Res, author of “Tower of Lies: What My Eighteen Years of Working With Donald Trump Reveals About Him.” “I can’t say why he changed. It could be because he has so much power. Or because he never really believed it.”
None of these setbacks damaged Trump’s self-promoted image as wealthy and famous, which was amplified by the television success “The Apprentice.”
However, Robert Thompson, a Syracuse University professor specializing in television and popular culture, said that success built upon earlier elements, including the appealing arrogance reflected in Trump’s 1987 book title “The Art of the Deal,” his aggressive pursuit of media coverage, and his fixation on naming ventures after himself.
This helped Trump become the “stock character of billionaire,” earning appearances on shows like “The Jeffersons,” “The Fresh Prince of Bel-Air,” “The Nanny,” and the movie “Home Alone 2,” Thompson noted.
“When you need someone to quickly and efficiently represent ‘American Rich Guy,’ Trump has kind of cast himself in that position,” Thompson said, “and everybody goes along with it.”
Trump refused to acknowledge his substantial losses. After his three Atlantic City, New Jersey casinos filed for bankruptcy, he told The Associated Press in 2016 that Atlantic City had been “a great period for me.”
Beginning in 2007, he became regularly involved with WWE executive Vince McMahon, whose wife Linda now serves as Trump’s education secretary. The future president enjoyed dramatic, televised events where his chosen wrestler always emerged victorious.
Trump also started addressing crowds, developing the “sketch and the rhythm” that would later become his political strength, Thompson explained: “The rallies are born in wrestling,” he said.
“Winning is an attitude, not a collection of facts,” Thompson observed. “Winning is, in this case, always defined by the person doing the winning.”
Trump brought this never-lose perspective into his political career.
Following his loss in the 2016 Republican Iowa caucus, he posted that winner Ted Cruz “illegally stole it.” Trump claimed victory in the popular vote against Democrat Hillary Clinton that November, “if you deduct millions of people who voted illegally.” Beyond his false assertions about the 2020 election being stolen, he alleged widespread fraud in the 2024 election, despite winning all crucial swing states.
Russell Muirhead, a Dartmouth College professor who has studied Trump’s chaotic leadership approach, said the president has practiced long enough “to live in a world where you make your own reality” with no actual world “outside your own mind.”
Even Trump’s golf playing involves accumulating victories — at least at his own courses.
Trump claims 38 victories at golf clubs he owns. This includes a 2018 tournament in West Palm Beach, Florida, where he didn’t participate but defeated the winner in a later match, one where he missed the opening round, and another where he posted a final-round 67 — a score that would impress even professional golfers.
Matthews said during her White House tenure, she couldn’t remember Trump ever admitting error, even privately.
“When it’s obvious that it looks like a loss on paper, you have to kind of spin this somehow into a victory,” she explained. “Because that’s what Trump would want.”
With Wednesday’s tax filing deadline approaching, Delaware residents and millions of other Americans are preparing to take advantage of new federal deductions for tip income and overtime pay that became available under President Trump’s comprehensive tax legislation.
However, taxpayers shouldn’t expect these same savings when completing their state tax forms. Individual states have the authority to determine whether they’ll adopt federal tax modifications, and the majority have chosen not to implement these particular changes.
Workers in states that haven’t aligned with federal tax policy will still face state tax obligations on tip and overtime income, even when receiving federal deductions for the same earnings.
Wednesday marks the filing deadline for both federal returns and most state tax submissions. Understanding how state income tax policies differ from federal rules is crucial for accurate filing.
Taxpayers in most states must complete two distinct forms – beginning with their federal return, then proceeding to state documentation. This sequence is important since state tax calculations typically begin with information from federal forms.
Nine states impose no income tax on wages and salaries: Alaska, Florida, New Hampshire, Nevada, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Washington, and Wyoming. Missouri exempts capital gains from taxation but taxes regular income, while Washington state does the opposite.
Roughly six states have chosen to mirror the federal tax breaks for tips, overtime wages, and interest on loans for domestically-assembled vehicles.
Idaho, Iowa, Montana, North Dakota, and Oregon provide all three deductions to state taxpayers. Colorado adopted the tip and auto loan breaks while excluding overtime deductions. Alabama only offers the vehicle loan deduction.
Some states automatically incorporate federal tax changes unless officials actively reject them – as Colorado did with overtime deductions. Most states, however, require legislative action to implement these breaks, as occurred in Idaho.
Arizona presents a unique situation where Democratic Governor Katie Hobbs issued an executive order in November allowing deductions for tips, overtime, auto loans, and senior citizens on state forms. She anticipated the Republican-controlled Legislature would subsequently codify these breaks into law.
However, Arizona’s statutes remain unchanged. Hobbs rejected two legislative proposals because they included corporate tax provisions she opposed, and a third attempt hasn’t gained passage.
“It’s an extraordinarily unusual situation,” said Adam Chodorow, an Arizona State University law professor specializing in tax policy.
“We will likely have lots of people deducting tips” and overtime wages “who aren’t legally entitled to do so,” he explained. “But they are being instructed by the state government to take those deductions.”
Arizona could still pass legislation officially authorizing these deductions, potentially with retroactive application beyond the filing deadline.
Several other states nearly extended these tax benefits to workers this year.
South Carolina postponed its refund filing deadline to October 15, giving the Republican Legislature time to adopt federal deductions. While the House approved such legislation, the Senate voted it down.
Wisconsin’s Republican lawmakers passed bills enabling tip and overtime deductions, but Democratic Governor Tony Evers vetoed the measures on April 3.
Georgia, Indiana, and Michigan have enacted legislation providing tip and overtime deductions beginning with 2026 tax filings, making them unavailable for current 2025 returns.
Oregon may reverse course, with pending legislation before Democratic Governor Tina Kotek that would eliminate auto loan deductions and certain corporate breaks starting in 2026.
Additional states may still choose to adopt or reject these tax deductions for their 2026 tax years.
WASHINGTON — More than a decade after President Barack Obama announced America would shift its strategic focus from Middle Eastern conflicts to counter China’s growing influence in Asia, the United States once again finds itself militarily engaged in the Middle East while pulling crucial defense assets away from the Pacific region.
The current military operations against Iran have forced President Donald Trump to postpone his planned summit with Chinese President Xi Jinping by several weeks, raising concerns among foreign policy experts that America is repeating past mistakes by allowing Middle Eastern conflicts to undermine its strategic priorities in Asia.
Foreign policy analysts who oppose deeper U.S. involvement in Middle Eastern conflicts argue that the Iran war is hampering Trump’s ability to properly prepare for next month’s critical meeting with Xi, particularly when significant economic stakes are involved. They caution that reduced American focus on Asia and weakened deterrence capabilities could encourage China to act against Taiwan if Beijing perceives an opportune moment.
“This is precisely the wrong time for the United States to turn away and be sucked into another intractable Middle East conflict,” said Danny Russel, a distinguished fellow at the Asia Society Policy Institute. “Rebalancing to Asia is highly relevant to America’s national interests, but it has been undercut by many bad decisions.”
However, supporters of the president’s strategy contend that taking decisive action in Venezuela and Iran helps counter Chinese influence on a global scale.
“Beijing is the chief sponsor for the adversaries that President Trump is dealing with sequentially, and it’s wise to do this sequentially,” Matt Pottinger, who served as a deputy national security adviser in the first Trump administration, said in a recent podcast.
NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte warned that future conflicts might span multiple regions, noting that China could potentially activate its “junior partners” in other areas to split American attention if it decides to move against Taiwan.
“Most likely it will not be limited, something in the Indo-Pacific to the Indo-Pacific,” Rutte said, speaking Thursday at the Ronald Reagan Institute in Washington. “It will be a multi-theater issue.”
Senator Jeanne Shaheen, the ranking Democrat on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, recently traveled with a bipartisan congressional delegation to Taiwan, Japan, and South Korea, where officials expressed concerns about rising energy prices and the withdrawal of American military equipment, including missile defense systems from South Korea and a rapid-response Marine unit from Japan.
During her visit, she worked to reassure allies of America’s dedication to preventing conflicts in Asia and maintaining regional security.
“Failure is not an option,” Shaheen told The Associated Press after returning from Asia. “We know China has already said they intend to take Taiwan by force if they need to, and they’re on an expedited time schedule. And we also know that what happened in Europe, in the war in Ukraine, in the Middle East is affecting those calculations.”
Kurt Campbell, who served as deputy secretary of state in the Biden administration, expressed concern that the military resources America had carefully built up in the Indo-Pacific region might not be fully restored even after the Iran conflict concludes.
According to Zack Cooper, a senior fellow at the American Enterprise Institute who analyzes U.S. strategy in Asia, the extended duration of the Middle Eastern conflict will continue drawing resources and attention away from Asia, while also negatively impacting future arms sales to the region.
“The United States has expended substantial numbers of munitions in the Middle East and will have to keep an increased force presence there, some of which has been redirected from Asia,” Cooper said. “Meanwhile, Xi Jinping’s wisdom in preparing a ‘war time’ economy by stockpiling and adding alternate energy sources has shown itself to be beneficial.”
Shaheen noted that America’s defense manufacturing sector faces challenges in meeting demand for weapons stockpile replenishment. “We’re working on a number of strategies to improve that, but at this point, timelines for weapons delivery are slipping,” she said.
The New Hampshire senator expressed optimism that Taiwan, Japan, and South Korea are increasing their own defense capabilities.
Obama’s strategic pivot to Asia demonstrated his recognition that America needed to maintain a strong Pacific presence to capitalize on regional economic growth and preserve U.S. leadership against China’s expanding influence.
“After a decade in which we fought two wars that cost us dearly, in blood and treasure, the United States is turning our attention to the vast potential of the Asia-Pacific region,” Obama said in a speech to the Australian Parliament. “So make no mistake, the tide of war is receding, and America is looking ahead to the future that we must build.”
However, the strategy faced setbacks when the proposed Trans-Pacific Partnership trade agreement with key regional allies failed to gain Senate approval. When Trump first assumed office in 2017, he pulled America out of the partnership and initiated a trade war with China.
His Democratic successor, Joe Biden, maintained Trump’s Chinese tariffs and strengthened export restrictions on advanced technology while reinforcing regional partnerships to counter China.
When Trump released his national security strategy in late 2025, the U.S. approach in Asia had been focused primarily on military deterrence in the Taiwan Strait and the First Island Chain, a series of U.S.-allied islands along China’s coast that limit Beijing’s access to the Western Pacific.
The national security document emphasizes America’s economic interest in maintaining access to advanced semiconductors, which come mainly from Taiwan and are essential for everything from computers to missiles, as well as protecting shipping routes in the South China Sea.
“Hence deterring a conflict over Taiwan, ideally by preserving military overmatch, is a priority,” the document says. “We will build a military capable of denying aggression anywhere in the First Island Chain.”
Regarding the Middle East, the document suggests reduced involvement: “As this administration rescinds or eases restrictive energy policies and American energy production ramps up, America’s historic reason for focusing on the Middle East will recede.”
Salisbury Mayor Randy Taylor has issued a detailed public explanation defending his controversial decision to dissolve the city’s employee union, pointing to what he describes as an unsustainable financial crisis threatening the municipality’s future.
In a letter addressed to Salisbury taxpayers, Taylor outlined the city’s mounting fiscal challenges, revealing that Salisbury is projected to withdraw $3.3 million from its reserve funds just to cover routine operating expenses in fiscal year 2026.
“As Mayor, I believe the public deserves a clear understanding of how their city’s finances work,” Taylor wrote in his message to residents.
According to the mayor, he inherited significant financial obstacles when taking office, including three tax hikes implemented over five years by the previous administration, resulting in Wicomico County’s highest municipal tax rate. Taylor claims the formation of the employee union, initially promoted as wage protection for all workers, ultimately stretched the city beyond its financial capacity.
The mayor provided a breakdown of municipal finance basics, explaining that daily operational costs like salaries, healthcare, and utilities must come from ongoing revenue sources such as property taxes and fees. Meanwhile, infrastructure projects like parks and community centers are funded through reserve money or bonds that require repayment from operational income.
“Every municipality is required to spend less than it takes in. Savings are for capital needs and occasional emergencies — not for recurring operating costs,” Taylor explained.
The financial pressures facing Salisbury stem from union-negotiated salary increases that outpaced the city’s revenue growth, according to the mayor. He noted that the city’s reserve funds have only grown due to one-time income sources, not from operational surpluses.
For the coming fiscal year, Salisbury expects revenue to increase by $1.7 million. However, before considering any wage adjustments, the budget faces significant new expenses: $1 million more for health insurance, $200,000 additional utility costs, and $250,000 in other unavoidable increases including fuel and liability insurance.
These mandatory cost increases total $1.45 million, which Taylor says would normally be manageable. However, existing union commitments compound the problem. The administration’s proposed single-step wage increase would cost $750,000, while career advancement and merit raises add another $120,000. Meeting current union demands would require taking more than $3 million from reserves this year alone.
“No responsible financial professional — whether a banker, CPA, auditor, or municipal finance officer — would advise using savings to pay for permanent operating costs. It is simply unsustainable,” Taylor stated.
The mayor emphasized that his decision to eliminate the union stems from mathematical necessity rather than political motivation. He cited his duty to maintain Salisbury’s long-term fiscal health, ensure adequate public safety funding, and preserve the city’s capacity for community investments.
“Dissolving the union is not a political decision, nor is it an emotional one. It is a decision grounded in math, law, and the obligation to keep Salisbury on stable financial footing,” Taylor wrote.
Despite the union dissolution, the mayor pledged his continued support for fair compensation, competitive benefits, and maintaining a skilled professional workforce. He argued that allowing the current financial trajectory to continue would violate his administration’s fiscal responsibilities.
“I remain committed to fair wages, competitive benefits, and a strong, professional workforce. I cannot stand by and allow Salisbury to drift into a structural deficit that jeopardizes our future,” Taylor concluded.
The mayor thanked residents for their attention to the matter and requested their continued confidence in efforts to ensure Salisbury’s financial stability.
Prosecutors in Manhattan have opened an investigation into sexual assault allegations targeting California Congressman Eric Swalwell, a Democrat who is currently running for governor of his state.
According to reports from the San Francisco Chronicle and CNN, a former employee from Swalwell’s district office has come forward with accusations of two unwanted sexual encounters. The woman alleges one incident occurred in 2019 while she worked for the congressman, and another in 2024 after she had departed his staff. In the more recent incident at a New York City hotel, she told CNN that Swalwell raped her.
The congressman has firmly rejected these claims, calling them “absolutely false” and pledging to defend himself against what he characterizes as false accusations. However, prominent Democrats have called on him to withdraw from the gubernatorial race following these revelations.
The unnamed accuser, whose identity was protected by both news outlets, reportedly stated she was too drunk to give consent during both alleged incidents.
CNN’s reporting also revealed that three additional women have made accusations of sexual misconduct against Swalwell.
Manhattan prosecutors have encouraged anyone with information about these allegations to reach out to their special victims unit.
In his response, Swalwell pointed to the timing of these accusations, noting they surface just before California’s June primary election. Among a crowded field of gubernatorial candidates from various parties, Swalwell has been viewed as a top contender likely to make it to a runoff under California’s nonpartisan primary system.
California’s electoral process allows the two highest vote-getters in the June primary to proceed to November’s general election, regardless of party affiliation.
WASHINGTON — A federal appeals court has directed a district court judge to take a fresh look at potential national security risks tied to stopping construction on President Donald Trump’s proposed $400 million White House ballroom project.
The three-member panel from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit determined Saturday that insufficient information was available to assess how much of the construction could be halted without compromising the safety of the president, his family, and White House personnel.
The matter has been sent back to the trial court judge who issued a March 31 decision blocking the project from moving forward without congressional authorization, though enforcement was delayed for two weeks. The appeals panel has now extended that delay through April 17, giving the Trump administration time to petition the Supreme Court.
The appellate judges directed U.S. District Judge Richard Leon to determine more clearly if his court order would disrupt the administration’s security and safety preparations.
Administration attorneys contended the construction encompasses vital security elements designed to protect against various potential dangers, including drones, ballistic missiles, and biological hazards. They maintained that delaying the work “would imperil the President and others who live and work in the White House.”
When Leon issued his temporary suspension, he determined the preservationist organization challenging the project would likely prevail since the president doesn’t have authority to construct the ballroom without congressional consent.
Leon carved out exceptions for any construction work essential to White House safety and security, stating he had examined confidential government materials before concluding that stopping the project wouldn’t compromise national security.
The Republican administration’s appeal referenced materials planned for installation to create a “heavily fortified” space, noting the construction involved bomb shelters, military facilities, and medical infrastructure beneath the ballroom.
The appeals panel observed that many government concerns centered on underground security work, which the White House claimed was “distinct from construction of the ballroom itself and could proceed independently.”
However, the White House now appears to indicate these security improvements are “inseparable” from the overall project, the appeals court noted, creating uncertainty about “whether and to what extent” proceeding with certain ballroom elements is essential for the security upgrades’ safety.
Carol Quillen, president and CEO of the National Trust for Historic Preservation, issued a statement saying the organization was waiting for additional clarification from the district court. She emphasized the group’s dedication “to honoring the historic significance of the White House, advocating for our collective role as stewards, and demonstrating how broad consultation, including with the American people, results in a better overall outcome.”
The preservation group filed suit in December, one week after the White House completed demolition of the East Wing to make way for a 90,000-square-foot ballroom designed to accommodate 999 people, according to Trump. The administration indicated above-ground ballroom construction would commence in April.
Leon determined last month the lawsuit would likely succeed because “no statute comes close to giving the President the authority he claims to have.”
“The President of the United States is the steward of the White House for future generations of First Families. He is not, however, the owner!” Leon wrote. The judge was appointed by President George W. Bush, a Republican.
Two days following Leon’s decision, the ballroom project received final approval from a key agency that Trump had filled with supporters. Another oversight body packed with Trump allies had greenlit the project earlier this year. However, the president had moved ahead with the most significant structural modification to the White House in over seven decades before consulting these commissions.
Trump maintains the project receives funding through private donations, though taxpayer money is covering construction of underground bunkers and security enhancements.
The three-judge appeals panel included Patricia Millett, Neomi Rao, and Bradley Garcia. Obama nominated Millett, Trump appointed Rao, and Biden selected Garcia.
Rao authored a dissenting opinion referencing a law that permits the president to make White House improvements.
“Importantly, the government has presented credible evidence of ongoing security vulnerabilities at the White House that would be prolonged by halting construction,” Rao stated, arguing such concerns outweigh the “generalized aesthetic harms” cited in the lawsuit.
Federal officials have granted major disaster declarations for seven states this week, opening the door to federal funding and support for communities recovering from severe weather events, the Federal Emergency Management Agency announced Saturday.
Alaska, Idaho, Montana, Oregon, South Carolina, South Dakota and Washington received approval for the declarations, which provide access to federal resources for infrastructure repairs and survivor assistance. Meanwhile, roughly 15 additional requests from states and tribal nations for extreme weather events from this year and last remain under review, along with three appeals from previously rejected applications.
The approvals come during the early weeks of Homeland Security Secretary Markwayne Mullin’s leadership of the disaster relief agency, suggesting the former Oklahoma Republican senator may bring more stability after the turbulent tenure of his predecessor, Kristi Noem, whom President Donald Trump dismissed in March.
However, FEMA’s operations face potential challenges from the continuing Department of Homeland Security shutdown, now in its eighth week. Although disaster response activities can proceed during shutdowns since FEMA’s Disaster Relief Fund remains available, those resources are dwindling as the funding standoff continues. Congressional appropriations would restore the fund with over $26 billion.
Speaking Tuesday, Mullin indicated he planned to update Trump on outstanding declaration requests that day, emphasizing his commitment to accelerating work on previous disasters before Atlantic hurricane season starts June 1.
“We’re trying to push this stuff forward as fast as possible,” Mullin stated during his first official trip as DHS secretary while examining Hurricane Helene recovery operations in North Carolina, recognizing that “disasters are happening constantly.”
White House representative Abigail Jackson explained Saturday that Trump evaluates such requests “with great care and consideration, ensuring American tax dollars are used appropriately and efficiently by the states to supplement — not substitute — their obligation to respond to and recover from disasters.” She noted the administration aims to have state and local authorities “invest in their own resilience before disaster strikes, making response less urgent and recovery less prolonged.”
Although Mullin affirmed his support for FEMA’s mission during Senate confirmation proceedings, the agency’s long-term direction remains unclear. Trump has indicated interest in transferring more disaster responsibilities to state governments. A FEMA Review Council established last year has yet to publish an anticipated recommendation report that could include significant changes to federal disaster resilience, response and recovery support.
Officials did not immediately clarify whether additional states or tribes had received notification of approvals or rejections not yet made public. Hawaii Governor Josh Green, a Democrat, announced Wednesday that his state had obtained a disaster declaration for destructive flooding in March.
Trump also modified existing disaster declarations for Tennessee and Mississippi, expanding county coverage for individual assistance following severe January winter storms.
Several communities have endured unusually extended waiting periods for responses to their disaster requests during Trump’s second presidency. Associated Press research from September revealed approvals were averaging more than one month.
Presidential approval of governors’ disaster declaration requests typically took under two weeks during the 1990s and early 2000s. That timeframe increased to approximately three weeks over the past decade under presidents from both parties.
Arizona has waited nearly three months for a response to its appeal after being rejected for support related to severe storms and flooding in September.
Several Democratic-controlled states have criticized denials of disaster declarations despite demonstrating need. Maryland Governor Wes Moore described Trump’s decision as “deeply frustrating” after the president rejected the state’s request twice for May 2025 flooding support, despite FEMA assessments showing damages exceeding $33 million.
Although FEMA evaluates damage using established formulas to analyze potential impacts on states and local jurisdictions, disaster declarations remain under presidential authority.
None of this week’s approvals included hazard mitigation funding, previously a standard component of disaster declaration support that helped communities rebuild with greater resilience. Trump has not approved any hazard mitigation requests for over a year.
WASHINGTON – A federal appeals court issued a decision Saturday permitting ongoing work on a proposed White House ballroom project backed by President Donald Trump to move forward until April 17 at minimum.
The court’s ruling means construction activities related to the new ballroom addition can continue for at least the next week while legal proceedings unfold.
WASHINGTON – Speculation about potential Supreme Court retirements is intensifying as two of the nation’s oldest conservative justices approach typical retirement age, with political timing becoming a crucial factor in their decisions.
