Blog

The Philippines experiences frequent seismic activity due to its position along the Pacific Ring of Fire, a zone of geological fault lines surrounding the ocean where the majority of global earthquakes take place. Below is a chronological review of significant recent earthquakes that have impacted the island nation:

On June 8, 2026, a magnitude 7.8 earthquake occurred offshore near Mindanao, resulting in the deaths of no fewer than 35 individuals. The seismic event generated tsunami waves that reached coastal areas.

October 10, 2025 brought two major offshore earthquakes to Davao Oriental province within hours of each other. The initial 7.4 magnitude earthquake claimed the lives of at least seven people. A second 6.8 magnitude tremor followed, also triggering local tsunami alerts.

A magnitude 6.9 earthquake struck Bogo City in Cebu province on September 30, 2025. The event surprised the area completely since the nearby Bogo Bay fault line had remained inactive for more than four centuries, as reported by the Philippine Institute of Volcanology and Seismology. The uncommon tremor occurred at shallow depth during nighttime hours while people were sleeping, resulting in no fewer than 72 fatalities, hundreds of injuries, and extensive property damage.

On December 2, 2023, a magnitude 7.6 earthquake hit near Mindanao around midnight, causing numerous residents to evacuate their homes in fear. The event resulted in at least three deaths.

November 17, 2023 saw a magnitude 6.7 earthquake off Mindanao’s coast that killed nine individuals, as confirmed by the National Disaster Risk Reduction and Management Council. Shopping center ceilings gave way, while landslides and building damage were documented throughout impacted regions.

A magnitude 7.0 earthquake affected Luzon island in the northern Philippines on July 27, 2022, causing 11 deaths.

December 15, 2019 brought a magnitude 6.8 earthquake to Davao del Sur in Mindanao, killing 13 people. This marked the fourth earthquake exceeding magnitude 6 to impact Mindanao since October of that year.

Authorities in Iraq are working Monday to determine the identities of those killed in a devastating bus accident that claimed 21 lives, according to a provincial official.

The passenger vehicle crashed and caught fire on Sunday in Iraq’s southern region, marking another tragic incident on the nation’s deteriorating roadways.

Ahmad Saleem, spokesperson for the Thi Qar provincial council, reported that fourteen victims were so severely burned they cannot be recognized or identified. He noted that officials suspect two Iranian citizens may be among those who perished, though their remains have yet to be confirmed.

According to Saleem, the bus was making its way from Najaf — a sacred city for Shiite Muslims that draws many religious visitors — toward the southern coastal city of Basra when the accident happened around 3 p.m. on Sunday. The crash took place in Thi Qar province, positioned between Thi Qar and Diwaniyah.

Beyond the fatalities, 20 additional passengers sustained injuries in the wreck. Among the wounded were two Iranian citizens who were transported back to Iran on Monday morning with assistance from the Iranian Consulate in Basra, the official reported.

Saleem blamed the accident on deteriorating road conditions, explaining that local officials had previously identified the roadway as dangerous. He also mentioned that a critical shortage of emergency vehicles in the province made it difficult to respond effectively to the disaster.

Such traffic accidents occur frequently throughout Iraq, where years of war, government corruption and insufficient funding have left the nation’s basic infrastructure crumbling. The country’s roadways lack proper upkeep, many cars and buses are old and unsafe, and traffic laws are rarely enforced.

Last year, another bus filled with religious pilgrims heading to the Iraqi city of Karbala crashed in an area north of Baghdad, resulting in 18 deaths.

LA PAZ, Bolivia — Violence broke out between demonstrators and law enforcement in Bolivia on Monday after conservative President Rodrigo Paz enacted legislation that could facilitate a more aggressive government response to ongoing protests calling for his removal from office.

In the central city of Cochabamba, protesters threw explosives, rocks and wooden objects at officers, who retaliated with tear gas, resulting in numerous detentions as roadway blockades continue to bring the Andean country to a standstill.

The fresh violence occurred following Paz’s approval of a law that streamlines the process for implementing tough governmental measures against demonstrations that have disrupted Bolivia for five weeks, creating transportation chaos and shortages of essential goods including food, gasoline and medical items.

Labor unions, rural farming communities and mountain Indigenous populations — angered by Paz’s elimination of fuel subsidies and dissatisfied with his inability over seven months to address Bolivia’s ongoing economic challenges — have established 90 roadblocks on major highways across the country, cutting off major urban areas, particularly La Paz, the governmental center, and nearby El Alto. Struggling with increasing prices and minimal pay, many demonstrators claim Paz has abandoned them despite their electoral support.

An independent public ombudsman’s weekend report indicated that between May 1 and June 2, the civil unrest caused 10 fatalities, 37 wounded individuals and 365 detentions. Officials state that seven deaths resulted from inadequate medical care, though all cases remain under investigation.

While Paz has attempted negotiations with demonstrators and called for limited police force, protesters have mostly declined meetings with the president and maintain their demand for his complete removal just seven months into his term. His victory last year concluded almost two decades of continuous governance by Bolivia’s Movement Toward Socialism, or MAS, the organization established by former President Evo Morales.

Growing pressure exists for Paz to take stronger action against the disorder. Monday’s signed legislation simplifies the government’s capacity to declare an emergency status that would halt constitutional protections and authorize military intervention to restore stability and eliminate blockades. However, Paz must issue an additional decree for emergency status to take effect. Whether he will choose this path remains uncertain, given that violent military suppression of demonstrations has previously removed Bolivian leaders from power.

“This law is to protect the majority of the country from the narco-terrorism that is instigating the protests,” Paz said in a national address after signing the law. “I extend my hand to the social organizations that have legitimate demands and reiterate my willingness to engage in dialogue.”

Following his remarks, groups attacked a public transportation union facility in El Alto amid rising tensions over fuel scarcity, resulting in at least 28 detentions, according to police. Violence spread through Cochabamba, where protesting agricultural workers tried to block a bridge linking the area to the country’s western region. Officers arrested 23 individuals while using tear gas to scatter demonstrators hurling rocks and explosives.

Crude oil markets saw modest increases during early Tuesday trading as tensions between Iran and Israel kept investors cautious about the durability of a temporary ceasefire between the two nations.

Brent crude futures climbed 13 cents to reach $94.38 per barrel, marking a 0.14% increase at 0001 GMT. Meanwhile, U.S. West Texas Intermediate crude gained 11 cents to $91.41 per barrel, representing a 0.12% rise.

The energy markets had experienced significant volatility during the prior trading session, with prices jumping as much as 5% following fresh Israeli military action against Iran and operations in Lebanon that dampened expectations for a swift end to the broader conflict. However, those gains were reduced after Iran’s military forces declared an end to their operations targeting Israel.

“While there is some relief from the latest pause in direct strikes, investors are not convinced the truce will hold,” said Tim Waterer, chief market analyst at KCM Trade.

According to Waterer, the market continues to factor in ongoing uncertainty instead of expecting a permanent solution.

Both Iran and Israel announced they had suspended their mutual attacks following an intervention by U.S. President Donald Trump, who urged them to immediately “stop ‘shooting’.” However, Tehran indicated it would restart military strikes if Israel persisted in targeting Hezbollah forces in Lebanon.

“While this helped stop the situation snowballing, the geopolitical backdrop remains tense, and a lasting peace deal remains elusive,” said Tony Sycamore, market analyst at IG.

In a video message broadcast on Israeli television, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu declared that Israel would respond forcefully should Iran launch another attack.

During an interview with Axios published Monday, Trump revealed he had cautioned Netanyahu that he could end up fighting without support if he returned to warfare with Iran.

“The key question is whether current de-escalation efforts can finally translate into a longer-lasting resolution, or if we’re simply in another temporary lull,” Waterer said.

Among the primary issues Washington is pursuing with Tehran during peace negotiations is the reopening of the Strait of Hormuz, a waterway that carried approximately one-fifth of global oil supplies before U.S. and Israeli airstrikes targeted Iran in late February.

U.S. military forces intercepted an empty oil tanker in the Gulf of Oman on Monday after the vessel tried to reach an Iranian port despite the current blockade restrictions against Iran, according to military officials.

Regional authorities in Ukraine’s Kharkiv region confirmed Tuesday that three civilians lost their lives during Russian strikes on the northeastern area, with emergency responders working to control resulting fires.

