{"id":96540,"date":"2026-07-16T12:32:07","date_gmt":"2026-07-16T16:32:07","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/tvdelmarva.com\/wp\/trump-team-scrambles-to-rebuild-tariff-revenue-after-supreme-court-ruling\/"},"modified":"2026-07-16T12:32:07","modified_gmt":"2026-07-16T16:32:07","slug":"trump-team-scrambles-to-rebuild-tariff-revenue-after-supreme-court-ruling","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/tvdelmarva.com\/wp\/trump-team-scrambles-to-rebuild-tariff-revenue-after-supreme-court-ruling\/","title":{"rendered":"Trump Team Scrambles to Rebuild Tariff Revenue After Supreme Court Ruling"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-large\"><img data-recalc-dims=\"1\" loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1000\" height=\"666\" src=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/tvdelmarva.com\/wp\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/news-1784219524689.jpg?resize=1000%2C666&#038;ssl=1\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-96539\" srcset=\"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/tvdelmarva.com\/wp\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/news-1784219524689.jpg?w=1000&amp;ssl=1 1000w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/tvdelmarva.com\/wp\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/news-1784219524689.jpg?resize=300%2C200&amp;ssl=1 300w, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/tvdelmarva.com\/wp\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/news-1784219524689.jpg?resize=768%2C511&amp;ssl=1 768w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 1000px) 100vw, 1000px\" \/><\/figure>\n\n\n<p>WASHINGTON \u2014 The U.S. Treasury was flush with cash last year as President Donald Trump&#8217;s sweeping import taxes brought in billions of dollars from goods arriving from nearly every nation on earth.<\/p><p>That revenue stream came to an abrupt halt after the Supreme Court struck down the largest of those tariffs back in February, leaving the administration scrambling to plug a massive financial hole.<\/p><p>The central question now facing Trump&#8217;s trade team: Can they replace that lost income before the clock runs out?<\/p><p>Time is running short. Following the Supreme Court defeat, the president turned to Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974, which allowed him to impose a 10% global tariff. The problem is that Section 122 only authorizes tariffs for 150 days \u2014 and Trump&#8217;s authority under that provision expires on July 24. Getting Congress to extend those tariffs is considered unlikely, especially with the November 3 midterm elections on the horizon and voters already frustrated by the rising cost of living.<\/p><p>However, the administration has a more lasting tool available. Section 301 of the same 1974 law allows the president to impose tariffs and other trade penalties against countries found to engage in unfair, unreasonable, or discriminatory trade practices. Trump used this authority during his first term to hit China with heavy tariffs, and he&#8217;s already deploying it again. As recently as late Wednesday, he announced 25% tariffs on certain Brazilian imports, accusing the world&#8217;s 11th-largest economy of a range of unfair trade behaviors.<\/p><p>Trade lawyers and analysts say they believe the administration will find a way to swap out the expiring Section 122 tariffs for the more durable Section 301 tariffs before the July 24 cutoff. &#8220;They&#8217;re going to raise the tariff wall again,&#8221; said trade attorney Ryan Majerus, a partner at King &#038; Spalding who served as a trade official in both Trump&#8217;s first administration and in President Joe Biden&#8217;s.<\/p><p>Trump had previously pushed the boundaries of presidential authority over import taxes \u2014 a power the Constitution grants to Congress. He invoked the 1977 International Emergency Economic Powers Act, known as IEEPA, to impose large tariffs on most of the world, justifying the move by declaring America&#8217;s longstanding trade deficits a national emergency. That represented a dramatic break from decades of U.S. trade policy favoring lower tariffs and open markets.<\/p><p>The Supreme Court rejected that approach entirely in February, ruling that the emergency powers law could not be used to impose tariffs. That decision forced the administration to issue refunds to importers who had already paid the levies, turning what had been a major source of government income into a net drain.<\/p><p>Tariff revenue had peaked at more than $31.4 billion in October. After the court ruling, collections fell to $22 billion in both March and April. By the time refund checks were going out faster than new tariff revenue was coming in, the numbers went negative \u2014 a modest $42 million shortfall in May ballooned into a staggering $25.6 billion loss in June.<\/p><p>Trump and Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent have both pledged to use other legal tools to recover the lost income.<\/p><p>Section 301 is now the administration&#8217;s primary vehicle. Unlike the IEEPA tariffs, Section 301 tariffs require the administration to go through a formal process \u2014 gathering public comments and holding hearings \u2014 before they can take effect. They carry no cap on their size, last for four years, and can be renewed. While the president has less ability to adjust them on the fly, they offer a more legally stable foundation than the IEEPA approach.<\/p><p>A shift to these rule-based tariffs would mean &#8220;there&#8217;s less uncertainty but not no uncertainty,&#8221; said Sarah Bianchi, a former U.S. trade official who now serves as chief strategist of international political affairs at the investment research firm Evercore ISI.<\/p><p>The administration has launched two major Section 301 investigations as part of its effort to restore tariff revenue. The first accuses 60 countries \u2014 representing 99% of U.S. imports \u2014 of not doing enough to stop goods made with forced labor from entering the market. The second is examining whether 16 trading partners, including China, the European Union, and Japan, are flooding the global market with overproduced goods, driving down prices and harming American manufacturers.