When questioned about the possibility of Justices Samuel Alito or Clarence Thomas stepping down, President Donald Trump expressed his desire for both men to continue serving on the nation’s highest court.
“I hope they’re going to be around a long time,” Trump stated to reporters on February 20, following the justices’ support of his position in a dissenting opinion regarding the court’s 6-3 decision that rejected his comprehensive global tariffs. “I hope they’re going to stay healthy. They’re great people.”
Neither Alito, age 76, nor Thomas, age 77, has publicly signaled any intention to step away from their lifetime appointments to the Supreme Court. Both justices declined to respond to Reuters inquiries about potential retirement plans for this year.
However, legal experts are increasingly discussing the possibility of a court vacancy as both men near the typical retirement age for Supreme Court justices since 2000, which averages around 80 years old. The approaching November congressional elections add another layer of complexity to the situation.
Should either justice retire, Trump would gain the opportunity to make his fourth Supreme Court appointment. The last president to name four justices was Republican Richard Nixon during his 1969-1974 presidency. Trump’s three previous appointments during his initial term created the current 6-3 conservative majority, which has significantly shifted American jurisprudence to the right since 2020.
ELECTORAL IMPLICATIONS
The Constitution grants the Senate authority to confirm presidential judicial nominees. Republicans currently maintain a 53-47 Senate majority. Should Democrats gain control of the chamber in upcoming midterm elections, they would likely attempt to obstruct any Trump nominee for a Supreme Court vacancy.
“The window for Trump to nominate a Supreme Court justice – or any federal judge – with a friendly Republican Senate could be closing by the end of this year,” explained John Yoo, who previously worked as a Justice Department attorney under Republican President George W. Bush.
“I think a conservative justice would want to retire during a time when an originalist would follow him or her, and that is most likely with Trump as president and the Senate controlled by Republicans,” Yoo continued, noting that Republicans may not simultaneously control both the White House and Senate again for several years.
Originalism represents an interpretive philosophy that constitutional language should be understood according to its meaning when originally written, a principle embraced by most of the court’s six conservative members.
Replacing either Alito or Thomas with another conservative would maintain the court’s current ideological composition while allowing Trump to appoint a younger justice who could potentially serve for decades.
Two additional septuagenarians serve on the court: conservative Chief Justice John Roberts and liberal Justice Sonia Sotomayor, both 71.
None of the court’s liberal members – Sotomayor, Elena Kagan (65), and Ketanji Brown Jackson (55) – are anticipated to retire soon. The same applies to Trump’s three previous appointees: Brett Kavanaugh (61), Neil Gorsuch (58) and Amy Coney Barrett (54).
THOMAS APPROACHES HISTORIC MILESTONE
Thomas, nominated in 1991 by Republican President George H.W. Bush, will next month achieve the distinction of becoming the second-longest-serving justice in Supreme Court history, trailing only Justice William O. Douglas, who served from 1939 to 1975.
Alito, who joined the court in 2006 following his appointment by George W. Bush, completed 20 years of service in January, while Roberts reached the same milestone last September.
Since 2000, five Supreme Court justices have chosen retirement while three died while serving. Justice John Paul Stevens holds the record as the oldest retiree at age 90 in 2010, while Justice David Souter was the youngest to step down at 69 in 2009.
Conservative Chief Justice William Rehnquist passed away at 80 in 2005, with Roberts, his former clerk, taking his place. Conservative Justice Antonin Scalia died at 79 in 2016, eventually replaced by Gorsuch after Senate Republicans blocked Democratic President Barack Obama’s nominee during his final year in office.
Liberal Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg died at 87 in 2020. Many liberals viewed Ginsburg’s decision to remain on the court during Obama’s presidency as a strategic error. Her death allowed Trump to install a conservative replacement, creating the current conservative supermajority.
“I think it has to loom over everybody’s decision,” said Cornell Law School professor Michael Dorf regarding Ginsburg’s consequential choice to stay rather than retire to enable a like-minded successor.
Both Alito and Thomas appear to have no known serious health issues, though each has required brief hospitalization recently. Alito received treatment for dehydration on March 20 after becoming ill during a Philadelphia event, returning to work the following Monday. Thomas missed court arguments in 2022 while hospitalized with flu-like symptoms.
POLITICAL CALCULATIONS
Legal scholars note that political timing has become increasingly significant in retirement decisions during recent decades, alongside traditional factors like age and health.
According to the Brennan Center for Justice, the last justice to retire under political circumstances likely leading to replacement by an ideologically opposed justice was in 1991, when Justice Thurgood Marshall stepped down due to declining health.
George H.W. Bush replaced the liberal Marshall with the conservative Thomas, who received narrow Senate approval following a controversial confirmation process.
Current retirement discussions have centered primarily on Alito.
“I would be utterly shocked and speechless if Justice Thomas were to retire this year,” said Yoo, a former Thomas clerk now teaching at the University of California, Berkeley School of Law. “He is in great health and is performing at the top of his game.”
Court observers have identified several potential indicators suggesting Alito may be considering departure.
Alito secured his judicial legacy by writing the groundbreaking 2022 decision that overturned the 1973 Roe v. Wade ruling, which had established women’s constitutional abortion rights.
“Generations from now, if somebody looks up Samuel Alito in Wikipedia or whatever replaces it, that will be the first line,” Dorf observed. “He’s the justice who wrote the opinion overturning the right to abortion.”
Alito has also guided Supreme Court doctrine in a conservative direction across various issues including affirmative action, gun rights, and presidential authority, according to Dorf.
Alito’s upcoming book, “So Ordered: An Originalist’s View of the Constitution, the Court, and Our Country,” is scheduled for release on October 6. This publication date, occurring one day after the court’s next nine-month term begins, could complicate Alito’s ability to promote the book while serving as a justice.
“The October publication date is a pretty big tell since one can’t exactly go on a book tour during the first argument session of the term,” wrote Georgetown University law professor Steve Vladeck on his Substack publication, One First.
CONSERVATIVE PERSPECTIVES
Alito and Thomas have encountered minimal public pressure from conservatives to retire. This contrasts with liberal Justice Stephen Breyer, who faced intense pressure from the left to step down before the 2022 midterm elections, which he ultimately did, allowing Democratic President Joe Biden to nominate Jackson, his former clerk, as replacement.
Josh Hammer, a former clerk to Judge James Ho of the New Orleans-based 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, expressed measured views about potential Supreme Court retirements on his Newsweek podcast “The Josh Hammer Show.” Ho is considered by conservatives as a leading Supreme Court candidate should a vacancy arise under Trump.
“Far be it for me, again, to advise that Clarence Thomas or Sam Alito resign. They are the two greatest justices on the U.S. Supreme Court, by some order of magnitude,” Hammer stated.
“I am simply saying that if you are being as risk-averse and cautious as possible, that this is as good a time as any for one of, potentially both of them, to step down,” Hammer continued. “They’re not going to live forever – as much as we would very much love them to both live forever.”
Yoo predicted that conservative calls for Alito and Thomas to retire will remain subdued as long as they maintain Trump’s support.
“I think they will not come out in public unless President Trump gives some signal – that has been the story with the MAGA world generally on most issues,” Yoo said, referencing Trump’s Make America Great Again movement.
SACRAMENTO, Calif. — California Congressman Eric Swalwell’s bid for governor collapsed into chaos Friday as major Democratic figures and organizations abandoned his campaign following sexual assault accusations that the lawmaker categorically denies.
The dramatic political fallout unfolded rapidly after allegations emerged that Swalwell sexually assaulted a woman on two separate occasions, including once when she was employed by him.
“These allegations of sexual assault are flat false. They’re absolutely false. They did not happen, they have never happened, and I will fight them with everything that I have,” Swalwell declared.
Despite his firm denial, the congressman indicated he would take time to consider his next steps, posting on social media that he planned to spend the weekend with loved ones before providing an update “very soon.”
Swalwell had been considered a frontrunner among Democrats seeking to succeed outgoing Governor Gavin Newsom. However, within hours of the allegations becoming public, his campaign infrastructure began crumbling as key endorsers distanced themselves and demanded his withdrawal.
Senator Adam Schiff announced he was “deeply distressed” by the accusations and urged Swalwell to abandon his gubernatorial pursuit.
Governor Newsom, who has largely stayed neutral in the succession battle and is viewed as a potential 2028 presidential contender, issued a statement calling the multi-source allegations “deeply troubling and must be taken seriously.”
Former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, who has not endorsed any candidate, described the claims as “serious allegations” requiring investigation and revealed she advised Swalwell that such scrutiny should occur “outside of a gubernatorial campaign.”
The timing proves particularly damaging as California’s election process enters a crucial phase, with mail-in ballots scheduled for distribution next month ahead of the June 2 primary.
According to reporting by the San Francisco Chronicle, a woman alleged Swalwell assaulted her in both 2019 and 2024. The publication examined text messages related to the more recent alleged incident and interviewed individuals the woman had confided in. She explained to reporters that she avoided contacting law enforcement due to concerns about credibility.
The allegations detail that the initial incident occurred in 2019 when the woman was on Swalwell’s staff, while the second allegedly happened following a charity fundraising event in 2024. In both instances, she claims she was too intoxicated to provide consent.
The Chronicle protected the woman’s identity, and The Associated Press has been unable to independently confirm her allegations or identity. Her legal representative declined to provide comment.
Democratic Representative Jimmy Gomez, who had been managing Swalwell’s campaign operations, announced his immediate departure from the role.
“The congressman should leave the race now so there can be full accountability without doubt, distraction, or delay,” Gomez stated on social media.
Major labor organizations also withdrew their backing, with the California Service Employees International Union and California Teachers Association suspending their endorsements. The California Federation of Labor Unions indicated they were “acting urgently” to determine their response.
A representative for House Democratic Leader Hakeem Jeffries emphasized that the accusations warrant a “serious and thorough investigation.”
The controversy has intensified pressure within an already contentious Democratic primary, with party leaders concerned that the crowded field could jeopardize their chances in the November general election. California’s top-two primary system advances the two highest vote recipients regardless of party affiliation.
Earlier this week, Swalwell had launched a series of campaign stops in Sacramento, where he told media representatives he had never engaged in sexual relationships with staff members or interns. He subsequently canceled a planned Thursday event in Palm Springs.
While vague rumors about Swalwell’s conduct with female staff had circulated on social platforms for weeks, the Chronicle’s report represents the first documented accusation from an identified source. CNN has also reported that multiple women have accused Swalwell of sending inappropriate sexual communications.
Swalwell has suggested the allegations represent targeted attacks due to his campaign’s growing success.
First elected to Congress in 2012, Swalwell represents a district east of San Francisco. He briefly pursued the presidency in 2019 before ending that campaign due to limited voter support. The married father of three gained national prominence as a House manager during President Donald Trump’s second impeachment proceedings in early 2021.
WASHINGTON — President Donald Trump has shattered long-standing diplomatic norms by actively campaigning for foreign political candidates, wielding his influence in ways unprecedented for an American president.
From supporting Hungary’s far-right leader Viktor Orbán with social media posts and high-profile visits, to threatening Argentina with the loss of $20 billion in financial aid if elections didn’t favor his preferred candidate, Trump has transformed foreign policy into a personal political tool.
In Honduras, the president endorsed a conservative mayoral candidate while pardoning a politician from the same party just as citizens prepared to cast their ballots.
Trump’s second-term approach represents a dramatic departure from traditional American diplomacy, where presidents typically avoided direct interference in other nations’ democratic processes. Critics argue this strategy prioritizes political loyalty over genuine U.S. national interests.
“The impact of that is to really cheapen a relationship,” explained David Pressman, who served as U.S. ambassador to Hungary under the Biden administration. Pressman witnessed Orbán’s public support for Trump in 2024 and noted that Hungarian foreign policy positions seemed “infused through a political U.S. rubric” rather than representing independent sovereign decisions.
The ultimate measure of Trump’s international political influence arrives this Sunday when Hungarian voters decide whether to grant Orbán a fifth consecutive term. Orbán became the first European leader to endorse Trump in 2016 and maintained their alliance even during Trump’s time out of office, visiting him in Florida and backing his 2024 presidential campaign.
“I love Hungary and I love that Viktor,” Trump declared this week while Vice President JD Vance put him on speakerphone during a Budapest rally attended by over 1,000 Orbán supporters.
The president has embraced his role as an international kingmaker, extending the influence he wields within the Republican Party to global politics.
“I love it when I give endorsements and people win,” Trump told Latin American leaders he had supported during a recent summit.
Trump typically endorses candidates who share his policy positions, including immigration hardliners like Orbán and Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi, or Argentina’s Javier Milei, who famously wielded a chainsaw to symbolize his commitment to cutting government spending.
The Conservative Political Action Conference has become a regular platform for promoting Trump’s international political allies.
At last year’s CPAC event in Warsaw, then-Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem encouraged Polish voters to support conservative candidate Karol Nawrocki, suggesting America’s military presence in Poland could depend on the election results. Nawrocki ultimately won.
During last month’s CPAC gathering in Hungary, Trump addressed attendees via video from the Oval Office, urging support for Orbán.
“The prime minister has been a strong leader who’s shown the entire world what’s possible when you defend your borders, your culture, your heritage, your sovereignty and your values,” Trump stated. “I hope he wins, and I hope he wins big.”
White House spokesperson Anna Kelly defended the president’s strategy as transparent leadership.
“President Trump is a great American statesman who will speak or work with anyone, and he makes no secret about those he likes or supports,” Kelly said. “Many individuals who align with President Trump’s ideology are getting elected to top offices around the world because everyone wants to replicate his immeasurable success on behalf of the American people.”
No foreign leader has received more Trump administration support than Orbán. The president has published multiple Truth Social posts promoting the Hungarian prime minister, whose authoritarian governing style and unwavering loyalty during Trump’s political exile have earned presidential favor.
“Hungary: GET OUT AND VOTE FOR VIKTOR ORBÁN,” Trump posted Thursday evening. Friday brought promises that his administration “stands ready to use the full Economic Might of the United States” to assist Hungary’s economy if needed.
Secretary of State Marco Rubio previously expressed concerns about “democratic erosion” under Orbán while serving in the Senate. Despite these past reservations, Rubio endorsed the Hungarian leader in February, highlighting the “very, very close personal relationship and working relationship” between Trump and Orbán.
During Vance’s Budapest visit this week, he explicitly endorsed Orbán while simultaneously criticizing European Union interference in foreign elections.
“Of course we’re going to work with whoever wins the Hungarian election because we love the people of Hungary and it’s an important relationship,” Vance told reporters. “But Viktor Orbán is going to win the next election in Hungary, so I feel very confident about that and about our continued positive relationship.”
However, independent polling shows Orbán trailing before Sunday’s election, and Trump’s unpopularity across Europe—stemming from his Greenland acquisition efforts and Iran military actions—may limit his influence.
While previous administrations have influenced foreign governments through covert operations, such as the CIA’s role in Guatemala’s 1954 coup under President Eisenhower, Trump’s open political engagement abroad remains unprecedented.
Former President Clinton’s support for Russian President Boris Yeltsin’s 1993 parliamentary dissolution represents one of the few historical examples of explicit presidential endorsement of foreign political actions.
James Lindsay, a distinguished senior fellow at the Council on Foreign Relations, emphasized Trump’s unique approach.
“Trump is just different than other presidents, and he’s viewed differently than other presidents, and that is a strength you can take advantage of,” Lindsay observed.
Senator Tim Kaine of Virginia connects Trump’s election interference to what the administration calls the “Trump Corollary” to the Monroe Doctrine, outlined in December’s national security strategy. The original 1823 Monroe Doctrine has historically justified U.S. military interventions throughout Latin America.
Kaine, who worked as a missionary in Honduras during extensive covert American involvement in the region, condemned the doctrine as “poison language.”
“It’s violating best practice,” he said. “America has been deeply involved in regime support, opposition and regime change in the Americas for centuries, and it is not a legacy that we should be proud of.”
Trump’s foreign endorsements often extend beyond mere political support.
In October, the president explicitly threatened to withdraw assistance from Argentina if Milei’s coalition failed in legislative elections. This ultimatum came shortly after finalizing a $20 billion currency swap agreement that had drawn criticism from American farmers and Democratic legislators.
“If he loses, we are not going to be generous with Argentina. OK?” Trump told reporters while hosting Milei at the White House.
During Honduras’s recent elections, Trump not only endorsed Nasry Asfura but warned that “the United States will not be throwing good money after bad” if his preferred candidate lost. Both Milei and Asfura won their respective races.
Trump also pardoned former Honduran President Juan Orlando Hernandez, who faced U.S. drug trafficking and weapons convictions.
“This cannot be allowed to happen, especially now, after Tito Asfura wins the Election, when Honduras will be on its way to Great Political and Financial Success,” Trump wrote on social media.
The president has repeatedly suggested pardoning Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, both in formal correspondence and during an address to Israel’s parliament. Netanyahu faces corruption charges including fraud, breach of trust, and bribery allegations, with a challenging reelection campaign expected this year.
Vance’s recent speech at the Munich Security Conference created diplomatic tensions with Germany when he criticized mainstream German parties for refusing to collaborate with far-right political groups.
German Chancellor Friedrich Merz responded that it was inappropriate for American leadership to “say something like that to us in Germany.”
“I wouldn’t do it in America, either,” Merz added.
NEW YORK (AP) — While President Donald Trump has been eliminating diversity programs across the federal government, the acronym “DEI” has largely disappeared from corporate communications and Democratic campaign messaging.
However, this week’s National Action Network conference in New York told a different story, as Democratic leaders and prospective White House hopefuls forcefully defended diversity, equity and inclusion programs that have recently lost political support.
House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries addressed a crowded room of Black activists, asserting: “We have the high ground on this issue.” He labeled Republicans as “extremists” conducting “an all-out assault on civil rights, on voting rights, certainly on diversity, equity and inclusion.”
Jeffries further argued: “They’re not trying to celebrate merit, they’re trying to elevate mediocrity. They want to suggest that diversity, equity and inclusion are foreign values. They’re not foreign values, they’re American values.”
These diversity programs expanded rapidly across businesses, universities and government offices following the 2020 Black Lives Matter demonstrations sparked by George Floyd’s killing.
However, GOP officials, particularly Trump, have characterized DEI efforts as divisive and discriminatory toward white Americans.
Trump issued executive orders on his inauguration day prohibiting “illegal DEI” across federal agencies. A subsequent March directive required any companies contracting with the government to follow the administration’s anti-DEI stance.
During his February State of the Union speech, Trump declared: “We ended DEI in America.”
Democratic responses to the administration’s anti-DEI campaign have been inconsistent and sometimes subdued throughout the past year, with certain party members attributing electoral losses to an overemphasis on diversity and identity issues that supposedly alienated voters from various backgrounds.
Nevertheless, several Democrats being discussed as potential presidential candidates are now actively promoting DEI initiatives.
This messaging change also demonstrates the party’s strategy to attract and motivate Black voters, who frequently see DEI attacks as connected to broader resistance against civil rights and economic fairness.
Pennsylvania Governor Josh Shapiro embraced this approach during his opening day appearance at the National Action Network.
“We believe diversity is our strength in the Commonwealth,” Shapiro stated. “We continue to have an Office of Diversity and Equity and Inclusion when other states have shuttered them.”
Maryland Governor Wes Moore, currently the only Black governor in office, emphasized that his state had “unapologetically” countered Washington’s DEI rollback by establishing state departments dedicated to supporting minority-owned businesses and social advancement while fighting racial disparities. He presented his state as an example of fair policymaking.
“We are seeing what the policies and the position are when it comes to belief in diversity from this federal administration,” Moore told The Associated Press afterward. “I actually think the future of how we should think about it should be seen in the present, of how places like Maryland are actually moving in this moment.”
Illinois Governor JB Pritzker spoke about directing his state to “set aside a whole bunch of that money to address inequities that have plagued the Black community over so many years” and supported Illinois’ measures designed to reduce economic and racial disparities.
Kentucky Governor Andy Beshear, scheduled to speak Saturday, plans to emphasize his dedication to diversity despite facing political opposition, according to political consultant Eric Hyers.
Beshear governs a state that Trump won by over 30 percentage points in the last election, yet he rejected what he called a discriminatory bill from his Republican-dominated legislature last year that would have eliminated diversity programs from state universities. Lawmakers later overturned his veto.
“He never wavered even when there was a post-2024 backlash,” Hyers commented about Beshear. “He believes in his core that diversity is a strength, not a weakness.”
Reverend Al Sharpton, who established and organizes the conference, told The Associated Press he wanted 2028 candidates to demonstrate “that what they’re campaigning on is something that addresses the race gap in the country, specifically, not just generalizations.”
Representative James Clyburn, a South Carolina Democrat and former Congressional Black Caucus chair with significant influence, cautioned that leaders from both parties who oppose DEI might be rejecting fundamental American principles.
“DEI stands for ‘diversity, equity and inclusion.’ Who, in search for a more perfect union, would shy away from diversity equity and inclusion? If you’re against those things, you are against democracy,” he explained to the AP.
The Department of Homeland Security has directed all workers who were placed on unpaid leave to report back to their positions amid the continuing partial government shutdown, based on an employee notification distributed Friday.
The department’s recall directive instructs all workers currently on furlough to resume their duties beginning with their next scheduled shift, which for the majority will be Monday.
The notification referenced a White House memorandum from April 3, where President Donald Trump issued an emergency directive guaranteeing that all DHS personnel would receive full compensation and benefits for losses incurred during the agency’s partial closure.
A Trump administration representative independently verified that DHS has instructed its entire workforce to return and confirmed that Trump’s order from the previous week ensures they will receive payment.
The partial closure of federal operations has persisted for almost two months. The majority of DHS personnel are classified as “essential,” meaning they must continue working even during shutdowns. The department employs 270,000 people.
Congressional representatives have not yet reached consensus on a fiscal 2026 budget allocation for DHS.
Democratic lawmakers have expressed strong opposition to Trump’s immigration enforcement policies, particularly his deployment of Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents, which operates under DHS authority.
Civil rights organizations have criticized Trump’s enforcement approach, claiming it undermines due process and free speech protections while creating dangerous conditions, especially for minority communities.
Trump has justified his policies by stating they are designed to strengthen national security and reduce unauthorized immigration.
ICE faced heightened criticism following incidents earlier this year when federal agents killed two American citizens in Minnesota.
DHS Secretary Markwayne Mullin “will be utilizing available funding to recall the entire DHS workforce” to restore operations, a department representative told the Federal News Network, while attributing responsibility for the partial shutdown to Democrats.