Regional governor Oleh Syniehubov announced on the Telegram messaging platform that the fatalities occurred in the town of Chuhuiv and included two men aged 70 and 50, along with a 70-year-old woman.

Meanwhile, the regional capital near the Russian border, also named Kharkiv, saw six people wounded from the bombardment, according to Mayor Ihor Terekhov’s Telegram post. The mayor reported damage to a utility facility and multiple fires erupting throughout the city.

The military strikes occurred while Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy was traveling back to Kyiv following discussions in London with officials from Britain, France and Germany regarding potential paths forward for resolving the four-year conflict.

Peace negotiations led by the United States between Ukraine and Russia have reached an impasse as Washington concentrates on addressing the Iran war situation.

On Monday, Zelenskiy described his meeting with U.S. envoys Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner as “positive,” commending their willingness to pursue a Ukraine war resolution in the upcoming weeks.

THE HAGUE, Netherlands — The top prosecutor at the International Criminal Court has been removed from his duties in a historic first for the international tribunal, as oversight officials moved forward with disciplinary action against Karim Khan following sexual misconduct accusations.

The 56-year-old British attorney faces claims of inappropriate sexual behavior involving a female staff member, a controversy that has persisted for over two years. Khan has consistently maintained his innocence throughout the proceedings.

The Assembly of States Parties, which serves as the ICC’s governing authority, will now determine Khan’s future through a special meeting to assess whether he should continue leading the international court.

Officials from the Bureau of the Assembly of States parties explained their choice was informed by multiple sources of information, stating it was “based on the report of an investigation undertaken by the United Nations Office of Internal Oversight Services (OIOS), the underlying evidence, the advice of an ad hoc Panel of judicial experts, and written submissions.”

The bureau emphasized that Khan’s temporary removal while awaiting the assembly’s decision “is not an indication of the final outcome.”

United Nations investigators discovered proof that Khan engaged in “nonconsensual sexual contact with (the aide) in his office, at his private residence, and whilst on mission,” based on their report obtained by The Associated Press. Despite these findings, a three-member judicial panel reviewing the evidence determined the investigation lacked sufficient conclusiveness.

Khan’s attorneys indicated they would release a public response on Tuesday when approached for their reaction.

Khan had previously stepped aside voluntarily in May 2025 while the investigation continued. This situation marks the first of its kind for the ICC, forcing the Assembly of States Parties to develop new procedures to handle the unprecedented circumstances.

The accusations against Khan were initially brought to the court’s independent oversight office more than two years ago. An Associated Press review uncovered claims that Khan spotted the woman in a different ICC division and transferred her to his office. Documents from whistleblowers indicate she subsequently became a frequent companion on official travel.

During one international trip, Khan reportedly invited her to lie down with him on a hotel bed before “sexually touched her,” according to the documentation. Additional alleged inappropriate actions described in the records included securing his office door and placing his hand in her pocket. He also reportedly made multiple requests for her to join him on personal vacation trips.

The Assembly of States Parties holds exclusive power to dismiss Khan from his position, which would require majority approval through confidential voting among its 125 member nations. Removing him would need support from sixty-three countries.

While no specific date has been announced for the assembly meeting, officials confirmed it will take place at the earliest opportunity.

THE HAGUE, June 8 – The chief prosecutor of the International Criminal Court, Karim Khan, has been suspended from his duties while member nations prepare to vote on his future, according to an announcement Monday from the court’s governing body. This action follows an investigation into sexual harassment allegations against him.

According to a diplomatic source familiar with the matter, the governing body’s executive bureau determined that Khan engaged in serious misconduct after completing an 18-month investigation. The probe examined claims that Khan had non-consensual sexual encounters with an attorney working in his office.

Khan has consistently rejected these allegations. The governing body will now forward their findings to all 125 countries that are members of the ICC, who are anticipated to hold a vote on potentially removing Khan from his position at a future date.

Leaders from North Korea and China met in Pyongyang on Monday, with both nations pledging to strengthen their partnership across multiple areas, according to reports from North Korean state media KCNA released Tuesday.

Kim Jong Un and Xi Jinping held discussions during the summit, with both sides committing to take their bilateral relationship to the next level, KCNA reported.

A powerful earthquake with a magnitude of 6.1 rattled Cuba’s northwest coastline Monday, creating the most significant seismic event the region has experienced in almost 150 years, according to official sources.

The U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) recorded the tremor at a relatively shallow depth of 26 kilometers (16 miles), with its center located 104 kilometers west-northwest of Mantua, Cuba – roughly two to four hours by vehicle from Havana.

This seismic activity was particularly uncommon for this Caribbean region, explained Paul Earle, a seismologist with the USGS. He noted the earthquake happened within a tectonic plate, where such events typically occur less frequently and are more dispersed compared to those along plate boundaries.

The last earthquake of comparable strength within 322 kilometers (200 miles) of Monday’s event occurred in 1880, when a 6.0 magnitude tremor struck near San Cristobal, Cuba, Earle stated.

While officials have not documented significant damage or injuries, the earthquake raised alarm in Cuba, where years of economic hardship have left many structures in poor condition. Widespread power outages throughout the area have complicated communication efforts.

“It felt strong. I had never felt anything like that,” said Yusmila Hernandez, 44, at her home in Pinar del Rio, in western Cuba.

“People ran outside, everyone scared. I can’t even explain it. It felt like no earthquake has ever felt here before,” Hernandez said.

The USGS confirmed that tremors reached Florida as well. In Mexico, the earthquake was experienced in popular tourist destinations including Cancun, Playa del Carmen and Tulum on the Yucatan peninsula. Residents and employees in Cancun’s downtown area, unaccustomed to significant seismic activity, fled from buildings.

Officials in Mexico’s Yucatan and Quintana Roo states implemented emergency procedures, though both governors reported via social media that no damage had been documented yet.

The U.S. National Weather Service did not issue any tsunami warnings or advisories following the earthquake.

JERUSALEM (AP) — Recent military actions by Israel against Lebanon and Iran have revealed a growing rift between U.S. President Donald Trump and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, two leaders who began this conflict as unified partners but now pursue different objectives.

Trump had openly cautioned Israel against attacking Beirut during its conflict with Iran-supported Hezbollah forces. Despite this warning, Israel launched strikes on Sunday, prompting Iran to retaliate with ballistic missiles targeting Israel for the first time since April’s ceasefire. Israel subsequently attacked Iran, even as Trump was conducting sensitive diplomatic talks with Iranian officials.

While the military exchanges have calmed, the strategic disagreements between the two leaders appear set to continue.

Trump, whose political party confronts upcoming elections, aims to conclude an increasingly unpopular military campaign and reopen the Strait of Hormuz to reduce fuel costs. Iranian officials have indicated that achieving a complete ceasefire in Lebanon remains essential for any comprehensive agreement.

Netanyahu, who similarly faces electoral pressure this year, must demonstrate success in stopping Hezbollah’s offensive operations while showing he can defeat Iran and its regional partners. He also must balance his relationship with Israel’s key ally without appearing subordinate.

The Feb. 28 joint American-Israeli assault on Iran initially displayed strong alliance unity.

Netanyahu declared the mission would weaken the Islamic Republic’s armed forces, eliminate its nuclear and missile capabilities, and overthrow its leadership. Trump confirmed the death of Iran’s supreme leader during the initial bombardment and encouraged Iranian citizens to reclaim their nation.

However, divergent goals quickly emerged: Trump sought rapid victory similar to his success in Venezuela, while Netanyahu pursued complete defeat of Iran and its allies regardless of timeline.

As Iran endured sustained attacks while keeping the Strait of Hormuz blocked, frustration mounted in both countries for different reasons.

American gas prices and consumer costs skyrocketed, leading former Trump supporters to accuse him of abandoning campaign pledges and entangling America in another Middle Eastern conflict. He has defended against these criticisms as growing public anger threatens Republican chances in November’s congressional races.

Israeli citizens expressed anger over Netanyahu’s inability to achieve decisive wins in conflicts triggered by Hamas’ Oct. 7, 2023, assault during his leadership. More than two years later, Hamas maintains control over Gaza sections, Hezbollah continues rocket attacks, and Iran’s government and nuclear infrastructure survive despite significant casualties.