<\/p><p>On the forced labor investigation, the administration has already signaled what it wants to do. U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer last month proposed tariffs of 10% on 16 countries and 12.5% on 44 others \u2014 rates similar to or slightly above the Section 122 tariffs they would replace. However, Greer&#8217;s office is still accepting public comments and has not yet formally imposed those tariffs.<\/p><p>Nathaniel Halvorson, a partner at the Baker McKenzie law firm and a former U.S. trade official, believes Greer&#8217;s office will get those forced-labor tariffs in place before the Section 122 authority expires, with little or no gap in coverage. &#8220;Really, they&#8217;re operating about as fast as legally possible,&#8221; he said.<\/p><p>The second investigation, focused on alleged overproduction by 16 countries, is not yet complete. Trade attorney Majerus expects the administration to announce significant new tariffs from that probe within a month or two, and he suspects the timing will be deliberately set to take effect after the midterm elections &#8220;for obvious reasons.&#8221;<\/p><p>Trump, who has long described himself as &#8220;Tariff Man,&#8221; has made no secret of his desire to restore the sweeping, worldwide import taxes he put in place in 2025. Some legal experts believe the new Section 301 investigations may be vulnerable to court challenges because of that stated goal.<\/p><p>&#8220;Section 301s have been pretty legally durable,&#8221; said Bianchi. &#8220;But no one has tried to use it to basically put in place universal tariffs. I think there will be legal challenges.&#8221;<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>After the Supreme Court struck down the largest of President Trump&#8217;s import taxes, the administration is racing to replace lost revenue before a July 24 deadline. Tariff income has swung from a record high of over $31 billion to a net loss, with June alone showing a $25.6 billion shortfall. Officials are turning to a different legal authority to restore the tariff structure before time runs out.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":96539,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[833],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-96540","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-politics"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/tvdelmarva.com\/wp\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/news-1784219524689.jpg?fit=1000%2C666&ssl=1","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/pbtNqq-p76","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":50226,"url":"https:\/\/tvdelmarva.com\/wp\/trumps-backup-tariff-plan-faces-court-challenge-after-supreme-court-loss\/","url_meta":{"origin":96540,"position":0},"title":"Trump&#8217;s Backup Tariff Plan Faces Court Challenge After Supreme Court Loss","author":"Admin","date":"April 10, 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"A federal trade court in New York is reviewing President Trump's second attempt at imposing global tariffs after the Supreme Court rejected his initial plan in February. Trump switched to using a 1974 trade law that allows temporary 10% tariffs, but legal experts question whether this alternative authority applies to\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Politics&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Politics","link":"https:\/\/tvdelmarva.com\/wp\/category\/politics\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/tvdelmarva.com\/wp\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/news-1775839132678.jpg?fit=1000%2C666&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/tvdelmarva.com\/wp\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/news-1775839132678.jpg?fit=1000%2C666&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/tvdelmarva.com\/wp\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/news-1775839132678.jpg?fit=1000%2C666&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/tvdelmarva.com\/wp\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/04\/news-1775839132678.jpg?fit=1000%2C666&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":32089,"url":"https:\/\/tvdelmarva.com\/wp\/federal-judge-orders-massive-tariff-refunds-totaling-up-to-182-billion\/","url_meta":{"origin":96540,"position":1},"title":"Federal Judge Orders Massive Tariff Refunds Totaling Up to $182 Billion","author":"Admin","date":"March 5, 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"A federal judge has directed the U.S. government to start issuing refunds for Trump's emergency tariffs that were ruled illegal by the Supreme Court. Economic analysts estimate these refunds could reach between $168 billion and $182 billion for importers nationwide.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Politics&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Politics","link":"https:\/\/tvdelmarva.com\/wp\/category\/politics\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/tvdelmarva.com\/wp\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/news-1772761680233.jpg?fit=450%2C300&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":24024,"url":"https:\/\/tvdelmarva.com\/wp\/supreme-court-blocks-trump-tariffs-but-alternative-import-tax-options-remain\/","url_meta":{"origin":96540,"position":2},"title":"Supreme Court Blocks Trump Tariffs, But Alternative Import Tax Options Remain","author":"Admin","date":"February 20, 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"The Supreme Court has rejected President Trump's sweeping worldwide tariff program imposed under emergency powers. However, trade experts say Trump can still pursue aggressive import taxes through several other legal authorities, including Depression-era laws that have never been used.