The representative confirmed that employee “paychecks are now being processed.”
California Congressman Eric Swalwell, a Democratic candidate for governor, is facing serious sexual assault allegations from a former congressional staffer, which he categorically rejects as false and politically driven.
Multiple prominent Democratic officials are now calling on Swalwell to withdraw from the gubernatorial race in response to these accusations.
According to a Friday report in the San Francisco Chronicle, a woman who previously worked in Swalwell’s district office has alleged two incidents of nonconsensual sexual contact – one occurring in 2019 while she was still employed by him, and another in 2024 after leaving his staff.
The Chronicle reported that the unnamed woman stated she was too intoxicated during both incidents to provide consent.
In a subsequent CNN interview, the former staffer described the 2024 incident as rape, allegations that Swalwell vehemently disputes.
Speaking to CNN while her identity was concealed, the woman described her resistance: “I was pushing him off of me, saying no.” When asked about his response, she stated, “He didn’t stop.”
CNN’s reporting also revealed that three additional women have come forward with separate allegations of sexual misconduct against Swalwell, including claims of unwanted explicit messages and photos. Swalwell has rejected all of these accusations.
In his response to both news outlets, Swalwell stated: “These allegations are false and come on the eve of an election against the frontrunner for governor.”
He continued: “For nearly 20 years, I have served the public – as a prosecutor and a congressman – and have always protected women. I will defend myself with the facts and where necessary bring legal action. My focus in the coming days is to be with my wife and children and defend our decades of service against these lies.”
Reuters was unable to reach a Swalwell spokesperson for additional comment.
The allegations have created significant upheaval in the campaign. Senator Adam Schiff, a nationally recognized Democrat, has rescinded his endorsement and called for Swalwell to exit the race. The California Teachers Association, the state’s largest educators’ union, has suspended its backing. House Democratic leadership, including Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, has stated that Swalwell should “immediately end his campaign.”
Among a crowded field of multi-party candidates, Swalwell had been viewed as a top contender to reach the runoff in California’s nonpartisan gubernatorial election. The two highest vote-getters in June’s primary will proceed to November’s general election, regardless of party affiliation.
SACRAMENTO, Calif. — Democratic Congressman Eric Swalwell, currently seeking California’s governorship, has firmly rejected claims that he sexually assaulted a woman on two separate occasions, including once when she was employed by his office.
According to a Friday report by the San Francisco Chronicle, a woman has accused Swalwell of sexual assault during incidents in 2019 and 2024. The publication examined text messages related to the more recent alleged assault and interviewed individuals who were told about the incidents. The accuser explained to reporters that she chose not to contact law enforcement because she feared her claims would be dismissed.
The Chronicle chose not to identify the woman, and The Associated Press has been unable to independently confirm her story or identity. Her legal representative has refused to provide comment.
According to the newspaper’s reporting, the woman was employed by Swalwell’s office when the first alleged incident took place in 2019, while the second alleged assault reportedly happened following a charity fundraising event. In both instances, she claims she was too intoxicated to provide consent.
Swalwell has categorically rejected the woman’s claims and indicated they may be politically motivated attacks targeting his campaign’s recent success.
“These allegations are false and come on the eve of an election against the front-runner for governor,” Swalwell said in a statement. “For nearly 20 years, I have served the public — as a prosecutor and a congressman and have always protected women. I will defend myself with the facts and where necessary bring legal action. My focus in the coming days is to be with my wife and children and defend our decades of service against these lies.”
The Chronicle reported that the woman has received a cease-and-desist letter from Swalwell’s legal team. Attorney Elias Debaie acknowledged sending at least one such letter and dismissed the allegations as “baseless.”
These accusations have emerged during a pivotal moment in the competitive race to lead America’s most populous state. Voters will receive mail-in ballots in less than four weeks ahead of the June 2 primary election.
By Friday afternoon, the California Teachers Association announced it was halting its endorsement. Democratic Senator Adam Schiff retracted his support, and a congressional colleague who had backed Swalwell called for him to abandon his campaign. Multiple gubernatorial competitors have also pressed him to withdraw from the contest.
While vague and unsubstantiated rumors about Swalwell’s alleged inappropriate conduct with female staff members have been circulating on social media platforms for several weeks, the Chronicle’s report marks the first documented account of someone making specific accusations. During a campaign stop in Sacramento earlier this week, he denied to journalists that he had ever engaged in sexual relationships with staff members or interns.
Earlier this week, Swalwell had announced multiple campaign appearances scheduled throughout California, but he canceled a planned Thursday event in Palm Springs.
Swalwell is considered among the top Democratic contenders in the packed field seeking to succeed outgoing Democratic Governor Gavin Newsom. He immediately faced calls to step aside from several Democratic opponents — former state controller Betty Yee, state schools superintendent Tony Thurmond, and San Jose Mayor Matt Mahan. Two other major rivals — former Congresswoman Katie Porter and billionaire environmental advocate Tom Steyer — expressed solidarity with the woman who came forward but did not demand Swalwell end his campaign.
This developing controversy could significantly damage Swalwell’s campaign if financial contributions decrease, limiting his ability to purchase advertising, or if labor unions and other organizations that have endorsed him decide to reverse their support.
Democratic Congressman Jimmy Gomez, who had endorsed Swalwell and assisted with his campaign operations, announced on social media that he was immediately stepping away from the campaign.
“The congressman should leave the race now so there can be full accountability without doubt, distraction, or delay,” Gomez said.
Swalwell, an Iowa native, won his House seat in 2012 and represents a district located east of San Francisco. He mounted a presidential campaign in April 2019 but ended it several months later after struggling to gain traction with voters. He gained national recognition serving as a House manager during former President Donald Trump’s second impeachment proceedings in early 2021.
SACRAMENTO, Calif. — Democratic Congressman Eric Swalwell is pushing back against sexual assault accusations while his California gubernatorial campaign faces mounting pressure from political allies demanding his withdrawal from the race.
According to reporting by the San Francisco Chronicle on Friday, an unnamed woman has accused Swalwell of sexually assaulting her on two separate occasions in 2019 and 2024. The publication examined text message evidence related to the more recent alleged incident and interviewed individuals who said the woman had confided in them about the assaults.
The accuser claims the first incident happened in 2019 while she was employed by Swalwell’s office, and the second occurred following a charitable fundraising event last year. She told the Chronicle that alcohol impairment prevented her from giving consent in both situations. The woman explained her decision not to contact law enforcement stemmed from concerns about credibility.
Neither The Associated Press nor other outlets have independently confirmed the woman’s identity or allegations. Her legal representative has refused to provide comment on the matter.
Swalwell has categorically rejected the accusations, characterizing them as a coordinated effort to derail his campaign’s progress.
“These allegations are false and come on the eve of an election against the front-runner for governor,” Swalwell said in a statement. “For nearly 20 years, I have served the public — as a prosecutor and a congressman and have always protected women. I will defend myself with the facts and where necessary bring legal action. My focus in the coming days is to be with my wife and children and defend our decades of service against these lies.”
The congressman’s legal team has responded by sending cease-and-desist correspondence to the accuser. Attorney Elias Debaie acknowledged dispatching at least one such letter while dismissing the claims as “baseless.”
The controversy has erupted during a pivotal moment in California’s gubernatorial contest, with mail-in ballots scheduled for distribution within weeks ahead of the June 2 primary vote.
Political fallout began immediately Friday afternoon when the California Teachers Association announced the suspension of its endorsement. Democratic Senator Adam Schiff rescinded his support, while Representative Jimmy Gomez, who had been helping manage Swalwell’s campaign, declared his immediate departure from the effort.
“The congressman should leave the race now so there can be full accountability without doubt, distraction, or delay,” Gomez stated on social media.
Multiple gubernatorial competitors have joined calls for Swalwell’s exit, including former state controller Betty Yee, education superintendent Tony Thurmond, and San Jose Mayor Matt Mahan. However, two prominent rivals — former Representative Katie Porter and environmental activist Tom Steyer — offered support for the accuser while stopping short of demanding Swalwell’s withdrawal.
Unsubstantiated speculation about inappropriate conduct with female staff members had circulated on social media platforms for weeks, but the Chronicle’s report represents the first documented allegation with specific details. During a Sacramento campaign appearance Tuesday, Swalwell told reporters he had never engaged in sexual relationships with staff or interns.
The congressman was forced to cancel a Thursday campaign event in Palm Springs, despite having announced a series of statewide appearances earlier in the week.
The scandal threatens to cripple Swalwell’s fundraising capabilities and could prompt additional endorsing organizations to reverse their support, potentially ending his viability in the crowded Democratic primary field seeking to replace outgoing Governor Gavin Newsom.
Swalwell, an Iowa native who won his House seat in 2012 representing districts east of San Francisco, briefly pursued the presidency in 2019 before ending that campaign due to limited voter interest. He gained national recognition serving as a House manager during former President Donald Trump’s second impeachment proceedings in early 2021.
Maryland Representative Jamie Raskin informed his Democratic colleagues on Friday that he plans to reintroduce legislation establishing a commission designed to evaluate presidential fitness for office, according to a House Judiciary Committee spokesperson.
The proposed “Commission on Presidential Capacity to Discharge the Powers and Duties of the Office” represents a revival of legislation Raskin, who serves as the top Democrat on the judiciary panel, originally proposed in 2020 during Donald Trump’s initial presidency.
Congressional Democrats have recently renewed discussions about pursuing Trump’s impeachment or invoking the 25th Amendment to the Constitution, which outlines procedures for removing presidential powers through means other than impeachment.
These conversations intensified after Trump’s recent statement that “a whole civilization will die” in Iran unless that nation’s government permits unrestricted maritime passage through the Strait of Hormuz. Maritime traffic in the region has faced disruptions following a joint U.S.-Israeli military operation against Iran that commenced February 28.
The proposed legislation faces dim prospects in the Republican-majority House, where Speaker Mike Johnson maintains strong support for Trump.
House and Senate Republicans have successfully prevented Democratic efforts to pass separate measures aimed at ending the unauthorized Iranian conflict.
Raskin’s proposal would establish a 17-member bipartisan panel to evaluate situations where a president may be incapable of executing official responsibilities due to physical disabilities, mental impairment, substance abuse, or other disqualifying circumstances.
During his first presidency, Trump faced two impeachment trials, both resulting in Senate acquittals when Republicans controlled that chamber.
While most Democrats have previously avoided impeachment discussions, Trump’s recent Iranian military actions and his apparent lack of clearly defined strategic goals have encouraged many party members to consider presidential removal options—though this approach doesn’t enjoy universal Democratic support.
PHOENIX (AP) — On Friday, a federal judge issued a temporary order preventing Arizona from applying its gambling regulations to prediction market companies, following legal action by the Trump administration after state officials brought criminal charges claiming Kalshi operates an unlawful gambling business.
U.S. District Judge Michael Liburdi’s decision also suspends Arizona’s criminal proceedings against Kalshi, which had been set for an arraignment on Monday. Following the judge’s ruling, a state prosecutor confirmed the Monday hearing has been canceled.
Judge Liburdi indicated he would provide detailed reasoning for his decision in a written order expected to be issued Friday evening.
The federal Commodity Futures Trading Commission initiated legal action against Arizona following cease-and-desist orders issued to Kalshi by state gambling authorities and subsequent criminal charges filed against the prediction market company. The commission contended that Arizona was overstepping federal jurisdiction over national swaps market regulation.
Survivors of Jeffrey Epstein’s sexual abuse are divided over First Lady Melania Trump’s recent call for congressional action regarding the late financier’s criminal activities.
During a public address Thursday at the White House Grand Foyer, the First Lady distanced herself from Epstein while advocating for enhanced congressional oversight of his case. Trump explicitly stated she maintained no personal relationship with the convicted sex offender.
The First Lady’s statement has generated mixed reactions among those who suffered abuse at Epstein’s hands. While some survivors view her congressional hearing proposal as a positive step toward accountability, others remain skeptical about the motivations behind her public declaration.
Epstein died in federal custody in 2019 while awaiting trial on sex trafficking charges. His death sparked widespread controversy and conspiracy theories, with many demanding further investigation into his criminal network and associates.
The First Lady’s unexpected entry into the ongoing Epstein discourse represents a significant development in the case that has captivated public attention for years. Her call for congressional action could potentially reignite legislative interest in examining the circumstances surrounding Epstein’s crimes and connections.
Eliot Engel, the longtime New York Democratic congressman who led the House Foreign Affairs Committee and influenced international policy for more than three decades, passed away Friday at age 79.
The former representative died at a hospital in the Bronx due to complications from Parkinson’s disease, his family announced.
“During his over 44 years in public service, Eliot Engel fought tirelessly for his constituents at home and for peace and security around the world,” his family stated.
Engel first entered Congress in 1988 after unseating a 10-term incumbent with a reform-focused campaign. His political career came full circle when he was defeated in a 2020 Democratic primary by Jamaal Bowman, marking a progressive victory over the establishment wing of the party.
Before his congressional career, Engel worked as an educator and served in the state Assembly. He gradually climbed the hierarchy of the House Foreign Affairs Committee until becoming its chairman in 2019. He championed Israel’s interests and became one of the earliest voices advocating for U.S. military action to support Kosovo during the 1990s conflict, when ethnic Albanians fought for independence from Serbia. NATO’s bombing campaign, led by the U.S. and U.K., ultimately paved the way for Kosovo’s independence nearly a decade later.
U.S. Rep. Richie Torres, also representing the Bronx, described Engel as “a fierce advocate for Kosovo and the Albanian community at a time when few others were paying attention.”
Among his legislative achievements, Engel co-negotiated the Harkin–Engel Protocol, a global accord designed to end the most severe forms of child labor on cocoa plantations across West Africa.
As Foreign Relations Committee chair, he oversaw the 2019-2020 impeachment investigation into President Trump regarding his attempts to pressure Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy to investigate then-rival Joe Biden.
Following Trump’s impeachment and subsequent Senate acquittal in February 2020, Engel promised continued oversight, stating there were “a lot of unanswered questions that the American public deserves to know” answers to.
The coronavirus pandemic soon dominated headlines, along with criticism of Engel’s absence from his district, initially highlighted by The Atlantic magazine.
His political troubles intensified after a microphone captured him telling another Bronx official at a press conference: “If I didn’t have a primary, I wouldn’t care,” while trying to secure speaking time.
Throughout his tenure, Engel became famous for arriving hours early to claim an aisle seat for the State of the Union address, positioning himself to shake hands with the president on camera as the commander-in-chief walked to the podium.
However, Rep. George Latimer, the Democrat who now represents Engel’s former district, emphasized that “his legacy consists of hard work on issues and kindness to all.”
WASHINGTON (AP) — Mayor Muriel Bowser presented her final budget proposal on Friday before leaving office this year, outlining a $21.2 billion gross operating expenditure plan that’s expected to create significant debate among District Council members and on Capitol Hill, where GOP legislators have increasingly intervened in local matters.
The mayor’s financial plan prioritizes education and healthcare expenditures while reducing allocations in multiple sectors, including eliminating $127 million designated for upcoming union contract negotiations and salary increases for non-unionized municipal workers.
A significant aspect of the proposal involves reducing the general funds budget to $12.7 billion, representing a 3.3% decrease from 2026 levels. These general funds finance essential city operations. Bowser explained the reductions stem from declining revenues caused partly by federal employment cuts and increasing expenses, such as elevated Medicaid costs and higher administrative expenses for SNAP benefits due to federal law changes that transferred certain costs to state governments.
During her presentation to Council members, Bowser emphasized the city is “not broke” while describing what she characterized as three distinct phases of her leadership: periods of expansion, the COVID-19 economic crisis, and the post-pandemic recovery.
“We are adjusting to what DOGE has done to our workforce and commercial corridor,” she stated, referencing the Trump administration’s federal government downsizing efforts. She noted that increased expenses and reduced income have created an estimated budget shortfall requiring attention.
“I think we all have to be clear headed about where we are and what it will take to keep growing,” Bowser remarked. The mayor has led the city since 2015 and announced she won’t seek reelection this year.
Council members challenged Bowser and her team regarding proposed reductions, particularly criticizing cuts to programs designed to reduce childcare expenses in a city where families spend over $25,000 annually on average for infant care, according to Child Care Aware of America. The proposal would limit the District’s childcare subsidy program, which assists low-income families with care costs, to 6,000 children. Current subsidy recipients would maintain their benefits. The plan also eliminates a program that supplemented childcare worker wages, a pandemic-era initiative designed to attract and retain employees in a traditionally low-wage sector.
Council Chairman Phil Mendelson indicated the council would likely conduct a budget vote in June.
Washington’s financial planning has faced complications over recent years, including 2025 when the House approved federal funding legislation forcing the district to return to 2024 budget limits, effectively removing $1.1 billion from its balanced budget during the fiscal year.
The Department of Government Efficiency’s federal workforce restructuring significantly affected the Washington area. Terry Clower, who directs George Mason University’s Center for Regional Analysis, calculated that the region lost more than 50,000 positions. Clower explained these job losses extend beyond lost wages and income taxes, also impacting businesses serving those workers and creating additional revenue losses for local governments.
The D.C. Office of Revenue Analysis determined Washington experienced a net reduction of 22,000 federal positions with combined annual salaries exceeding $3 billion.
City Administrator Kevin Donahue identified revenue impacts from federal workforce reductions, primarily through the Department of Government Efficiency, which resulted in approximately $325 million in lost revenue from employment cuts and reduced consumer spending. These losses are projected to increase further in fiscal year 2027.
WASHINGTON — Former First Lady Melania Trump caught many off guard Thursday when she delivered an unexpected public statement rejecting any significant ties to Jeffrey Epstein, the late convicted sex trafficker, during a time when his case had largely disappeared from public discussion.
Speaking from prepared notes at the White House Thursday, Mrs. Trump declared she and her legal team were pushing back against “unfound and baseless lies” regarding her relationship with the deceased financier, who used his connections among wealthy and influential people to find victims and hide his criminal activities.
“The lies linking me with the disgraceful Jeffrey Epstein need to end today,” she declared. “The individuals lying about me are devoid of ethical standards, humility and respect. I do not object to their ignorance, but rather I reject their mean-spirited attempts to defame my reputation.”
Mrs. Trump declined to answer reporters’ questions following her remarks, leaving numerous unanswered questions about what motivated the statement.
The timing remains mysterious. Her husband, President Donald Trump, and his administration appeared to have finally moved beyond more than a year of Epstein-related controversy, particularly as the Iran conflict had dominated Washington’s attention.
The former first lady’s public comments will likely thrust the matter back into the political spotlight, even though the president has encouraged both the public and press to leave the case behind.
Mrs. Trump appeared to reference a short 2002 email with sender and receiver information redacted. The message opens with “Dear G!” and closes with “Love, Melania,” praising the recipient regarding a magazine piece about “JE.”
“I know you are very busy flying all over the world,” the email states. “How was Palm Beach? I cannot wait to go down. Give me a call when you are back in NY.”
This correspondence was sent during the same month New York Magazine published a profile of Epstein in which Trump described him as a “terrific guy.”
During Thursday’s statement, Mrs. Trump denied being friends with either Epstein or his associate and former romantic partner Ghislaine Maxwell, though she acknowledged moving in similar social circles throughout New York and Florida. She characterized an email response she sent to Maxwell as “casual correspondence” without providing additional details.
“My polite reply to her email doesn’t amount to anything more than a trivial note,” she stated.
Released documents also included an image from Epstein’s residence displaying multiple photographs arranged on furniture and stored in drawers. Within that image, tucked inside a drawer among other pictures, was a photo showing Donald Trump with Epstein, Melania Trump, and Maxwell.
Mrs. Trump highlighted Thursday that multiple people and organizations have issued apologies for their “lies about me.” Among her examples, the most recent occurred in October when book publisher HarperCollins UK apologized to the former first lady and removed sections from a publication that suggested Epstein facilitated her introduction to Donald Trump.
MS NOW journalist Jacqueline Alemany reported on social media Thursday that President Trump told her he was unaware of his wife’s planned statement regarding Epstein.
The White House press office has not responded to inquiries for comment.
Nick Clemens, speaking for Mrs. Trump, confirmed the West Wing knew in advance about her planned statement. However, he directed questions about whether officials knew the specific content of her remarks to the West Wing.
In recent weeks, President Trump’s public schedule has focused primarily on the Iran conflict.
The former first lady’s statement returned Epstein to public attention months following federal authorities’ release of millions of documents under the Epstein Files Transparency Act, legislation passed after sustained public and political pressure. The law mandates government disclosure of files related to the late financier and Maxwell.
Congressional members initially criticized the Justice Department for limited document releases, but officials explained additional time was necessary to examine newly discovered materials and protect sensitive victim information.
While several prominent European figures have faced consequences for Epstein associations, comparable prosecutions have not occurred in the United States.
Most significantly, Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor — formerly Britain’s Prince Andrew — was arrested in February following the latest document release. Mountbatten-Windsor’s name appeared repeatedly in the files, showing a close connection with Epstein.
However, his arrest was unrelated to sexual misconduct. Instead, he faces charges for allegedly sharing confidential trade information with Epstein.
Mrs. Trump urged Congress to conduct public hearings focused on Epstein’s crime survivors, providing opportunities to testify before lawmakers and have their accounts officially recorded.
“Each and every woman should have her day to tell her story in public if she wishes,” she said. “Then, and only then, we will have the truth.”
In an unusual move, former First Lady Melania Trump broke her typical silence Thursday to issue a public declaration distancing herself from Jeffrey Epstein while demanding Congressional investigations into the case.
Trump’s unexpected statement explicitly denied any personal relationship with the late financier and convicted sex offender, marking a rare instance of the former first lady addressing controversial topics publicly.
The announcement has generated divided responses among those who experienced abuse at Epstein’s hands, with survivors expressing varying perspectives on her decision to speak out and call for legislative action.
Fresh polling data from the Pew Research Center reveals a notable shift in Republican attitudes toward Israel, particularly among younger conservative voters, while President Donald Trump has launched sharp criticism against several prominent right-wing media figures.
The new survey indicates that while Republican support for Israel still outweighs opposition overall, there’s been a marked decline among younger party members. Among all Republicans and those who lean Republican, 58% maintain favorable views of Israel while 41% hold unfavorable opinions.
The generational divide within the party has become more pronounced, with 57% of Republicans between ages 18 and 49 now holding negative views of Israel, representing an increase from 50% the previous year. In contrast, Republicans aged 50 and above maintain predominantly positive attitudes toward the nation.