The disagreement centers on Lebanon, where Israeli-Hezbollah combat continues despite ceasefire declarations.

Iran insists Lebanon must be part of any broader regional peace agreement, a condition Trump appears willing to accept for diplomatic progress. Iran has warned of renewed attacks on Israel if Lebanese strikes continue.

Israel remains committed to separating the conflicts and pursuing its Lebanese operations, having seized substantial southern territory, until the Hezbollah threat ends completely.

Public tensions emerged last week when Trump confirmed a heated phone conversation with Netanyahu regarding Lebanon. He acknowledged using profanity and calling the Israeli leader “crazy,” expressing frustration that Israel’s Hezbollah campaign jeopardized Iranian negotiations.

Through multiple interviews, Trump clearly expressed displeasure with Israel’s Sunday Beirut attack, which occurred without advance notice and struck civilian housing, killing two people and injuring 20 according to Lebanese officials.

He subsequently called for Israeli restraint following Iran’s missile barrage that same day. “I call all the shots,” not Netanyahu, Trump declared to the Financial Times.

Israel bombed Iran within hours.

Trump initially advocated restraint to stabilize markets and preserve ongoing negotiations, according to someone familiar with U.S.-Israeli discussions who requested anonymity due to the sensitive nature of these conversations.

Israeli representatives argued that America would not accept attacks without immediate retaliation. The source noted both sides understood that failing to respond to Iranian strikes would create political difficulties for Netanyahu domestically.

Netanyahu has minimized any apparent disagreements.

Following recent strikes, he addressed reporters in Hebrew, stating “Israel has a full right to self-defense, and we are exercising it to the extent necessary.”

“I say this to you, just as I say this, with appreciation and respect, in my good conversations with my friend, President Trump,” he continued.

This marks another instance of Trump publicly disagreeing with Netanyahu regarding military operations.

In March, barely three weeks into the conflict, Trump criticized Netanyahu’s choice to target a crucial Iranian energy facility, which led Iran to strike Gulf region energy infrastructure.

“I told him, ‘Don’t do that,’” Trump recalled. “We get along great. It’s coordinated, but on occasion he’ll do something.”

Despite Trump’s public criticism, two sources familiar with the situation who lacked authorization for public comment revealed the U.S. received advance notification of Israel’s attack plans.

The lasting impact of this recent disagreement remains uncertain.

“It’s not so uncommon for the U.S.-Israel relationship to have these kinds of tensions. What’s so different right now is how publicly it’s playing out,” observed Michael Singh, managing director at the Washington Institute for Near East Policy.

He pointed out that Trump has engaged in similar public disputes with other world leaders, including close allies.

Eytan Gilboa, a specialist in U.S.-Israel relations at Israel’s Bar-Ilan and Reichman universities, expressed doubt that the disagreement seriously endangers the alliance. He noted Netanyahu’s caution in avoiding excessive confrontation.

“If there was a big threat, like if Israel were to continue the war in Iran and drag the U.S. into it, that would have been a different situation,” he explained. “But that is not happening.”

He acknowledged, however, that “basic disagreements between Netanyahu and Trump on Iran, Lebanon and Gaza” remain unresolved.

Criminal gangs operating in Nigeria’s northwestern region have captured dozens of community members who attended what they believed would be peace discussions, according to law enforcement and local sources who spoke Monday. The incident underscores the deteriorating safety conditions plaguing the area.

Law enforcement officials report that 39 individuals were taken captive on Sunday during a forest gathering close to Magamin Diddi village within Maradun municipality in northwestern Zamfara State. Local community members and government representatives suggest the actual number of victims may reach 50.

The Zamfara State Police Command issued a statement explaining that those captured had been meeting with family members of a criminal leader, hoping to establish peace agreements and lift movement restrictions that had been placed on their community.

Zamfara sits at the heart of an ongoing security emergency where criminal organizations, known locally as bandits, conduct large-scale abductions, murders and attacks on villages. This violence has interrupted agricultural activities and forced thousands from their homes.

The police statement confirmed that law enforcement agencies have sent officers and intelligence resources to find the missing individuals.

Community members report that several people were freed to deliver the criminals’ financial demands to the village.

Bashar Aliyu, who lives in Magamin Diddi, stated that the criminal organization is seeking 125 million naira ($91,880) to free those who were taken.

Across numerous communities, locals have begun conducting direct negotiations with criminal groups to access their farmland or free kidnapping victims, despite official discouragement of such practices that authorities find difficult to stop.

TEL AVIV, Israel (AP) — Following Monday’s missile exchange between Israel and Iran that marked the most significant escalation since their fragile ceasefire in April, exhausted Israeli citizens returned to practiced wartime behaviors with feelings of resignation and detachment. Citizens sought shelter during morning alarm warnings, then some remained at home while others continued daily activities like shopping or bringing children to playgrounds in efforts to preserve everyday life.

Throughout Tel Aviv, the nation’s business and cultural center, typically busy roads showed less activity than usual, with shops and establishments seeing reduced foot traffic compared to typical weekdays. This quieter environment contrasted sharply with the vibrant, multicolored Pride celebration decorations displayed throughout the city in preparation for the June 12 annual parade.

Earlier that day, projectiles were fired from Yemen and Iran targeting Israel. These attacks followed Israel’s weekend strikes on southern Beirut neighborhoods, where Israeli officials claimed Hezbollah, Tehran’s regional partner, maintained military facilities.

“We’re not normalizing it,” said Liron Eldad, a mother of two children, referring to the ongoing conflict while accompanying other parents at a Tel Aviv playground located beside a community bomb shelter. However, she added, “we can’t just sit there and be bitter.”

This response has become a predictable cycle following the Hamas assault on Oct. 7, 2023, which sparked conflicts across Gaza, Lebanon and Iran. The continuous fighting, emergency warnings and daily life interruptions have created widespread exhaustion and despair among Israeli residents.

Eldad expressed her disappointment with national leadership and anticipation for political transformation through October elections. “It’s clearly not working, what we’re doing, and instead we’re getting deeper and deeper into wars,” she stated.

Throughout Israel on Monday, educational institutions remained shuttered and medical facilities suspended non-emergency services, relocating certain patients to lower levels while Israeli defense systems neutralized incoming missiles.

Following Iran’s announcement that it would cease offensive actions against Israel, these limitations were removed and classes were scheduled to restart Tuesday. By Monday night, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu also indicated that Israel’s military operations had concluded, though he warned the nation would react “with force” to any subsequent Iranian aggression.

Nevertheless, the temporary return to conflict left Israelis anxious. “I feel like I’m stuck in a place where you have no control over your life,” expressed Rana Raslan, a physician and mother who was also present at the Tel Aviv playground.

Numerous residents also criticized Netanyahu and his government coalition for rekindling the hostilities. Following Israel’s weekend Beirut strikes, Iran threatened retaliation for the assault, which Israel conducted despite Washington’s appeals to avoid major operations near the Lebanese capital.

“The behavior of the government and the prime minister, and the way he’s brought us into unending wars and his constant lies to his infantile base, don’t help me sleep well at night,” commented Moshe Regev, 63, a retired economist visiting Tel Aviv’s beachfront.

The conflict started on Oct. 7, 2023, when Hamas-led forces attacked southern Israel, resulting in 1,200 deaths and 251 kidnappings. Since that time, over 72,700 people have died in Israel’s Gaza campaign, according to the Gaza Health Ministry, which operates under Hamas administration and whose statistics are typically accepted as credible by international organizations.

A few streets inland from the coastline, 75-year-old Shlomi Yakobi, who sells fresh produce, commended Netanyahu’s leadership during the previous three years. He described this as a chaotic time that would have overwhelmed a weaker leader, noting his five decades operating a stand in Tel Aviv’s Carmel marketplace.

“People are hiding at home instead of going out,” he observed while serving apricots to several visitors. Yakobi explained that the conflict has hurt his business, though he believes the country had limited alternatives. He sometimes finds himself with excess inventory, which he gives to the neighboring synagogue.

“For two years now, you never know what’s going to happen in the next five minutes,” he said.

Lebanon’s President Joseph Aoun issued an uncommon direct message to Israeli leadership and citizens during a CNN interview that broadcast Monday, urging them to choose diplomatic negotiations over continued warfare and cautioning that military approaches “will never provide you with security and safety.”