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Politics&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Politics","link":"https:\/\/tvdelmarva.com\/wp\/category\/politics\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/tvdelmarva.com\/wp\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/news-1771605219893.jpg?fit=1000%2C642&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/tvdelmarva.com\/wp\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/news-1771605219893.jpg?fit=1000%2C642&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/tvdelmarva.com\/wp\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/news-1771605219893.jpg?fit=1000%2C642&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/tvdelmarva.com\/wp\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/news-1771605219893.jpg?fit=1000%2C642&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":26103,"url":"https:\/\/tvdelmarva.com\/wp\/high-court-blocks-trump-tariffs-but-trade-uncertainty-continues\/","url_meta":{"origin":96540,"position":3},"title":"High Court Blocks Trump Tariffs, But Trade Uncertainty Continues","author":"Admin","date":"February 24, 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"The Supreme Court struck down President Trump's sweeping import taxes on Friday, limiting his ability to impose tariffs without congressional approval. However, trade experts warn the decision may actually increase business uncertainty as Trump explores alternative legal pathways to rebuild his tariff policies.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Politics&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Politics","link":"https:\/\/tvdelmarva.com\/wp\/category\/politics\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/tvdelmarva.com\/wp\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/news-1771911285180.jpg?fit=1000%2C666&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/tvdelmarva.com\/wp\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/news-1771911285180.jpg?fit=1000%2C666&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/tvdelmarva.com\/wp\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/news-1771911285180.jpg?fit=1000%2C666&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/tvdelmarva.com\/wp\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/02\/news-1771911285180.jpg?fit=1000%2C666&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":63423,"url":"https:\/\/tvdelmarva.com\/wp\/court-strikes-down-trumps-global-tariffs-after-supreme-court-defeat\/","url_meta":{"origin":96540,"position":4},"title":"Court Strikes Down Trump&#8217;s Global Tariffs After Supreme Court Defeat","author":"Admin","date":"May 7, 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"A federal trade court in New York has declared President Trump's 10% worldwide tariffs illegal following a lawsuit by small businesses. The ruling comes after the Supreme Court previously rejected broader tariffs imposed by the administration.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Politics&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Politics","link":"https:\/\/tvdelmarva.com\/wp\/category\/politics\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/tvdelmarva.com\/wp\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/news-1778193502273.jpg?fit=1000%2C668&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200,"srcset":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/tvdelmarva.com\/wp\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/news-1778193502273.jpg?fit=1000%2C668&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200 1x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/tvdelmarva.com\/wp\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/news-1778193502273.jpg?fit=1000%2C668&ssl=1&resize=525%2C300 1.5x, https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/tvdelmarva.com\/wp\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/news-1778193502273.jpg?fit=1000%2C668&ssl=1&resize=700%2C400 2x"},"classes":[]},{"id":32201,"url":"https:\/\/tvdelmarva.com\/wp\/two-dozen-states-challenge-trumps-new-10-import-tariffs-in-court\/","url_meta":{"origin":96540,"position":5},"title":"Two Dozen States Challenge Trump&#8217;s New 10% Import Tariffs in Court","author":"Admin","date":"March 6, 2026","format":false,"excerpt":"Twenty-four states led by Democratic attorneys general filed a federal lawsuit Thursday challenging President Trump's newly imposed 10% global tariffs. The states argue Trump is illegally using emergency trade powers to address routine trade imbalances after the Supreme Court struck down his previous tariff program.","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Politics&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Politics","link":"https:\/\/tvdelmarva.com\/wp\/category\/politics\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/tvdelmarva.com\/wp\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/03\/news-1772773374134.jpg?fit=450%2C300&ssl=1&resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]}],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/tvdelmarva.com\/wp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/96540","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/tvdelmarva.com\/wp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/tvdelmarva.com\/wp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/tvdelmarva.com\/wp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/tvdelmarva.com\/wp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=96540"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/tvdelmarva.com\/wp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/96540\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/tvdelmarva.com\/wp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/96539"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/tvdelmarva.com\/wp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=96540"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/tvdelmarva.com\/wp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=96540"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/tvdelmarva.com\/wp\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=96540"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}