For context, Democratic opposition to Israel has grown even more dramatically, with 80% of Democrats and Democratic-leaning independents now viewing Israel unfavorably, jumping from 69% last year and 53% in 2022. Younger Democrats show slightly stronger negative sentiment than their older counterparts, with 47% expressing very unfavorable opinions compared to 39% of older Democrats.
Republican opinions on Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu have become evenly split, with 45% expressing significant or moderate confidence in his leadership while 44% report little to no confidence. The age gap persists here as well, with Republicans over 50 showing twice the confidence level in Netanyahu compared to younger Republicans—58% versus 30%.
Regarding Trump’s approach to US-Israel relations, approximately 73% of Republicans express confidence in his decision-making abilities, compared to just 16% of Democrats. However, younger Republicans show less enthusiasm, with only 52% of those under 30 expressing confidence, dramatically lower than the 93% confidence rate among Republicans 65 and older.
In a separate development, President Trump used his Truth Social platform to launch an extensive attack on conservative media personalities Tucker Carlson, Alex Jones, Candace Owens, and Megyn Kelly. These commentators, who previously backed Trump, have recently voiced opposition to his Iran war stance and Israel policies. Trump labeled them as “NUT JOBS, TROUBLEMAKERS,” ridiculed them for being “thrown off Television,” and declared they were no longer welcome on TV appearances.
The president alleged that these four media figures want Iran to develop nuclear weapons and suggested their criticisms stem from seeking “cheap publicity” for their podcast ventures. Trump dismissed suggestions of division within his MAGA movement, stating that anyone opposing him represents “the opposite of MAGA.”
Trump further claimed he could “get them on my side” at will but stated he refuses to take their calls when they attempt to contact him. He ended his statement by emphasizing that MAGA represents winning and strength, declaring “these people have no idea how to do that, BUT I DO.”
CHICAGO (AP) — A complex political dispute over whether Chicago public schools should close on May 1 is reaching a critical point, leaving hundreds of thousands of students and families uncertain about their plans.
The powerful Chicago Teachers Union, which supports Mayor Brandon Johnson, is pushing for educators to join protest activities in America’s third-largest city on May Day, aligning with global workers’ rights demonstrations. However, the recently appointed head of Chicago Public Schools has turned down the request to close schools.
This disagreement has left families of more than 315,000 students in limbo.
Workers’ rights demonstrations on May Day have traditionally been strong in Chicago, a city known for supporting organized labor. International Workers Day traces its origins back more than 100 years to a significant period in labor movement history.
Labor organizations across the United States are organizing a comprehensive boycott of work, commerce, and education this year to oppose the Trump administration’s policies. In various locations, including North Carolina, union groups are urging teachers to skip work on May 1.
The Chicago Teachers Union is calling for the country’s fourth-largest school system to eliminate classes entirely, claiming this would enable both educators and students to demonstrate during a period when public education faces challenges. Labor groups are pushing for increased educational funding, higher taxes on wealthy individuals, and an end to immigration enforcement operations.
Over 70% of the district’s student population comes from low-income households, with most students being Black or Latino.
“What our students need, and what history teaches us is the only thing that works, is educators, labor unions, and community groups standing together to defend each other and our democracy and demand that the government put our families over their fortunes,” the CTU said in a statement.
Earlier this week, Macquline King, the recently appointed district CEO, announced she had no intention of canceling classes.
“As a career educator, I believe every minute in the classroom is vital for our students,” she said in a statement, adding that the district’s school board could override her with a vote. Their next regular meeting is April 23.
The union plans to designate May 1 as a professional development day for educators, switching it with one originally scheduled for June 5, which marks the beginning of students’ summer vacation. The union has submitted a formal complaint regarding this issue.
The potential closure of more than 500 schools is causing significant problems for parents who are worried about securing childcare or canceling test preparation activities.
District research revealed that 113 schools, roughly 20% of all schools, had scheduled events for May 1, including educational trips, athletic competitions, and makeup sessions for Advanced Placement exams. An additional 100 schools reported having other events such as proms and senior recognition nights planned for that date, according to a document from King to board members that The Associated Press obtained.
“Disruptions would directly affect academic testing and key student milestones, particularly for graduating seniors and 8th graders with limited ability to recover or reschedule these experiences,” King wrote in the memo.
Mariam Hafezi, whose child attends middle school in northwest Chicago, expressed support for civic education and wouldn’t oppose student-organized walkouts. However, she pointed out that these demonstrations were being organized by adults.
“It is a teachable moment without them being outside of school,” she said. “It would be wiser to spend time in class explaining about the strike in general.”
The conflict over a single school day highlights a challenging situation for first-term Mayor Johnson and his potential reelection campaign in 2027.
Johnson endorses the May 1 demonstrations but has been less definitive publicly about whether schools should be closed. His office did not respond to an email on Friday.
As a former CTU organizer, Johnson won the 2023 election with union backing. This relationship has created friction, especially during last year’s contract discussions and the removal of former CEO Pedro Martinez.
Following a difficult search process for a replacement, the board selected King, someone already working within the district who had been serving as interim CEO. The board approved her three-year contract last week.
This disagreement has also provided insight into the politics of the city’s newest Democratic governing body. Chicago is transitioning from a mayor-appointed school board to a completely elected one this November.
The current 21-member board includes both elected and appointed members who frequently disagree.
“Calls to keep students out of school are reckless,” elected board member Jennifer Custer wrote on Facebook. “They hurt parents who work, disrupt classrooms, and set our kids back — all for politics.”
However, Emma Lozano, a veteran immigrant rights advocate appointed by Johnson, expressed a different view.
She believes students should participate in May 1 demonstrations, which have attracted hundreds of thousands of participants in Chicago in previous years.
“We don’t just get educated in the classroom,” she said. “We get educated in the world and have to learn how to fight for our rights.”
Former New York City Mayor Eric Adams revealed on Friday that he has obtained honorary citizenship from Albania, moving him closer to his frequently stated goal of pursuing life overseas after leaving politics.
Albania’s President Bajram Begaj granted the honorary citizenship to Adams, a Democrat, following a formal request, according to an official presidential decree.
Albanian media outlets first broke the story, which was subsequently verified by Adams’ representative, who noted that the former mayor has maintained strong ties with Albanian-American communities for years.
“The decision by the Republic of Albania to grant Mayor Adams citizenship reflects that enduring relationship and mutual respect,” spokesperson Todd Shapiro stated via text message, noting that this recognition “further strengthens the bond between New York and Albania.”
Adams, who previously referred to himself as an “international mayor,” has demonstrated ongoing interest in the small Balkan country. His grown son resided in Albania while participating in the nation’s equivalent of “American Idol,” and Adams himself visited the country in October during his final months as mayor.
During that visit, he explained his purpose was “to say hello to a friend and learn from a friend and build a relationship with a friendship that will not allow our oceans or seas to divide us.”
Adams’ specific plans for his new citizenship status remain unclear. However, he has consistently voiced aspirations to relocate far from New York City after his political career.
“When I retire from government, I’m going to live in Baku,” Adams declared during a 2018 Azerbaijan community event while serving as Brooklyn Borough President. Later, in a conversation with a Jewish media outlet, he mentioned wanting to spend his retirement in the Israeli-controlled Golan Heights.
During his mayoral tenure, Adams’ frequent international travel, particularly to Turkey, led to federal charges partly based on claims he accepted inappropriate travel perks from foreign contacts.
Adams rejected these accusations, and the Trump administration’s Justice Department subsequently dismissed the case. Adams later discussed potential ambassadorial positions with Trump officials, though no appointment occurred.
Following his unsuccessful reelection campaign, Adams took a four-day Albanian trip, where he met with Prime Minister Edi Rama, cabinet members, and business leaders. The Albanian government partially funded this journey.
Since departing office, Adams has been seen in Dubai and the Democratic Republic of Congo, though his current activities remain largely mysterious.
This January, he introduced a cryptocurrency that he claimed would combat antisemitism and “anti-Americanism,” but the venture faced criticism after losing substantial value.
Minnesota state officials have filed legal action against the Trump administration, accusing federal authorities of concealing evidence in connection with fatal shootings carried out by immigration enforcement officers in Minneapolis.
The lawsuit centers on incidents where Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents killed two American citizens, Alex Pretti and Renee Macklin Good, and wounded a Venezuelan individual during enforcement activities in the city.
State authorities claim the federal government is refusing to provide critical evidence and information about these shooting incidents, hampering their ability to conduct a thorough investigation into the deaths and injury that occurred during the immigration crackdown.
The legal challenge highlights growing tensions between state and federal officials over transparency and accountability in immigration enforcement operations that have resulted in civilian casualties.
WASHINGTON — Detailed designs for President Donald Trump’s proposed ceremonial arch in Washington D.C. were made public Friday, revealing an elaborate 250-foot monument topped with a golden winged statue carrying a torch and wearing a crown reminiscent of the Statue of Liberty.
According to the 12-page design document from the U.S. Commission on Fine Arts, the massive structure would feature two golden eagles positioned alongside the central figure, with four gilded lions standing guard at the base. The phrases “One Nation Under God” and “Liberty and Justice for All” would be etched in gold lettering on opposite sides of the monument.
The proposed location places the arch in a traffic circle linking Washington to northern Virginia, positioned between the Lincoln Memorial to the east and Arlington National Cemetery to the west.
Speaking about the project in February, Trump referenced historical attempts to construct such a monument in the capital, explaining that the nation originally pursued this type of structure two centuries ago. “It was interrupted by a thing called the Civil War, and so it never got built,” Trump said. “Then, they almost built something in 1902, but it never happened.”
The President has argued that Washington stands alone among major global capitals in lacking such a commemorative structure, emphasizing that other significant cities worldwide feature similar monuments.
President Donald Trump posted disturbing security camera footage on his Truth Social platform late Thursday, showing a fatal hammer attack at a Fort Myers gas station that he’s using to advance his mass deportation policies.
The suspect, 40-year-old Rolbert Joachin, faces murder charges for the April 2nd killing of a convenience store employee approximately 160 miles northwest of Miami. While Trump identified the man as Haitian, police and court documents don’t specify his nationality but note he required a Creole interpreter due to limited English proficiency.
Trump frequently uses immigration-related crimes to support his border policies and criticize Democrats, including former President Joe Biden, claiming they allow dangerous individuals into the country. Research indicates that undocumented immigrants commit violent, drug, and property crimes at lower rates than U.S.-born citizens.
“The video of her brutal slaying is one of the most vicious things you will ever see,” Trump wrote in his social media post, calling the suspect an “animal.”
The security footage, also posted by the Department of Homeland Security, shows the attacker first striking a black car with a hammer outside the Chevron station. When victim Nilufa Easmin, 51, emerges wearing black pants and a pink shirt to confront him, the man in yellow shirt and black shorts immediately strikes her head with the weapon.
The graphic video captures Easmin falling to the sidewalk near the store entrance, where the attacker continues hitting her head six times before stepping over her motionless body and leaving the scene.
According to a GoFundMe campaign organized by Samir Bahadur Syed from the Bangladesh Association of Southwest Florida, Easmin was “a devoted mother who worked tirelessly to provide for her two young daughters.”
Fort Myers officers responded to reports of the hammer attack and discovered the victim on the ground with severe head injuries and multiple wounds. They apprehended Joachin walking nearby shortly after the incident.
Police report that Joachin has admitted to the crime. He appeared in court Wednesday on murder and property damage charges, with arraignment scheduled for May 4th. His public defender has not responded to requests for comment.
Trump criticized Biden for allowing Joachin to remain in the United States under temporary protection. Kelly Walker, acting director of ICE’s Miami enforcement office, revealed Friday that Joachin arrived by boat near Key West in August 2022, was arrested, and received Temporary Protected Status in 2023, which was revoked this week.
The Trump administration strongly opposes Temporary Protected Status programs, which allow citizens from countries experiencing crisis or conflict to live and work in America temporarily. Republicans argue that Biden’s administration has overused TPS to permit hundreds of thousands to remain in the country inappropriately.
Multiple federal lawsuits challenge Trump’s attempts to end TPS for over one million people, including 350,000 Haitians. A federal appeals court upheld a lower court’s decision against terminating Haiti’s temporary status in March, and the Supreme Court will hear arguments on April 29th.
The Department of Homeland Security and Trump administration frequently publicize crimes involving immigrants and maintain a website tracking ICE arrests and related offenses. They regularly feature “Angel Families” who have lost relatives to crimes committed by immigrants.
ICE commemorated the first anniversary of reopening their victim assistance office Thursday, featuring emotional testimony from surviving family members.
WASHINGTON – Internal discussions at the White House revealed that President Trump’s administration contemplated having him deliver a nationally televised speech about the Iran ceasefire agreement on Tuesday, but senior staff ultimately advised against the prime-time address, according to three federal officials who spoke with Reuters.
The choice reflects the administration’s delicate approach – attempting to demonstrate early optimism about the agreement that paused hostilities and reopened the Strait of Hormuz while simultaneously acknowledging the deal’s uncertain future. These conversations about a potential presidential speech had not been publicly disclosed before.
With negotiations scheduled to commence Saturday in Islamabad, experts question whether the temporary halt in fighting will lead to a permanent resolution of the conflict.
Anonymous sources indicated that Trump was persuaded not to deliver the address. However, the White House disputed these claims in an official response, stating: “This is fake news. This was never even discussed with the president.”
The officials requested anonymity when describing private White House conversations.
Instead of a formal address, Trump revealed the ceasefire through a social media announcement just hours before Tuesday’s deadline, after which he had promised to obliterate Iran’s entire society.
This dramatic policy shift represented one of the most abrupt wartime reversals by any American commander-in-chief.
According to one source, Trump strongly insisted on delivering the televised remarks. Officials explained that while the speech was being considered, the White House abandoned the plan due to lingering uncertainties about the ceasefire terms.
Senior advisers were still analyzing the agreement’s components and felt they lacked sufficient information for a presidential address to the nation, sources revealed.
On April 1, Trump had delivered a 19-minute evening broadcast to Americans, firmly defending his war strategy and announcing plans for intensive strikes against Iran over the following two to three weeks. A subsequent address would have provided an opportunity to explain his strategic reversal.
A senior White House official confirmed internal conversations about Trump speaking to the nation Tuesday evening.
“There was chatter about it, but obviously it didn’t come to fruition, and we didn’t alert the networks or anything; it didn’t get that far,” the official explained to Reuters, though they did not verify that Trump was discouraged from giving the speech.
The ceasefire has suspended American and Israeli bombing campaigns against Iran. However, it has not lifted the Strait of Hormuz blockade, which has created unprecedented global energy supply disruptions, nor has it stopped the separate conflict between Israel and Iranian-supported Hezbollah forces in Lebanon.
The waterway remained closed Friday, and Israel exchanged gunfire with Hezbollah in Lebanon – two ongoing issues that both the United States and Iran characterized as breaches of their ceasefire agreement just before their initial peace discussions.
Trump has expressed his anger publicly, posting that Iran was violating the agreement and declaring Friday: “The only reason they are alive today is to negotiate!”
Nevertheless, both nations are dispatching senior negotiators to Islamabad for discussions beginning Saturday. Vice President JD Vance will head the American delegation and stated Friday that the United States was prepared to negotiate honestly.
“If they’re going to try to play us, then they’re going to find the negotiating team is not that receptive,” Vance warned.
Experts emphasize the minimal trust existing between both parties, noting that Trump’s Tuesday threat that “a whole civilization will die tonight” unless his conditions were satisfied may have caused additional damage.
During his previous presidency, Trump withdrew from a 2018 nuclear agreement his predecessor had negotiated with Iran, then bombed Iranian nuclear facilities during 2025 negotiations. Trump initiated the current war against Iran on February 28, despite mediator Oman expressing optimism for a diplomatic resolution.
“So there’s a baked-in lack of trust that is going to confound any diplomacy going forward,” explained Justin Logan, who directs defense and foreign policy studies at the Washington-based Cato Institute think tank.
Pentagon officials state that American and Israeli operations have severely damaged Iran’s military capabilities for a generation. Yet analysts believe Iran will likely emerge as a persistent, long-term challenge for Washington: a diminished opponent with more extreme leadership and hidden reserves of weapons-grade uranium.
Tehran has also proven its capacity to block the Strait of Hormuz, providing significant influence over international energy markets and regional competitors, experts note.
Federal immigration authorities have launched a comprehensive nationwide investigation targeting organized networks accused of helping expectant mothers from other countries fraudulently obtain visas to give birth in the United States, according to internal communications obtained by news outlets.
Immigration and Customs Enforcement distributed an internal message Thursday directing field agents across the nation to prioritize what the agency calls its “Birth Tourism Initiative.” The investigation seeks to identify and dismantle networks that allegedly assist pregnant foreign nationals in traveling to America specifically to secure U.S. citizenship for their newborns.
The enforcement action represents part of President Donald Trump’s broader immigration strategy following his return to office in January 2025, targeting both unauthorized border crossings and legal immigration pathways. The administration has pointed to birth tourism concerns as justification for its efforts to eliminate automatic citizenship for children born on American soil.
“Uninhibited birth tourism poses a tremendous cost to taxpayers and threatens our national security,” White House spokeswoman Anna Kelly said in a statement, adding that most nations do not provide automatic citizenship at birth.
Federal agencies including the Department of Homeland Security, ICE, and the Justice Department declined to provide additional details when contacted for comment.
While no federal statute explicitly prohibits birth tourism, regulations established during Trump’s previous presidency in 2020 forbid using temporary visitor and business visas primarily to secure American citizenship for babies. Individuals involved in such arrangements face potential prosecution for fraud and related criminal charges.
Official statistics tracking foreign nationals who travel to the United States specifically for childbirth purposes do not exist, nor are there verified calculations of associated taxpayer expenses.
The Center for Immigration Studies, an organization advocating for reduced immigration levels, published research in 2020 suggesting approximately 20,000 to 25,000 mothers engaged in birth tourism during a twelve-month span from 2016 to 2017.
With 3.6 million total births recorded in the United States during 2025, birth tourism cases likely constitute a small percentage of overall deliveries.
Republican lawmakers have cited birth tourism allegations as grounds for restricting access to American citizenship, which has traditionally been granted at birth under constitutional amendment provisions.
On his first day back in office, Trump signed an executive directive ordering federal agencies to stop recognizing citizenship for children born in America when neither parent holds U.S. citizenship or permanent residency status, marking a significant departure from established legal practice spanning more than 100 years.
Several federal judges have temporarily halted the executive order, pushing the matter to the Supreme Court, which heard oral arguments last week. U.S. Solicitor General D. John Sauer, speaking for the Trump administration, argued that automatic citizenship has fostered “a sprawling industry of birth tourism.”
Sauer contended that birthright citizenship guarantees have motivated thousands from “potentially hostile nations” to travel for childbirth, “creating a whole generation of American citizens abroad with no meaningful ties to the United States.”
The new ICE enforcement initiative, led by the agency’s Homeland Security Investigations division, focuses on uncovering fraudulent activities, though the potential scope of cases remains uncertain.
“HIS is advancing efforts to protect the integrity of U.S. immigration and identification systems, specifically targeting fraudulent activities associated with birth tourism schemes,” the internal communication stated. Officials indicated they would work to disrupt “fraud, financial crimes, and organized facilitation networks that exploit lawful immigration processes.”
Federal prosecutors previously pursued a significant birth tourism case in 2019, charging more than twelve individuals in connection with “birth houses” operating in Southern California that served wealthy Chinese clients.
In what ICE described as the first federal prosecution targeting birth tourism, Chinese national Dongyuan Li admitted guilt to federal charges related to the operation. She received a ten-month prison sentence and was released in December 2019.
Another Chinese national, Chao “Edwin” Chen, received a three-year prison sentence in 2020 but had already departed the United States for China before serving his term, according to ICE records.
Former Vice President Kamala Harris revealed Friday that she’s contemplating another presidential campaign in 2028, telling attendees at a civil rights conference that the possibility remains on the table.
Speaking at the National Action Network gathering in New York City, an organization established by Reverend Al Sharpton, Harris responded to a direct question about her political future from Sharpton himself.
“I might, I might. I’m thinking about it, I’m thinking about it,” Harris responded, drawing enthusiastic applause from the audience.
The former vice president explained that any decision would depend on who could most effectively serve “the American people” in the nation’s highest office come 2028.
Harris, who previously held the role of vice president during Joe Biden’s administration, was defeated by Donald Trump in the 2024 election, losing both the popular vote and Electoral College. Her political background includes serving as a United States senator and California’s attorney general. She also mounted an unsuccessful campaign for the Democratic presidential nomination in 2020.
Any potential 2028 campaign could encounter obstacles, as recent surveys suggest Democratic voters are seeking fresh leadership following Harris’ electoral defeat against Trump.
The National Action Network event attracted numerous prospective Democratic contenders, including Pennsylvania’s Governor Josh Shapiro, former Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg, and Illinois Governor JB Pritzker, along with other political figures.
NEW YORK — The former Vice President received enthusiastic encouragement from African American activists Friday when she revealed she’s seriously weighing another White House campaign.
“I might. I am thinking about it,” Harris responded when Rev. Al Sharpton directly questioned whether she planned to seek the presidency in 2028.
The exchange occurred at the National Action Network’s yearly gathering, where over six potential Democratic candidates made appearances this week, seeking to build relationships with Black voters who represent a crucial Democratic constituency.
While the Democratic presidential primary cycle won’t officially launch until after this November’s midterm contests, the week’s events highlighted numerous Democrats already positioning themselves for what’s expected to be a competitive race.
Currently, no obvious frontrunner has emerged. However, one candidate clearly dominated at Sharpton’s event.
Harris, who made history as the first Black woman to serve as vice president and carried the Democratic ticket in 2024, was the only speaker to receive a standing ovation and drew the week’s largest audience. Attendees broke into her speech with calls of “Run again!”
Sharpton observed that Harris collected more ballots in her unsuccessful 2024 race than Democratic presidents Barack Obama and Bill Clinton had in their campaigns.
“Whatever she decides to do, she made a point in history,” Sharpton commented.
Since leaving office 15 months ago, Harris has previously hinted at another presidential campaign. She recently established a political action committee and has been traveling nationwide to campaign for Democratic candidates, particularly throughout Southern states.
However, some party members have turned their attention toward newer Democratic leadership following Harris’ challenges in the previous presidential election.
This week’s speaker roster included Pennsylvania Gov. Josh Shapiro, former Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg, Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker, Maryland Gov. Wes Moore, Kentucky Gov. Andy Beshear, Rep. Ro Khanna of California, and Arizona Sens. Mark Kelly and Ruben Gallego.