“We are ready, we are willing, we are committed. Are you? If you are, let’s sit and talk,” Aoun stated.

Despite resistance from the armed organization Hezbollah, which continues battling Israeli forces in Lebanon’s southern region, the Lebanese administration is engaging in direct discussions with Israel through Washington’s mediation to achieve a complete halt to fighting.

Aoun indicated he would refuse to meet with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu until a war-ending agreement is secured. He clarified that such an arrangement would constitute a non-aggression agreement rather than a comprehensive peace treaty.

“We need to end the state of hostility between Lebanon and Israel. Forever. And this (pact) could be a path forward for a just and lasting peace,” Aoun explained.

The Lebanese leader said his country would align with the 2002 Arab Peace Initiative, which proposes Arab world normalization with Israel in return for Palestinian statehood and Israeli withdrawal from occupied lands.

“But we cannot jump from A to B directly. We have to go through different steps,” Aoun noted.

The conflict began March 2 when Hezbollah launched attacks against Israel to support its Tehran ally. Israel countered with aerial bombardments and ground operations that have resulted in Israeli occupation of large portions of southern Lebanon.

Israeli attacks on Lebanon have resulted in over 3,600 deaths and displaced more than one million Lebanese citizens. Although the U.S. announced a ceasefire April 16, combat has persisted, with Lebanon reporting nearly 3,500 Israeli strikes following the truce declaration.

Sunday saw Israel target Beirut’s southern neighborhoods in response to Hezbollah attacks on northern Israel, sparking a 24-hour period of direct fire exchange between Iran and Israel that risked undermining Washington’s diplomatic efforts to broker an agreement with Tehran regarding their conflict spanning more than three months.

During his CNN appearance, Aoun expressed Lebanon’s desire for positive relations with Iran built on mutual respect and non-interference, while asserting that Lebanese citizens were dying to advance Iran’s agenda.

In interview segments that aired Friday, Aoun criticized Iran for treating Lebanon as a negotiating tool in discussions with the United States, representing some of his harshest public comments about Tehran to date.

The Pentagon on Monday published a revised roster of prominent Chinese corporations that Washington believes are supporting Beijing’s armed forces, adding e-commerce giant Alibaba, search engine company Baidu, and electric vehicle manufacturer BYD to the designation.

This long-anticipated revision replaces a previous roster from early 2025 and arrives less than four weeks following President Donald Trump’s meeting with China’s Xi Jinping during a Beijing visit, where both leaders preserved a fragile trade war ceasefire.

In February, as Trump’s China visit was still being planned, the Pentagon temporarily published an updated roster, called the 1260H or CMC list, but swiftly retracted it without providing detailed reasoning.

Monday’s release matches the retracted February roster except for adding China’s leading memory chip manufacturers CXMT and YMTC, two firms that had been dropped from the brief February index, disappointing Washington’s China hardliners.

Additional companies now included are biotechnology firm WuXi AppTec, artificial intelligence robotics company RoboSense Technology Co Ltd, and Unitree, a prominent Chinese manufacturer of humanoid and four-legged robots. On June 1, U.S. artificial intelligence chip producer Nvidia announced plans to collaborate with Unitree on building robots for research purposes.

China’s embassy in Washington has not yet provided a response to requests for comment.

Several companies, including two subsidiaries of Chinese state-controlled oil giant China National Offshore Oil Corporation (CNOOC) — CNOOC China Ltd and CNOOC International Trading — were dropped from the list. Nevertheless, CNOOC subsidiary China BlueChemical Limited was added, and the department’s documentation emphasized that CNOOC operates under direct Chinese government control.

Firms may sometimes be removed not because the U.S. concludes they lack military connections to China, but because they have ceased American operations or changed their corporate names.

Alibaba, Baidu, CXMT, YMTC, Unitree and CNOOC have not yet responded to comment requests.

The designated companies “qualify for designation as ‘Chinese military companies,’” and maintain operations within the United States, according to the Pentagon’s documentation, which federal law mandates at least yearly. The companies may request removal, the filing stated.

The roster now encompasses a wide range of China’s leading technology corporations essential to strengthening Beijing’s military and industrial capabilities, and its release may heighten tensions between the competing nations, which remain engaged in economic and geopolitical rivalry.

While the Pentagon roster doesn’t directly impose sanctions on Chinese corporations, under new legislation, the department will be barred in future years from contracting and purchasing from listed companies.

Inclusion on the roster also signals Pentagon suppliers and other federal agencies about the U.S. military’s assessment of these firms, several of which have filed lawsuits against the United States challenging their designation.

RAMALLAH, West Bank (AP) — A fragile peace agreement in the Middle East has managed to survive, though just barely, despite being tested by multiple outbreaks of violence during the last two months. However, the ceasefire now faces its greatest threat of complete collapse, potentially plunging the region back into widespread warfare — with Lebanon serving as the potential trigger.

Weekend Israeli attacks targeting Hezbollah fighters in Beirut prompted retaliation from their primary backer, Iran, which conducted its initial strikes against Israel since the peace agreement took effect April 7. Israel countered with attacks on Iranian locations, while Iran’s allied forces in Yemen and Iraq made threats to expand the conflict. The U.S. and other peace brokers scrambled to keep the violence from escalating beyond control.

Should calm be restored, the underlying factors that sparked this violent episode remain unchanged.

Israel and the U.S. continue their confrontation with Iran and Hezbollah over determining the region’s future power structure, with all parties believing they operate from positions of advantage. U.S. President Donald Trump and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, both confronting important elections, have conflicting priorities.

Here’s how each party evaluates the dangers, benefits and way forward:

Israel approaches its initial nationwide elections following Hamas’ Oct. 7, 2023, assault on Israel that sparked the region’s conflicts. Netanyahu faces demands to demonstrate power after making repeated promises to eliminate Hezbollah. Through multiple wars and combat cycles, Israel has failed to permanently stop Hezbollah attacks into northern Israel.

Netanyahu also remains cautious about seeming subordinate to Trump, facing domestic criticism that yielding to the U.S. prevents the nation from achieving its military objectives. Trump has urged Netanyahu to prevent Lebanese fighting from undermining U.S. efforts to negotiate region-wide peace, and has declared that he, not Netanyahu, is the one who “calls the shots.”

Therefore, while Israel has begun direct talks with Lebanon’s government and achieved multiple ceasefire deals with it recently, Netanyahu has continued operations in southern Lebanon, capturing significant territory and advancing further north beyond Lebanon’s Litani River. It has maintained raids in the south targeting what it claims are Hezbollah’s rocket and drone stockpiles.

Netanyahu sought a display of strength following Hezbollah’s rocket attacks on northern Israel Sunday — an action Israeli officials had warned would prompt Israeli attacks on Beirut.

Hezbollah has dismissed the ceasefires accepted by Israel and the Lebanese government and declared it will not stop fighting while Israel maintains its attacks and keeps forces in southern Lebanon. The militant organization has sustained attacks on Israeli soldiers in southern Lebanon along with barrages into northern Israel.

Iran mostly abandoned Hezbollah to fight alone during much of an earlier 2024 conflict. Following that war, Hezbollah ended its missile attacks on Israel — although Israel maintained regular strikes on what it identified as Hezbollah positions in Lebanon. However, when Israel participated with the U.S. in attacking Iran on Feb. 28, Hezbollah launched attacks on northern Israel supporting its partner.

Iran’s response to Israel regarding the Beirut attacks demonstrated its readiness to risk renewed regional warfare for its Lebanese interests and most significant regional partner.

Hezbollah faces mounting pressure as Israeli forces advance north of the Litani, approaching the city of Nabatiyeh, a regional center where Hezbollah maintains broad support. The organization also confronts growing tensions with the Lebanese government, where the prime minister and president have criticized Hezbollah for resuming conflict with Israel.

Hezbollah has resisted giving up its weapons, something Lebanese officials have promised will occur. The organization has stated it would only consider abandoning its weapons as part of a broader governmental “defense strategy,” possibly one incorporating Hezbollah into the Lebanese military.

Iran’s strike against Israel for Hezbollah’s sake involves significant dangers. Should full-scale warfare resume, Iran would face additional economic damage plus attacks on its military and top leadership.

