Travel toward Lebanon’s Litani River today reveals an increasingly desolate landscape. The primary roadway linking southern Lebanon to the rest of the nation sits virtually abandoned, with only occasional ambulances racing along the asphalt before veering onto alternate paths. Approximately 30 kilometers north of Israel’s border, all passage comes to an abrupt halt – Israeli military forces have demolished every crossing except one, further isolating southern Lebanon’s residents.
This waterway has repeatedly emerged as a central element in the region’s military and political struggles throughout history. The World Zionist Organization presented a proposal to the Paris Peace Conference in 1919 suggesting the Jewish National Home should extend from the Mediterranean shoreline south of Sidon, encompass the Lebanon Mountains’ foothills reaching the Litani River, and continue eastward along the waterway.
While this historical detail remains factual, Israeli authorities emphasize it doesn’t reflect today’s military objectives. Current Israeli leadership states their mission involves forcing Hezbollah forces beyond the river and establishing conditions allowing northern Israeli residents to live free from rocket and anti-tank threats, consistent with UN Security Council Resolution 1701’s framework. This resolution demands the region south of the Litani remain clear of armed forces and weaponry outside Lebanese government authority.
During March 1978, three years into Lebanon’s civil war, Israeli forces launched Operation Litani, invading southern Lebanon up to the river. This military action followed the March 11, 1978 Coastal Road massacre, when Fatah militants from Lebanon hijacked an Israeli coastal highway bus, killing 38 Israeli civilians including 13 children. Israel’s declared objective involved dismantling Palestine Liberation Organization infrastructure in southern Lebanon while pushing these forces beyond the Litani. The offensive resulted in approximately 1,000 Lebanese and Palestinian deaths, many civilians, and helped expel PLO forces from southern regions.
Four years afterward, Israel initiated Operation Peace for Galilee, later known as the First Lebanon War. Israeli officials characterized it as an effort to eliminate PLO military presence from Lebanon’s border area, responding to the attempted assassination of Israeli ambassador Shlomo Argov in London on June 3, 1982.
Initially, Israel announced plans to push PLO forces roughly 40 kilometers north of the border, beyond range of weapons threatening northern Israeli communities. The conflict quickly exceeded these original parameters. Israeli troops advanced extensively into Lebanon, occupied territory south of the Litani, besieged Beirut for 10 weeks, and later created a southern Lebanon security zone. This occupation continued until 2000, when Israeli forces withdrew under pressure from Lebanese resistance fighters, including the Iranian-backed Hezbollah organization that emerged during the occupation.
For southern Lebanon residents, the current conflict feels like reliving past trauma. Israel’s renewed offensive against Hezbollah has again cleared roadways, damaged civilian infrastructure, and forced families northward. Simultaneously, Hezbollah’s rocket, missile, and anti-tank strikes continue pressuring northern Israel, undermining the Israeli campaign’s stated objective of reducing the group’s capacity to threaten border communities. Lebanese authorities report the current conflict, which intensified on March 2, has claimed over 2,000 lives and displaced approximately 1.2 million Lebanese residents, while Israel maintains the campaign aims to weaken Hezbollah’s military capabilities and prevent future attacks on Israeli communities.
“We are not going anywhere,” declared Khodr, a paramedic operating a damaged ambulance. Two weeks earlier, an Israeli strike on their facility destroyed nearly all windows and killed three colleagues. They’ve patched holes with paper and plastic materials. “Now it cannot move wounded people, but we still use the ambulance to transport food, water and medicines to the villages at the border,” he told The Media Line.
Khodr works as a farmer by profession but volunteers his services during wartime. “If there was a state here, taking care of its citizens, Hezbollah would not exist, but there isn’t,” he explained. “If someone comes and tries to take my land, of course I would go up in arms and defend it; who would do it if I don’t?” The 60-year-old provides unpaid paramedic services despite constant life-threatening risks. Lebanese health officials report Israeli attacks on healthcare infrastructure, including hospitals, ambulances, and primary care facilities, have killed at least 57 paramedics. “We are civilians, we do not carry any weapons,” Khodr emphasized.
Despite Israeli evacuation directives, many southern Lebanese residents have decided to stay in their homes. Some lack alternative destinations, as northern regions are overwhelmed with internally displaced populations. Israel claims it issues such orders in areas where civilians face risks from ongoing military operations and Hezbollah activities, though Lebanese critics and many residents dispute or consider this inadequate justification. “I cannot leave, because I need to continue working in order to feed my family,” explained Mohammad from a village near the Litani River. His wife and two children have relocated north, but he cannot afford to join them. “I would go if they would give me money,” he told The Media Line, referring to Israeli forces since they’re requesting his departure.
Nevertheless, diplomatic developments have evolved rapidly. Israel and Lebanon conducted their first direct negotiations in decades in Washington on April 14, 2026, with US mediation. Lebanon seeks a ceasefire, displaced person returns, reconstruction, and Israeli withdrawal, while Israel has focused discussions on Hezbollah’s disarmament and broader security arrangements. Hezbollah has rejected these negotiations, and Israel’s Security Cabinet was scheduled to discuss a potential ceasefire on April 15. Though no breakthrough has been announced, these talks represent the clearest indication in years that both parties are exploring negotiated solutions to reduce or end hostilities.
Life continues around the Litani River despite ongoing conflict. Spring has arrived, with small flowers appearing around craters left by Israeli missiles on the highway. The river’s waters flow peacefully, seemingly unaware of surrounding violence. For southern residents, the question no longer concerns whether the Litani remains significant in warfare – clearly it does. The more challenging question involves whether it can also play a role in achieving peace.