When Buttigieg took the stage after Harris departed, he faced lukewarm applause in a room that had emptied by half. While some audience members cheered his mentions of supporting federal employees and minority-owned businesses, many had left the packed venue following Harris’ remarks to attempt taking photos with the former vice president.
Like other potential 2028 candidates this week, Buttigieg dismissed questions about another presidential campaign with laughter.
Harris provided a more direct response.
She stated “I’m thinking about it” three times when Sharpton pressed her about pursuing the White House in 2028.
“I served for four years being a heartbeat away from the presidency of the United States. I spent countless hours in my West Wing office footsteps away from the Oval Office. I spent countless hours in the Oval Office and the situation room. I know what the job is, and I know what it requires,” Harris explained.
She added: “I am thinking about it in the context of who and where and how can the best job be done for the American people. That’s how I’m thinking about it. I’ll keep you posted.”
NEW YORK — Former Vice President Kamala Harris revealed Friday that she’s seriously weighing another White House campaign after supporters at a civil rights gathering urged her to seek the presidency once more.
When Rev. Al Sharpton posed the direct question about a 2028 run, Harris responded: “I might. I am thinking about it.”
The exchange occurred at the National Action Network’s yearly gathering, where over six potential Democratic candidates made appearances throughout the week, seeking to build relationships with Black voters who represent a crucial Democratic constituency.
While the Democratic presidential primary cycle won’t officially launch until after this year’s midterm elections, the convention highlighted how various party figures are already positioning themselves for what’s expected to be a competitive race.
Currently, no obvious frontrunner has emerged. However, Harris appeared to be the crowd favorite at Sharpton’s event.
The former vice president, who broke barriers as the first Black woman to hold that office and served as the 2024 Democratic presidential candidate, was the only speaker to receive a standing ovation and drew the week’s largest audience. Supporters interrupted her speech multiple times with calls of “Run again!”
Sharpton highlighted that Harris collected more votes in her unsuccessful 2024 race than former Democratic Presidents Barack Obama and Bill Clinton achieved in their campaigns.
“Whatever she decides to do, she made a point in history,” Sharpton remarked.
This isn’t the first time Harris has hinted at another presidential campaign since departing office 15 months ago. She recently established a political action committee and has been traveling nationwide to campaign for Democratic candidates, particularly in Southern states.
However, some party members are looking toward newer Democratic leadership following Harris’ challenges in the most recent presidential election.
This week’s speaker roster included Pennsylvania Governor Josh Shapiro, former Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg, Illinois Governor JB Pritzker, Maryland Governor Wes Moore, Kentucky Governor Andy Beshear, California Representative Ro Khanna, and Arizona Senators Mark Kelly and Ruben Gallego.
When Buttigieg took the stage after Harris departed, he spoke to lukewarm applause in a significantly emptied auditorium. While some attendees cheered his remarks about supporting federal employees and minority-owned businesses, many had left following Harris’ address to attempt photographs with the former vice president.
Like other potential 2028 candidates this week, Buttigieg dismissed questions about future presidential ambitions with humor.
Harris provided a more direct response.
She stated “I’m thinking about it” three separate times when Sharpton inquired about her 2028 intentions.
“I served for four years being a heartbeat away from the presidency of the United States. I spent countless hours in my West Wing office footsteps away from the Oval Office. I spent countless hours in the Oval Office and the situation room. I know what the job is, and I know what it requires,” Harris explained.
She added: “I am thinking about it in the context of who and where and how can the best job be done for the American people. That’s how I’m thinking about it. I’ll keep you posted.”
President Donald Trump’s backup strategy for implementing worldwide import taxes is facing another court battle as his signature economic initiative encounters continued legal resistance.
On Friday, the U.S. Court of International Trade in New York conducted oral arguments regarding Trump’s current tariff system, which he implemented after the Supreme Court rejected his original, more expansive tariff plan in February.
Trump initially attempted to establish global tariffs by citing the International Emergency Economic Powers Act of 1977, declaring the nation’s persistent trade deficit a national emergency to justify imposing substantial import taxes worldwide. His interpretation of this legislation was broad, allowing him to set tariffs of any amount, at any time, targeting any nation he chose.
However, the Supreme Court invalidated those tariffs on February 20, ruling that the emergency powers law did not grant authority to use tariffs as a response to national emergencies.
Following this setback, Trump turned to Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974 as his backup plan. This provision permits presidents to establish worldwide tariffs up to 15% for a maximum of 150 days, requiring Congressional authorization for any extension. Trump immediately announced 10% tariffs under this authority and indicated he might increase them to the full 15%, though he has not yet done so. These current tariffs will end on July 24.
The legal dispute centers on whether Section 122’s language regarding “fundamental international payments problems” encompasses trade deficits — the difference between American exports and imports with other nations.
This trade provision was created during the monetary crises of the 1960s and 1970s, when the dollar was backed by gold. During that era, foreign countries were exchanging dollars for gold at fixed rates, threatening to destabilize American currency and create financial market turmoil. Since the gold standard no longer exists, opponents argue Section 122 has become outdated.
The situation presents complications for both sides. Trump’s own Justice Department previously filed court documents stating the president had to use emergency powers because Section 122 lacked “obvious application” to trade deficit issues, describing trade deficits as “conceptually distinct” from payment problems.
Conversely, the challengers face their own contradiction: the same trade court that is now hearing their case previously ruled that Trump could have used Section 122 to address trade deficits instead of emergency powers.
WASHINGTON – President Donald Trump encouraged Americans in February to enjoy their enhanced tax refunds, describing this year’s payments as “substantially greater than ever before” due to new individual tax relief measures enacted in 2025.
“Don’t spend all of this money in one place!” Trump posted on his Truth Social platform.
However, Americans are finding themselves doing exactly that, as rising fuel costs are consuming the majority of increased tax refunds resulting from new deductions on gratuities, Social Security benefits, overtime wages, vehicle loan interest, and state and local taxes included in last year’s GOP tax legislation.
Oil prices remained near $100 per barrel Friday despite an unstable ceasefire in the U.S.-Iran conflict, with the Strait of Hormuz still blocked ahead of diplomatic discussions in Islamabad. Even with potential reopening of the crucial waterway that carries roughly 20% of global oil supplies, fuel costs may continue climbing for months, according to Energy Information Administration projections showing Brent crude averaging $96 annually.
Energy analysts at Rystad Energy warn that damaged infrastructure throughout the Gulf region will constrain future production, with reconstruction expenses estimated at a minimum of $25 billion and potentially rising as hostilities persist.
Continued energy supply disruptions suggest extended hardship at gas stations, with economists noting that lower-income Americans, who dedicate larger portions of their earnings to fuel, will experience minimal benefits from tax reductions.
Consumer prices surged 0.9% in March, marking the steepest monthly increase in nearly four years, primarily due to unprecedented gasoline price jumps amid global oil market volatility and ongoing tariff impacts, Friday’s Bureau of Labor Statistics report revealed. Additional cost increases for diesel fuel, fertilizer, aluminum, and other commodities affected by Middle Eastern conflicts, along with food price inflation, threaten to eliminate remaining refund benefits.
Through March 27, average individual tax refunds for 2025 increased by $351, representing an 11.1% jump to $3,521 compared to the previous year, based on current Internal Revenue Service processing statistics.
These amounts may climb before Wednesday’s April 15 filing deadline, with projections ranging from Morgan Stanley’s $560 estimate to the Tax Foundation’s $611 calculation and Treasury’s $1,000 forecast. However, some relief may appear through reduced payroll withholding or decreased quarterly individual payments.
TAX BENEFITS BECOMING ECONOMIC BUFFER
Stanford Institute for Economic Policy Research economists calculate that conflict-related price increases have raised Americans’ typical annual gasoline expenses by $857 this year. Their March 23 analysis assumed Brent futures at $99 per barrel – roughly $2 above Friday’s levels – and projected Strait of Hormuz reopening around April 10.
Congressional Joint Economic Committee Democrats estimate Americans spent an extra $8.4 billion on gasoline during the Iran war’s initial month, using AAA price information, Edmunds.com fuel efficiency data, and federal consumption statistics. This amount represents nearly one-third of the $26.5 billion total IRS refund increase through March 27.
“Gas prices are probably the most salient price in the economy,” explained Stanford University economics professor Neale Mahoney. “The impacts may be modest from a macro perspective, but for the sort of kitchen-table economics of a family, and things that they’re paying attention to, they can be big.”
Families anticipating larger refunds for summer vacations or home renovations may scale back plans as they spend more filling their tanks. Food costs are also expected to rise as higher diesel, fertilizer, jet fuel, and aluminum prices ripple through the economy.
What officials intended as economic stimulus is now functioning more as protection against deeper recession, though analysts are reducing U.S. consumption and GDP projections by several tenths of a percentage point. Morgan Stanley now forecasts 2026 consumption growth slowing to 1.7% from 2025’s 2.1%, with durable goods bearing most impacts, while Oxford Economics cut global GDP growth expectations for 2026 to 2.6% from 3.0%, well below recent performance.
ENHANCED DEDUCTIONS FOR PROPERTY OWNERS
Most tax relief provisions in the One Big Beautiful Bill Act approved by the Republican-majority Congress last year applied retroactively from January 2025, meaning initial benefits primarily come through claimed income deductions.
Multiple breaks, including those covering tips, overtime, Social Security, and auto loan interest, apply whether taxpayers itemize returns or claim the standard deduction, which also increased $1,150 for individual filers in 2025. This modification would generate a $138 refund boost for 12% tax bracket filers earning $11,926 to $48,475.
Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent recently praised the overtime deduction as “a home run,” noting 25% of filers are utilizing it.
However, one major benefit – a $30,000 increase in state and local tax deductions – still requires itemization, essentially excluding non-homeowners without mortgages or property tax obligations.
Only taxpayers with market incomes between $71,659 and $126,348 – exceeding 60% of earners – will retain money from new tax breaks after covering increased fuel expenses, according to Tax Foundation analysis. Market income encompasses adjusted gross income, tax-exempt interest, employer health and retirement benefits, and additional components.
Tax Foundation research indicates that reductions for the top 0.01% of returns exceeding $2.24 million in income still provide greater tax savings than benefits for those earning up to $37,486.
Vice President JD Vance departed the nation’s capital Friday afternoon bound for Pakistan, where he will engage in diplomatic discussions concerning Iran, delivering a stern message to Iranian leadership about negotiating honestly.
Speaking with members of the press before his departure from Washington, Vance expressed optimism about the upcoming diplomatic mission. “We’re looking forward to the negotiation. I think it’s going to be positive,” he stated.
The Vice President emphasized the administration’s willingness to engage constructively while making clear the consequences of dishonest negotiations. “As the president of the United States said, if the Iranians are willing to negotiate in good faith, we’re certainly willing to extend the open hand,” Vance explained. “If they’re going to try to play us, then they’re going to find the negotiating team is not that receptive.”
The diplomatic talks represent a significant moment in U.S.-Iran relations as both nations navigate complex regional tensions through dialogue.
The Cecil County Board of Elections in Maryland has issued an official public notice to residents.
The announcement was posted on the county’s official website as part of their civic alerts system to keep the community informed about election-related developments.
Cecil County is located in northeastern Maryland, bordering Delaware and Pennsylvania.
WASHINGTON — The Democratic Party finds itself overwhelmed as external organizations pour unprecedented amounts of money into their midterm primary contests.
While Democrats work to reclaim congressional control, groups connected to the American Israel Public Affairs Committee, along with cryptocurrency and artificial intelligence organizations, have taken over television advertising, often pushing actual candidates to the margins of their own races.
“These primaries have become proxy wars, and the candidates are almost afterthoughts in larger skirmishes,” explained Democratic pollster Zac McCrary.
The Democratic National Committee is now moving forward with a resolution during their New Orleans spring gathering to criticize this spending surge that has disrupted their primaries and heightened internal party divisions. The final vote is scheduled for Friday.
Defeated candidates have blamed special interest groups for destroying their campaigns. Current contenders are appealing to voters by criticizing wealthy outside organizations. Even those who received benefits from the spending have voiced concerns.
“It’s definitely a brave new world,” McCrary noted.
“We’re not talking about doubling of campaign expenditures,” he continued. “We’re talking about 10 times or 20 times more.”
Dan Sena, who previously served as executive director at the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, explained that party organizations no longer hold the influence to promote their preferred candidates.
“All that’s been completely smashed now,” Sena stated. He cautioned that even if Democrats recapture the U.S. House, outside spending could harm the party’s future.
Speaking about House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, he warned, “You’re going to hand Jeffries a caucus that is divided.”
During this election cycle, external funding in U.S. House contests has primarily focused on districts strongly favoring Democrats, indicating the primaries will probably decide November’s general election winners. Following a record number of House retirements this year, numerous seats became available for the first time in years, attracting many Democratic candidates.
Illinois witnessed over $125 million in outside expenditures across five open Democratic primaries. In nearly every congressional race, external spending surpassed what candidates themselves spent.
Though the election calendar is still early, signs point to significant spending in many additional races. Nearly 40 seats have already experienced more than $1 million in outside expenditures, based on Federal Election Commission records.
In Illinois, AIPAC-affiliated groups topped the spending list for U.S. House races, according to AdImpact, which monitors political advertising purchases, with cryptocurrency-linked Fairshake following behind.
AIPAC was established to promote robust U.S.-Israel relations, a particularly divisive topic as Democratic opposition to Israel grows due to the Gaza conflict. Some DNC members sought to specifically address AIPAC’s primary involvement, but the final resolution avoided this.
“We had various resolutions that focused on different industries and groups, and instead of going one-by-one, we passed a blanket repudiation,” stated DNC Chair Ken Martin.
This recent DNC gathering represents another installment in ongoing conflicts between progressives and party leadership.
Progressive members want the party to establish official language requiring all Democratic presidential candidates to reject funding from dark-money organizations, or super PACs that don’t need to reveal their donors.
“It’s necessary that we actually have the party do something on this issue, not just say something,” said Larry Cohen, co-chair of Our Revolution, a progressive organization created by independent Sen. Bernie Sanders of Vermont, who aligns with Democrats.
Progressives view the New Orleans DNC resolution as progress toward their objective. However, some Democrats caution against weakening their candidates when confronting a well-funded Republican Party.
“Provided that we don’t handcuff ourselves in the general elections — because if the Republicans are going to use dark money in general elections, we should be using our money in general elections, too — if you provide an even playing field, I think then that’s fine,” explained Sen. Ruben Gallego, an Arizona Democrat. “But we just can’t be handcuffing ourselves in the general to lose races.”
DNC resolutions wouldn’t prevent outside groups from injecting funds into primary or general election contests. But some Democrats consider this issue fundamental to party principles.
“We should eliminate any super PAC in a Democratic primary. And I think every presidential candidate in 2028 should pledge that they will not have any super PAC spending in a Democratic primary,” said Rep. Ro Khanna, a progressive and potential Democratic presidential candidate who co-chaired Sanders’ 2020 presidential campaign.
“That should be a litmus test,” Khanna maintained. “If you’re not willing to take that pledge, then you’re part of the problem.”
In an unusual move, former First Lady Melania Trump released a public statement Thursday addressing speculation about her connection to convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. Trump categorically denied maintaining a friendship with Epstein and disputed assertions that the disgraced financier facilitated her introduction to former President Donald Trump.
Federal health officials have conceded they made a major data error when launching a fraud investigation into New York’s Medicaid program, raising questions about the accuracy of similar probes targeting other states across the country.
The mistake involved wildly inflated numbers that Dr. Mehmet Oz, who leads the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, used to justify the investigation. In a social media video and official correspondence to New York’s governor last month, Oz stated that approximately 5 million New Yorkers received personal care services through Medicaid in the previous year.
“That level of utilization is unheard of,” Oz declared in his video, demanding that New York “come clean about its Medicaid program.”
However, federal officials now admit the actual figure was roughly 450,000 people, representing just 6% to 7% of the state’s total Medicaid recipients rather than the three-quarters that the original claim suggested.
CMS spokesperson Chris Krepich explained this week that the agency incorrectly interpreted New York’s billing code system and has since updated its analysis methods. “CMS is committed to ensuring its analyses fully reflect state-specific billing practices and will continue to work closely with New York to validate data and strengthen program integrity oversight,” Krepich stated in an email.
The blunder has drawn criticism from policy experts who question the thoroughness of the administration’s anti-fraud initiatives. “These numbers could have been cleared up in a phone call, so it’s really slapdash,” commented Michael Kinnucan, a senior health policy adviser at the Fiscal Policy Institute who first highlighted the administration’s incorrect figures.
Despite acknowledging the error, federal officials say their investigation continues, citing other concerns about New York’s Medicaid spending and oversight practices. They point to higher-than-average costs per beneficiary and the state’s substantial investment in personal care aide positions.
New York health officials have pushed back against the characterizations. Cadence Acquaviva from the state Department of Health described Oz’s original statements as “a targeted attempt to obscure the facts.” She emphasized that “New York State remains committed to protecting and preserving vital Medicaid programs that deliver high-quality services to New Yorkers who depend on them.”
Governor Kathy Hochul’s office welcomed the federal admission of error. “The initial claim by CMS was patently false, and we are glad they now admit it,” said spokesperson Nicolette Simmonds. She added that Hochul “has been clear that New York has zero tolerance for waste, fraud and abuse in Medicaid, or any other state programs.”
The New York investigation is part of a broader federal effort targeting potential healthcare fraud in multiple states, including California, Florida, Maine, and Minnesota. President Trump recently established an anti-fraud task force headed by Vice President JD Vance, which has already moved to suspend $243 million in Minnesota Medicaid funding over fraud allegations.
Critics argue this approach creates unnecessary confrontation in what should be collaborative oversight efforts. “We want to think collaboratively among all the stakeholders in the program about how we can actually fix it,” Kinnucan explained. “We don’t want to have fraud be this political football.”
Beyond the numerical error, advocates say Oz made additional misleading claims about New York’s program. He suggested the state had relaxed eligibility requirements to include conditions like being “easily distracted” as grounds for personal care assistance.
Rebecca Antar, who directs the health law unit at the Legal Aid Society, contradicted this assertion, explaining that New York actually tightened its requirements in September and that “easily distracted” doesn’t appear in the criteria.
Oz also characterized personal care services as tasks “that our families would normally do for us, like carrying groceries,” a description that upset program participants like Kathleen Downes, a 33-year-old Nassau County resident with quadriplegic cerebral palsy.
Downes, who requires assistance with basic activities like bathing and eating, said the comment overlooks the reality that many people lack family members who can provide such intensive care. “He’s assuming that everybody wants to and can just do it for free forever,” she noted. “And that’s not feasible for a lot of people.”
NEW YORK (AP) — During his opening 100 days as New York City’s mayor, Zohran Mamdani has transformed municipal leadership with an unprecedented level of celebrity influence rarely witnessed in local politics.
Large gatherings of supporters regularly attend his public announcements. Standard city operations have gained fresh energy and public attention. High-profile entertainers actively promote his policy initiatives.
Through this approach, he has secured several significant early accomplishments. He has also established a working relationship — temporarily at least — with President Donald Trump, an unpredictable leader who appreciates celebrity culture.
However, as the Democratic mayor reaches this early benchmark in his administration, questions remain about whether his public prominence can translate into successful implementation of the progressive policies that helped him win election.
While facing determined opposition, particularly from those who continue to criticize his previous statements about law enforcement and Israel, the mayor has managed to reduce concerns among some former doubters.
Jay Jacobs, who leads the state Democratic Party and notably declined to support Mamdani during the campaign, said: “It’s early but so far, so good. We may not agree on everything philosophically, but he is getting the job done.”
As his administration reached the 100-day mark — traditionally used to evaluate new leadership — his staff has emphasized their focus on fundamental municipal responsibilities.
Although these tasks represent standard mayoral duties — waste collection, snow removal and road maintenance — the 34-year-old leader has utilized his talent for creating viral online content to generate public engagement with government services.
When winter weather threatened the city, Mamdani’s social media appeals for additional snow removal volunteers successfully recruited thousands of new workers. A separate online video from the mayor promoting the city’s emergency notification system attracted over 50,000 new participants within one week, according to his administration.
Working with WNBA player Natasha Cloud from the New York Liberty, Mamdani launched a tournament-style voting system allowing residents to select minor infrastructure repairs they wanted the mayor to personally address in their communities. Within several weeks, the initiative received more than 21,000 votes.
To generate excitement for his childcare initiative serving 2-year-olds, Mamdani enlisted rapper Cardi B to help evaluate a musical competition that will select the program’s official theme song.
Speaking to journalists on his 99th day in office this week, Mamdani stated: “The challenge that we set out for ourselves was to work as hard and as fast as New Yorkers do.”
The celebrity attention, however, can create negative reactions. His unexpected guest spot on “Tonight Show With Jimmy Fallon” during an extreme cold period drew criticism as inappropriate timing while homeless deaths were increasing throughout the city.
Curtis Sliwa, a Republican candidate who opposed Mamdani in last year’s election, criticized what he called “Too much styling and profiling,” pointing to persistent issues with street homelessness, public housing conditions and infrastructure problems.
Nevertheless, Sliwa, who strongly criticized Mamdani during the campaign but recently joined the mayor in a comedic performance at the City Hall press corps’ annual event, seemed to offer qualified praise.
“We just had Eric Adams, swagger man who’d party to the break of dawn, and now we have a guy who seems like he’s got a normal working schedule,” Sliwa said, referring to the previous mayor. “So having Zohran as the alternative, I think for a lot of people even if they disagree with him, there’s some stability.”
Mamdani has also directed his significant public following toward another standard aspect of municipal leadership: budget planning.
Earlier this year, Mamdani conducted an unusually serious news conference at City Hall regarding a substantial budget shortfall, stating that either the state would need to impose higher taxes on wealthy residents or he would be forced to raise local property taxes to achieve budget balance.
The mayor’s public strategy was widely interpreted as an attempt to pressure New York Governor Kathy Hochul into supporting a millionaires tax, a central priority for Mamdani and his political supporters. Hochul, a centrist Democrat facing reelection this year, has firmly rejected such legislation.
When the City Council presented an alternative budget proposal using different methods to address the deficit, Mamdani criticized the plan and produced a video targeting Council Speaker Julie Menin, which led to online harassment of the speaker by some of his supporters.
The city’s financial difficulties, which remain unresolved, may present a significant obstacle for Mamdani as he works to advance his policy agenda.