However, Iran’s leaders have attempted to display confidence that the Islamic Republic and its economy can survive the impact. They have repeatedly risked the ceasefire’s failure over the past two months by maintaining a rigid position in U.S. negotiations.

Iran is wagering that its massive disruption of Strait of Hormuz traffic provides leverage to resist U.S. and Israeli objectives in negotiations – and that Trump’s hesitation to return to war will ensure the U.S. controls Israel.

Iran has demanded Lebanon’s inclusion in any regional settlement, and seeks to prevent a pattern allowing Israel to attack Lebanese and Iranian targets without facing retaliation.

The United States and Israel coordinated the Iranian strikes that initiated the war. However, public disputes between Trump and Netanyahu have recently become visible.

The war presents risks for Trump’s Republican Party, with midterm elections in November. Trump has claimed the elections — and economic concerns — don’t influence his war decisions. However, his party and advisers likely worry about potential voter damage from an ongoing conflict that increases gas prices and other costs. The president also wants to avoid voters seeing him as pulling the United States into another expensive Middle East conflict.

Similar to Lebanon, the U.S. and Israel increasingly express different positions on Iran.

In negotiations, the U.S. has prioritized resolving Iran’s nuclear program and ensuring free shipping through the Strait of Hormuz. Israel, historically worried about Iran’s nuclear program, also recognizes a unique chance to weaken Iran’s ballistic missile capabilities and its support for regional armed groups.

Despite extensive discussions, there’s minimal indication Iran is ready to compromise on its enriched materials and nuclear program’s future.

Gulf Arab nations want the conflict ended as rapidly as possible. Before the April ceasefire stopped most fighting, Iranian air attacks damaged regional infrastructure. Airports, desalination facilities, aluminum plants and oil installations were all hit.

Renewed broader warfare would expose those targets to additional attacks. An Iranian drone attack on Kuwait’s airport last week reminded everyone of the danger.

Meanwhile, Iran’s control of the Strait of Hormuz has affected oil and gas exports for Gulf nations dependent on sending tankers through the passage between the Persian Gulf and Arabian Sea.

U.S.-allied Gulf states have historically hosted American naval, air and military installations because they view the partnership as protection from Iran. Yet when war erupted, they remained vulnerable to attacks, challenging their confidence in an alliance meant to ensure security.

The Gulf states have little to benefit from extended warfare and much to lose if instability becomes the region’s standard condition.

ISTANBUL (AP) — Venezuelan acting President Delcy Rodríguez conducted meetings with Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan in Istanbul on Monday, focusing on expanding bilateral partnerships in trade, energy, and mining sectors, according to an announcement from the Turkish president’s office.

Rodríguez, who took office following the capture of former president Nicolás Maduro by U.S. forces in January, traveled to Turkey after completing a visit to India where she worked on strengthening energy partnerships.

“President Erdogan expressed that our country always stands by the friendly people of Venezuela. He emphasized Turkey’s determination to further advance cooperation with Venezuela in many fields, particularly trade, energy, and mining,” the statement from the Turkish presidential communications directorate said.

The oil-wealthy South American nation and Turkey have developed strong diplomatic relationships during the past ten years, which were reinforced when Maduro supported Erdogan following the unsuccessful coup attempt in 2016. Turkey has consistently provided diplomatic backing for Maduro, and both nations have established agreements for energy and gold trade cooperation despite facing international sanctions.

During the discussions at Istanbul’s Dolmabahce Palace, Rodríguez and Erdogan also explored strategies to increase bilateral trade from its current level of $448 million in 2025 to an ambitious goal of $3 billion.

The leaders also discussed international developments during their meeting, according to the official statement.

Israeli leadership declared Monday it would cease military strikes against Iran following a security cabinet session, with an Israeli official stating the halt came after President Trump made the request during a phone call with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.

“At Trump’s request, we’re stopping the strikes on Iran,” the official stated.

The official clarified that military operations would persist if Hezbollah launches attacks on northern Israeli communities, saying: “We’re continuing in Lebanon with full force according to the equation that if they fire at the communities-we’ll strike in Dahieh.”

The decision follows Israeli military actions in the Beirut suburb of Dahieh that preceded Iran’s Sunday missile attack, during which the Islamic Republic fired 11 missiles toward Israel.

Despite recent tensions, the Israeli official characterized Monday’s phone conversation between President Trump and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu as constructive.

“Good overall. The two countries see eye to eye, despite the fact that twice we acted contrary to his public position in the last day-both in the strike in Beirut and in the response in Iran,” the official explained.

The official emphasized that Israel maintained its stance while preserving diplomatic ties with Washington: “Israel has proven its ability to stand its ground on its right to self-defense even against the president, but without breaking the rope and while maintaining the strategic partnership. The feeling is that the current escalation is behind us.”

Earlier Monday, Iranian news agency Fars reported that “Iran’s armed forces announced the end of military operations against Israel,” while issuing a warning that “if Israel attacks Lebanon again, we will respond more severely.”

Prior to Iran’s statement, President Trump posted on Truth Social that “Israel and Iran want an immediate ceasefire.”

Trump further stated that “final discussions on ‘peace’ are ongoing, but are being affected by ignorant fools who are interfering with them. The siege will continue at full force until a ‘final deal’ is reached.”

In a separate earlier post, President Trump declared that “Israel and Iran must immediately stop the ‘firing.’”

Chile has ended a diplomatic standoff lasting nearly three years by naming a new ambassador to Israel, marking one of President José Antonio Kast’s most significant foreign policy moves since taking office.

The South American nation had been without diplomatic representation in Israel for 947 days, a gap that started when former President Gabriel Boric recalled the previous ambassador in October 2023, less than a month after the Hamas attack on October 7.

Gabriel Zaliasnik, a prominent attorney and former leader of Chile’s Jewish community, will fill the vacant post. His selection represents more than just a routine diplomatic assignment – it signals a fundamental shift in how Chile approaches its relationship with Israel.

Following the announcement by Chile’s Foreign Ministry, Zaliasnik expressed gratitude on social media platform X, thanking Kast for “the trust placed in me by appointing me ambassador to the State of Israel.” He pledged that Chile would “take care of the strategic bilateral relationship of more than 70 years” and said he would assume the role “with strength and hope.”

The Foreign Ministry highlighted Zaliasnik’s credentials as a University of Chile-educated attorney, founder of the Albagli Zaliasnik law firm, and former Justice Ministry adviser on criminal procedure reform. However, his political significance extends beyond his legal background – he previously served as president of the Jewish Community of Chile and has been a vocal advocate on Israel-related issues.

The diplomatic post became vacant on October 31, 2023, when Boric ordered Ambassador Jorge Carvajal back to Santiago for consultations following the October 7 attack and Israel’s subsequent military response in Gaza. Carvajal never returned to Tel Aviv and was later reassigned to the Netherlands.

Under Boric’s administration, Chile-Israel relations deteriorated significantly. The former president initially refused to receive Israeli Ambassador Gil Artzyeli’s credentials in 2022, citing the death of a Palestinian teenager during an Israeli military operation. After October 7, Chile joined Mexico in referring Gaza’s situation to the International Criminal Court and later supported South Africa’s genocide case against Israel at the International Court of Justice.

The breakdown in relations particularly affected the more than 10,000 Chileans living in Israel. Five Chilean citizens were killed in the October 7 attack, and others were taken hostage. Community members criticized Boric for failing to provide adequate public recognition of their losses while simultaneously distancing Chile from Israel diplomatically.

The Chilean Community of Israel released a statement calling the appointment “a great day for Chilean democracy” and describing it as “an act of repair.” The organization’s president, Hernán López, and vice president, Sivan Gobrin, accused Boric of having “instrumentalized the figure of the ambassador as a weapon against the government of Israel.”

In an interview, López described the recall of the previous ambassador as making him “basically a hostage of the president to punish Israel.” He argued that this policy also punished “the Chilean community in Israel and the 10,000 Chileans who live here.”

Gabriel Silber, a former member of Chile’s Chamber of Deputies and Jewish community member, characterized the Boric years as marked by “an absolutely ideologized bilateral agenda.” He argued that previous Chilean governments, regardless of political orientation, had viewed Israel through the lens of national interest, focusing on technology, security, water management, mining, agriculture, and innovation.