Andrew Rein, who heads the fiscally conservative Citizens Budget Commission, described Mamdani as facing an “extra challenging” budget process, but noted that the mayor’s communication abilities could help him manage difficult circumstances.
“What we’ve seen is him bringing his newer strategies and tools to communications but in a very practical, old-school problem,” Rein explained. “When he uses his communications skills to get people more invested and to improve the functioning of government and to help New Yorkers the trade offs that have to be made, that is going to be a great win.”
On the evening of Mamdani’s victory celebration, hundreds filled the streets, many arriving spontaneously, hoping to catch sight of the mayor-elect as he departed the event. Departing campaign workers received cheers by name well past midnight. One observer compared the street celebration to Beatlemania.
Medhavie Agnihotri, a 25-year-old technology consultant, remarked: “I feel like I’m at a presidential inauguration. This is the first time in a while I’ve felt this hope.”
His celebrity appeal has remained strong among certain groups since taking office.
Around City Hall, New Yorkers and visitors regularly request photographs, looking through the metal fencing hoping to spot the mayor.
This week, during the mayor’s 97th day in office, a large crowd assembled in the main area of Manhattan’s busy Bellevue Hospital, observing as Mamdani announced the city would begin transferring certain individuals with severe medical conditions from the notorious Rikers Island detention facility to the hospital.
He arrived to cheers and applause from the substantial gathering, many appearing to be hospital employees who raised their phones to record the mayor’s remarks. Additional spectators watched from elevated walkways above.
Ricardo Granados, a 67-year-old retiree accompanying his son to a medical appointment, paused to investigate the commotion. He expressed enthusiasm upon learning Mamdani would appear, mentioning he had previously met Mamdani when the politician was campaigning in Granados’ neighborhood.
“I’m extremely fond of him. I think he’s going to make a real difference,” Granados said. “He wants to find out who needs what and he wants to help.”
Military service personnel are expressing mounting concerns about how the Trump administration has utilized the armed forces since the president returned to office for his second term, based on conversations with active duty members and military advocacy groups.
The unrest within military ranks has intensified following the administration’s military engagement in Iran, according to interviews conducted by NPR with various service members and those who represent their interests.
The growing dissatisfaction among military personnel highlights tensions between the administration’s military policies and the comfort level of those tasked with carrying out orders within the armed services.
Members of Congress are pushing for formal investigations into the prediction betting website Polymarket following reports of suspicious trading activity related to recent geopolitical developments involving Iran.
The controversy centers around anonymous users who allegedly placed strategic wagers on Iranian military actions just hours before those events actually took place, raising questions about potential insider information.
This marks the latest incident where groups of unidentified bettors have made precisely-timed predictions on significant world events through the platform, prompting increased scrutiny from federal lawmakers.
The timing of these bets has sparked concerns among congressional representatives about the integrity of prediction markets and whether some users may have access to classified or privileged information about international affairs.
Polymarket operates as a platform where users can place monetary bets on the outcomes of future events, ranging from political elections to major news developments.
A federal immigration board has rejected the most recent legal challenge by Palestinian activist Mahmoud Khalil to halt his deportation proceedings.
The Board of Immigration Appeals turned down Khalil’s petition to have his removal case dismissed, marking another setback in his ongoing legal battle to remain in the United States.
The adverse ruling moves the activist closer to potential deportation as his legal options continue to narrow. Khalil has been fighting removal proceedings while advocating for Palestinian causes.
The immigration board’s decision represents the latest development in what has become a prolonged legal fight over Khalil’s immigration status and his efforts to avoid being sent out of the country.
WASHINGTON — President Donald Trump’s attempts to find a way out of the Iranian conflict are creating friction within GOP ranks.
The Republican Party hasn’t faced this kind of internal testing since Trump’s “America First” philosophy gained prominence a decade ago by opposing overseas military engagements. His current strategy — combining threats of destruction with a shaky ceasefire agreement — has failed to mask divisions that have grown over the six weeks since hostilities began.
Conservative activist Laura Loomer, typically one of Trump’s strongest advocates, criticized the idea of making any agreement with Iran. She also questioned Vice President JD Vance’s leadership role in negotiations scheduled to begin Saturday in Pakistan, as Vance positions himself for a possible 2028 presidential campaign.
“I support President Trump,” Loomer said in an interview. “I just don’t believe in negotiating with Islamic terrorists.”
Vance’s office did not respond to a request for comment.
Former Georgia Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene, who has shifted from Trump supporter to critic, demanded the president’s removal under the 25th Amendment following his recent statement that a “whole civilization will die tonight” without an Iranian agreement. Podcaster Megyn Kelly, formerly with Fox News, delivered a harsh rebuke of Trump and questioned, “Can’t he just behave like a normal human?”
On a recent episode of “The Charlie Kirk Show,” the host joked about whether their program or the ceasefire would conclude first.
Congressional Republican leadership has remained mostly quiet despite mounting criticism. Many privately worry about Trump’s social media threats and the war’s potential impact during an election year. With Congress in recess through early April, House Speaker Mike Johnson of Louisiana and Senate Majority Leader John Thune of South Dakota have provided minimal public response to Trump’s actions.
Some lawmakers cited the rapidly changing situation as a reason for their silence.
“How do you go up and give a presentation or speech in a situation where every 12 hours, the baseline story has a new gradient?” said Rep. Dave Schweikert, an Arizona Republican running for governor. “In many ways, it is the sin of arrogance thinking you can go out and talk about something when the story is still unfolding.”
This uncertainty leaves Republicans in a precarious position, mirroring the war’s unstable status. The party already confronts challenging prospects for November’s midterm elections, with some hoping voters will have moved past Iran by then.
“My hope is that it will be long behind us by the time votes are cast,” said veteran Republican strategist Chris Wilson. “Fortunately for the GOP, foreign policy flare-ups rarely decide midterm elections on their own, especially when voters are far more focused on the economy and prices at home.”
Currently, Trump and his administration project confidence. The president celebrated a “big day for World Peace” when the ceasefire was initially announced. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt called it a “victory for the United States of America that the president and our incredible military made happen.”
Trump responded to critics on social media, calling detractors like Kelly “stupid people” who will “say anything necessary for some ‘free’ and cheap publicity.”
Several congressional supporters defend Trump against claims he’s become too involved overseas while neglecting domestic issues.
“Part of America First is making sure that the homeland stays safe and Iran is a factor in our safety,” said Rep. David Kustoff of Tennessee. “We are all hopeful that the ceasefire does hold and that Iran lives up to their side of the agreement.”
Historically, the president’s party loses congressional seats during midterm years, and recent election results provide additional GOP concerns.
Republican Clay Fuller captured Greene’s former district by approximately 12 percentage points, compared to her 29-point victory two years prior and Trump’s nearly 37-point district win. In Wisconsin, the liberal state Supreme Court majority expanded when a Democratic-backed candidate won decisively.
This continues a pattern of strong Democratic performances in recent contests, including in the Florida legislative district containing Trump’s Mar-a-Lago property.
According to Associated Press-NORC Center polling from last month, only about 40% of Americans approve of Trump’s presidential performance. This figure has remained steady since his January 2025 return to office but matches his standing during his first term when Democrats gained 40 House seats in 2018.
While Trump maintains solid Republican support, there are indications he could alienate supporters if America becomes mired in extended warfare. Though 63% of Republicans support airstrikes on Iranian military installations according to the March survey, only 20% favor deploying American ground forces. Rising fuel costs present another challenge, with roughly 60% of Republicans expressing concern about affording gasoline in coming months, though they’re less worried than other Americans.
Republicans who have engaged with constituents during recess believe the party has political space to manage the war situation.
Kustoff reported that voters throughout his rural northwestern Tennessee district appeared “generally supportive” of Trump’s Iran policies, even amid higher gas prices.
“My takeaway is that people are willing to endure some short-term pain as it relates to gas prices if the situation with Iran is resolved,” he explained.
However, returning lawmakers face several challenging decisions next week.
When the war started, some GOP members said Trump would need congressional authorization if fighting continued beyond 60 days, a deadline approaching late April if the ceasefire collapses. The administration wants billions in additional war funding, creating a vote that could complicate budget-conscious Republicans’ fall campaigns.
Democrats plan to force another vote on a war powers resolution limiting Trump’s Iran options. While a similar measure failed last month, another vote could pressure Republicans depending on ceasefire developments.
Schweikert characterized the war powers vote as the “dance of parties.”
“Their job is to try to embarrass us and our job as the majority is to try to make things work,” he said. “It’s just the job.”
A federal immigration appeals board has rejected the latest challenge by Palestinian activist Mahmoud Khalil to stop his deportation proceedings, moving the former Columbia University graduate student closer to potential removal from the United States.
The Board of Immigration Appeals delivered its final removal order Thursday, Khalil’s legal team confirmed. The board’s decisions remain confidential, and the U.S. Department of Justice has not responded to requests for comment.
Khalil expressed no shock at the outcome, describing the decision as “biased and politically motivated.” His legal representatives maintain he cannot be legally held or removed while his separate federal court case continues.
“The only thing I am guilty of is speaking out against the genocide in Palestine — and this administration has weaponized the immigration system to punish me for it,” Khalil stated.
The immigration appeals board establishes legal precedent within the complex immigration court framework, which operates under Department of Justice oversight and faces growing Trump administration influence.
The 31-year-old permanent resident became the first publicly identified individual arrested during federal enforcement actions targeting non-citizens who voiced criticism of Israel and its Gaza operations.
Federal authorities allege Khalil’s leadership role in Columbia’s pro-Palestinian demonstrations was “aligned to Hamas.” However, no evidence linking him to the designated terrorist organization has been disclosed, and Khalil strongly rejects any antisemitism accusations.
Following his March arrest, Khalil remained in immigration detention for 104 days, causing him to miss his first child’s birth, until a New Jersey federal judge ordered his release.
Khalil’s federal case suffered a major blow this year when a U.S. appeals court ruled the New Jersey judge exceeded his jurisdiction by ordering the release. The 2-1 panel decision determined that immigration court proceedings must conclude before federal court challenges can proceed.
His attorneys have petitioned the complete appeals panel to review that ruling. This month, they also requested one appellate judge’s recusal due to his former position as a senior Justice Department official who participated in student protest investigations.
Born in Syria to Palestinian parents, Khalil obtained Algerian citizenship through family connections. He warns that deportation could expose him to persecution and potentially fatal consequences.
A federal court has rejected the Department of Justice’s attempt to obtain Massachusetts voter registration records on Thursday, delivering another blow to the Trump administration’s nationwide campaign to gather comprehensive voter information.
U.S. District Court Judge Leo Sorokin ruled that federal prosecutors failed to meet legal requirements for accessing state voter databases under federal law. The Obama-appointed judge determined that the attorney general’s office did not provide adequate justification for demanding the records.
“Put simply, the statute requires a statement of why the Attorney General demands production of the requested records,” Sorokin wrote. That statement has to be factual, “not just a conceivable or possible basis.”
The Justice Department declined to comment on the decision, stating in an email that it “does not comment on ongoing litigation.”
Federal officials claim they need the voter information to strengthen election security measures, but state leaders from both parties across the country have pushed back, arguing the requests breach state and federal privacy protections. Many officials worry the government plans to use the sensitive information for alternative purposes, including identifying potential non-citizens on voter rolls.
At a Rhode Island court proceeding last month, a Justice Department lawyer revealed that officials want unredacted voter data to share with the Department of Homeland Security for citizenship verification purposes. DHS has recently expanded its Systematic Alien Verification for Entitlements (SAVE) program for this specific goal.
“Our intention is to run this against the DHS SAVE database,” DOJ attorney Eric Neff told U.S. District Judge Mary McElroy during a March 26 hearing challenging the federal government’s authority to access the voter data.
Federal prosecutors have filed lawsuits against at least 30 states plus Washington D.C., demanding access to voter data that includes birth dates, home addresses, driver’s license numbers, and partial Social Security numbers.
According to the Brennan Center, at least 12 states have either delivered or agreed to provide their complete voter registration databases to the department: Alaska, Arkansas, Indiana, Louisiana, Mississippi, Nebraska, Ohio, Oklahoma, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas and Wyoming.
In the Massachusetts decision, Judge Sorokin determined that the Justice Department ignored procedural requirements established by a 1960 civil rights statute for requesting voter records.
This legislation, created to combat racial discrimination in voting, mandates that state voter files be accessible to the U.S. attorney general only when officials provide a detailed explanation of why the information is needed and how it will be utilized.
The department’s request for Massachusetts voter data contained no reference to the Civil Rights Act and failed to cite specific concerns about Massachusetts’ compliance with federal voting regulations, the judge noted. Most critically, it lacked any factual foundation for the demand, Sorokin determined.
In legal filings, the Justice Department argued it needed the data to examine “Massachusetts’ possible lack of compliance” with federal voter registration requirements. Officials also contended that the Civil Rights Act serves as an investigative tool for identifying federal election law violations and maintained that the attorney general shouldn’t be required to prove violations before seeking evidence.
“These arguments miss the point,” Sorokin wrote.
Massachusetts Attorney General Andrea Joy Campbell praised the decision as a significant victory for voters and legal principles.
“The privacy of our voters is not up for negotiation, and I will continue to defend the integrity and security of our elections from the Trump Administration’s cruel and harmful agenda,” she said in a news release.
Four other federal judges in different states have rejected similar Justice Department lawsuits.
A Michigan federal judge ruled that laws referenced by the Justice Department don’t mandate disclosure of the voter records requested by federal officials. A California federal judge stated the administration “may not unilaterally usurp the authority over elections,” which the Constitution grants to states and Congress. An Oregon federal judge concluded the federal government wasn’t entitled to unredacted voter registration lists containing sensitive information.
A Georgia federal judge dismissed a DOJ lawsuit due to improper filing location. Federal officials then refiled the case in the correct jurisdiction, where it remains pending.
The Justice Department has filed appeals challenging the Oregon, California and Michigan dismissals.
WASHINGTON — The Trump administration announced Thursday that tax refunds have surged 24% when compared to the four-year average from before Trump assumed the presidency, attributing the boost to the Republican tax reform package enacted in recent years.
While the White House had initially projected that average refund amounts would climb by no less than $1,000 when this tax filing season launched in January, the most recent Internal Revenue Service figures show the current average refund sits at $3,521. This represents an 11% jump from the previous tax year’s average of $3,170.
Speaking anonymously to preview the data analysis, a Trump administration official attributed the refund increases to various tax relief measures and spending reductions affecting taxpayers at different income levels. These include eliminating taxes on tips and overtime pay, allowing deductions for auto loan interest, and providing certain deductions for senior citizens.
The official would not identify which specific tax deduction generated the most significant savings for filers. The administration’s analysis drew from daily Treasury Department statements covering the 2021-2026 timeframe.
When questioned about whether potential economic gains from larger tax refunds might be negated by rising fuel costs stemming from conflict in Iran and disruptions in the Strait of Hormuz, the official emphasized that the enhanced refunds are putting more money directly into Americans’ wallets.
The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office projects that the Republican tax and spending legislation will contribute $4.2 trillion to the federal debt by fiscal year 2034, based on their most recent Budget and Economic Outlook report.
The current tax filing period opened in January, and taxpayers face an April 15 deadline to submit their returns or file for an extension.
WASHINGTON — The Trump administration has achieved numerous victories through the Supreme Court’s emergency appeals process, with Justice Sonia Sotomayor explaining that conservative justices often view halting executive actions as causing irreversible damage.
Speaking at the University of Alabama School of Law on Thursday, Sotomayor described the surge in emergency requests from Trump’s team as “unprecedented in the court’s history.”
The nation’s highest court ruled in favor of the Trump administration in approximately 24 cases during the previous year, frequently overturning lower court rulings that had deemed various policies potentially unlawful. These decisions covered topics ranging from immigration enforcement to significant reductions in federal funding.
Although intended as temporary measures, these rulings have effectively enabled Trump to advance major components of his policy agenda in the near term.
The emergency appeals process, which involves requests for swift Supreme Court intervention in ongoing lower court cases, has become a point of contention among the justices themselves. This tension became visible when Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson and Justice Brett Kavanaugh engaged in a rare public disagreement about the emergency docket last month.
While Sotomayor has opposed many rulings favoring Trump, she explained that the court’s conservative majority frequently argues that stopping executive policies or congressional legislation creates legal damage that cannot be undone. This creates a difficult standard for opponents to meet, even when plaintiffs include immigrants facing potential deportation or states experiencing cuts to educational funding.
“If you start with the presumption that there is irreparable harm to one side, then you’re going to have more grants of emergency relief. Because the other side is going to have a much harder time,” she said. “It has changed the paradigm on the court.”
Sotomayor’s remarks offered insight into Supreme Court decisions that typically receive minimal public explanation. Despite numerous emergency victories for Trump, the court did reject his comprehensive tariff policies following complete legal briefs and oral arguments.
Former First Lady Melania Trump issued an uncommon public statement Wednesday from the White House Grand Foyer, firmly rejecting claims that she maintained a personal relationship with convicted sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein or his associate Ghislaine Maxwell.
Trump also made a direct appeal to Congress, requesting that lawmakers organize public hearings where Epstein’s victims could provide sworn testimony to officially document their experiences.
In her remarks, Trump confronted persistent speculation head-on, stating: “The lies linking me with the disgraceful Jeffrey Epstein need to end today.” She emphasized that she maintained no connection to either Epstein or Maxwell.
“I never been friends with Epstein,” Trump stated, acknowledging that she and Donald Trump sometimes attended the same social gatherings as Epstein in New York City and Palm Beach, but stressed this did not constitute a personal bond. “To be clear, I never had a relationship with Epstein or his accomplice, Maxwell.”
Epstein, a financier, faced federal sex trafficking charges involving minors when he was taken into custody in 2019. He died in jail while his trial was pending. Maxwell, who worked with him, received a 20-year prison sentence in 2021 after being found guilty of helping to recruit and abuse underage victims.
Regarding a previously disclosed email correspondence with Maxwell, Trump characterized it as ordinary communication. “My email reply to Maxwell cannot be categorized as anything more than casual correspondence,” she explained, noting it did not indicate any significant relationship.
Trump revealed she first met Epstein in 2000 at an event where she accompanied Donald Trump, stressing she had no awareness of his criminal behavior at that time. She dismissed online allegations, saying: “Numerous fake images and statements about Epstein and me have been calculating on social media for years now,” and cautioned: “Be cautious about what you believe. These images and stories are completely false.”
She confirmed her name has not surfaced in legal cases connected to Epstein and rejected any involvement in his illegal activities. “I was not a participant, was never on Epstein’s plane, and never visited his private island,” she declared.
Trump mentioned that she and her legal team have contested what she termed “unfound and baseless lies,” pointing out that multiple individuals and organizations, including Daily Beast, James Carville, and HarperCollins UK, had issued apologies or corrections.
A federal court has halted the Trump administration’s move to eliminate immigration protections for more than 5,000 Ethiopian nationals, preventing their potential deportation and preserving their ability to remain and work in America.
U.S. District Judge Brian Murphy in Massachusetts ruled Wednesday that the Trump administration ended the Temporary Protected Status program for Ethiopians while ignoring proper procedures established by Congress.
The ruling adds to mounting legal challenges as hundreds of thousands of protected immigrants from various nations fight the cancellation of their status in federal courtrooms nationwide. This marks another judicial obstacle to Trump’s efforts to eliminate TPS programs as part of his strict immigration policies.
During the Biden presidency, over 1 million immigrants from 17 nations received TPS protection. However, the Department of Homeland Security has revoked protections for 13 of those countries since Trump began his second term in January 2025.
Venezuelan nationals represented the biggest group of beneficiaries, with Haitians and Salvadorans following in size.
The U.S. Supreme Court is scheduled to consider arguments on April 29 regarding the administration’s attempts to end TPS for 6,100 Syrian nationals and 350,000 Haitian immigrants.
Congress established TPS in 1990 to halt deportations to nations experiencing natural disasters or civil conflict, providing work authorization in periods lasting up to 18 months.
The Biden administration provided TPS to Ethiopians in the U.S. during 2022, citing the necessity to shield them from armed violence and humanitarian crisis. Officials extended the protection in April 2024.
The Trump administration’s Department of Homeland Security cancelled Ethiopia’s TPS designation in December 2025, claiming the nation no longer qualified for the protection.
Judge Murphy determined that DHS ignored the legal procedures Congress created to govern TPS decisions.
“Fundamental to this case — and indeed to our constitutional system — is the principle that the will of the President does not supersede that of Congress,” Murphy, who was appointed by Biden, said in his decision. “Presidential whims do not and cannot supplant agencies’ statutory obligations.”
Following Murphy’s ruling, DHS emphasized that TPS remains a temporary program.
DHS spokeswoman Lauren Bis said the ruling “is just the latest example of judicial activists trying to prevent President Trump from restoring integrity to America’s legal immigration system.”
WASHINGTON — A federal judge ruled Thursday that the Defense Department continues to defy his previous court order requiring the restoration of journalist access to the Pentagon.
U.S. District Judge Paul Friedman previously supported The New York Times this month when he determined that the Pentagon’s updated credentialing rules infringed upon reporters’ First Amendment free speech rights and constitutional due process protections. Friedman again backed the Times’ position, finding that Pentagon officials attempted to circumvent his ruling by implementing new regulations that effectively ban all journalists from the facility without mandatory escort supervision.
“The department simply cannot reinstate an unlawful policy under the guise of taking ‘new’ action and expect the court to look the other way,” Friedman wrote.
Friedman’s original ruling required Pentagon leadership to restore press credentials for seven Times journalists and emphasized that his decision covers “all regulated parties.”
Pentagon representatives did not immediately provide comment when contacted. The Pentagon facility functions as the central command center for American military operations.
Last October, journalists from major news organizations departed the building rather than accept the new requirements. The Times filed a lawsuit against the Pentagon and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth in December challenging the policy changes.
Legal representatives for the Times claimed the Pentagon violated both “the letter and spirit” of the judge’s March 20 ruling through its modified policy. The newspaper also alleged that Pentagon officials were attempting to establish unprecedented guidelines controlling when journalists may grant anonymity to their sources.
Friedman stated that the access currently provided to credential holders “is not even close to as meaningful as the broad access” they previously enjoyed.
Government attorneys argued that the Pentagon’s updated policy completely follows the judge’s instructions. Pentagon spokesperson Sean Parnell previously announced the administration’s intention to appeal Friedman’s March 20 ruling.