“Chile, under governments of the left and the right, saw Israel as a relevant ally,” Silber explained. “What mattered was Chile’s own agenda.” He contended that this changed under Boric, who “moved toward an agenda centered on anti-Israel sentiment.”

The Jewish Community of Chile also welcomed Zaliasnik’s appointment, emphasizing the restoration of normal diplomatic ties. The organization expressed hope for “new opportunities for cooperation in areas of great relevance” and “a new stage of encounter and bridge-building between Chile and Israel.”

Dafne Englander, executive director of the Jewish Community of Chile, said the appointment fulfilled promises Kast made during his campaign. She noted that he had avoided making public statements about Israel during the election to prevent controversy, instead telling Jewish leaders he would “act” once in power.

“It is a very powerful signal,” Englander said. “It means putting Israel back in a relevant place as a strategic partner for Chile.” She emphasized that Kast chose someone who would inevitably draw criticism, demonstrating his commitment to the relationship.

The appointment has drawn criticism from Palestinian organizations in Chile. The Palestinian Community of Chile called the decision “a very serious decision,” “contrary to the national interest,” and “deeply offensive” to Chileans of Palestinian origin. The group asked the government to reverse the appointment.

Antonia Orellana, a former minister for women and gender equality under Boric, also criticized the decision, calling it “a terrible signal for Chile’s interests” and arguing that Zaliasnik had defended positions “contrary to Chile’s historical position.”

The controversy reflects deeper tensions within Chile, which hosts one of the largest Palestinian diasporas outside the Middle East. In April 2025, Maurice Khamis, president of the Palestinian Community of Chile, and Marcela Sabat, its director of public affairs, became the first Chilean-Palestinian representatives to join the PLO Central Committee.

Khamis has been a controversial figure, stating in a 2021 interview: “I absolutely support Hamas, because Hamas is a resistance movement.” After October 7, he said the Palestinian Community condemned attacks against Israeli civilians and rejected violence as a political method.

Englander suggested that the Palestinian community leadership has little interest in separating local coexistence from the Middle East conflict. “Their objective is to keep the conflict permanently in the public arena,” she said.

The appointment ends the diplomatic vacancy but faces significant challenges. The embassy requires staffing, budget allocation, and political support to function effectively. Agreements that stalled under political pressure will need revival, and defense and technology partnerships must be carefully managed.

López expressed cautious optimism about the opening created by Zaliasnik’s appointment while acknowledging the difficulties ahead. He noted that the new ambassador arrives at “a Foreign Ministry that does not have great resources” and an embassy that is “semi-dismantled in terms of staff and budget.”

Despite these challenges, López sees an opportunity to move beyond the defensive posture of recent years. “We do not have to continue being the opposition to an antisemitic government,” he said. “We can be a normal, constructive civil organization.”

The appointment represents Kast’s first major step in repairing Chile-Israel relations. The more challenging task will be demonstrating that Zaliasnik’s selection marks not just a reversal of Boric’s policies, but the foundation for lasting strategic cooperation between the two nations.

Middle Eastern tensions reached a dangerous new level Monday as Israel and Iran launched direct military strikes against each other for the first time since a ceasefire in April, creating a widening rift between President Trump and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu over military strategy.

The escalation unfolded after Israel conducted airstrikes against Hezbollah positions in Beirut’s southern neighborhoods on Sunday, responding to what officials described as missile attacks from the militant group targeting northern Israel. Iran, which had previously warned against further Israeli operations in Beirut, retaliated by launching ballistic missiles toward Israeli territory. Israel then responded with its own airstrikes targeting Iranian petrochemical, missile, and military installations, despite urgent appeals from the US president to avoid further military action.

Israeli defense officials reported successfully intercepting Iranian missiles aimed at Israeli territory, while Iranian authorities claimed their strikes focused on Israeli air installations, including the Nevatim and Tel Nof bases. While no significant Israeli casualties were immediately confirmed, missile debris caused damage to several residential structures in a West Bank settlement, according to Israeli media reports.

Various sources provided conflicting estimates of the Iranian missile barrage, with some reports indicating approximately 30 missiles were fired toward Israel since Sunday evening, while others suggested the initial wave involved 10 or 11 projectiles. Israeli forces also intercepted a missile launched from Yemen, marking what appeared to be the first Houthi attack on Israel since the April truce.

Missile debris from the Israel-Iran exchange landed in Syria’s Daraa province, where Syrian Civil Defense teams conducted inspections on June 7. Syrian state media also reported that an Iranian missile fell near Quneitra in southwestern Syria after Israeli interception efforts.

The Iran-supported Houthi movement, which has consistently targeted Israel and maritime routes throughout the broader conflict, announced what it termed a complete blockade of Red Sea shipping for vessels connected to Israel. “We declare a complete and total ban on Israeli maritime navigation in the Red Sea,” the Houthis’ military wing stated, warning that Israel-linked shipping would be considered legitimate military targets.

Monday’s sudden escalation threatens to undermine American-led diplomatic initiatives aimed at extending the fragile Iranian ceasefire and advancing toward a comprehensive agreement addressing Tehran’s nuclear program, sanctions relief, maritime passage through the Strait of Hormuz, and the status of Iran-backed militant groups throughout the region.

President Trump, who has consistently indicated that Washington and Tehran are approaching an agreement, pressed Netanyahu to avoid additional strikes. According to reports from American and Israeli officials, the US president contacted the Israeli prime minister by telephone from Bedminster, New Jersey, warning that continued Israeli attacks could jeopardize negotiation progress.

Subsequently, President Trump maintained that the recent military exchange would not disrupt ongoing talks. In comments to the Financial Times, he declared, “It’s not going to have any impact on the deal. I call the shots. I call all the shots. He doesn’t call the shots.”

The statement was remarkably direct even by President Trump’s standards and highlighted a growing division between Washington and Jerusalem. Netanyahu has consistently portrayed himself to Israeli voters as uniquely skilled at managing relations with the US president. However, recent days have challenged that image through reports of a contentious phone conversation in which the American president criticized the Israeli prime minister regarding Israeli military operations in Lebanon and Iran.

Washington has encouraged Israeli restraint, particularly regarding Lebanon, to maintain diplomatic channels with Tehran. Netanyahu, facing pressure from Israeli security officials and political supporters, has maintained that Israel cannot permit Hezbollah to attack northern Israel or reconstruct its military capabilities in Lebanon while using ceasefire negotiations as protection.

In a video statement last week, Netanyahu declared, “There will be no situation in which Hezbollah attacks our cities and our citizens, and its terrorist headquarters in Beirut, in Dahiyeh, will remain out of bounds.”

The tension between the two leaders reflects a fundamental strategic disagreement. The US administration seeks a regional arrangement that would reopen the Strait of Hormuz, extend the ceasefire, constrain Iran’s nuclear program, and reduce attacks on American and allied targets. Israel focuses on degrading Iran’s missile capabilities and striking Hezbollah, which it considers Tehran’s most threatening proxy along its northern border.

Lebanon served as the immediate catalyst. Israel attacked Beirut’s Dahiyeh district, a Hezbollah stronghold in the capital’s southern areas, following what Netanyahu described as Hezbollah fire toward northern Israel. Lebanese state media reported at least two fatalities and approximately twelve injuries from the strike. Israeli officials identified the target as a Hezbollah command facility.

The attack followed days of uncertainty regarding American-mediated efforts to stabilize the Lebanese front. Last week, Israel and Lebanon accepted elements of a ceasefire proposal discussed in Washington, but Hezbollah rejected the arrangement and insisted on complete Israeli withdrawal from southern Lebanon. Israel continued operations in southern Lebanon and stated it would not cease activities while Hezbollah maintained armed positions near the border.

Iran has consistently argued that any broader ceasefire with the United States must encompass Lebanon. Tehran and Hezbollah have accused Israel of attempting to separate the Lebanese front from the wider conflict, allowing Washington and Tehran to negotiate while Israel continues targeting Hezbollah.

Tehran officials responded sharply following the Beirut strike. Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf, Iran’s parliamentary speaker and chief peace negotiator, stated that American bases and Israeli assets in the region had become legitimate targets due to hostile actions, including what he termed the “violation of agreements over Lebanon.” Iranian lawmakers also threatened a “decisive and painful” response.