The Pentagon Press Association, which represents AP journalists, stated that the Pentagon’s temporary policy maintains elements that Friedman ruled unconstitutional while introducing additional limitations on credentialed reporters.
“In effect, Plaintiffs ask this Court to expand the Order to prohibit the Department from ever addressing the security of the Pentagon through a press credentialing policy with conditions that may address similar topics or concerns as the enjoined conditions. The Order does not say that, and this Court should not read it to say that,” Justice Department attorneys wrote.
The existing Pentagon press corps consists primarily of conservative media organizations that accepted the policy changes. Reporters from outlets that rejected the new requirements, including The Associated Press, have maintained their military coverage from locations outside the Pentagon.
Friedman, who received his judicial appointment from Democratic President Bill Clinton, referenced recent U.S. military actions in Venezuela and Iran as examples highlighting the importance of public access to government information.
“Those who drafted the First Amendment believed that the nation’s security requires a free press and an informed people and that such security is endangered by governmental suppression of political speech. That principle has preserved the nation’s security for almost 250 years. It must not be abandoned now,” the judge wrote.
Friedman concluded that the disputed policy clearly aims to eliminate “disfavored journalists” and substitute them with those who are “on board and willing to serve” the administration.
“That,” he wrote, “is viewpoint discrimination, full stop.”
The former Slovenian model who became America’s First Lady has consistently maintained her position in the White House on her own terms, rarely engaging directly with the press or taking public stances on political matters.
Thursday’s media appearance where Melania Trump firmly rejected any suggestion of ties to convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein stands out as one of her uncommon direct addresses to journalists during her tenure.
The 55-year-old First Lady has maintained an exceptionally low public profile for someone in such a prominent position. During 2017, her husband’s initial year in the presidency, she delivered just eight public addresses. This contrasts sharply with Michelle Obama, who gave 74 speeches during Barack Obama’s first presidential year in 2009.
Kate Andersen Brower, who authored “First Women: The Grace and Power of America’s Modern First Ladies,” described her to Britain’s The Times in 2024, saying: “She is very unknowable.”
Despite her typically reserved approach, the First Lady has occasionally generated significant public attention. Following the 2020 election, she supported her husband’s unfounded claims of electoral victory, stating: “Every legal – not illegal – vote should be counted,” using similar rhetoric to allegations of voting irregularities.
A particularly memorable moment occurred in 2018 when she sparked widespread media attention by choosing to wear a jacket displaying “I REALLY DON’T CARE, DO YOU?” during her flight to Texas for a visit with migrant children who had been separated from their families. She later explained the jacket was her response to media criticism.
Earlier this year, she produced a documentary film called “Melania” that followed her activities during the 20 days before her husband’s second presidential inauguration. While promoted as providing unprecedented behind-the-scenes access, reviewers noted it offered limited fresh perspectives.
As Donald Trump’s third spouse, she holds the distinction of being the first naturalized citizen to serve as First Lady. Her modeling career began at age 16, eventually taking her to fashion capitals Paris and Milan before she relocated to New York in 1996.
She encountered her future husband at a Manhattan social event two years after arriving in the city, and they wed in January 2005.
President Trump has drawn comparisons between his wife and the iconic Jackie Kennedy, later known as Jackie Onassis. During a 2019 appearance on Fox News’ “Fox and Friends,” he stated: “We have our own Jackie O today. It’s called Melania. We’ll call it Melania T.”
“People love her. She gets no credit from the media, but she gets credit from the people,” Trump added.
A legal conflict centered around artwork at a Kansas burger restaurant may ultimately reach the nation’s highest court. The case’s final determination could have significant ramifications for municipal governments throughout the United States.
WASHINGTON — Two major organizations successfully reached a settlement agreement with the Justice Department on Thursday, reversing budget cuts that threatened library funding nationwide through the Institute of Museum and Library Sciences.
The American Library Association and the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees announced their legal agreement will restore the IMLS’s ability to distribute grants and maintain programs supporting libraries and museums across the country.
Justice Department officials have not yet provided comment on the settlement, while White House representatives directed inquiries to the Justice Department’s Civil Division.
Democracy Forward led the legal challenge filed in May, seeking to prevent the administration from dismantling the IMLS following President Donald Trump’s March 14 executive order labeling the agency and others as “unnecessary.”
The cost-cutting initiative represented part of a wider government effort to reduce federal spending by eliminating staff positions, grant programs, and various services.
Following the executive order, agency employees were placed on administrative leave and received termination letters. The acting director proceeded to cancel existing grants and contracts while dismissing all National Museum and Library Services Board members.
“When the administration began shuttering IMLS last year, it set off a chain reaction. Libraries across the country started cutting hours, staff and services people rely on – after-school programs, support for job seekers and connection for older adults,” stated American Library Association president Sam Helmick.
According to settlement terms, all 2025 staff reduction orders have been canceled, allowing affected employees to resume their positions. The IMLS has agreed not to implement additional workforce reductions related to the executive order’s objectives.
American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees president Lee Saunders described the settlement as a win for communities nationwide that rely on library and museum services.
The organizations will formally dismiss their lawsuit within seven days, provided the government fulfills all agreement conditions.
This settlement follows a Rhode Island federal judge’s approval three days earlier of the administration’s request to withdraw its appeal in a separate case brought by 21 state attorneys general.
Established in 1996 under Republican congressional leadership, the IMLS serves as the sole federal agency dedicated to library funding. Its mission focuses on advancing and supporting America’s museums and libraries through grants, research, and policy initiatives.
The institute merged operations from earlier government entities, including the National Commission on Libraries and Information Science and the Institute of Museum Services.
Annual IMLS grant distribution reaches thousands of recipients nationwide, totaling over $200 million in recent years.
In an unusual public declaration on Thursday, First Lady Melania Trump firmly rejected suggestions that she maintained a friendship with Jeffrey Epstein, the deceased convicted sex offender.
The first lady’s statement also addressed speculation about how she met her husband, clarifying that Epstein did not play a role in introducing her to President Donald Trump.
The public statement represents a rare occasion where the first lady has directly addressed controversial topics in the media spotlight.
WASHINGTON – Federal communications regulators announced Tuesday they are weighing restrictions that could prevent three prominent Chinese telecommunications firms from establishing data center operations on American soil while also blocking domestic carriers from establishing connections with these companies.
The Federal Communications Commission revealed it has reached a preliminary determination to stop American telecommunications providers and other carriers operating within US borders from establishing interconnections with entities included on what officials call the “Covered List” – companies deemed to present national security risks. This list includes China Mobile, China Telecom and China Unicom.
The potential restrictions represent the latest effort by federal authorities to limit Chinese telecommunications companies’ presence in American infrastructure networks over concerns about possible security threats.
PHOENIX — Environmental advocates achieved significant victories in Arizona’s utility board elections, gaining control over decisions at the country’s largest public power company as it faces mounting electricity demands from expanding data centers.
Tuesday’s election results from the Salt River Project in the Phoenix area show that competing groups will need to find middle ground on critical issues including potential rate hikes and the choice between natural gas versus renewable energy sources to satisfy growing power needs.
The electoral contest concluded amid heightened voter engagement driven by climbing household energy costs and community resistance to large-scale data centers throughout this swing state and beyond, as national political dynamics energize previously obscure utility board races.
The campaign also attracted involvement from Turning Point Action — primarily recognized for rallying young conservative voters for President Donald Trump — which labeled the environmental advocates as “radical environmentalists.”
Clean energy supporters secured two additional positions on the 14-member board, establishing an 8-to-6 voting advantage. Nevertheless, candidates supported by construction companies and data center developers maintained control of the president and vice president roles, preserving their authority to determine which issues reach the board for consideration.
“We’re a little disappointed by not winning president and vice president, but now we have a majority, so we’re going to have to do a little negotiating,” said Randy Miller, a renewable energy advocate on the board.
The power company estimates it must expand its generating capacity by 100% over the next ten years while facing mounting pressure to decrease dependence on fossil fuels such as coal and natural gas that produce climate-warming emissions.
Supporters of the incumbent president and vice president caution about potential energy shortages and power outages without maintaining some reliance on natural gas-powered generating facilities.
The group campaigning under the “clean energy” banner argued that current board leadership shows excessive willingness to connect to natural gas infrastructure, implement rate increases, and welcome data center development. These candidates have previously opposed significant natural gas initiatives by the Salt River Project and last year’s rate increase proposal.
MADISON, Wis. — Governor Tony Evers put his signature on legislation Thursday that authorizes online sports wagering in Wisconsin, bringing the state into a group of 33 that permit the activity.
However, Wisconsin residents shouldn’t expect to place legal online bets anytime soon. The legislation, which received support from both parties in the state legislature, mandates that Wisconsin must first hammer out fresh agreements with Native American tribes who will operate the sports wagering platforms.
The governor emphasized his commitment to fair treatment across all tribal nations in the negotiation process.
“The real work begins today,” Evers stated. “Each of the 11 Tribes must now work diligently-and together-to shape the future of sports betting in Wisconsin. … An approach that exacerbates long-standing inequalities among Tribal Nations is not good for Wisconsinites or Wisconsin. I will not entertain it as governor.”
Currently, Wisconsin permits gambling exclusively on tribal territory through special agreements between the state and tribal governments. Sports wagering is restricted to specific tribal gaming facilities, while online betting remains prohibited.
The newly enacted legislation would permit online sports wagering only when the technological infrastructure managing the bets, including computer servers, operates from tribal lands within Wisconsin. This system, called the “hub-and-spoke” approach, has already been implemented in Florida.
Wisconsin’s tribal agreements require tribes to share a portion of their gambling profits with the state government. During 2024, tribal casinos contributed more than $66 million to state coffers.
Evers highlighted that the new legislation creates opportunities “to support mental health programs and to combat the opioid crisis, two issues that I know plague both Tribal Nations and communities across our state.”
The legislation gained backing from multiple Wisconsin tribes and the Milwaukee Brewers. Advocates argue that residents are already wagering through overseas betting sites, prediction platforms, or by traveling to neighboring states like Illinois where it’s permitted.
Opposition came from the Sports Betting Alliance, representing major companies including FanDuel, DraftKings, bet365, BetMGM and Fanatics. These companies claimed partnering with Wisconsin tribes wouldn’t be financially viable since federal regulations require tribes to receive 60% of gambling revenues. They favored a state constitutional amendment that would open sports betting to all operators.
Evers, who won’t seek a third term this year, initially pledged to sign the bill if Wisconsin’s 11 federally recognized tribes supported it. He later expressed reservations when some tribes remained uncommitted. On Thursday, the governor confirmed that all 11 tribes are now actively discussing implementation details.
Nationwide, regulated sportsbooks processed approximately $167 billion in wagers last year, producing nearly $17 billion in revenue after paying customer winnings, according to the American Gaming Association. This represented almost a 23% jump from the prior year.
NEW ORLEANS — An individual who spent almost three decades behind bars before his conviction was overturned achieved a historic electoral victory in New Orleans, vowing to repair the court system that wronged him. However, Louisiana Governor Jeff Landry and Republican lawmakers are now working quickly to abolish his position before his inauguration.
Calvin Duncan secured 68% of voter support this past November to claim the Orleans Parish criminal court clerk position, campaigning on judicial reform based on his personal struggles to obtain court documents while incarcerated in maximum security facilities.
Duncan reconstructed his life partly through seeking and winning the clerk position. However, Louisiana Senate Republicans voted Wednesday to eliminate Duncan’s newly won role as part of broader GOP initiatives to reorganize New Orleans’ court system — a Democratic stronghold with a majority Black population. The state’s Legislature remains predominantly Republican and white, with the conservative state leading challenges to voting rights protections.
Duncan’s inauguration is set for May 4.
Speaking to The Associated Press, he expressed belief that Louisiana officials are targeting him in retaliation, despite his name appearing on the National Registry of Exonerations, because they have consistently rejected his claims of innocence.
Republican leaders deny personal motivations and characterize their actions as promoting governmental efficiency.
“The citizens of New Orleans overwhelmingly said: ‘I want to give this person a chance, he can make a difference,’” Duncan, a Democrat, told lawmakers during a March committee hearing. “What this bill does, it says: ‘Thank you but you wasted your time.’ It disenfranchises everybody.”
Duncan’s legal troubles began with David Yeager’s 1981 murder when the victim was 23 years old, resulting in Duncan’s imprisonment for over 28 years. In 2011, facing a hearing on new evidence, prosecutors offered to reduce Duncan’s sentence to time already served if he accepted guilt for manslaughter and armed robbery charges. Though Duncan gained freedom, he continued fighting to clear his reputation.
Eventually, in 2021, a judge determined Duncan had been wrongfully convicted and completely dismissed his sentence.
During his 2023 tenure as state attorney general, Landry fought against Duncan’s request for wrongful conviction compensation. Duncan abandoned his petition when Landry’s replacement, Liz Murrill, threatened action against Duncan’s state law license. During Duncan’s clerk campaign, Murrill promised “further action” if he continued describing himself as “exonerated.”
Both Landry and Murrill have referenced Duncan’s acceptance of the 2011 plea agreement for manslaughter and armed robbery.
“The Attorney General made it clear during the election that if I continued to accurately speak about my innocence and exoneration that I would face consequences from her office,” Duncan told The Associated Press. “We are seeing those consequences today as she and the Governor try to undo the will of 68% of voters in New Orleans.”
Murrill stated she had “no involvement” in efforts to eliminate the office.
Landry informed the AP that removing Duncan’s elected position focused on enhancing “government efficiency” and “cleaning up a system in Orleans Parish that has been plagued by dysfunction and corruption for years.”
Supporters of merging the criminal clerk position with the civil clerk role note that other parishes have combined these offices. Eliminating the criminal clerk position would save approximately $27,300 annually, according to legislative auditor estimates, though consolidation costs remain “unknown.”
The legislation’s Republican sponsor, Sen. Jay Morris from north Louisiana, admitted that eliminating Duncan’s elected role might overwhelm the civil clerk with additional cases. His proposed solution involves “hiring someone.”
While other New Orleans judicial officials facing potential future job elimination would complete their current terms, Duncan would not receive this consideration.
Morris informed lawmakers that the legislation aims to pass in time to prevent Duncan from assuming office before his four-year term begins.
The measure, expected to pass the GOP-controlled House and receive Landry’s approval, would take immediate effect upon the governor’s signature.
“I have never seen something so barbaric,” Sen. Royce Duplessis, a Democrat representing New Orleans said on the Senate floor. “I understand politics and I know you all are going to vote how you are going to vote. But just know, when we are all done here, history has a record.”
Duncan, age 62, led efforts resulting in a 2020 U.S. Supreme Court ruling that eliminated non-unanimous jury convictions. He also established a nonprofit organization focused on improving incarcerated individuals’ court system access. He has described winning the clerk’s office as his life’s greatest achievement.
After more than a year of public deliberation, Rehoboth Beach commissioners voted Monday, April 6, to approve significant revisions to the city charter that will now advance to the Delaware General Assembly for final authorization.
City officials emphasize that the approved modifications do not authorize any property tax increases. All future tax adjustments would require additional public discussion, community input sessions, and formal votes by the mayor and commission members.
A key provision changes how property tax caps are calculated, shifting from a set dollar figure to a percentage based on the city’s total property values. This adjustment ensures that three newly approved hotels and 31 residences planned for Oceanside Reserve (formerly the Baymart site) contribute appropriate tax amounts. The change also addresses situations where expensive new construction replaces demolished older properties. City records show 34 demolition permits were issued in 2025, with an average of 28 annually over the past decade.
Officials also clarified that the charter revisions do not authorize increased municipal spending. Budget decisions remain part of the separate annual budget process, with the FY 2027 budget having undergone five public sessions in January, February, and March before final approval on March 20.
The approved charter language includes two modifications from earlier versions. First, the section addressing commissioner qualifications now specifies that prohibited financial interests apply to property “in the City of Rehoboth Beach” when defining conflicts that would prevent spouses or partners from serving together on the board.
Second, commissioners removed restrictions that would have prevented household members of current commissioners from seeking office, as long as they are not spouses or romantic partners.
City leadership addressed criticism about insufficient public participation, noting that charter discussions have occurred in open meetings for well over a year with numerous opportunities for resident feedback through written comments, meeting testimony, and other communications.
The Environmental Protection Agency announced Thursday its intention to relax regulations governing coal ash waste disposal, reversing stricter standards implemented during the previous administration’s environmental initiatives targeting coal-fired power facilities.
Under the Trump administration’s new proposal, oversight requirements for groundwater monitoring near coal ash storage locations would be reduced, and companies would no longer face mandates to clean up entire coal facility properties – only specific areas where ash was deposited. The changes would also streamline processes for repurposing coal ash materials.
EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin defended the proposal, stating it demonstrates the agency’s “commitment to restoring American energy dominance, strengthening cooperative federalism, and accommodating unique circumstances at certain (coal ash) facilities.”
Coal combustion generates massive quantities of ash waste containing dangerous heavy metals. Without proper containment, this material can seep into underground water supplies. Many coal facilities are located along rivers and waterways, with ash storage sites positioned in close proximity.
Initial coal ash regulations were established during the Obama era, mandating protective linings for new storage areas, water quality testing, and closure of leaking containment ponds – often requiring ash relocation. The Biden administration removed exemptions for older coal ash sites in 2024.
This regulatory rollback represents another step in the Trump administration’s broader campaign to reduce environmental restrictions as part of relief measures for fossil fuel companies. The action aligns with President Trump’s agenda to revitalize America’s coal sector while limiting cleaner energy alternatives.
“The toxic metals and pollutants leach out into the surrounding waters,” warned Nicholas Torrey, an attorney with the Southern Environmental Law Center, a nonprofit organization. “That’s the pollution threat that’s happening every day.”
Environmental organizations and community activists cautioned that these modifications will increase dangerous contaminants in water sources and heighten exposure risks for residents living near coal facilities.
Coal industry representatives have maintained that extensive regulations increase operational costs and force premature plant shutdowns. The sector has previously petitioned the EPA for regulatory adjustments.
A coalition of coal and energy trade groups stated last year: “EPA’s recent unprecedented expansion of the federal (coal ash) regulations has needlessly diverted funds from the power sector’s efforts to meet the Nation’s growing energy needs; increased costs for power companies and consumers without corresponding benefits to public health or the environment.”
Major environmental disasters initially spurred EPA action on coal ash oversight. Federal attention began following a 2008 Tennessee containment failure that scattered coal ash across 300 acres, requiring extensive remediation. Cleanup workers later reported cancer cases linked to ash exposure. A similar incident occurred in North Carolina in 2014, releasing tens of thousands of tons of material.
Congressional leaders are demanding federal investigations into the prediction betting platform Polymarket following suspicious trading activity that occurred just before President Donald Trump announced a U.S.-Iran ceasefire this week.
According to reports, more than 50 newly created accounts on Polymarket wagered significant amounts on a ceasefire agreement in the hours and minutes leading up to Trump’s Tuesday night social media announcement. These accounts had no previous betting history on the platform.
This marks the third major instance of questionable timing on Polymarket trades. Earlier this month, an unidentified user earned $400,000 by betting Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro would lose power, placing the wager just hours before Maduro’s capture. Another trader made approximately $550,000 betting on U.S. military action against Iran and the removal of Ayatollah Ali Khamenei shortly before hostilities began.
Harvard University researchers published findings last month suggesting the problem extends far beyond geopolitical events. Using blockchain data analysis, they calculated that traders with possible insider knowledge have generated $143 million in profits on Polymarket, betting on everything from Taylor Swift’s personal life to Nobel Peace Prize winners.
Representative Ritchie Torres, a New York Democrat serving on the House Financial Services Committee, sent correspondence Thursday to the Commodity Futures Trading Commission requesting a thorough review of these suspicious trades.
“This pattern raises serious concerns that certain market participants may have had access to material nonpublic information regarding a market-moving geopolitical event,” Torres stated in his letter, which was exclusively shared with news outlets.
During a media interview, Torres questioned the odds of legitimate trading. “What is the statistical likelihood that of anyone other than an insider trader placing a winning bet 12 minutes before a market-moving presidential announcement,” Torres said. “There are two answers: God, or an insider trader. And something tells me that God it not placing bets around Donald Trump’s posts on Truth Social.”
Platforms like Polymarket and Kalshi enable users to place wagers on diverse events, from local weather forecasts in Phoenix to Federal Reserve interest rate decisions. While federal regulations prohibit U.S. residents from using Polymarket, the platform’s cryptocurrency foundation and minimal identity verification make enforcement challenging.
Connecticut Senator Richard Blumenthal also sent demands to Polymarket Thursday, seeking explanations for why the company continues permitting bets on warfare and violence, and questioning their efforts to prevent insider trading.
“Polymarket has become an illicit market to sell and exploit national security secrets unlike any in history, and by extension a potential honeypot for foreign intelligence services watching for those same suspicious bets and wagers,” Blumenthal wrote.
Bipartisan criticism has emerged from Republican lawmakers as well, with pending legislation in both chambers aimed at restricting these betting markets.
“We don’t want to imagine a world where America’s adversaries use prediction markets to anticipate our next move,” stated Representative Blake Moore, a Utah Republican, responding to the ceasefire betting revelations.
Polymarket has not responded to requests for comment regarding these allegations.
Both Polymarket and Kalshi face significant pressure as they pursue expanded U.S. operations, particularly in the profitable sports betting sector.
After being prohibited from U.S. operations in 2022, Polymarket is attempting reentry by purchasing a CFTC-licensed exchange and clearinghouse. The company has started limited domestic operations while maintaining its separate offshore cryptocurrency platform beyond U.S. regulatory reach.
Kalshi, already operating under U.S. regulation, aims to become America’s leading prediction market. The company has expanded heavily into sports betting, leading critics to characterize it as primarily a sports gambling platform with secondary event-based contracts. Both companies have formed partnerships with sports franchises and media organizations to expand their market presence.
The rivalry includes political connections, with Donald Trump Jr. holding investment stakes in Polymarket through his 1789 Capital venture fund while simultaneously serving as a paid strategic consultant for Kalshi.
Anti-abortion advocates across the nation are expressing mounting impatience with the Trump administration’s handling of abortion pill regulations, seeking swifter action to limit online prescriptions they believe are weakening state-level abortion prohibitions.
This week’s federal court decision in Louisiana highlighted growing tensions over the issue. U.S. District Judge David Joseph, a Trump appointee, indicated the state presented compelling arguments while choosing not to immediately halt telehealth prescriptions for the abortion medication mifepristone.