By early Monday, Iran had fulfilled that threat, launching ballistic missiles at Israel for the first time in two months. Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps described the attack as retaliation for Israeli strikes and claimed Israeli military installations were targeted.

From Tehran’s perspective, the attack served as both retaliation and warning. “The operation was carried out in response to a missile attack launched by the Zionist regime … against several radar sites in three different places” in Iran, the Revolutionary Guards stated in comments reported by AFP.

Israel then conducted retaliatory strikes inside Iran. The Israeli military reported hitting multiple targets at the Mahshahr petrochemical complex, marking the first Israeli attack on an Iranian energy-related facility since the April ceasefire, along with additional military targets. Iranian media confirmed damage to portions of the facility, though the full extent remained unclear.

Explosions were reported in Tehran, Isfahan, Tabriz, Karaj, and Kermanshah, while Iranian and regional sources also indicated strikes near security-related positions elsewhere in the country. Iranian media reported attacks on security installations, including in the Madan district, and separate accounts pointed to strikes around Shiraz airport. Iranian opposition sources claimed that Basij members abandoned some positions due to targeting fears, though those reports could not be independently confirmed.

The Israeli strikes were significant not only for directly targeting Iran but because they occurred after the US president had requested restraint. For Washington, the timing could not have been worse. American and Iranian negotiators have been attempting to preserve a tentative framework that would extend the ceasefire for 60 days, reopen or stabilize transit through the Strait of Hormuz, and initiate a new phase of nuclear discussions.

Negotiations remain delicate. Iran demands sanctions relief, access to frozen assets, and recognition of its role in regulating Strait of Hormuz passage. The United States seeks stronger guarantees that Iran will not develop nuclear weapons and wants stricter terms than the 2015 nuclear agreement, which President Trump abandoned during his first term.

Iranian media indicated that all flights at Tehran’s Mehrabad Airport and Mashhad International Airport were canceled indefinitely. Additional reports suggested operations at Tehran’s main international airport and portions of Iran’s western airspace were temporarily suspended following the Israeli strikes.

Foreign governments began warning their citizens about deteriorating regional security and travel conditions. The Indian Embassy in Tehran urged Indian nationals to leave Iran immediately using available commercial options and advised against travel to the country. Canada also warned its citizens to avoid all travel to Iran and recommended that those already present should depart if safely possible. Other governments have cautioned about sudden airport closures, flight cancellations, and rapidly changing security conditions across the region.

Throughout the Gulf, the situation has remained unstable. Over the weekend, Iran fired missiles and drones toward Bahrain and Kuwait, claiming to target American military assets following US strikes on Iranian coastal surveillance facilities. Bahrain and Kuwait reported intercepting the attacks. US Central Command confirmed American forces shot down Iranian drones over the Strait of Hormuz and reported no American casualties.

Markets responded immediately. Oil prices increased more than 3% Monday, with benchmark Brent crude rising above $96 per barrel as traders evaluated the risk of renewed fighting near the Strait of Hormuz and Bab el-Mandeb, crucial routes for global oil, liquefied natural gas, and commercial shipping.

Houthi officials also indicated that maritime attacks could intensify. “We consider all enemy movements to be legitimate military targets for our armed forces,” the group stated after pledging to halt Israeli maritime navigation in the Red Sea.

In Israel, renewed missile fire prompted tightened Home Front Command restrictions nationwide. Schools and educational activities were closed throughout the country Monday, examinations were canceled, and gatherings were limited to 200 people outdoors and 500 indoors. Israelis were also instructed to ensure safe rooms and shelters remained accessible.

The escalation also created new pressure on Ben Gurion Airport. As of Monday morning, Israeli officials indicated no decision had been made to close the country’s airspace or halt Ben Gurion Airport operations, but professional discussions were underway after Home Front Command requested limiting the number of people in the airport area to 2,500 at any given time.

The Transportation Ministry argued there was no reason to close Ben Gurion Airport as long as takeoffs and landings remained feasible. Transport officials sought a broader limit, with Israeli media reporting the ministry preferred an initial cap of up to 5,000 passengers and workers rather than the 2,500-person threshold requested by Home Front Command.

The Israel Airports Authority announced that, following an assessment led by the transportation minister, Ben Gurion Airport was operating normally. The authority stated it was conducting ongoing evaluations and maintaining continuous contact with the Transportation Ministry, the Civil Aviation Authority, and other relevant bodies to preserve operational continuity and passenger service. Travelers were advised to verify with their airlines and follow official information channels.

Foreign airlines nevertheless began adjusting schedules. Wizz Air announced canceling all flights to Israel for the next 24 hours, adding to renewed uncertainty for passengers and airlines after months of disruption related to the Iran conflict.

For Israel, the challenge lies in the interconnected but distinct nature of each front. Hezbollah in Lebanon, the Houthis in Yemen, Iranian forces, and pro-Iranian armed groups in Iraq and Syria all operate within Tehran’s regional network, but each maintains its own priorities and battlefield calculations. A strike in Beirut can provoke fire from Iran. An American strike in the Gulf can trigger attacks on Kuwait or Bahrain. A Houthi missile can force Israel to respond far from its borders.

This interconnectedness explains why the American president advocates for a comprehensive agreement. However, it also explains why Israel’s prime minister hesitates to reduce military pressure. Israeli officials argue that ceasefire diplomacy cannot become protection behind which Iran and Hezbollah rebuild military capabilities. They maintain that Hezbollah fire on northern Israel and Iranian missile launches require direct military responses.

Domestic politics have intensified the dilemma. Israeli opposition figures who criticized Netanyahu’s handling of the April ceasefire claim the government has failed to convert military gains into a lasting strategic outcome. Opposition Leader Yair Lapid stated after the April pause that “It will take us years to repair the political and strategic damage that Netanyahu caused due to arrogance, negligence, and lack of strategic planning.”

Yair Golan, head of the left-wing Democrats party, characterized the ceasefire as a “strategic failure” by Netanyahu. “He promised a historic victory and security for generations, and in practice, we got one of the most severe strategic failures Israel has ever known,” Golan stated.

Former Prime Minister Naftali Bennett also accused Netanyahu’s government of failing to transform the conflict into a decisive strategic victory. “Unfortunately, as every child can see, Hamas, Hezbollah, and Iran are still standing. This is because a government that is tearing Israel apart from within cannot defeat the enemy from without,” Bennett declared.

Consequently, the region is now trapped in a volatile triangle: Washington seeks leverage for an agreement, Tehran wants concessions without appearing weak, and Jerusalem wants freedom of action against Iran and its proxies. Each side attempts to influence the ceasefire without being perceived as the party that violated it.

Currently, President Trump appears committed to maintaining negotiations despite the missiles and airstrikes. Netanyahu appears equally determined to preserve Israel’s capability to strike Hezbollah and Iran when Israeli officials believe deterrence is threatened.

This tension may characterize the next phase of the crisis. If the United States and Iran can still achieve a ceasefire extension, Israel will face pressure to limit Lebanese operations and avoid further strikes inside Iran. If the talks fail, Monday’s exchange may be remembered not as a contained flare-up but as the opening phase of a renewed regional conflict.

Regardless, the past 24 hours have demonstrated that the April ceasefire no longer functions as an effective brake on escalation. Iran has again fired directly at Israel. Israel has again struck inside Iran. Hezbollah remains a trigger point in Lebanon. The Houthis have returned to the missile equation. Civilian life and aviation in Israel and Iran are again being restricted by missile fire threats. And the US president and Netanyahu, once publicly aligned on confronting Iran, are now openly divided over how to end the conflict without allowing Tehran or its proxies to claim victory.

Israeli military leadership announced Monday that American forces assisted in defending against Iranian missile strikes, while Israeli warplanes carried out extensive attacks on Iranian military targets and prepared for potential extended combat operations.

In a military briefing, Israel Defense Forces (IDF) Spokesperson Brigadier General Effii Defrin discussed recent tensions with Iran and claimed Tehran broke the ceasefire agreement.

“Iran allegedly connects the IDF strike in Dahieh to its attack, it violated the two-month ceasefire yesterday with its fire toward Israel. This may indicate the Iranians’ inability to sign an agreement with the Americans, and to buy time they violated the ceasefire,” Defrin stated.