Organizations opposing abortion are urging the Food and Drug Administration to expedite its ongoing review, hoping for new limitations on mifepristone access, particularly through online medical consultations. Federal officials maintain that comprehensive reviews require adequate time.
These advocacy groups have concentrated their pressure primarily on the FDA rather than directly criticizing the Republican president, whose three Supreme Court nominees helped enable the 2022 decision that eliminated Roe v. Wade protections and permitted current state prohibitions. However, the administration’s court filings requesting delays until completing its review have angered some activists.
“The stall tactics are beyond frustrating,” said Kristi Hamrick, speaking for Students for Life of America. Hamrick suggested the administration could also prevent pill distribution through mail by reinterpreting and enforcing a 19th-century statute.
Judge Joseph delivered a split decision Tuesday in litigation initiated by Louisiana Attorney General Liz Murrill alongside a woman claiming her partner forced her to use mifepristone to terminate her pregnancy.
The broader objective involves reversing FDA policies that have expanded pill accessibility. Murrill and officials from other states filing comparable lawsuits argue that online medication availability undermines prohibition effectiveness in the 13 states banning abortion throughout pregnancy, with narrow exceptions.
Provider surveys indicate telehealth availability helps explain why U.S. abortion numbers haven’t declined following Roe’s reversal. Although state bans include medication abortion restrictions, some Democratic-led states have enacted protective legislation for healthcare providers prescribing pills via telehealth and mailing them to ban states. These protective statutes face testing through various legal proceedings.
In Louisiana’s case, Joseph rejected Murrill’s request for immediate telehealth prescription blocking during ongoing litigation. However, he indicated eventual action remains possible and plaintiffs would likely prevail because the state demonstrated “irreparable harm.”
The judge also mandated FDA reporting on its drug review progress within six months.
Wednesday brought Murrill’s appeal filing to the U.S. 5th Circuit Court of Appeals, seeking accelerated action.
Family Research Council President Tony Perkins, an influential conservative voice and former Louisiana legislator, praised Murrill’s appeal.
Perkins noted public surprise upon learning abortion numbers haven’t decreased since the 2022 Supreme Court ruling.
“Bewilderment sets in,” he explained. “We’re already seeing an enthusiasm gap between the parties. What the Republicans do not need is a dampening of enthusiasm in their base.”
He hopes the administration will impose pill restrictions rather than risk losing conservative, anti-abortion voter support in November’s elections.
Some organizations adopt more cautious approaches.
National Right to Life’s federal affairs director Madison LaClare expressed confidence in the administration’s mifepristone review process. SBA Pro-Life America president Marjorie Dannenfelser avoided presidential criticism, stating: “The Trump-Vance administration has an important opportunity right now to prioritize women’s safety.”
Nevertheless, recent voting patterns suggest abortion-rights supporters maintain political advantage. Since Roe’s overturn, abortion questions have appeared on ballots in 17 states, with abortion-rights positions winning in 14 instances.
“There seems to be an emerging consensus in the country that people don’t want to ban abortion,” observed Rachel Rebouche, a University of Texas School of Law professor studying abortion issues.
Wednesday’s FDA statement to The Associated Press confirmed ongoing mifepristone safety evaluation, “including the collection of robust and timely data, evaluation of data integrity, and implementation of the analyses, validation, and peer-review.”
Following completion, the agency will determine whether prescription rule modifications are warranted.
The FDA noted such academic studies typically require over a year but the agency aims for faster completion. Spokespersons declined specifying when work commenced.
Mifepristone has remained a key focus for anti-abortion activists and congressional allies since Trump’s return to office. During January 2025 confirmation proceedings, Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. faced repeated Republican questioning about the medication and confirmed presidential safety review requests.
Frustration over perceived FDA inaction intensified last fall when the agency approved an additional generic mifepristone version.
The medication typically combines with another drug, misoprostol, for abortion procedures.
Originally approved in 2000 as safe and effective for early pregnancy termination, mifepristone initially carried strict prescribing and distribution limitations due to rare excessive bleeding cases. Only specially certified physicians could prescribe it, requiring in-person appointments for pill dispensing.
Both requirements ended during COVID-19. FDA officials explained that over 20 years of monitoring and reviewing numerous studies involving thousands of women demonstrated safe unsupervised usage.
President Trump’s administration has once again proposed eliminating federal support for tribal colleges and universities, marking the second consecutive year such cuts have been suggested.
The fiscal year 2027 budget blueprint includes a massive $1.5 trillion boost for defense programs while simultaneously removing billions in funding that supports the government’s obligations to tribal communities through treaties and trust agreements. Among the most significant cuts would be the complete elimination of support for the Institute for American Indian Arts, which stands as the nation’s sole federally-supported institution dedicated to contemporary Native American arts education.
The spending plan unveiled recently also targets funding reductions for tribal colleges and universities, along with two educational institutions managed by the Bureau of Indian Education: Kansas-based Haskell Indian Nations University and New Mexico’s Southwestern Indian Polytechnic Institute. Both schools became involved in legal action against the BIE in the previous year due to funding reductions and staffing cuts implemented by the current administration.
“If this budget was to pass, our TCUs would be forced to close within a year,” said Ahniwake Rose, president of the American Indian Higher Education Consortium, which represents the interests of tribal colleges and universities.
The proposed budget extends beyond educational institutions, also eliminating billions in federal support for housing programs, business development initiatives, and infrastructure projects that serve Native American populations.
Approximately three dozen tribal colleges and universities currently operate under tribal nation management across the United States, delivering educational opportunities to predominantly rural communities while offering substantial tuition savings for tribal members. The majority of these institutions depend heavily on federal funding, which represents a financial obligation rooted in the nation’s treaty commitments and trust responsibilities to tribal governments.
The previous year saw similar cuts to tribal college funding under Trump’s leadership, including various grant programs through agencies such as the USDA that support tribal education initiatives. Additionally, funding for minority-serving educational institutions was reduced, with some resources redirected toward Historically Black Colleges and Universities and tribal colleges.
Administrators at tribal educational institutions indicate they do not anticipate receiving those redistributed funds during the current cycle.
Rose emphasized that, similar to last year’s situation, Congress now holds the responsibility for protecting federal support for tribal colleges and universities.
“These cuts are unacceptable, and I will fight relentlessly to protect IAIA and secure the federal funding they need,” Senator Ben Ray Luján, a Democrat from New Mexico and a member of the Senate Indian Affairs Committee, said in a statement. “President Trump’s budget proposal to eliminate IAIA’s federal funding is a direct attack on Native communities and yet another example of how the administration is turning its back on Native communities.”
A new nationwide survey shows that nearly two-thirds of Americans continue to back legal marriage rights for same-sex couples, though support has dipped from previous highs. According to the Public Religion Research Institute poll, 65% of those surveyed believe gay and lesbian couples should have the legal right to marry.
The findings reveal a stark partisan divide on the issue. While 83% of Democratic respondents expressed support for marriage equality, only 49% of Republicans shared that view.
Geographically, support varies significantly across the country. According to PRRI, “The only states without majority support for same-sex marriage are Mississippi and Arkansas. The highest support is in Massachusetts and Rhode Island.”
WASHINGTON — Prior to Donald Trump’s return to office, the Biden administration and numerous electric companies had been constructing a renewable energy-focused future. Their plan involved eliminating coal power to cut greenhouse gas emissions and decrease air pollution responsible for over 1,000 annual deaths.
Multiple coal facilities — generating pollution equivalent to 27 million vehicles — were scheduled for closure during Trump’s second presidency. However, according to officials and energy analysis firm Enverus, coal plant shutdowns may cease entirely while Trump remains in office.
America is experiencing a significant energy policy transformation as Trump exercises extensive governmental authority to support coal while hindering cleaner energy options. An Associated Press analysis of government information and expert interviews suggests this could result in costlier electricity, increased air pollution, and delayed climate action.
Trump administration officials are utilizing emergency authority to block five coal facilities from shutting down. This decision is increasing customer bills: maintaining one Michigan facility operational for approximately seven months required $135 million. Officials are spending millions in taxpayer funds on repairs and life extensions for additional coal plants while reducing pollution standards to help facilities continue operating without expensive improvements.
Interior Secretary Doug Burgum stated the objective for coal facilities “is 100% stay open, no more retirements, no more shutting down.”
These measures surpass Trump’s coal support during his initial presidency, when he eased certain environmental rules for temporary assistance. The administration contends that coal provides essential electricity even during severe weather conditions, offering advantages over renewables that they claim the Biden administration foolishly subsidized for climate purposes.
“The Trump administration this time around is much more organized and strategic in trying to bring about a revival of coal,” explained Robert Lifset, a University of Oklahoma energy history professor. “You’re seeing almost like a whole-of-government approach.”
This occurs while electricity consumption increases due to massive data center expansion. One Indiana community supervised extensive solar panel construction on agricultural land before the anticipated closure of the Schahfer Generating Station, a coal facility in Wheatfield, Indiana. The Trump administration now maintains this plant’s operation, declaring its power essential.
“I was really emotional about it because finally they weren’t going to be a threat to our air and to our water anymore,” expressed Barbara Deardorff, an activist raised approximately 2 miles from the facility. “Since then, everything’s gone upside down.”
Following World War II, American electricity consumption increased with economic expansion. These patterns diverged after the 2008 recession: economic growth resumed while electricity demand remained stable, partly due to enhanced efficiency, according to Seth Feaster from the Institute for Energy Economics and Financial Analysis, which advocates renewable energy.
Power companies extensively retired expensive older facilities, substituting them with more efficient natural gas and renewable sources. Coal’s portion of American electricity generation fell by over half.
Schahfer’s smokestacks had provided a recognizable presence among northern Indiana’s farmland since construction in the 1970s. In 2023, its operator envisioned a different future: the Northern Indiana Public Service Company announced plans to eliminate coal from 73% of energy production to zero while pursuing renewables. Schahfer would close.
As closure approached, the surrounding area was changing. Solar installations appeared on hundreds of agricultural acres nearby, representing a local character shift some mourned while others welcomed for cleaner energy and additional tax income.
In December, the Trump administration issued emergency directives to maintain Schahfer’s operation, claiming its coal-generated electricity was vital for meeting extreme weather demand.
“Today, the policies that get in the way of a reasonable energy development and mess up the math are things focused around climate change,” stated Energy Secretary Chris Wright during a February news conference regarding electric grid reliability.
The coal facility continues operating while Amazon has proposed a multi-billion-dollar data center complex nearby powered by gas generators producing more than double the former coal facility’s output. NIPSCO indicated an Amazon agreement would safeguard customers.
“It’s been a complete 180,” said Deardorff, noting her family can no longer farm land they’ve long leased near the plant.
Completely halting retirements, as Burgum suggested, would maintain approximately 34 gigawatts of coal power scheduled for retirement before 2029. This threatens to halt decades of declining coal pollution that significantly reduced deaths through plant closures or new equipment installations. Coal plants designated for retirement under Trump produced over 130 million tons of carbon dioxide annually, plus tens of thousands of tons of harmful sulfur dioxide and nitrogen oxides.
“If we retire all the coal plants we could avoid those 2,000 deaths per year from coal. And if we keep the plants online and they keep burning coal, then we’re going to get those emissions and see those same health impacts,” explained Lucas Henneman, a George Mason University environmental engineer who directed a government study on coal pollution deaths.
Beyond five facilities ordered to remain operational, the administration allocated $175 million in taxpayer money for upgrades extending seven other plants’ lifespans. Officials are reviewing applications for $350 million in similar expenditures.
Maintaining America’s aging coal plant fleet could ultimately cost approximately $1 billion yearly, according to Michelle Bloodworth from industry organization America’s Power. She justified the spending in an interview, noting “billions and billions” previously supported renewables.
The administration possesses broad authority in determining emergency situations and can “order almost any change in operation of the electricity system,” the Congressional Research Service reported in February.
This hasn’t prevented legal challenges from five Democratic-controlled states — Washington, Illinois, Minnesota, Michigan and Colorado.
Colorado Attorney General Phil Weiser argued Trump administration orders burden consumers with increased costs and obstruct sustainable energy development.
“We are going from a trajectory where we were going to lead the world on clean energy to one where we are becoming an isolated petrostate,” said Bob Keefe from renewable energy monitoring organization E2. “It’s costing jobs, it is costing investments, it is hurting us in the global marketplace and by the way it is resulting in higher electricity prices.”
Economists doubt coal’s resurgence will endure. No major American coal plant has been constructed since 2013, though one is planned for Alaska. Aging coal facilities don’t make economic sense when solar costs remain low, according to Tufts University associate professor Steve Cicala.
Portions of Trump’s agenda have already stumbled. The largest federal coal lease auction in over ten years failed, and courts have rejected some Trump efforts to block wind energy projects.
Industry leaders remain optimistic.
“It’s our time,” declared CEO Jimmy Brock from Core Natural Resources, among America’s largest coal mining companies.
WASHINGTON – Following President Trump’s aggressive statements threatening Iran and its entire population, Democratic lawmakers have abandoned their previous restraint regarding discussions of presidential removal from office during his second term.
Numerous Democratic representatives have publicly stated that Trump should be ousted from the White House, either via impeachment proceedings or through the 25th Amendment, which permits the vice president and Cabinet to determine a president is incapable of fulfilling presidential duties.
Although Trump later stepped back from his threatening language and agreed to a two-week ceasefire arrangement with Iran, the incident has amplified Democratic demands for the strongest possible opposition to the Republican commander-in-chief. Lawmakers report their offices have been inundated with Iran-related calls from constituents.
The widespread Democratic response reflects the seriousness of Trump’s catastrophic threats against a nation with over 91 million citizens. It has also elevated the domestic political implications of an ongoing conflict. The Trump administration now confronts increasing pressure to provide congressional testimony about the military action and explain requests for hundreds of billions in additional defense funding.
“A commander in chief who is truly in control would have never gotten into this colossal mess to begin with,” Senate Democratic leader Chuck Schumer stated during a Wednesday press conference in New York.
For now, both Schumer and House Democratic leader Hakeem Jeffries are avoiding impeachment discussions, instead urging Republicans to support legislation requiring Trump to obtain congressional authorization before launching additional Iranian strikes. Any removal effort would likely fail while Republicans maintain congressional control.
House Democrats intend to use Thursday’s brief session to push for rapid passage of war powers legislation, though Republican leadership is anticipated to block the effort.
“We will continue to unleash maximum pressure on Republicans to put patriotic duty over party loyalty and join Democrats in stopping the madness,” Jeffries wrote to Democratic members Wednesday.
White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt defended Trump’s language as successful strategy.
“I think it was a very, very strong threat from the president of the United States that led the Iranian regime to cave to their knees and ask for a ceasefire and agree to reopening the Strait of Hormuz,” she stated during a White House briefing.
As Democrats advance their opposition to Trump, they’re addressing concerns from their supporters and voters. Congressional offices experienced heavy contact from constituents this week, primarily from individuals disturbed by presidential rhetoric.
Rep. Suzan DelBene’s Washington state office received numerous calls and emails Monday and Tuesday, mostly regarding Iran but also concerning Trump’s impeachment or 25th Amendment removal, according to an anonymous aide.
District staff discovered 75 Iran-related voicemails after a one-hour Tuesday break, the aide reported.
“My office phones have not stopped ringing,” Rep. Maxine Dexter of Oregon said at a Portland press conference, calling for House members to immediately return to Washington.
Dexter’s office logged 257 Tuesday calls, exceeding any previous 24-hour period since the freshman representative’s team started tracking.
The citizen response appears spontaneous rather than coordinated pressure campaign.
While advocacy organizations have shared some talking points, including 25th Amendment legal specifics, no organized effort has targeted congressional offices with strategic messaging, according to an anonymous Democratic strategist familiar with the situation.
The “horror” of Trump’s statements and the magnitude of presidential threats apparently triggered the citizen mobilization, the strategist explained.
Several prominent conservative figures, including former Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene of Georgia, have also suggested Trump’s removal through the 25th Amendment.
Democrats previously impeached Trump twice for first-term actions, though he was acquitted both times. They’ve avoided such discussions for 16 months while focusing midterm messaging on everyday economic concerns rather than opposing a president who narrowly secured the popular vote.
Then Trump issued Tuesday morning’s threat to eliminate “an entire civilization.”
“Whether by his Cabinet or Congress, the President must be removed from office. We are playing with the brink,” Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez of New York posted on social media.
Removal demands continued even after the ceasefire announcement.
“Temporary ceasefire or not, Trump already committed an impeachable offense. Congress needs to get back to work and remove him from office before he does more damage to our country and the world,” said Rep. Seth Moulton of Massachusetts, an Iraq War veteran.
Republicans hold the House majority and have successfully defeated two previous second-term Trump impeachment attempts. They may face another challenge as Rep. John Larson of Connecticut has filed a resolution containing 13 impeachment articles against Trump.
Last June, 128 Democrats joined all Republicans to table Rep. Al Green’s Texas-sponsored impeachment resolution charging abuse of power after Trump conducted Iranian military strikes without congressional authorization.
Green’s December impeachment resolution generated a 237-140 vote, but showed shifting dynamics with 47 Democrats voting “present” instead of outright opposition. Jeffries and other leaders argued proper impeachment groundwork hadn’t been established and they would vote “present” while maintaining focus on American affordability issues.
Jeffries’ approach to new impeachment pressure remains uncertain. However, Democratic leaders scheduled a Friday call with House Judiciary Committee members focusing on “Trump administration accountability and the 25th Amendment.”
Other Democrats have targeted Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth for removal. Hegseth has supported U.S. Iranian actions, claiming American and Israeli forces achieved “capital V military victory” and that Iranian military no longer significantly threatens U.S. forces or regional stability.
Democratic Rep. Yassamin Ansari, whose family emigrated from Iran, joined calls for Hegseth’s dismissal. She expressed being “momentarily relieved” that Iranian civilians would escape Trump’s widespread destruction threats.
“We need urgent action for the sake of our national security and the safety and security of the rest of the world,” Ansari stated.
WASHINGTON – A Chinese pharmaceutical company secured a significant victory against an American startup by employing a lobbying firm with close ties to Donald Trump Jr., according to federal documents reviewed by news outlets.
Grand Pharmaceutical Group hired Checkmate, a lobbying company led by Ches McDowell, who maintains a personal friendship and business relationship with the former president’s eldest son. The Chinese firm paid $30,000 for two weeks of lobbying work in December.
The lobbying effort helped Grand Pharma’s attorney secure a crucial meeting with Chris Pilkerton, who heads the Committee on Foreign Investment in the U.S. (CFIUS), in early January. During that meeting, the lawyer contended the dispute was purely commercial without national security concerns, sources familiar with the discussion revealed.
By the end of January, CFIUS denied Minnesota-based FastWave’s petition for a national security review of Grand Pharma’s investment, citing reasons unrelated to national security matters. FastWave had only managed to arrange calls with lower-level CFIUS staff members during the same period.
The rejection has brought FastWave to the edge of financial collapse, the company informed CFIUS officials.
While it remains unclear whether Checkmate’s lobbying directly influenced the CFIUS determination, the situation has raised eyebrows among China policy experts and Democratic legislators who learned of the circumstances.
Tim LaPira, a political science professor at James Madison University, described such lobbying as “very typical.” He explained, “If you want to speak to the party in power, you are going to need to hire somebody that has those partisan connections.”
However, six China specialists and three Democratic lawmakers expressed concern that Chinese companies might leverage lobbyists with Trump administration connections to gain influence.
Michael Sobolik from the Hudson Institute, a conservative research organization, characterized the situation critically. He stated that if a Chinese company can lobby the U.S. government into supporting it against an American firm on national security issues, “that is the height of the swamp.”
The White House dismissed such criticism. Spokesman Kush Desai said, “Nothing has changed with CFIUS’s diligence, investigation, or enforcement operations, which continue to robustly and vigilantly safeguard America’s national security interests.” He called any suggestion that the Trump administration would compromise CFIUS at special interests’ request “categorically false.”
McDowell, who leads Checkmate, has appeared in social media photographs hunting alongside Trump Jr. and co-owns property with him. A Checkmate representative clarified that while McDowell appears on Grand Pharma’s lobbying records, he didn’t personally handle the matter.
Grand Pharma’s lawyer, Jeff Bialos, characterized the process as “a lengthy fact-based investigation” with an outcome that wasn’t “politically driven.” He described the situation as “a private commercial dispute… being squeezed into the CFIUS box.”
FastWave CEO Scott Nelson criticized “the opaque and highly irregular procedural decisions” from CFIUS, saying they hampered his company’s ability to protect critical technology from a Chinese investor.
The dispute stems from Grand Pharma’s $12 million investment in FastWave in 2021. The American company later began producing specialized catheters for treating arterial calcium buildup using laser technology.
U.S. regulations control shipments of that laser technology to China because of potential military applications for enhancing warfare capabilities.
Initially welcoming Grand Pharma’s investment, FastWave later asked CFIUS in 2025 to review the arrangement. The company hoped officials would require Grand Pharma to sell its 40% ownership or become a passive investor, fearing intellectual property theft and blocked fundraising efforts.
FastWave’s concerns intensified after discovering a press release on Grand Pharma’s website announcing a partnership with Jiangsu Zhenyi Medical Technology Co., Ltd, a Chinese competitor.
CFIUS rejected FastWave’s filing, citing “material misstatements” in the company’s responses. The committee pointed to contradictory statements about Grand Pharma’s involvement in FastWave’s fundraising negotiations between July and August 2025.
FastWave defended itself in February 2026, arguing that Grand Pharma’s feedback consisted of minor termsheet edits that weren’t substantive and came after their July statement to CFIUS.
Notably, CFIUS didn’t address potential national security risks in its rejection.
CFIUS attorney Tatiana Sullivan called the committee’s rejection letter unusual, explaining that CFIUS typically collaborates with companies to resolve misunderstandings and only rejects filings outright for “serious inaccuracies” related to national security.
Nelson criticized the timing, noting the rejection came “months after the underlying statements were made” and that CFIUS “never informed us of these concerns, and gave us no opportunity to clarify or correct them before rejecting the filing on the very last day of an extensive review period that lasted over 200 days and included 29 question sets.”
McDowell met Trump Jr. at a conservative event in 2016 and developed their friendship by offering a superior hunting experience. The two have jointly owned North Carolina property since 2021, according to property records.
Social media posts show McDowell appearing with Trump Jr. and Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy holding falcons in October 2024, and posing with rifles alongside Trump Jr. and Eric Trump over hunting trophies in January 2024.