Regarding collaboration with Washington, Defrin explained: “We coordinated with CENTCOM [US Central Command] also in defense. They took part in the interceptions yesterday.”

Military sources reported that IDF Chief of Staff Lt. Gen. Eyal Zamir has held three separate conversations with CENTCOM commander Adm. Brad Cooper.

The armed forces revealed that numerous Israeli Air Force aircraft carried out an extensive mission against Iran’s key air defense infrastructure. Military officials said Iran had recently positioned defense equipment at various sites to rebuild detection and protection capabilities that were previously compromised. The attacks eliminated these installations and, the military stated, enhanced the Israeli Air Force’s ability to operate within Iranian airspace.

During nighttime operations, multiple Israeli Air Force jets attacked nine Iranian air defense installations across western and central Iran. On Monday morning, Israeli aircraft also hit three manufacturing facilities at a petrochemical site in southwest Iran.

The IDF indicated it is readying for several additional days of combat and has prepared for the potential of an extended confrontation.

By Monday midday, Iran had fired no fewer than 20 ballistic missiles toward Israel, the military reported. The IDF stated these missiles were either stopped by defenses or struck unpopulated regions.

The IDF additionally noted that Iran-backed Houthis in Yemen launched two ballistic missiles at Israel on Monday morning. Military officials said one projectile was intercepted while the other failed to reach Israeli territory.

US Ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee shared social media updates from a Jerusalem bomb shelter Monday while Iranian missiles targeted Israeli territory, expressing strong support for Israel and harsh criticism of Iran during the attack.

Writing on X during the missile barrage, Huckabee stated: “Iran fired missiles at Israel last night & early today. The missile alerts sounded at 6am in Jerusalem. They were intercepted thank God! Iran & its proxy agents of evil want to incinerate America & Israel. Mothership of Satan is in Tehran.”

Approximately one hour afterward, the ambassador shared another update indicating he had moved to a shelter as more warning sirens activated.

“In the shelter now. Hearing loud booms overhead. Hopefully it’s the interception. Another day we live under threat of crazed Iranian regime,” he posted.

These social media messages occurred during ongoing military conflict between Israel and Iran that extended into Monday. Iranian forces launched eleven separate missile volleys at Israel the night before, forcing Israeli citizens to take cover in shelters. The Home Front Command shuttered educational institutions and limited large public events, while major medical centers relocated their operations to basement levels.

Huckabee’s statements backed Israel’s defensive measures and held Iran responsible for escalating tensions.

Meanwhile, President Trump revealed he had advised Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu against launching counter-strikes following Iran’s assault.

During a conversation with Channel 12’s Barak Ravid on Sunday evening, President Trump commented: “The Iranian strikes didn’t hurt anybody. Hopefully Israel is not going to retaliate. If Bibi strikes them back, it’s just gonna keep going like the last 47 years, or the last 3000 years.”

President Trump additionally stated: “We are very close to a final deal with Iran. It is going to be a good deal. I don’t want it to blow up because of what is happening now.”

“I am going to call Bibi right now and tell him not to retaliate. Each of them had their fun. Israel had its strike and Iran had its strike. We don’t need another one,” he added. “I don’t want to see an additional attack tonight.”

In a separate Financial Times interview, President Trump declared: “Netanyahu will have no choice but to accept a deal with Iran. He doesn’t decide, I decide.”

He further noted that “the (Iranian) attack did not change my desire to complete the negotiations with Iran.”

Israeli military officials announced Monday they successfully intercepted all Iranian missiles launched toward their air bases, while acknowledging their forces struck a petrochemical facility in Iran during the latest exchange between the two nations.

The Israel Defense Forces (IDF) stated they shot down all missiles fired from Iran on Monday morning, contradicting Tehran’s assertions that Iranian projectiles successfully hit the Nevatim and Tel Nof air bases.

An Israeli official verified that their Air Force targeted a petrochemical plant in Iran. The governor of Iran’s Khuzestan province informed the Iranian news agency Fars that Israeli forces attacked the Karoun petrochemical plant in Mahshahr, resulting in partial damage to the facility.

Iran’s Revolutionary Guards issued a statement explaining their actions: “The operation was carried out in response to a missile attack launched by the Zionist regime… against several radar sites in three different places” in Iran.

Emergency sirens echoed throughout Israel, forcing citizens into protective shelters. The Home Front Command maintained active restrictions, including limitations on school activities and gatherings exceeding 200 people.

The Health Ministry’s director-general ordered hospitals to move operations to underground areas and prepare staff for emergency protocols. The IDF simultaneously mobilized to support hospital operations.

Rescue services reported damage to multiple homes in a West Bank settlement from debris believed to be from an Iranian missile. No casualties were recorded, with the IDF determining the damage likely resulted from fragments of an intercepted projectile.

Alerts extended beyond Israeli borders. Saudi Arabia’s Ministry of Defense confirmed sirens in Al-Kharj province and near the Prince Sultan US base. Early Monday, the US Department of Defense noted “there are indications of missiles or drones in Jordanian airspace,” prompting the US Embassy in Jordan to advise residents to stay near protected locations.

Israeli Ambassador to the United States Yechiel Leiter posted on X late Sunday: “Iran launched 11 ballistic missiles toward Israel today. Each of these missiles can destroy an entire neighborhood and kill hundreds. No self-respecting nation in the world would tolerate such an attack, and neither will Israel. Israel is now targeting Iranian surface-to-surface missile launch sites, as well as infrastructure facilities unrelated to the energy sector.”

These comments followed President Trump’s statement that he encouraged Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to avoid responding to Sunday’s Iranian strikes. In an interview with Channel 12’s Barak Ravid, President Trump stated: “The Iranian strikes didn’t hurt anybody. Hopefully Israel is not going to retaliate. If Bibi strikes them back, it’s just gonna keep going like the last 47 years, or the last 3000 years.”

President Trump continued: “We are very close to a final deal with Iran. It is going to be a good deal. I don’t want it to blow up because of what is happening now.”

“I am going to call Bibi right now and tell him not to retaliate. Each of them had their fun. Israel had its strike and Iran had its strike. We don’t need another one,” he added. “I don’t want to see an additional attack tonight.”

In remarks to the Financial Times, President Trump also declared that “Netanyahu will have no choice but to accept a deal with Iran. He doesn’t decide, I decide.” He emphasized that “the (Iranian) attack did not change my desire to complete the negotiations with Iran.”

WASHINGTON — The United States imposed travel restrictions on over 100 Nicaraguan government officials and their relatives Monday, escalating pressure on the Central American nation’s leadership over human rights violations.

The new penalties were announced by Secretary of State Marco Rubio, who cited the recent death of imprisoned activist Brooklyn Rivera as a key factor in the decision. Rivera had been a vocal critic of Nicaraguan President Daniel Ortega and his wife and co-president Rosario Murillo before his death last month while in custody.

“The United States stands with the Nicaraguan people who, like Rivera, aspire to see a free Nicaragua,” Rubio stated.

Nicaraguan government representatives have not yet provided a response to the sanctions announcement.

These latest restrictions bring the total number of Nicaraguan officials and family members barred from U.S. entry to more than 2,350. Officials did not disclose the names of those targeted in this most recent action.

The U.S. Bureau of Western Hemisphere Affairs posted on X expressing concern about six of Rivera’s relatives and associates who have disappeared, condemning their vanishing.

Earlier this year in April, the current administration imposed penalties on two sons of Nicaragua’s co-ruling couple.

Rivera was a prominent Indigenous rights advocate who dedicated years to championing his community’s causes before authorities detained him in September 2023. His imprisonment occurred amid an extended government campaign against civil society groups and opposition voices that started after widespread demonstrations in 2018, which officials violently suppressed.

According to Nicaragua’s government, Rivera’s death resulted from a bacterial infection that developed after his health deteriorated following a COVID-19 diagnosis, causing both physical and neurological decline.

International human rights advocates and organizations condemned Rivera’s death, and U.S. officials had demanded his freedom after the government released images showing him hospitalized in serious condition.

Nicaragua’s administration has detained political opponents, religious figures, journalists and others before forcing them into exile, removing citizenship and seizing property from hundreds of individuals. The government has closed over 5,000 organizations since 2018, mostly religious groups, while compelling thousands of citizens to leave the country.